MVP voting needs consistency: 2015 Curry vs 1997 Jordan

[Chadwin]

You can't give it to Curry and not give it to Jordan.

[Marchesk]

It's human judgement, not an objective criteria, so it will necessarily be inconsistent at times.

[KobesFinger]

Wasn't Karl Malone MVP in 1997?

[Noyze]

fail thread.

[Chadwin]

Wasn't Karl Malone MVP in 1997?

Yes, when Jordan was on the second best regular season team of all time. Kukoc only played 57 games.

[daily]

fail thread.Bitter Harden fan. The kid's in every MVP thread beating the same dead horse over and over

[navy]

Yes, when Jordan was on the second best regular season team of all time. Kukoc only played 57 games.
Im not quite sure what this is suppose to mean.

Anyways, voter fatigue.

[Spurs5Rings2014]

Bitter Harden fan. The kid's in every MVP thread beating the same dead horse over and over

He has a point, it needs consistency. One year they give it to a guy who had the best stats that year, but not the best record. The next they give it to a guy with the best record, but not the best stats. It's too subjective. Either have it be the best player on the best team or the best player irregardless of team success. No more half measures, Walter.

:no:

[jimmybball]

Bitter Harden fan. The kid's in every MVP thread beating the same dead horse over and over
:lol

[daily]

He has a point, it needs consistency. One year they give it to a guy who had the best stats that year, but not the best record. The next they give it to a guy with the best record, but not the best stats. It's too subjective. Either have it be the best player on the best team or the best player irregardless of team success. No more half measures, Walter.

:no:

It's a subjective vote. Every year the What is an MVP question is a different question as it should be. You can't base it on any one criteria because the league is different every year, situations are different and team fortunes are different. The dynamics change from year to year so you want a vote that isn't locked in one or two things.

[Chadwin]

He has a point, it needs consistency. One year they give it to a guy who had the best stats that year, but not the best record. The next they give it to a guy with the best record, but not the best stats. It's too subjective. Either have it be the best player on the best team or the best player irregardless of team success. No more half measures, Walter.

:no:

:cheers: :applause:

[MJistheGOAT]

Voter fatigue
Curry or Harden is deserved this year, don

[warriorfan]

Curry is on a better team and he is a better player.



What the fucc are harden stans smoking on?

[MJistheGOAT]

Curry is on a better team and he is a better player.



What the fucc are harden stans smoking on?

Quality of cast and over/underachieving is critical in MVP election

Most valuable =/= Best player

[3ball]

.
This was immediately after Malone missed a FT that would've put the Jazz up 3:


http://gifsforum.com/images_new/gif/other/grand/72819e470fc9442abdd482a771cfabf7.gif


In the Finals, MJ exacted his revenge for getting screwed (again) out of regular season MVP: GW in Game 1.. Flu Game in Game 5 including another GW.. GW-assist to Kerr in game 6.. Best clutch of all time..

Then he did it again in 1998 - all this came against the team (Jazz) that made the Finals by beating Hakeem, Shaq's 4 All-Star Lakers, and Duncan/Robinson/Popovich - that Jazz team defeated the most talent ever to make a Finals.
.