Segregation - Great Concept Executed Poorly?

[sweggeh]

Charlemagne the God said this, and in some ways he may be right. Segregation may be the best thing for society. But not segregation based on race, religion or anything stupid like that. I mean segregation based on the content of the persons character. Certain people really don't deserve to be living with or interacting with other people. I feel sad that in my own city I am living with people who are extremely morally corrupt. We have to start testing people and then separating them based on how much they positively influence society. So basically racists, discriminators, crazy religious people, cheats, trolls, gangsters and basically everyone that affects society in a significantly negative way can live in one place, everyone else lives somewhere else.

Now some of you may say that prison already kind of does this, but there are plenty of ways to very negatively affect society that are not illegal, so that isn't really enough.

[Knicks101]

http://i.imgur.com/CnNrn5f.png

[Patrick Chewing]

OP pushing hard for Worst Poster on ISH.

[Demon Lizard]

:coleman:

[IcanzIIravor]

OP is trying too hard.

[NumberSix]

That's one way to go. Another would be, freedom for all.

[GimmeThat]

what you are saying here is that signatures ought to mean something. And that alt accounts is the test of good judge and bad judge.

Besides the fact that circumstances.

Is the black and white of test "through" time, or test "of" time.

[Jailblazers7]

Charlemagne the God said this,

Stopped reading here.