Hilary Campaign Video

[Jameerthefear]

https://youtu.be/0uY7gLZDmn4

This is such blatant pandering that I'm not even sure what to say :roll: :roll:
That was pathetic

[24-Inch_Chrome]

Hill-dog.

http://southparkwillie.com/Season11/1104HilDogs.jpg

[zoom17]

Jam you don't have to worry about Clinton she isn't winning the south.

[Jameerthefear]

Why do you keep spelling "Hillary" wrong?



Jam taking the L as usual
Damn. Why you do that to me on the 1st post? Could have waited a page

[Jameerthefear]

is this even gonna go two pages? :coleman:
You don't think it will?

[BigNBAfan]

I strike when I see an opening

im abou to strike and knck out to hillary

peace guys

[Jameerthefear]

i do 40 posts per page :D

in default posts per page settings, yes it will!
You don't believe in me?

[BigNBAfan]

booom dam i thought my post would end up on the second page

[RepMe]

Hillary living rent free.

[zoom17]

Hillary living rent free.

That post to rep ratio :lebronamazed:

[L.A.Showtime]

https://media.giphy.com/media/RDlxad4sL55O8/giphy.gif

[BigNBAfan]

^ dat vision tho

only she can steer america straight

[KevinNYC]

Jam you don't have to worry about Clinton she isn't winning the south.

Well Democrats don't need the South to win. However, in 2012 which will probably turn out to be a much rougher year for Democrats, based on the economy, Obama still won Florida and Virginia and was close in North Carolina.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/ElectoralCollege2012.svg/522px-ElectoralCollege2012.svg.png

Off the top of my head, I think that Clinton has a good chance in Arkansas and West Virginia. Actually, just checked totals from 2008 even though she will run better than Obama, it still probably won't be enough to win these states.

I would say that Clinton at least wins the Southern states that Obama won in
2008. Virginia, North Carolina and Florida.

[Jameerthefear]

The SJWs have already set it in stone.

[L.A.Showtime]

Well Democrats don't need the South to win. However, in 2012 which will probably turn out to be a much rougher year for Democrats, based on the economy, Obama still won Florida and Virginia and was close in North Carolina.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/ElectoralCollege2012.svg/522px-ElectoralCollege2012.svg.png

Off the top of my head, I think that Clinton has a good chance in Arkansas and West Virginia. Actually, just checked totals from 2008 even though she will run better than Obama, it still probably won't be enough to win these states.

I would say that Clinton at least wins the Southern states that Obama won in
2008. Virginia, North Carolina and Florida.

Sounds about right.

[longhornfan1234]

Well Democrats don't need the South to win. However, in 2012 which will probably turn out to be a much rougher year for Democrats, based on the economy, Obama still won Florida and Virginia and was close in North Carolina.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/ElectoralCollege2012.svg/522px-ElectoralCollege2012.svg.png

Off the top of my head, I think that Clinton has a good chance in Arkansas and West Virginia. Actually, just checked totals from 2008 even though she will run better than Obama, it still probably won't be enough to win these states.

I would say that Clinton at least wins the Southern states that Obama won in
2008. Virginia, North Carolina and Florida.

I just bookmarked this thread.... I see you in 2016.:lol

[DonDadda59]

Feminist agenda about to go into full effect. :eek:

[KevinNYC]

I just bookmarked this thread.... I see you in 2016.:lol

Are you going to lose another avy bet?

You should be banned from using the :lol in a political thread until one of your predictions actually pans out.

[secund2nun]

This war hawk corporate b*tch is no different than Bush, Obama etc. She works for the corporations and against the people.

[fiddy]

nearly threw up, this was disgusting, if hilary wins i hope russia nukes us

[Cactus-Sack]

Well Democrats don't need the South to win. However, in 2012 which will probably turn out to be a much rougher year for Democrats, based on the economy, Obama still won Florida and Virginia and was close in North Carolina.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/ElectoralCollege2012.svg/522px-ElectoralCollege2012.svg.png

Off the top of my head, I think that Clinton has a good chance in Arkansas and West Virginia. Actually, just checked totals from 2008 even though she will run better than Obama, it still probably won't be enough to win these states.

I would say that Clinton at least wins the Southern states that Obama won in
2008. Virginia, North Carolina and Florida.

No dem is wining and Paul is polling ahead of her in CO, VA and IA.

Enjoy being against war and surveillance etc from 2016-2024

[L.A.Showtime]

Feminist agenda about to go into full effect. :eek:


Jam's meltdown already began. Imagine if Hillary actually wins.

[DonDadda59]

Jam's meltdown already began. Imagine if Hillary actually wins.

Jam's worst nightmare. Everyday will be prom day.

[KNOW1EDGE]

Hillary would be a horrible president.

But let's be real, the U.S hasn't had a decent president in decades and will likely never have a good president ever again. America has gone to absolute sh1t and until we get a genuine human being in office that will never change but rather continue to get worse.

Fuhck politics

[L.A.Showtime]

Hillary would be a horrible president.

But let's be real, the U.S hasn't had a decent president in decades and will likely never have a good president ever again. America has gone to absolute sh1t and until we get a genuine human being in office that will never change but rather continue to get worse.

Fuhck politics

Funny enough, her husband was that person.

[KNOW1EDGE]

Funny enough, her husband was that person.

Agreed. I was really young when he was president though.

Romney would have made a hell of a president IMO, still bitter that he lost to fuhckboy last time.

[KevinNYC]

Agreed. I was really young when he was president though.

Romney would have made a hell of a president IMO, still bitter that he lost to fuhckboy last time.Wait. So when you say hasn't a had a real president in decades you're only going back as far as the Clinton presidency?

[24-Inch_Chrome]

Thinks America needs a genuine human being...thinks Romney could have been that. :roll:

[Jameerthefear]

Wait. So when you say hasn't a had a real president in decades you're only going back as far as the Clinton presidency?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIZTKcVKTYs
Defend this KevinCuck

[KNOW1EDGE]

Wait. So when you say hasn't a had a real president in decades you're only going back as far as the Clinton presidency?

I'm saying he is the last good president we have had.

And before that it was JFK in 61-63.

5 decades. 10 dif presidents. 2 of them were good IMO

Clinton was president over 2 DECADES ago, therefore, imo, he was the best president we have had in DECADES. Clinton was not our first president, there were more before him

[L.A.Showtime]

I'm saying he is the last good president we have had.

And before that it was JFK in 61-63.

5 decades. 10 dif presidents. 2 of them were good IMO

Clinton was president over 2 DECADES ago, therefore, imo, he was the best president we have had in DECADES. Clinton was not our first president, there were more before him

Technically he was president until 2001, so it has only been 1.4 decades, but I agree with your point.

[KevinNYC]

I'm saying he is the last good president we have had.

And before that it was JFK in 61-63.

5 decades. 10 dif presidents. 2 of them were good IMO

Clinton was president over 2 DECADES ago, therefore, imo, he was the best president we have had in DECADES. Clinton was not our first president, there were more before him
and he was still president LESS than two decades ago. Hell the impeachment is n't even 20 years old. He was president this side of the millennium.

[KevinNYC]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIZTKcVKTYs
Defend this KevinCuck

I think I've finally had enough,
I think I maybe think too much
I think this might be it for us
(blow me one last kiss)
You think I'm just too serious,
I think you're full of shit
My head is spinning so
(blow me one last kiss)

[Dresta]

Gee, American politics worked so much better when candidates thought it dishonourable to parade around campaigning for themselves, and pathetically pandering to voters in manner that was seen as lacking in self-respect.


This war hawk corporate b*tch is no different than Bush, Obama etc. She works for the corporations and against the people.
This. She's a proven piece of scum, and yet people will vote for because she's a woman and because she's a Democrat - it's so pathetic

Hilary has been one of the most hawkish members of the Obama administration, and she does it with an incredible conceit and arrogance when it comes to dealing with situations and regions of the world she knows absolutely nothing about. She clearly engaged in illegal behaviour over the Benghazi incident, which is why she wiped all her emails ('whoops, silly me, i'm only a woman you know' :rolleyes:)

As US Secretary of State her brazen ignorance left a trail of misery in her wake.

edit: And lol @ the fools who think Bill was a good President. The man who pretended to care about the poor, while sending nothing aside from rhetoric their way. The man who kept saying what a great job Greenspan was doing as Fed Chairman, as he pursued the same disastrous policies that blew up in 2000 & 2007. Clinton was just as responsible for tying together Wall St. and Washington in a devils pact as anyone else.

The man who bombed a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan (calling it a terrorist target) that resulted in the deaths of hundreds if not thousands simply to allow him to save face and distract from the Lewinsky affair going to trial. A great President everybody :applause:

To even find a half-way decent President you have to go back to Eisenhower, and before that, back to before Hoover, who was the first 'economic wizz-kid' of many who have slowly destroyed this country and everything positive it used to represent.

[dunksby]

Hilarious.

Sorry had to do it.

[BRabbiT]

https://youtu.be/0uY7gLZDmn4



that's actually not that bad.

her message is obviously 'i'm one of you':lol

typical politician

[nightprowler10]

She works for the corporations and against the people.
Name a "viable" candidate that doesn't.

[StephHamann]

https://youtu.be/0uY7gLZDmn4

This is such blatant pandering that I'm not even sure what to say :roll: :roll:
That was pathetic

http://media.giphy.com/media/O5NyCibf93upy/giphy.gif

[KevinNYC]

People still acting like America is a democracy where anyone can make it :oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:
Your post doesn't actually prove this point. Only the Bushes are a multi-generational political family. The current president is also obviously an exception to your rule. Bill Clinton is another obvious exception to your rule, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton#Early_life_and_career)he may have come from a more modest background than Obama.[QUOTE]Early life and career

William Jefferson Blythe III, in 1950 at age four
Clinton was born William Jefferson Blythe III on August 19, 1946, at Julia Chester Hospital in Hope, Arkansas.[2][3] His father, William Jefferson Blythe, Jr. (1918

[DonDadda59]

People still acting like America is a democracy where anyone can make it :oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:

If Hillary wins, and completes both terms, it would mean two families from 1988-2024 had effectively ruled the biggest nation on the planet for fourty years (Minus Obamas term in office). Even Russia, China and Arabic hell holes have more variety in their leadership. Not to mention here biggest rival will probly end up being from that other Royal American houseold : Jeb Bush.

Yup, The U.S. is a plutocracy just like every other 'democracy' that has ever exised. Rome was ruled by a select few wealthy families, so is this country. Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Rockefeller, Chafee- if you have any of these last names then there's a great chance you will be in a position of great political power as a birth right.

[KevinNYC]

Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Rockefeller, Chafee- if you have any of these last names then there's a great chance you will be in a position of great political power as a birth right.
In terms of the Clinton's this doesn't apply to Bill. It doesn't apply to Hillary. The only person in the world, it applies to is Chelsea.

Nixon, Reagan and Carter were all from modest backgrounds as well, though Reagan had won fame and access as an actor in Hollywood.

[KevinNYC]

KevinNYC is the democratic version of a sterotypical southern Republican. It really is amazing how many idiots there are on both sides of the political spectrumYes, please ignore the many points where your post is wrong.

[Dresta]

Americans love making aristocratic families out of wishy-washy mediocrities - it's become a national tradition in the 20th century.

[KevinNYC]

PS. Putin is more popular with Russians than any American leader ever has been since World War 2. The fact that youre so blinded by your CNN propaganda and have never actually met a Russian highlights how little you, and most Americans, know about the world.
A. I don't watch CNN except for a travel show on Netflix.

B. CNN is still Lightyears more independent than Russian TV.

C. Since 2009 Russia has taken several steps to increase control of TV broadcasting, newspapers and the internet.


Russia ranks 148 out of 180 on the World Press Freedom index compiled by Reporters Without Borders.
https://elblogdereli.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/carte2014_en.jpg

Freedom House lists Russia (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2015#.VSwOIfnF_zg) as not free and points out that freedom in Russia has gotten worse over the past two decades and worse again last year.
http://www.condistintosacentos.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Captura-de-pantalla-2014-03-29-a-las-14.54.35.png

If you're a blogger in Russia who gets more than 3,000 visitors to your site in a day, you have to register with the Russian government (http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/russian-blogger-law-puts-new-restrictions-on-internet-freedoms/2014/07/31/42a05924-a931-459f-acd2-6d08598c375b_story.html).
Russia’s shrinking space for freedom of expression on the Internet is set to constrict further Friday, as tough regulations go into effect that will give Russian authorities powerful oversight over the country’s most-read online personalities, including opposition bloggers and politicians.

....

The Internet in Russia had long been a largely uncensored arena even as the nation’s television stations and newspapers toed an *ever-stricter Kremlin line. The new regulations, bloggers and activists say, will encourage online self-censorship and will create new risks for those who advocate contrarian viewpoints.

The set of regulations coming into effect Friday is known here as the “blogger law” because it requires any person whose online presence draws more than 3,000 daily readers to register, disclose personal information and submit to the same regulations as mass media. ....

A law that gives Russian authorities the power to block Web sites without any official explanation went into effect Feb. 1, and it was put to use a month later, blocking four Russian opposition Web sites, including the blog of anti-corruption politician Alexei Navalny, Russia’s most prominent anti-Kremlin leader. Navalny remains under house arrest on unrelated corruption charges and is barred from communicating with the media.

....
In the same month, another prominent independent news Web site, Lenta.ru, was transformed after the editor was fired and most of her staff left. That site’s coverage is now significantly more pro-Kremlin.

The new rules require anyone who has a daily online audience of more than 3,000 people to register with the Russian Internet-
oversight agency, Roskomnadzor, and to comply with mass media regulations that require bloggers to publish their names and contact details. The rules also hold them liable for any misinformation that they publish — along with any misinformation contained in comments posted on their Web sites, even if the bloggers did not write the comments.Basically Russia passed a law that could shutdown Insidehoops if it was based in Russia.


So given all that Putin's popularity rating doesn't really matter does it? I mean Saddam Hussein once won his "elections" with 99.96% and 99.47% of the votes.

The Russian I know tell me that they are paying 65-70 rubles for a dollar now and not the 100 they paying back in December.

[24-Inch_Chrome]

Canada :applause:

[Derka]

PS. Putin is more popular with Russians than any American leader ever has been since World War 2. The fact that youre so blinded by your CNN propaganda and have never actually met a Russian highlights how little you, and most Americans, know about the world.

:oldlol: :oldlol: Irony is not merely an American concept. Good to know!

[L.A.Showtime]

:oldlol: :oldlol: Irony is not merely an American concept. Good to know!

:lol

[zoom17]

Possibly our next president...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_x04Gn3-2g

[MightyWhitey]

Yup, The U.S. is a plutocracy just like every other 'democracy' that has ever exised. Rome was ruled by a select few wealthy families, so is this country. Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Rockefeller, Chafee- if you have any of these last names then there's a great chance you will be in a position of great political power as a birth right.
:lol this is what a community college education gets you. Good grief you've posted over 10000 times did you at least get that movie role in the sponge bob square pants movie?

[Lakers Legend#32]

I like the two gay guys talking about getting married.
That's a big F#ck You to the South.
Bravo Hillary.

[MightyWhitey]

Hillary would be a horrible president.

But let's be real, the U.S hasn't had a decent president in decades and will likely never have a good president ever again. America has gone to absolute sh1t and until we get a genuine human being in office that will never change but rather continue to get worse.

Fuhck politics
Ronald Reagan was the last best president. Obama is the worst president by far. And bubba was the first black president.

[Lebron23]

Possibly our next president...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J_x04Gn3-2g


I wish Gaddaffi was still the President of Libya. Just look at the current state of Libya. Sometimes a country like Libya needs a dictator, and ruthless leader like Gaddaffi.

[24-Inch_Chrome]

I wish Gaddaffi was still the President of Libya. Just look at the current state of Libya. Sometimes a country like Libya needs a dictator, and ruthless leader like Gaddaffi.

:facepalm

No country needs a leader like Gaddafi.


good situation :pimp:

:rockon:

[Lebron23]

:facepalm

No country needs a leader like Gaddafi.



:rockon:

Libya have different tribes, different savages.

[24-Inch_Chrome]

Libya have different tribes, different savages.

That doesn't mean the answer is a brutal dictator who violates the basic human rights of his people.

[zoom17]

That doesn't mean the answer is a brutal dictator who violates the basic human rights of his people.

Libya was much better with Gaddafi than what it's now.

[longtime lurker]

Hilary is going to get elected president. The GOP is such a ****ing joke and complete mess.

[jongib369]

She went to my high school, they've got a little shrine for her

Video some students from the school made about her while I was attending

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8AGrcP5uqs

[Patrick Chewing]

Hilary is going to get elected president. The GOP is such a ****ing joke and complete mess.


Explain how you came to this conclusion.

[dunksby]

That doesn't mean the answer is a brutal dictator who violates the basic human rights of his people.
Gaddafi wasn't a sadistic maniac, he was nowhere near a guy like Saddam, Africa is wild and you can't rule an African country according to a set of rules and moral codes set by those who live in very different places. Just take a look at the list of African countries and pick three that you think are in a better state now than Libya under Gaddafi.
On a different note, all countries have dirty laundry and deal with those whom the deem as threat to society in different ways, there is one thing I can assure you of and that's right now Egyptians and a lot of other African and European countries would love it if Gaddafi was still alive, because there is no way he would let one ISIS member remain breathing in his country.

[ThePhantomCreep]

Explain how you came to this conclusion.

The Blue Wall > The Red Wall

[Dresta]

That doesn't mean the answer is a brutal dictator who violates the basic human rights of his people.
What do you mean the answer? What answer? Whose answer? Ours? Since when do we have the right to provide new 'answers' for other people? Gaddafi, funnily enough, gave up his weapons, and we repaid him by helping fanatics to slaughter him in the street (good luck getting anyone else to give up their interests for the sake of American good will :lol). Libya is now in store for years of misery that could barely even be imagined while Gaddafi was in power - i'm sure regular Libyans are very happy you and Hillary decided to provide an 'answer' for them.

This woman turned the country into yet another American-sponsored wasteland, ruining the lives of millions, and look how smug and gleeful she is about it, the repugnant bitch.

Anyone who thinks this grotesque piece of shit cares about anyone other than herself is a deluded clown.

[tomtucker]

Hillary should make a sex tape and put that as her campaign video. Depending on how well she takes the d1ck will be deciding factor on my vote.
what are good and what are bad ways to take the dick ?

[Dresta]

Did someone really say that Libya is better now than under Gaddafi? :oldlol: :oldlol: :oldlol:

Better for who? The American oil companies? Yeah of cors its better for them. For the people of Libya though? For Africa? For the Middle East? For world peace? You bet not.

Just another example of Putins foreign policy views been ignored for the sake of the American war machine. While Putin was advocating for restraint and dialogue in the Libyan and Syrian conflict, Americas "liberals" (I cant believe theyre considered liberals) were financing and arming jihaddists and sadistic fukcs to bring hell to the people. They're trying the same thing in Ukraine right now. When will they stop?

PS. Can someone imagine if the Republicans had been in power these last eight years? Imagine the hell hole wede all be in right in! Even their democrats who are considered liberal have still managed to bring so much carnage and destruction to the world in less than a decade. Its all one finally tuned machine this America.

But no lets ignore the millions of people dying because of America and focus on Russias laws prohibiting homosexuals blowing eachother in public.
Doesn't help that if anyone runs with a more sensible view of foreign policy and an intent to limit the power of the executive branch (balance of powers my arse), they are shot down by the media and political establishment as some kind of crazy loon. President's are defined by the media according to how much power they usurp to themselves, they all have to 'make their mark' to be great - not really an idea you want in the heads of politicians.

Nor does it help how partisan 'liberal' bellends won't acknowledge that the US state department is littered with the seeds of Cheney (and, of course, hopelessly idealistic 'liberationists' like Samantha Powers). Thing is, neocons aren't conservative at all: they're liberals through and through. Actual conservatives (something that is barely present in the Republican Party), have always emphasised the need to avoid foreign entanglements, and to spread their beliefs by setting a so-called 'shining example.' The liberal mentality is central to all the recent foreign policy disasters (and see how willing liberals are to ally themselves with fascists in Ukraine - that tells you something). Unfortunately, nobody listened to George Kennan, because his realistic perspective limited the sphere of action for people intent on changing the world/moulding it to their own designs. He once said 'God help us if we ever try to force democracy onto the Russian people' and reading him is like reading a litany of everything stupid and barbaric Americans would do around the world, before it happened.

But obviously conservatism would get the blame, because in the liberal mind, the word conservative is synonymous with 'bad' or even 'evil.' Liberals are the only good people, thus those who oppose them and their ideals are evil, and have to be dealt with - this is American foreign policy around the world ever since the end of the Cold War. Remember, liberals actually think liberal democracy constitutes 'the end of history' - a strong belief of the man at the bottom of American foreign policy, the idiotic and racist liberal Woodrow Wilson.

Nor can we ignore that America has been a big backer (and continues to be) of Saudi Arabia, the country, more than any other, most responsible for the chaos now taking place in the muslim world. They've spent fortunes cultivating and spreading Wahhabism, no doubt frequently with American money.


edit: and oh, how i wish the most important Presidential power was still the veto, the way it was intended (a negative power) - the President was never intended to mould and direct policy like the executive branch does today (and we have FDR to blame for this largely, another liberal demagogue born of American royalty, who pretended to care about people, but was an utter scumbag and tyrant). The Supreme Court doesn't function as it should anymore either. The country basically needs rebuilding from the bottom up.

[rufuspaul]

I would say that Clinton at least wins the Southern states that Obama won in
2008. Virginia, North Carolina and Florida.


In the general election? No way in hell Hillary wins NC.

[KevinNYC]

In the general election? No way in hell Hillary wins NC.Is that because it's Hillary?

Here's my reasoning. Romney won by 2 points
50.39% 48.35%

2016 is going to be a much better year for Democrats than 2012 was.
Hillary is going to perform better among white southern voters than Obama did.

Right now, before there is a Republican candidate to actually focus on, Hillary leads some and is behind others

General election match ups for President in North Carolina remain very close, although Clinton has slipped a little bit from a month ago. On the last poll she led by an average of 2 points across her 9 match ups with the potential Republican contenders, this month she trails by an average of 1 point,

Actually, the 2008 election was a squeaker, so the margin of error is pretty slim for a Democrat. And turnout was actually much higher in 2012 by 4%. So you might be right.

[T_L_P]

Should have been my main man Ron Paul last time, tbh.

[KingBeasley08]

http://i.imgur.com/BxVA5Fr.jpg

[KevinNYC]

Politico has Iowa and New Hamshire Politicos reacting to the campaign video.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/gop-insiders-applaud-clinton-roll-out-116988.html#ixzz3XNCyqoBj

[L.A.Showtime]

http://i.imgur.com/BxVA5Fr.jpg

Bill will have MORE freedom this time around though :pimp: