Right now, going forward; Blake Griffin or LeBron James?

[Fudge]

As your franchise player, who y'all got?

[BigNBAfan]

cmon man... and you're complaining about how this forum has gone to shit?

[riseagainst]

Blake Griffin.

[Fudge]

cmon man... and you're complaining about how this forum has gone to shit?
Dude, i'm not even trolling.

Blake's been a ****ing monster. It's a legit question.

[Prometheus]

Why are bran-bashers so desperate?

[BuffaloBill]

Griffin



He's like Lebron minus the 5 turnovers a game

[Fudge]

5 years younger, evolving every year, improving in every area of his game, ONLY 26 years old, etc.

It's legit discussion.

Quit being little sensitive betchez.

[HylianNightmare]

LeBron

[ClipperRevival]

Gotta take Griffin because he's 5 years younger. Of course Blake will never be as good as LeBron but the 5 additional prime years I will get from Blake is too much to pass up. And I think we can all agree that LeBron is already past his prime, at least physically. He peaked around 2012. Blake has yet to hit his peak yet.

[VengefulAngel]

Lebron James and it's not even close....

[SpecialQue]

For marketing: Blake.
For winning: Lebron.

For both: Kobe

[IncarceratedBob]

blake and it's not close. lebron is already showing signs of decline plus blake would be willing to take a 5 million dollar a year type deal if it meant winning. lebron wouldnt do that

[G0ATbe]

Blake, no contest. He's better than LeBald in all areas except perhaps 3 point shooting and yet 5 years younger.

[ISHGoat]

I am a huge lebron stan but I would take blake going forward, because he is so much younger than lebron.

But give me curry, kd, or ad going forward since I dont think those three are on as much PEDS and will be less hurt by the testing next year.

[RRR3]

LeBron is better now, and Blake isn't touching LeBron at his best, but Blake has more productive years left obviously.

[sd3035]

Blake is pretty much better everywhere at this point except shooting the 3

[DFish24]

Blake easily, heck I might even take him over Bran at the same age.

[Cocaine80s]

Op was at almost full greens yesterday :roll:

[ShawkFactory]

Blake easily, heck I might even take him over Bran at the same age.
wut

[sd3035]

Op was at almost full greens yesterday :roll:

must have got mod negged or something

[24-Inch_Chrome]

must have got mod negged or something

"Mod negged." :oldlol:

[UK2K]

I am amazed by Blake's abilities to get to the rim and finish. His shot has come along.

He's a great player. I'd take him.

[Optimus Prime]

HGH testing is coming next season, so Griffin without a doubt. Beta is past 30 and will be without his miracle juice.

:kobe:

[Fudge]

So the majority would take Biffin?

[plowking]

Op was at almost full greens yesterday :roll:

I negged him with all my alts.

[JohnFreeman]

LeBron if you want immediate success. Griffin for future.

[Manila]

can you imagine Lebron to Blake Griff trade straight up? I guess not

[SugarHill]

For marketing: Blake.
For winning: Lebron.

For both: Kobe

How is Blake better for marketing?

[Joyner82reload]

LeBorn has MAYBE 3 years left in the league as a top 10 player and 5-6 years total. You have to take Griffin.

[305Baller]

I dont know why but im going with BALD. I think he can last longer than expected...

[funnystuff]

wait, people are saying Blake LOL hahahah :lol :lol

[LoneyROY7]

Give me the bad ass ginger. :pimp:

[Fudge]

Give me the bad ass ginger. :pimp:
:banana:

[Joyner82reload]

wait, people are saying Blake LOL hahahah :lol :lol

Why wouldn't they? LeBron will be around current Kobe, Garnett, and Duncan's level of minutes played in 3 years. His production is about to fall off a cliff. Hell he'll be at the most minutes played in NBA history in 6 years if he continues to play at his standard 4,000 minutes per year(RS+PO) of the past few seasons. He's not a cyborg, and he is already clearly starting to decline.

[Nuff Said]

Griffin may be the better player now but the power that lebron has is undeniable. Dude brings in talent. People want to play with him. Cleveland wasn't shit and as soon as he came back they get a decent squad. It means a lot in terms of stacking the deck and winning.

[Prometheus]

Griffin may be the better player now but the power that lebron has is undeniable. Dude brings in talent. People want to play with him. Cleveland wasn't shit and as soon as he came back they get a decent squad. It means a lot in terms of stacking the deck and winning.

It's one thing to say Griffin because he's younger, and will probably be the better player within a few years. But to suggest that he's the better player right now is beyond stupid. LeBron is still LeBron.

[Smoke117]

I'll take the guy who has carried teams in the past...aka Lebron.

[LA_Showtime]

LeBron. The money you'd make with a guy like LeBron James off the court makes everything won on the court, admittedly not much, a bonus.

[SpaceJammeR]

so im guessing lerbon gets a past from now on out since he's declining and blake griffin has no excuse to win a championship with a mega stacked team.

[VengefulAngel]

so im guessing lerbon gets a past from now on out since he's declining and blake griffin has no excuse to win a championship with a mega stacked team.

Lebron has champion expectations so Blake must also have championship expectations. (according to idiots who think Blake > Lebron right now)

[Wally450]

Lebron has champion expectations so Blake must also have championship expectations. (according to idiots who think Blake > Lebron right now)

You got people that would take Blake over prime KG. With that said, LeBron easily.

[ImKobe]

How is Blake better for marketing?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXNhwvyglYA