Possible theory for increase in poverty

[NZStreetBaller]

poor people have more babies.... therefore the poor is multiplying far more then the rich.

Eventually we would end up with less then 1% of the world with all the money...........

[fiddy]

Dont worry WW3 will take care of this issues.

[NumberSix]

poor people have more babies.... therefore the poor is multiplying far more then the rich.

Eventually we would end up with less then 1% of the world with all the money...........
Except, the Marjory of wealthy people aren't born into wealth and the majority of family wealth disappears after a few generations.

If you amass a nice fortune, if you have a few kids, then they have a few kids, then they all have a few kids, what's left of that money gets spread out pretty thin after a few generations.

[masonanddixon]

lol you just realised that retards have more progeny than educated people?

[NZStreetBaller]

lol you just realised that retards have more progeny than educated people?

Oh im sorry. Does veing being uneducated instantly qualify you as a retard? ?? U clearly know nothing boy....

[NZStreetBaller]

Dont worry WW3 will take care of this issues.

I dont think it will take care of it. But ww3 is very likely.....

[masonanddixon]

Oh im sorry. Does veing being uneducated instantly qualify you as a retard? ?? U clearly know nothing boy....
Can you please re-phrase that into something remotely cogent?

I never said. I stated explicitly that retards outbreed the educated.

[NZStreetBaller]

Can you please re-phrase that into something remotely cogent?

I never said. I stated explicitly that retards outbreed the educated.

Sorry bro im half cut watching the state of origin. You are a beautiful person. Continue your quest to invest the disolvable g string brother

[fiddy]

I dont think it will take care of it. But ww3 is very likely.....
Dont underestimate the number of nukes in stock :lol

[masonanddixon]

Sorry bro im half cut watching the state of origin. You are a beautiful person. Continue your quest to invest the disolvable g string brother

Rugby is gay as hell.

[NZStreetBaller]

Rugby is gay as hell.

Whats gay about no time outs and players playing defense and offense without shoulder pads.

[NZStreetBaller]

Dont underestimate the number of nukes in stock :lol

Oh i dont at all. Nor am i suprised that the us would focus more on destruction then improving their own economy.

[fiddy]

Oh i dont at all. Nor am i suprised that the us would focus more on destruction then improving their own economy.
Thats the road to the NWO...

[NZStreetBaller]

Thats the road to the NWO...

Oh god stop lol.

[fiddy]

Oh god stop lol.
Its coming, EU was born after WW2, NWO coming soon, probably September 2015.

[Dresta]

Poor people will always breed themselves into further poverty if one provides them with the opportunity to do so without repercussion; doesn't say much for the future of the gene pool when some teenage retards can have a clan of kids, and they be supported and enabled by others (poorly), and then you have a handful of delinquent retards (exponential growth in unproductive human characteristics).

We likely only got to the industrial revolution through the elimination of the chaff of the species, who were reckless and impulsive, incapable of thinking long-term, and thus with no inherent tendency to save. Yet the tendency to save in the UK increased steadily from 1200-1800, and then with a population boom, sparked the most dramatic change the human world has undergone. Why was this? Well, a likely possibility is that the wealthy generations would have far more surviving offspring than the working classes (who rarely made it), and so you had a gradual filtering down, so that the working classes of 1800 were far more industrious and thrifty than the same in 1200.

Now we just encourage people in the other direction through the bureaucratic welfare superstate. I can think of little that is more degenerate and degrading - Western man is intent on elevating his weakest instincts into virtues :oldlol:. These are the symptoms of the will to negate life, a hatred of everything life is and entails. It simply cannot last.

[DeuceWallaces]

Except, the Marjory of wealthy people aren't born into wealth and the majority of family wealth disappears after a few generations.

If you amass a nice fortune, if you have a few kids, then they have a few kids, then they all have a few kids, what's left of that money gets spread out pretty thin after a few generations.

Saying something over and over doesn't make it true.

[InfiniteBaskets]

Maybe the government should offer optional tubal ligations and vasectomies to those under the poverty line or receiving welfare with a $5000 incentive or something.

[STATUTORY]

look up Malthus, that's what the dude preached

[Akrazotile]

Maybe the government should offer optional tubal ligations and vasectomies to those under the poverty line or receiving welfare with a $5000 incentive or something.


And as a sentencing alternative for certain criminal convictions. Ive been saying this for years.

[NumberSix]

Saying something over and over doesn't make it true.
Denying something over and over doesn't make it false.

[GimmeThat]

from a scholarly standpoint

I may argue your theory also argues against the theory of time continuum:
stating that the separation, 'my colleague may argue the term segregation instead' of fractions of differential quality, which directs at the e-quality of ability in its complex form. does not exist.

you may declare this as the radicalization for the foo fighters, about the term, management.

[DeuceWallaces]

Denying something over and over doesn't make it false.

Most studies show that you're wrong. The greatest probability in attaining a higher economic status or maintaining that status is through inherited wealth. The probability of moving up from a income equal to or less than the US median of roughly 50K into just 6 figures, let alone a millionaire, is practically nill and has never been worse than it is now.

[NZStreetBaller]

Seriously i dont get poor people sometimes. I am a guy who grew up in a house with 9 people poor as ever. both parents working with welfare help.

lucky i was curios enough at a young age to just to simply ask "what do the rich do that i dont do" instead of instantly looking for someone to blame and taking my pitchfork to the government.

[Godzuki]

laziness begets laziness. more people who can hangout and just survive on gov programs and not working gets exacerbated the more its possible to get away with it.

the harsh reality is being poor is supposed to suck to make u bust your ass and find a job to be able to feed yourself...to have a roof over your head...we've more or less minimized the harsh downsides of being poor thru gov programs, and have made most of the poor, and then some, content with living off of the government. the being poor standard in the US is a far greater quality of life than most other countries being poor.

machiavellian governance would go a long way in turning the country around, too bad we're too PC to take that road :coleman:

[NZStreetBaller]

laziness begets laziness. more people who can hangout and just survive on gov programs and not working gets exacerbated the more its possible to get away with it.

the harsh reality is being poor is supposed to suck to make u bust your ass and find a job to be able to feed yourself...to have a roof over your head...we've more or less minimized the harsh downsides of being poor thru gov programs, and have made most of the poor, and then some, content with living off of the government. the being poor standard in the US is a far greater quality of life than most other countries being poor.

machiavellian governance would go a long way in turning the country around, too bad we're too PC to take that road :coleman:

:applause:

[GimmeThat]

Most studies show that you're wrong. The greatest probability in attaining a higher economic status or maintaining that status is through inherited wealth. The probability of moving up from a income equal to or less than the US median of roughly 50K into just 6 figures, let alone a millionaire, is practically nill and has never been worse than it is now.

Without the linguistic skills to disprove the statement in which the greatest probability in attaining a higher economic status or maintaining that status is through inherited wealth.

you had left out the bench mark.

as I had in comparison that of lower level proof, which is not to be confused as generalizing, but the application in the broken down statements of concepts, where the legal environment describes as circumstantial, and we can say that in the political, economic level, tracking, and discovering the symptoms. as psychology proves to be the boundary.


I find it is important to point out that knife blades are generally made of steel. And not of metal, the arguable end consumption form.



Excalibur out.