View Full Version : In the end, the kobe vs lebron debate boils down to this
ISHGoat
06-29-2015, 05:16 PM
What do you value more?
Accolades and accomplishments (kobe 5 rangz)
Vs
In-game impact and dominance (legoat)
Mj has both, which is why he's the indisputable goat.
Wilt has impact, while Russell's impaxt was questionable on the offensive end.
Lebron stans should be wilt stans, and kobe/Russell
Droid101
06-29-2015, 05:17 PM
What do you value more?
Accolades and accomplishments (kobe 5 rangz)
Vs
In-game impact and dominance (legoat)
Mj has both, which is why he's the indisputable goat.
Wilt has impact, while Russell's impaxt was questionable on the offensive end.
Lebron stans should be wilt stans, and kobe/Russell
Scoring 81 points in a game isn't dominating? 62 in three quarters against the best team in the West isn't dominating?
I guess you have a weird definition of "In game impact and dominance."
ISHGoat
06-29-2015, 05:18 PM
Scoring 81 points in a game isn't dominating? 62 in three quarters against the best team in the West isn't dominating?
I guess you have a weird definition of "In game impact and dominance."
I guess your criteria for evaluating careers is single game highs
I'm talking about widely accepted advanced stats that capture a players performance over an entire season, but you know, those don't favor your boy so lets just post "81 points doe".
Actually, we don't even need to look at advanced stats. Lebron has Kobe beat in every basic stat except turnovers and free throw %. Even scoring, which is supposedly kobe's strongest aspect, lebron has him beat with more points on better efficiency.
I'm just guessing here, but Kobe has never led the league in PER, ws48, bpm, vorp in the regular season nor in the playoffs. But I guess those stats are just made up to prop up certain individuals while bringing down others
SouBeachTalents
06-29-2015, 05:22 PM
It's honestly Kobe's first 3 rings. How much value people place on those is imo what truly will always be the divider in that debate
ISHGoat
06-29-2015, 05:22 PM
It's honestly Kobe's first 3 rings. How much value people place on those is imo what truly will always be the divider in that debate
Let's not act like his last two rings were on par with any of bran's championship runs either
warriorfan
06-29-2015, 05:23 PM
I guess your criteria for evaluating careers is single game highs
I'm talking about widely accepted advanced stats that capture a players performance over an entire season, but you know, those don't favor your boy so lets just post "81 points doe"
I'm just guessing here, but Kobe has never led the league in PER, ws48, bpm, vorp in the regular season nor in the playoffs. But I guess those stats are just made up to prop up certain individuals while bringing down others
all those stats are based off box score
it's basically like remixing the box score stats 4 different times
box score lovers are bran fans
bball lovers are kobe fans
dubeta
06-29-2015, 05:26 PM
Stats: Lebron
Individual accolades: Lebron
Rings: Kobe
Overall: LeBron
its not that hard tbh
outbreak
06-29-2015, 05:27 PM
Let's not act like his last two rings were on par with any of bran's championship runs either
why aren't they on par with lebrons eastern conference runs with a stacked team?
raprap
06-29-2015, 05:29 PM
why aren't they on par with lebrons eastern conference runs with a stacked team?
Those weren't stacked teams though....
ISHGoat
06-29-2015, 05:29 PM
all those stats are based off box score
it's basically like remixing the box score stats 4 different times
box score lovers are bran fans
bball lovers are kobe fans
Wel those remixed box scores are eztremely axcurate. I dare you to look up this seasons top offensive and defensive differentials. Iirc, bogut was #1 on D while curry was #1 on O. I guess theyre just made up formulas right?
HOoopCityJones
06-29-2015, 05:34 PM
It's honestly Kobe's first 3 rings. How much value people place on those is imo what truly will always be the divider in that debate
How much should one value Kareem's rings? All he did was score and play defense for all his title Teams, just like Kobe. :confusedshrug:
It's hilarious how some of you can sit there with a straight face and pretend Shaq was the sole reason for the 3peat, when it's proven that the ball was in Kobe's hand for pretty much every clutch moment during that run. Shaq was obviously more dominant statistically and as a presence, but even in 2000 Jalen Rose tried to take this dude out of The Finals because he felt they had a better shot beating Shaq without him and still came up big in game 4 on a bum ankle, which arguably clinched the series.
Every pass for a big play including Ron's three vs The Celtics, Fish's 3 vs the Magic, Shaq's alley hoop vs The Blazers, Horry's corner 3 vs The Blazers. ALL facilitated by Kobe. Even without scoring he's impacted the game in huge ways, even in the infamous game 7 vs The Celtics Lebron stans love to harp on where he out rebounded Kevin Garrnet and Rasheed Wallace.
SouBeachTalents
06-29-2015, 05:35 PM
How much should one value Kareem's rings? All he did was score and play defense for all his title Teams, just like Kobe. :confusedshrug:
:roll: It's hilarious how some of you can sit there with a straight face and pretend Shaq was the sole reason for the 3peat, when it's proven that the ball was in Kobe's hand for pretty much every clutch moment during that run. Shaq was obviously more dominant statistically and as a presence, but even in 2000 Jalen Rose tried to take this dude out of The Finals because he felt they had a better shot beating Shaq without him and still came up big in game 4 which arguably clinched the series.
Every pass for a big play including Ron's three vs The Celtics, Fish's 3 vs the Magic, Shaq's alley hoop vs The Blazers, Horry's corner 3 vs The Blazers. ALL facilitated by Kobe. Even without scoring he's impacted the game in huge ways, even in the infamous game 7 vs The Celtics Lebron stans love to harp on where he out rebounded Kevin Garrnet and Rasheed Wallace.
Lol, don't get so defensive, I wasn't implying anything good or bad by that. But I generally do believe Kobe's first 3 rings are the most polarizing aspect of his resume
HOoopCityJones
06-29-2015, 05:39 PM
Lol, don't get so defensive, I wasn't implying anything good or bad by that. But I generally do believe Kobe's first 3 rings are the most polarizing aspect of his resume
Because he put up comparable scoring averages to prime Shaq? :biggums:
SouBeachTalents
06-29-2015, 05:42 PM
Because he put up comparable scoring averages to prime Shaq? :biggums:
Because some will believe what you say, while others will believe he was the second best player, and those who say he was "carried" by Shaq
raprap
06-29-2015, 05:43 PM
How much should one value Kareem's rings? All he did was score and play defense for all his title Teams, just like Kobe. :confusedshrug:
It's hilarious how some of you can sit there with a straight face and pretend Shaq was the sole reason for the 3peat, when it's proven that the ball was in Kobe's hand for pretty much every clutch moment during that run. Shaq was obviously more dominant statistically and as a presence, but even in 2000 Jalen Rose tried to take this dude out of The Finals because he felt they had a better shot beating Shaq without him and still came up big in game 4 on a bum ankle, which arguably clinched the series.
Every pass for a big play including Ron's three vs The Celtics, Fish's 3 vs the Magic, Shaq's alley hoop vs The Blazers, Horry's corner 3 vs The Blazers. ALL facilitated by Kobe. Even without scoring he's impacted the game in huge ways, even in the infamous game 7 vs The Celtics Lebron stans love to harp on where he out rebounded Kevin Garrnet and Rasheed Wallace.
:lol calm down bro
dubeta
06-29-2015, 05:43 PM
Because he put up comparable scoring averages to prime Shaq? :biggums:
3 Peat Finals averages
Kobe- 22.6 ppg
Shaq- 36.3 ppg
'comparable' :bowdown:
Inferno
06-29-2015, 05:44 PM
I mean, yeah, that's what it comes down to. Kobe's definitely had the better career while LeBron at his peak was definitely a better player (no matter how slightly one may argue) IMO :confusedshrug:
Mr. Jabbar
06-29-2015, 05:46 PM
it comes down to eye test really. i'd take kobe every time UNLESS i needed to backstab someone and be a colluding, shortcutting bitch with no greatness.
9erempiree
06-29-2015, 05:52 PM
Kobe is better than Lebron and no comparison.
Do we really need to go down this road again?
You got small ***** and nobody can see it, if you zoom the hell out of this picture.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Bot39eURk50/hqdefault.jpg
vs.
This....
http://nballin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/n6wbgg.gif
http://nballin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/n6wbgg.gif
http://nballin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/n6wbgg.gif
http://nballin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/n6wbgg.gif
http://nballin.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/n6wbgg.gif
TheMarkMadsen
06-29-2015, 05:55 PM
It's honestly Kobe's first 3 rings. How much value people place on those is imo what truly will always be the divider in that debate
Kobe 01: 29/7/6
Kobe 02: 27/6/5
Lebron 13: 26/8/6
9erempiree
06-29-2015, 05:58 PM
Prime Kobe would shit on Lebron. Just look at these scrubs that are shitting on him and winning Finals MVP. You should lose points just for that alone. Can you imagine Kobe or Jordan losing a Finals and their counterpart wins FMVP?
Too much damage have been done and at this point there is no way any real fan would have Lebron over Kobe.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.