96 Sonics vs 14 Spurs

[sportjames23]

Glove, Reign Man and crew vs Duncan (owner of Lebron), Leonard (other owner of Lebron) and crew.

Who you got in a series?

[Lebron23]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/af/Whatifsports_color_logo.gif

Spurs in 4.

Game 1

http://whatifsports.com/nba/boxscore.asp?gameid=10428879&teamfee=-1

Game 2

http://whatifsports.com/nba/boxscore.asp?gameid=10428877&teamfee=-1

Game 3

http://whatifsports.com/nba/boxscore.asp?gameid=10428875&teamfee=-1

Game 4

http://whatifsports.com/nba/boxscore.asp?gameid=10428874&teamfee=-1

[JellyBean]

As a Sonics fan, I would give the Spurs the edge in this match-up, 4-2.

[nba_55]

90's had only 1 good team, it wasn't the Sonics. Spurs in 4.

[OldSchoolBBall]

lol @ "Spurs in 4". No. Spurs in 6 or 7, yes.

[BuffaloBill]

90's had only 1 good team, it wasn't the Sonics. Spurs in 4.



Spurs?

[Marchesk]

That was a good Sonics team. They just happened to run into a 72 win, on a mission, Bulls team.

If the Bulls didn't sweep them, there's no way in hell the Spurs would. They were a good perimiter defensive team who shot the three well. And Kemp would cause some problems for SA.

[SamuraiSWISH]

Bulls basically were going to sweep them, then let their foot off the pedal. Possibly to win it at home? Anyway, that was a great Sonics team. I see the '96 Sonics v.s. 2014 Spurs going 7 games. San Antonio was probably better.

[Killbot]

With current rules then 2014 Spurs

[dubeta]

I honestly don't see Sonics winning a game in that series

Spurs have them beat in everyday, plus have superior coaching, and far more depth


The 3 point weapon is also something the Sonics would not know how to defend, leading to their quick demise.


Spurs in 4

[Marchesk]

The 3 point weapon is also something the Sonics would not know how to defend, leading to their quick demise.

The Bulls shot more 3P per game than the Spurs did (they made less though). And Kemp would be a problem.

The Sonics weren't an aging, burnt out team with too many games on their legs with one superstar trying to do it all. They were deep and athletic too. They would have a much better chance defending SA than Miami did last year.

[Basketbolero]

Dumb thread.

96 dudes are always going to beat 14, how the fvck do you even score against 96 ppl? :biggums:

[Marchesk]

96 dudes are always going to beat 14, how the fvck do you even score against 96 ppl?

Depends on paint camping rules tbh. :coleman:

[the mesiah]

As much as I want to say sonics , spurs would be too experienced ,too deep ,sonics lack that real depth from 1-5.