Peak Steve Nash vs Current Steph Curry

[kurple]

:confusedshrug:

who would you rather have?

[Nowitness]

Nash was the better defender, 3 point shooter, scorer, handler and leader.

Curry is the better passer.

[theaussieguy]

Nash was the better defender, 3 point shooter, scorer, handler and leader.

Curry is the better passer.


Lol not sure if trolling, ur being cheeky or if you simply got the names around the wrong way.

[ArbitraryWater]

pretty even.. no, slight edge Curry

[warriorfan]

The Alpha who is a better player?

Or the Beta who is a lesser player?


hmm

[Lebron23]

Give me Steve Nash.

[Ca$H]

Give me Steve Nash.

Curry > Bran.

[Bernkastel]

Steve Nash.

[sd3035]

obviously Curry, but Nash was awesome

[JohnFreeman]

Nash

[PistonsFan#21]

How far did Steve Nash led his team when he had: prime Amare Stoudemire, Prime Marion, young Joe Johnson and Barbosa coming off the bench ? And you cant even use his conference being tougher as an excuse

[Eric Cartman]

Nash for now, but Curry if he wins FMVP.

[ArbitraryWater]

I want Bruce Jenner's dick

:biggums:

[MEB2kDeez]

Nash for now, but Curry if he wins FMVP.
This

[lilteapot]

Curry if he wins the title + FMVP which he will get if they win

[JohnMax]

For the playoffs Curry is averaging 29.9 ppg on 47.5 percent and 4.9 3pt made on 44.8 percent

[Eric Cartman]

Curry is averaging 29.9 ppg on 47.5 percent
Kobe average .5 less than that on the same % and people called him a sidekick :lol

[Nashty]

Steve Nash is my favorite player, but I would take Steph. Nash was the better floor general, but Steph is better at everything else.

[PistonsFan#21]

Kobe average more than that and people called him a sidekick :lol

yea...except he didnt

[ArbitraryWater]

Kobe average more than that and people called him a sidekick :lol

nah, Kobe averaged 29.4 ppg that year.

[warriorfan]

Kobe average more than that and people called him a sidekick :lol


Curry is doing it more efficiently while being the best player on his team.

[navy]

Never thought much of Nash. Curry.

[Eric Cartman]

Kobe in 2001:

29.4 ppg, on 47%

Sidekick doe

[warriorfan]

Kobe in 2001:

29.4 ppg, on 47%

Sidekick doe


Who had the most points on Kobe's team? :confusedshrug:

[Eric Cartman]

Who had the most points on Kobe's team? :confusedshrug:
Shaq: 487
Kobe: 471

[Nowitness]

Shaq: 487
Kobe: 471

Sidekick.

[warriorfan]

Shaq: 487
Kobe: 471


There you go



http://www.enfieldmotorcycles.com/images/custom_pics/silas1.JPG

[Eric Cartman]

There was no sidekick there, it was Batman and Superman.

Jackie Chan and Bruce Lee.

Tupac and Biggie.

[SugarHill]

Jet Li was nowhere near Jackie Chan level

[Eric Cartman]

Jet Li was nowhere near Jackie Chan level
Will edit to please you

[warriorfan]

I thought Jet Li died in that tsunami

[Eric Cartman]

I thought Jet Li died in that tsunami
Blazing with 'Pac in Bahamas atm

[SugarHill]

Will edit to please you
:yaohappy:

[AintNoSunshine]

Considering this Warriors team has been extremely successful I will give Curry the benefit of the doubt. But if we are conparing players Nash is lesser of a scorer but better play makers. They wont be much worse with Nash in Currys place.

[rzp]

There you go



http://www.enfieldmotorcycles.com/images/custom_pics/silas1.JPG

:lol :lol

[Eric Cartman]

Which other player could put up near 30 point average alongside prime Shaq?

Jordan? KD?

[LAZERUSS]

Both Curry and Nash are/were elite shooters. But Curry is also an elite scorer. The man averaged 24 ppg in 33 mpg. Curry is a legitimate 30 ppg scorer if playing under more ideal (scoring and shooting) circumstances.

Nash was a better passer without a doubt, though. Nash is an all-time great passer.

[DCL]

they're different players.

nash was a terrific shooter who was a pass-first type of player...

curry is a terrific passer who's a shoot-first type of player...

nash was closer to stockton than a jordan

curry is no jordan so dont even get into that, but he's closer to jordan than a stockton

[IGOTGAME]

Curry is also a much better defender. Based on NBA all defensive team voting he is the 5th best defensive point guard in the league. He also got 2 votes for First team all defense.

They may be comparable offensively, but Curry is a top tier defensive point guard. So, the comparison goes to Curry.

[ArbitraryWater]

Curry is also a much better defender. Based on NBA all defensive team voting he is the 5th best defensive point guard in the league. He also got 2 votes for First team all defense.

They may be comparable offensively, but Curry is a top tier defensive point guard. So, the comparison goes to Curry.

dude :roll:

You're the same guy that said Curry is irrelevant on this team, and any average PG can lead them to the same success :biggums: :lol

what happened?!

[tontoz]

How far did Steve Nash led his team when he had: prime Amare Stoudemire, Prime Marion, young Joe Johnson and Barbosa coming off the bench ? And you cant even use his conference being tougher as an excuse


He only had those guys for 1 year. Pretty sure JJ got hurt in the playoffs that year too. They lost in the WCF to the Spurs in their prime.

[tontoz]

I think which guy you choose would depend on the other players on the team. If you have other big time scorers than Nash would be the better choice. If you don't have a legit number 1 scoring option than Curry would be the better pick.

[kurple]

How far did Steve Nash led his team when he had: prime Amare Stoudemire, Prime Marion, young Joe Johnson and Barbosa coming off the bench ? And you cant even use his conference being tougher as an excuse
why not? the conference is tougher, but the warriors has had a much easier road

[dirkdiggler41]

Nash was such a great player. I have never seen a player control the speed of the game like he did. He could score like no other. He really showed it against Dallas in the 2005 playoffs, when Avery Johnson decieded that the Mavs was not going to help out on Nash. Just let Nash get his. It failed and nash posted 30ppg on 55% with 12 apg.

With that said, I pick Curry because I believe he is the better player overall and plays a style that wins in the long run.

[Solid Snake]

Nash

[FKAri]

Depends on the team. If you swap them, both teams do worse.

[24-Inch_Chrome]

Steve Nash. :banana:

[Legends66NBA7]

Curry. Nash was never on this type of level.

[CJ Mustard]

Kobe average .5 less than that on the same % and people called him a sidekick :lol
That's because he was a sidekick.

[Cold soul]

Nash for now but Curry is close a ring and FMVP and debate ends.

[illmaticone]

Definitely Curry. I love Nash as much as the next guy, but Nash has never been on the level Curry is on right now.

[Jacks3]

Curry easily.