Injuries don't get remembered long term

[The_Pharcyde]

nobody talks about the #1 seed bulls having their main option blow out his acl in the first round when they talk about lebrons 1st title

no one talks about worthy and byron scott being out for most of the 1991 finals when talking about jordans 1st title

as the years pass by the context gets lost and people tend to just remember the winning team... its just the nautre of sports

the warriors won this title in legitimate fashion... they are required to win four rounds and they did that.. they have no say in who they face
they dominated the regular season and won the title
you can point to weak competition but you give high stock to the 01,02 lakers for defeating the 76ers and new jersey nets by a combined 8-1 series result
amazing


they deserved it, the asterisk movement needs to be stopped

[buddha]

you're an idiot.

you stated that nobody will remember this asterisk movement yet you still want it to be stopped? lol who cares?

[The_Pharcyde]

you're an idiot.

you stated that nobody will remember this asterisk movement yet you still want it to be stopped? lol who cares?

no im saying will remember the injuries so why not give the credit to a great team that won, rather than harp on the injuries

[bluechox2]

op remembered

[FKAri]

Then why bring it up?

[The_Pharcyde]

Cause he's an idiot. And one of those guys who labelled LeBron's first 2 rings as asterisks rings. Kobetard being Kobetard.

lol i like lebron and kobe, so this cant be true

you missed my whole point...
i actually gave credit to lebrons rings in my post, saying that the context of his rings wont be remembered as time passes and they will just remember him winning

same goes for the warriors

I promise this forum is so lame, its like a high school cafeteria
everyone is on a certain team
lebron stans, jordan stans, kobe stans, 60's stans...

why cant you just appreciate the talent of your generation and not be 6 years old and stick by your "man"

also you dont know how to spell labeled

[Foster5k]

also you dont know how to spell labeled


nobody talks about the #1 seed bulls having their main option blow out his acl in the first round when they talk about lebrons 1st title

no one talks about worthy and byron scott being out for most of the 1991 finals when talking about jordans 1st title

as the years pass by the context gets lost and people tend to just remember the winning team... its just the nautre of sports

the warriors won this title in legitimate fashion... they are required to win four rounds and they did that.. they have no say in who they face
they dominated the regular season and won the title
you can point to weak competition but you give high stock to the 01,02 lakers for defeating the 76ers and new jersey nets by a combined 8-1 series result
amazing


they deserved it, the asterisk movement needs to be stopped
And you don't know how to spell nature...

[warriorfan]

op stop letting know nothing virgins get in your head

[J Shuttlesworth]

nobody talks about the #1 seed bulls having their main option blow out his acl in the first round when they talk about lebrons 1st title

no one talks about worthy and byron scott being out for most of the 1991 finals when talking about jordans 1st title
d
Nobody remembers this stuff apparently, but here you are reminding everyone about it. Apparently, people will remember it :facepalm

[Rocketswin2013]

Both the Bulls of '12 and the Lakers of '91 would have still lost. Lakers should've made it closer, though. And LeBron would have locked Rose down at will again. He had his best defensive playoff run in 2012.

[triangleoffense]

warriors would have won even if the cavs had love and irving

[CeilingFan#1]

I still remember the 2009 Lakers benefiting from Yao's injury.

[GimmeThat]

op, I just wanted you to know, we've all lost something, you are not the only one.