the population of Nigeria is projected to surpass that of the USA by 2050

[Bigsmoke]

http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/2015-report.html

[Akrazotile]

But not enough. Their population was less than 40 million in 1950. For the sake of the world's future we need to start putting sterilization chemicals in the waters of countries like India and Nigeria.


This exactly.

[RidonKs]

yeah and if the people there don't like it and start attacking our trade routes in the arabian sea, fk it we'll just nuke em

[Akrazotile]

Problem is, politicians and businesses love ghis growth because its just more people to sell shit to and make the company's executives rich.

When the average beta cuck lib sheep in America sees Barack Obama or Jon Stewart supporting it, he supports it too.

When he sees them condemn anyone who criticizes or questions foreign countries, minorities, anything but the classic white establishment (whose consumer loyalty is already secured) he condemns it too, because it's presented as "hip" in the media to be a doormat, and the insecure, unsure, mindless beta cuck sheep need a policy to follow. And this is what we have.

Look what the welfare era did for blacks economically. Theres a reason guys like Jackie Robinson, Sammy Davis Jr, Wilt Chamberlain, Martin Luther King etc were conservatives. They knew traditional values would be better for their people than handouts, absent fathers and BET. But liberals insisted if the avg black guy wants it, he deserves it. Would have been far better to have the successful black individuals out-reproduce the poor ones but, politicians need a division tactic, and liberals need a side to join that makes them feel like big superior know-it-all babysitters. What good has it done for blacks, and what good has it done for society? Ferguson, south Chicago, Baltimore... These places are shit holes. Good job Democrats.

India, Packistan, Nigeria, Afghanistan, these are the absolute worst places to have go through a population boom. But you wont catch a politician or an MSNBC pundit saying so, so dont expect any ISH liberals to have the guts to venture on honest opinion without the support of their politicial union reassuring their stupid little puppet selves.

[KingBeasley08]

Since when do Barack Obama or Jon Stewart support this. Holy strawman :lol

MLK was being hounded by the FBI for being a communist sympathizer yet this dude is calling him a conservative wow. Dude was a borderline socialist. I'm starting to think you don't even know what you talk about

[IcanzIIravor]

Problem is, politicians and businesses love ghis growth because its just more people to sell shit to and make the company's executives rich.

When the average beta cuck lib sheep in America sees Barack Obama or Jon Stewart supporting it, he supports it too.

When he sees them condemn anyone who criticizes or questions foreign countries, minorities, anything but the classic white establishment (whose consumer loyalty is already secured) he condemns it too, because it's presented as "hip" in the media to be a doormat, and the insecure, unsure, mindless beta cuck sheep need a policy to follow. And this is what we have.

Look what the welfare era did for blacks economically. Theres a reason guys like Jackie Robinson, Sammy Davis Jr, Wilt Chamberlain, Martin Luther King etc were conservatives. They knew traditional values would be better for their people than handouts, absent fathers and BET. But liberals insisted if the avg black guy wants it, he deserves it. Would have been far better to have the successful black individuals out-reproduce the poor ones but, politicians need a division tactic, and liberals need a side to join that makes them feel like big superior know-it-all babysitters. What good has it done for blacks, and what good has it done for society? Ferguson, south Chicago, Baltimore... These places are shit holes. Good job Democrats.

India, Packistan, Nigeria, Afghanistan, these are the absolute worst places to have go through a population boom. But you wont catch a politician or an MSNBC pundit saying so, so dont expect any ISH liberals to have the guts to venture on honest opinion without the support of their politicial union reassuring their stupid little puppet selves.

You're all over the place with this. Take a break and try again.

[KingBeasley08]

Funny part is the Democrats are the ones who support Planned Parenthood and abortion. The side he aligns himself with is the one that opposes abortion at all costs and want all babies to be born :lol

[Akrazotile]

Since when do Barack Obama or Jon Stewart support this. Holy strawman :lol

MLK was being hounded by the FBI for being a communist sympathizer yet this dude is calling him a conservative wow. Dude was a borderline socialist. I'm starting to think you don't even know what you talk about


I should have specified social conservative. He supported social standards and personal fesponsibility for your family. The absence of which has been a huge contributor to the state of the greater black community today.

[HitandRun Reggie]

Since when do Barack Obama or Jon Stewart support this. Holy strawman :lol

MLK was being hounded by the FBI for being a communist sympathizer yet this dude is calling him a conservative wow

He's probably referring to the fact that MLK was a staunch Republican"supporter" at first. Remember the first 2 civil rights acts were brought forth by Republicans but the Dems shot it down. Even in 1964, the Civil Rights Act had more Dems voting against it than Republicans. MLK had a civil rights agenda so he was hitching his wagon to whoever was pushing it hardest at the time.

But yeah don't think he was a conservative. He just used religion to suck in supporters like many Republicans and Democrats do today, plus he was a sexual deviant so I don't think he actually held many of the beliefs he used stammer out on the podium.

[DonDadda59]

But not enough. Their population was less than 40 million in 1950. For the sake of the world's future we need to start putting sterilization chemicals in the waters of countries like India and Nigeria.

:whatever:

Concentration camps > sterilization chemicals when it comes to population control.

Did wonders for Germany's errr... eternal problem... before the cuck bleeding heart libs from other countries stuck their big noses in, pun intended.

[KingBeasley08]

I should have specified social conservative. He supported social standards and personal fesponsibility for your family. The absence of which has been a huge contributor to the state of the greater black community today.
Ok, yea. He also supported a welfare state and reparations. The two aren't mutually exclusive.


King supported the ideals of democratic socialism, although he was reluctant to speak directly of this support due to the anti-communist sentiment being projected throughout America at the time, and the association of socialism with communism. King believed that capitalism could not adequately provide the basic necessities of many American people, particularly the African American community

King stated that black Americans, as well as other disadvantaged Americans, should be compensated for historical wrongs. In an interview conducted for Playboy in 1965, he said that granting black Americans only equality could not realistically close the economic gap between them and whites. King said that he did not seek a full restitution of wages lost to slavery, which he believed impossible, but proposed a government compensatory program of $50 billion over ten years to all disadvantaged groups.[67]

He posited that "the money spent would be more than amply justified by the benefits that would accrue to the nation through a spectacular decline in school dropouts, family breakups, crime rates, illegitimacy, swollen relief rolls, rioting and other social evils".[68] He presented this idea as an application of the common law regarding settlement of unpaid labor, but clarified that he felt that the money should not be spent exclusively on blacks. He stated, "It should benefit the disadvantaged of all races".[69

[Akrazotile]

Funny part is the Democrats are the ones who support Planned Parenthood and abortion. The side he aligns himself with is the one that opposes abortion at all costs and want all babies to be born :lol

I dont align myself with a side, my brother. I typically have more in common with views on the right than the left, but it's never because I need other people to agree with me. I have my own opinions, and voice them willingly.

[Akrazotile]

You're all over the place with this. Take a break and try again.


The point is nobody's gonna have the guts to do anything about this. Bc business and politics wont take the lead on it, so the average person will be afraid to acknowledge any of the problems with it.

[Akrazotile]

:whatever:

Concentration camps > sterilization chemicals when it comes to population control.

Did wonders for Germany's errr... eternal problem... before the cuck bleeding heart libs from other countries stuck their big noses in, pun intended.


Killing people because you dont like them =/= forcibly controlling third world populations because its literally going to fukck up the planet for everyone.


This isnt about race - thats simply the tool people will rely on to prevent any action - its about mother nature bout to go on life support. This is BAD for the world. Period. It does nobody any good. Tolerating it bc theyre poor and colored makes one a cuck. Period.

The shit aint necessary. Why would you ever wanna see all these poor countries become a billion strong? Why? Reach into your bag of arbitrary morals and ethics and find me one good reason. And dont give some "dude, you gotta like respect the space of all people bc we're all the same" hippie nonsense bc there are no such things as universal morals in a gawdless universe.

Maybe we can economically incentivize them to slow down reproduction. Take some of that money the green parties are spending on billboards, and just pay these countries off to get serious about birth control. Whatever we do, we have to do something. This is a PLANET issue.

[Akrazotile]

We also need to STOP AIDING them unless we're gonna attach birthrate incentives.

[RidonKs]

Killing people because you dont like them =/= forcibly controlling third world populations because its literally going to fukck up the planet for everyone.
:roll:

listening to an imperialist try to justify himself is such rich entertainment

[Akrazotile]

:roll:

listening to an imperialist try to justify himself is such rich entertainment



What a cuck

[DonDadda59]

Killing people because you dont like them

According to German social scientists at the time, the extermination of the Jews was as necessary as the extermination of rats (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1ttJgTqpsM). Who are you with your arbitrary morals to question their reasoning? After all, it was their country and they had the right to enforce any laws they wanted, yes?

It's science, bruh. Why did the liberal carpet-bagging cucks from foreign nations with their arbitrary liberal morals have to get in the way of scientific population control? :facepalm

[RidonKs]

We also need to STOP AIDING them unless we're gonna attach birthrate incentives.
bro the amount you give the world in aid is already at a lower percentage of gdp than probably anywhere in the world... unless you include the money coming from the ned and iri which is used almost exclusively to fund elections in foreign countries. could you imagine what americans might say if some billion dollar firm in china started throwing lots of money around to effect next year's election? there would be riots in the streets. hell probably the same if BP announced a big campaign even though they're already right in on the game.

[RidonKs]

According to German social scientists at the time, the extermination of the Jews was as necessary as the extermination of rats (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1ttJgTqpsM). Who are you with your arbitrary morals to question their reasoning? After all, it was their country and they had the right to enforce any laws they wanted, yes?

It's science, bruh. Why did the liberal carpet-bagging cucks from foreign nations with their arbitrary liberal morals have to get in the way of scientific population control? :facepalm
https://s3.amazonaws.com/ANF/2012-November/1234-Specter-Haunting-America.jpg

[Akrazotile]

According to German social scientists at the time, the extermination of the Jews was as necessary as the extermination of rats (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1ttJgTqpsM). Who are you with your arbitrary morals to question their reasoning? After all, it was their country and they had the right to enforce any laws they wanted, yes?

It's science, bruh. Why did the liberal carpet-bagging cucks from foreign nations with their arbitrary liberal morals have to get in the way of scientific population control? :facepalm


Because lots of enterprising American revenue generators were Jewish and if Uncle Sam wanted to protect his place as the lead economic dog he needed to protect them jews! Not to mention the Nazis would eventually be a threat to American hygemony so stopping them was in Americas interest irrespective of how it pertained to jewish concentration camps.

[DonDadda59]

Because lots of enterprising American revenue generators were Jewish and if Uncle Sam wanted to protect his place as the lead economic dog he needed to protect them jews!

I'm positive that most Jews with means got the message to get out of Germany/mainland Europe after kristallnacht.

The ones without means were forced into ghettos, stripped of their possessions. And who needs a whole population of ghetto-dwelling poor people?

Better to exterminate them, yes?

You really should watch the whole thing (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g0oIH0NOtE). Really illuminates why the population control process was so necessary to Germany at the time.


Not to mention the Nazis would eventually be a threat to American hygemony so stopping them was in Americas interest irrespective of how it pertained to jewish concentration camps.

The U.S. was more than willing to let the Europeans fight it out among themselves while remaining neutral. It was only after Pearl Harbor that America became involved in all the f*ckery. Germany almost absent-mindedly declared war on Uncle Sam, only because their Axis ally had beef. Other than that, Germany sunk a few American merchant ships here and there... but other than that, there were no real issues between the Nazis and Washington that would've called for combat.

[RidonKs]

Because lots of enterprising American revenue generators were Jewish and if Uncle Sam wanted to protect his place as the lead economic dog he needed to protect them jews! Not to mention the Nazis would eventually be a threat to American hygemony so stopping them was in Americas interest irrespective of how it pertained to jewish concentration camps.
that isn't why the united states got involved in ww2. that's just the background.

the history is that the united states strongly supported the hitler's moderate national socialists. it was english and french declarations that jolted the world into action, and america followed along once it had war declared against it by the nazi's and more importantly the japanese who could threaten colonies like the phillipines. there was nothing proactive from the state department until late in the game, if they were truly concerned about hegemony they would have taken action earlier.

[Akrazotile]

I'm positive that most Jews with means got the message to get out of Germany/mainland Europe after kristallnacht.

The ones without means were forced into ghettos, stripped of their possessions. And who needs a whole population of ghetto-dwelling poor people?

Better to exterminate them, yes?

You really should watch the whole thing (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g0oIH0NOtE). Really illuminates why the population control process was so necessary to Germany at the time.



The U.S. was more than willing to let the Europeans fight it out among themselves while remaining neutral. It was only after Pearl Harbor that America became involved in all the f*ckery. Germany almost absent-mindedly declared war on Uncle Sam, only because their Axis ally had beef. Other than that, Germany sunk a few American merchant ships here and there... but other than that, there were no real issues between the Nazis and Washington that would've called for combat.


Well listen, I wasnt there so I cant tell you how Germany should have handled its "jewish problem." But quite honestly if they felt they had one, they had every right to at least discuss it openly. Maybe they should have pioneered the creation of a jewish state, and created incentive for citizens to move there, which would have been more in keeping with their professed christian values than genocide. But the other thing is Hitler singled out jews specifically because of disdain (backed by agenda-driven "science") and not bc he was worried about an overall German population problem.

Youll also notice I dont cry out against the US intervening in genocides around the world to stop them. I think all cultures and people should be preserved - and same with natural wildlife - but that doesnt mean you let any of them grow so big they fukk everything else up. Thats simple self preservation. Too many cucks are intimidated by politicians, businesses, and wannabe "leaders" of the social justife movement to do whats logical. All these powers saying one thing, the average cuck insecure in his own voice doesnt have the guts to stand his ground. Gets caught up in the emotional ploys of the left.

But you can look at my stance on ISRAELS demographic problem. The ultra orthodox jews are having like 7-8 kids a piece. It HAS to stop. I dont care that theyre jews. The planet cant take this. I dont care who it is or what color. China did what it had to do and I lauded them. Israel SHOULD have enough reasonable, educated people to do something about its impending problems. The issue is, I dont know that places like Nigeria and India and Inonesia are going to handle their business. If they dont it is in the GLOBAL INTEREST to do something about it. Period. And anyone who claims to be support "climate change initiatives" should agree. Anyone who purports to support wildlife and natural ecosystems and natural resources should agree.

Anyone who is a cuck thats afraid to take a stance on issues involving large numbers of poor people and/or minorities bc theyre afraid to lose their inclusion in the liberal support lounge, will surely dosagree.

[NumberSix]

Well listen, I wasnt there so I cant tell you how Germany should have handled its "jewish problem." But quite honestly if they felt they had one, they had every right to at least discuss it openly.
German Jews were native Germans. It's their homeland too. It's not like they were a bunch of illegals or something. I can't imagine anybody actually think its legitimate to oppress native Germans in Germany just because they're Jewish. They're as German as anybody else.

[Akrazotile]

German Jews were native Germans. It's their homeland too. It's not like they were a bunch of illegals or something. I can't imagine anybody actually think its legitimate to oppress native Germans in Germany just because they're Jewish. They're as German as anybody else.


Yes but historically they were segregated (often by their own accord), had a different culture, different view on German society etc. IF they were drastically out-reproducing gentile Germans at the time (which I dont know the stats on) then of course other Germans would have every right to say "whats going on here?"

People have a right to lreserve their culture, that INCLUDES the dominant culture, not just minority cultures. Spike Lee speaks out against white gentrification. Marion Barry speaks out against Chinese owned businesses in black neighborhoods. Nobody makes a huge fuss. Why should a white person wanting to preserve white, european culture where he lives get any more backlash than those guys? ABC shows Spike's grinning midget mug every time the knicks have a national tv home game. A proud, overt racist, Spike Lee. Why do we let them treat someone like Mel Gibson or Cosmo Kramer any different? We shouldnt. If we do, its called CUCKING.

[DonDadda59]

German Jews were native Germans. It's their homeland too. It's not like they were a bunch of illegals or something. I can't imagine anybody actually think its legitimate to oppress native Germans in Germany just because they're Jewish. They're as German as anybody else.

Technically the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 stripped Jews of German citizenship. The Nazis were only dealing with a foreign threat within their borders. Patriots they were. :applause:

[StephHamann]

Too many american ISH virgins, start making babys instead of stanning Lebron James.

[StephHamann]

Well listen, I wasnt there so I cant tell you how Germany should have handled its "jewish problem." But quite honestly if they felt they had one, they had every right to at least discuss it openly. Maybe they should have pioneered the creation of a jewish state, and created incentive for citizens to move there, which would have been more in keeping with their professed christian values than genocide. But the other thing is Hitler singled out jews specifically because of disdain (backed by agenda-driven "science") and not bc he was worried about an overall German population problem.


They actually did that, but they chose genocide over that idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan

The Madagascar Plan was a proposal of the Nazi government of Germany to relocate the Jewish population of Europe to the island of Madagascar.

[Akrazotile]

Technically the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 stripped Jews of German citizenship. The Nazis were only dealing with a foreign threat within their borders. Patriots they were. :applause:


The way they handled their concerns was obviously horrendous. And many of their concerns were based on fabrications and/or cultural misunderstandings. However if they had concerns about cultural preservation they had every right to discuss it openly. Political correctness IS FOR CUCKS. Theres a reason its called "political" correctness. Because politicians want to appease as many people as possible for votes. Because business want as many customers as possible. Their focus is not borne of social concern. Theyre trying to position themselves as the "kings of tolerance" because it helps THEM INDIVIDUALLY.

The idiot PC sheep that go along for the ride only do so out of a need to fit in and to matter, to be on the same side those polticians and businesses have conditioned everyone to believe is the side of "good."


You constant bringing up nazis is just an emotional ploy youve been trained to rely on to beat back any unwelcomed use of logic. I wish youd look at social issues with the same practical eye you use for religion. We can never get a serious take on important issues out of you unless a tryavron martin is killed once in a blue moon. Wish youd show that much concern over meaningful stuff.

[Akrazotile]

They actually did that, but they chose genocide over that idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan

The Madagascar Plan was a proposal of the Nazi government of Germany to relocate the Jewish population of Europe to the island of Madagascar.


:lol

A funny, but terrible idea. Too much unique natural wildlife on Madagascar. Or at least - there used to be :(

Should have just supported the Israeli state from the beginning. Never would have had to do all that damage to their reputation.

[tomtucker]

[B]pretty sure ebola and aids were God

[JEFFERSON MONEY]

[QUOTE=tomtucker][B]pretty sure ebola and aids were God

[tomSR.]

well , overpupolation is ruining the earth......and it

[MMM]

the 3rd world is overpopulated but the 1st world is the drain on resources. Slowing down the rate of consumption seems relatively more realistic than population controls.