PDA

View Full Version : Talking with 9/11 Truthers: Dubious "facts"



KevinNYC
02-09-2015, 12:18 PM
9/11 truthers are obsessed with minute details of the 9/11 attacks and will over overwhelm you with their "facts" and questions. In the course of answering one question, you may concede to them a given "fact." They often posit one fact as given while asking a different question.

Lots of 9/11 WTC discussion starts off with some dubious facts. Here are some points 9/11 truthers repeat that are false.

• The towers fell “at freefall speed”
It’s actually pretty easy to find pics or video of the collapse that show debris from the collapse falling faster than the buillding itself

http://femr2.ucoz.com/_ph/6/2/139901890.gif

The towers fell in about 2/3rds of freefall speed. The massive scale of these buildings often complicates the picture. The freefall debris is probably 20 stories ahead of the collapse in the image above.

• Steel Columns were smashed into dust.
Actually the dust was from the acres and acres of sheetrock used in the towers.
A giant pile of metal was left at the bottom of the towers that was probably 10 stories tall.

http://www.skeptic.com/eskeptic/2011/images/11-09-07/Ground-Zero-NYC-September-17-2001.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baAFwLwTD2A

• All the concrete was smashed into dust.
This is not true, chunks of concrete could be seen all over the pile
Note the concrete hanging off the rebar.

http://www.stevespak.com/fires/manhattan/void.jpg

• Steel Columns were immediately shipped to China and there was no investigation. No actually it was shipped to a few local scrap yards including the Fresh Kills Landfill in Staten Island

http://www.epa.gov/wtc/images/wtc_slideshow_0007.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uls-qPlnYj4

A group from the Structural Engineer Society of NY made at least 40 trips to the scrap yards to examine the debris and select pieces of steel to save for examination. They were specifically looking for the columns and other pieces from the floors that collapsed

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/hanger17/core6.jpg

• The small tops of the WTC did not have enough weight to demolish the buildings, that the bottoms of the buildings were made to support heavy weight so they would stop the motion or deflect it to one side.

One of leading WTC truthers once used cardboard boxes to illustrate this point.

https://sites.google.com/site/911guide/Gagebox-full-full.jpg

However, cardboard boxes are not made of thousands of interconnected parts like the floor sections of the WTC were. To make this argument they often confuse static force with a dynamic force. You can put a kettlebell on a fine China plate and it will not break, but if you drop the kettlebell on it, the plate will shatter.
You also don’t even have to resort to analogy to prove the top half of building can bring a whole building down. There is a type of controlled demolition that crashes the top part of a building into the bottom. It’s called verinage. It’s mainly used in Europe. In this method, they prep the building for demolition and then attach cables to the support columns and yank them. No explosives are used, but they still produce giant dust clouds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwFHEoiUZ7o

• The towers “fell into their own footprint”
Well the towers footprints are preserved. When the towers fell, debris fell not just within the WTC plaza, but hit buildings across the street. This is because the when the floors were stripped away from the outer columns, all the interior support is gone and without their interior support these columns fell outwards. Imagine if you had a refrigerator box that was six feet tall and you slicing all the corners at once. The sides would fall outwards. The top columns in this case were like 700 and 900 feet high and ended up impacting buildings across the street.

http://placeforvacations.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Ground-Zero-700x429.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/df/WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png/578px-WTC_Area_With_Building_Numbers_50dpi.png

A structural engineering firm mapped the debris of the towers. The debris was not in their own footprint, in fact, it looked like this.
http://www.nmsr.org/tower1_dmg.jpg

KevinNYC
02-09-2015, 12:19 PM
• Steel Columns had to melt for the collapse to begin

Steel is known to get quite bendy well before it reaches melting temperature
https://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/woodbeambentsteel-full.jpg

Before and After photos of an office fire test performed by British Steel (http://www.steelconstruction.info/Structural_fire_engineering#Cardington_fire_tests)

http://www.steelconstruction.info/images/6/67/Cardington_office_fire_test_before.png
http://www.steelconstruction.info/File:Cardington_fire_test_afterward.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Drsgs6-3Qlg

KevinNYC
02-09-2015, 12:24 PM
Some things you may not know about the WTC collapse

HitandRun Reggie
02-09-2015, 12:34 PM
http://www.thedailyrash.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/070109_odonnell.jpg

"FIRE CAN'T MELT STEEL"

Draz
02-09-2015, 01:12 PM
Don't do this.

nathanjizzle
02-09-2015, 01:19 PM
no scientist or engineer can calculate how the twin towers would react to a commercial plane loaded with fuel and 2 jet engines crashing into it, with tens of thousands of pounds of flammable material inside the building.

but, leave it up to the ever so irrational, illogical, know it all attention seeking type of conspiracy theorists to claim they know.

nathanjizzle
02-09-2015, 01:23 PM
http://www.thedailyrash.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/070109_odonnell.jpg

"FIRE CAN'T MELT STEEL"

there ignorance even shows whenever they say shit like that. the steel doesnt have to melt to collapse, it just has to be compromised.

chosen_one6
02-09-2015, 01:24 PM
no scientist or engineer can calculate how the twin towers would react to a commercial plane loaded with fuel and 2 jet engines crashing into it, with tens of thousands of pounds of flammable material inside the building.

but, leave it up to the ever so irrational, illogical, type of conspiracy theorists to claim they know.

Your opinion on everything is invalid forever.

This n*gga thinks the moon could have been a star :oldlol:

sweggeh
02-09-2015, 01:30 PM
no scientist or engineer can calculate how the twin towers would react to a commercial plane loaded with fuel and 2 jet engines crashing into it, with tens of thousands of pounds of flammable material inside the building.

but, leave it up to the ever so irrational, illogical, know it all attention seeking type of conspiracy theorists to claim they know.

Um, thats exactly the type of thing that can be calculated. Thats why science, mathematics and engineering exist.

SexSymbol
02-09-2015, 01:49 PM
Yes, it is an obvious inside job, or at least not the plane causing them to fall, there's nothing to discuss when one of the planes crash on it's own after people try to take over and a building still crumbles to the ground instantly without anything touching it.
There's no debate, people that are trying to help the gov's side on this are just brainwashed, because it got so terrible when everything started to get exposed, that it became cool to bash any "conspiracy" theory, no matter how factual and logical it is.

KevinNYC
02-09-2015, 02:32 PM
or at least not the plane causing them to fall, there's nothing to discuss when one of the planes crash on it's own after people try to take over and a building still crumbles to the ground instantly without anything touching it.

What are you talking about here? You seem to be jumbling a lot of things together.

~primetime~
02-09-2015, 02:34 PM
Truthers can not be reasoned with...they have made up their mind, it was just an extremely well calculated hoax by thousands of people orchestrated by the Illuminati and no one has come forward to confess yet because the Illuminati would kill them and their family.

Largest successful secret of all time...

The Iron Sheik
02-09-2015, 02:45 PM
does it really even matter at this point?

Nanners
02-09-2015, 04:14 PM
http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/05/politics/sept-11-report-missing-pages/

fiddy
02-09-2015, 04:16 PM
why didnt the U.S. go after Saudi Arabia?

Nanners
02-09-2015, 04:21 PM
why didnt the U.S. go after Saudi Arabia?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec-gxFAU3M0


http://www.snagajob.com/resources/files/2015/01/Money.jpg

http://www.livetradingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/gcc-oil-barrels.jpg

fiddy
02-09-2015, 04:29 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec-gxFAU3M0


http://www.snagajob.com/resources/files/2015/01/Money.jpg

http://www.livetradingnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/gcc-oil-barrels.jpg
The U.S. isnt very dependent on the middle east oil, something like 20 percent comes from there the rest comes from local sources

Nanners
02-09-2015, 04:32 PM
The U.S. isnt very dependent on the middle east oil, something like 20 percent comes from there the rest comes from local sources

14 years ago things were different, fracking and tar sands were not really a thing back then like they are today.

also 20% is still a huge amount when talking about an entire nations oil supply

andgar923
02-09-2015, 04:33 PM
What if the truthers and the conspiracy theorists both got it wrong?

What if the towers did collapse like the conspiracy theorists state and the fire did indeed bring it down, but not without the 'aid' of some demolition work as well?

So both sides get it partially correct.

There was demolition, but it was also the plane + the fire and jet fuel. Im sure that the powers that be calculated all of it.

People saying that truthers are solely a bunch of whack job internet geeks, when in reality there's firefighters, scientists, demolition experts and others that have become part of the 'truther' movement. Are all of their opinions supposed to be laughed at?

What about military and politicians from within and abroad that have questioned the 'official' version?

I don't know the truth.

I know that 'truthers' can jump the shark and can be loonies.

But I also know that the government has lied, covered up and will continue to do so and should not be trusted. They either aided in providing intelligence, covered up for the guilty parties, covered up their own mistakes, or straight up planned and orchestrated the entire thing.

But there is no way in hell that the official story is what is true. Something is being covered up and we've been lied too.

KingBeasley08
02-09-2015, 05:49 PM
9/11 conspiracy theorists are retarded. US can't cover up the President getting a blowjob yet they pull off the most elaborate plot in history

~primetime~
02-09-2015, 06:02 PM
9/11 conspiracy theorists are retarded. US can't cover up the President getting a blowjob yet they pull off the most elaborate plot in history
exactly...It's absolutely absurd

They couldn't keep Pat Tillman's death hush hush but they can keep something hush that involves literally 1,000+ people to be in on it? GTFO

KevinNYC
02-09-2015, 07:24 PM
why didnt the U.S. go after Saudi Arabia?
Most of the planning was done in Germany?:confusedshrug:

KNOW1EDGE
02-09-2015, 07:43 PM
I get a real kick out of this type of thing.

I love debating and talking with conspiracy theorists, I have a few friends, who whenever I see them, I'll bring up 9/11 just to get them going, and I just laugh while they get all riled up. It's great.

KevinNYC
02-09-2015, 07:47 PM
But there is no way in hell that the official story is what is true. Based on what? Your cynicism?

What part of two jet planes into the towers and then the subsequent fires triggered a progressive collapse is in no way in hell true?

There's simply never been any evidence of a controlled demolition that has been presented, so you have to come with something more than your own doubt.

People saying that truthers are solely a bunch of whack job internet geeks, when in reality there's firefighters, scientists, demolition experts and others that have become part of the 'truther' movement. Are all of their opinions supposed to be laughed at?
Anyone regardless of politics or intelligence can fall victim to paranoia and conspiratorial thinking. Because someone is a scientist doesn't mean they have any expertise in building extremely tall buildings. Most architects have never built a very tall building. It's just an argument from authority to say this person is a scientist or an architect, therefore their argument is correct.

They have to come forward with an argument that stands up to scrutiny. All the data is there, they can create a model like the many other groups that have done to so, to see what would have happened. It's been years and years since the data was available. And nothing.


Also I'm not aware of any demolition experts who agree that towers came down in a controlled demolition. You may want to read this
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf