PDA

View Full Version : If the government could effectively stop the production of recreational drugs...



navy
07-28-2015, 11:27 PM
Should they do it? Alcohol included.

ISHGoat
07-28-2015, 11:31 PM
Should they do it? Alcohol included.

nah cus then wed just all be muslims

no weed no booze no bacon no *****

Lensanity
07-28-2015, 11:34 PM
So medical Cannabis would still exist?

Batz
07-28-2015, 11:36 PM
We'd just make new recreational drugs.

navy
07-28-2015, 11:37 PM
So medical Cannabis would still exist?
Yes. cannabis would still exist. There would just be no way to get it legally or illegally for non medical reasons.

SugarHill
07-29-2015, 12:13 AM
for what reason?

Dresta
07-29-2015, 12:32 AM
I personally think TV is a far more malign influence than drugs have ever been. The internet too, and its ushering in graphomania of the mob. Both destroy the imagination, which is probably the most valuable thing possessed by human beings.

Patrick Chewing
07-29-2015, 12:49 AM
I hear that Krokodil drug is pretty intense. I'd try that next.

navy
07-29-2015, 01:00 AM
for what reason?

Because the negatives outweigh the positives?

Lensanity
07-29-2015, 01:00 AM
Yes. cannabis would still exist. There would just be no way to get it legally or illegally for non medical reasons.
If they could do it for free they definitely would. Billions would be saved by getting rid of the DEA and freeing up the prisons.

Droid101
07-29-2015, 01:09 AM
We'll just sniff glue.

NumberSix
07-29-2015, 06:14 AM
Because the negatives outweigh the positives?
And that's for you to decide?

navy
07-29-2015, 06:19 AM
And that's for you to decide?
No. Post otherwise.

Cactus-Sack
07-29-2015, 06:25 AM
No. Post otherwise.
You're the one who made the egotistical, asinine statement, you back it up.

navy
07-29-2015, 06:28 AM
You're the one who made the egotistical, asinine statement, you back it up.
It was a questioned posed to sugarhill, I was expecting a yes or no response.

Not a statement. Which usually end in a period.....lol at egotistical and asinine

Cactus-Sack
07-29-2015, 06:30 AM
Nope, you clearly quoted nubersix dummy

navy
07-29-2015, 06:37 AM
Nope, you clearly quoted nubersix dummy
:biggums:

Stop derailing my thread with nonsense.

Is it really that hard to see that my egotistical asinine statement was to sugarhill and not numbersix?