View Full Version : Forrest Diaw
Real14
05-01-2015, 12:37 AM
You deserve this nickname brotha especially knowing how Retardre Jordan messed up at tha end two days ago. Forrest Diaw went stupid tonight for offense interference at tha end of the game. Forrest should of just let Blake take the blunder.:facepalm What you think about this guy's stupid mistake tonight?
http://nbatitlechase.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/boris-diaw-swollen-eye.jpg
http://24.media.tumblr.com/8edc2f94046c52fbfab5c4ffa0a5b677/tumblr_mfk85u8TW01qmn5ngo2_250.gif
livinglegend
05-01-2015, 12:39 AM
He was their 2nd best player tonight after Marko Bellineli.
lilteapot
05-01-2015, 12:39 AM
Shit happens in the heat of the game. Even if he didn't touch it they'd be down 1 pt with .9 on the clock so whatever.
Real14
05-01-2015, 12:40 AM
He was their 2nd best player tonight after Marko Bellineli.
Yea but he should of done better at that last moment.
Real14
05-01-2015, 12:41 AM
Shit happens in the heat of the game. Even if he didn't touch it they'd be down 1 pt with .9 on the clock so whatever.
1.9 is still enough time for a miracle.
lilteapot
05-01-2015, 12:41 AM
1.9 is still enough time for a miracle.
it was .9. Not 1.9. Big difference.
J Shuttlesworth
05-01-2015, 12:42 AM
My nikka Real14 with the GOAT nicknames :roll:
J Shuttlesworth
05-01-2015, 12:42 AM
Shit happens in the heat of the game. Even if he didn't touch it they'd be down 1 pt with .9 on the clock so whatever.
Was that shot going to go in? Bellinelli's 3, that is
Real14
05-01-2015, 12:43 AM
My nikka Real14 with the GOAT nicknames :roll:
Hey I try:lol
lilteapot
05-01-2015, 12:43 AM
Was that shot going to go in? Bellinelli's 3, that is
No, my point is if diaw didn't touch it and blake did they'd still be down 1 with just under a second left.
Chizdog
05-01-2015, 12:44 AM
it was .9. Not 1.9. Big difference.
Heck even if it was still 1.9 seconds left it is still Clippers ball, there is no way they comeback from that.
Real14
05-01-2015, 12:45 AM
it was .9. Not 1.9. Big difference.
I thought it was 1.6, my bad for saying 1.9.
livinglegend
05-01-2015, 12:46 AM
Shit happens in the heat of the game. Even if he didn't touch it they'd be down 1 pt with .9 on the clock so whatever.
The shot wasn't going in.
lilteapot
05-01-2015, 12:47 AM
The shot wasn't going in.
For ****s sake, Blake touched it, if he did touch it it would be basket interference which means even though the shot wasnt going in it would have counted.
livinglegend
05-01-2015, 12:49 AM
For ****s sake, Blake touched it, if he did touch it it would be basket interference which means even though the shot wasnt going in it would have counted.
He touched it because Diaw redirected the ball toward the basket. Otherwise, Blake wouldn't touch it.
Spurs m8
05-01-2015, 12:49 AM
Way different scenario, esp with the game being over.
Asukal
05-01-2015, 12:52 AM
That non call on the travelling violation killed the spurs chances tonight. Diaw's goal tend had little to do with the loss. :whatever:
SuperPippen
05-01-2015, 01:02 AM
I've negged you a lot before, but I'm not gonna lie, I chuckled when I read the thread title.
For that, I'll give ya some rep. :cheers:
Real14
05-01-2015, 01:10 AM
I've negged you a lot before, but I'm not gonna lie, I chuckled when I read the thread title.
For that, I'll give ya some rep. :cheers:
Its all good bro, I forgive u:cheers:
lilandywiggins
05-01-2015, 01:42 AM
Dumb nickname.
lilteapot
05-01-2015, 02:02 AM
He touched it because Diaw redirected the ball toward the basket. Otherwise, Blake wouldn't touch it.
Blake hit the ball literally when it was right in the middle of the cylinder. He would have hit it regardless considering he hit it half a second after Diaw tipped t
tomtucker
05-01-2015, 03:25 AM
life is like a box of KFC
.
http://asset-3.soup.io/asset/4074/7699_3b5c.jpeg
SyRyanYang
05-01-2015, 03:26 AM
Blake wouldn't swapped it if Diaw didn't go for the tip-in.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.