PDA

View Full Version : White woman has sex with a bbc while man is unconscious in the middle of the street



You Cant Ban Me
09-12-2015, 04:29 PM
http://cdn-r2.unilad.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/UNILAD-1612.jpg

https://youtu.be/txXDTIygiZk

Message to all the bbc boyz out there
make sure not to fall unconscious around any white man/woman because you never know what they will do :facepalm

9erempiree
09-12-2015, 04:31 PM
Not going to lie. That was funny and the reporters having to report this shit.:lol

senelcoolidge
09-12-2015, 04:31 PM
Wait why are these things popping up everywhere all of sudden. A few days ago I saw one from Singapore of people doing the same thing in the corridor of an apartment. This one and another.

Jameerthefear
09-12-2015, 04:38 PM
Switch genders and the headline is women raped while unconscious.

9erempiree
09-12-2015, 04:39 PM
Also the bitch is some nasty skanky broad.

ISHGoat
09-12-2015, 04:42 PM
Also the bitch is some nasty skanky broad.


Well why do you think she is with a black man? You think white, asians, or even hispanics want a ho like that?

You Cant Ban Me
09-12-2015, 04:43 PM
a bbc is like crack to these white whores

branslowski
09-12-2015, 05:57 PM
Why couldn't the thread title be " Woman has sex with unconscious boyfriend in the parking lot"?...Because thats what actually happened..:coleman:

Bless Mathews
09-12-2015, 07:41 PM
a bbc is like crack to these white whores

No doubt.

If i had a dollar for every while woman I cracked, I could buy a couple pair of j's

KevinNYC
09-12-2015, 07:54 PM
Why couldn't the thread title be " Woman has sex with unconscious boyfriend in the parking lot"?...Because thats what actually happened..:coleman:

Also it was consensual and he was awake when it started and then passed out.

Jameerthefear
09-12-2015, 07:59 PM
Also it was consensual and he was awake when it started and then passed out.
Oh so that's how it works?

poido123
09-13-2015, 06:41 AM
Roadside service anyone?

:lol

Hawker
09-13-2015, 06:43 AM
Oh so that's how it works?

Good luck having sex with a limp dick.

MMM
09-13-2015, 11:45 AM
Also it was consensual and he was awake when it started and then passed out.

How can it be consensual if one partner is unconscious?

Consent needs t be given throughout the act and if he felt she took advantage while he was unable to give consent then it is rape. In this situation he consented after the fact which I don't have an I with but the sentiment that it started consensual is dangerous

ArbitraryWater
09-13-2015, 11:46 AM
already posted these important news

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?p=11704895

outbreak
09-13-2015, 03:29 PM
Why does it matter if he works at the BBC?

KevinNYC
09-13-2015, 04:33 PM
but the sentiment that it started consensual is dangerous

He says was awake and consented at the beginning. They started. He fell asleep.

outbreak
09-13-2015, 04:41 PM
Also are the media able to release photos of someone being raped now?

Jameerthefear
09-13-2015, 04:47 PM
He says was awake and consented at the beginning. They started. He fell asleep.
:roll:

Jameerthefear
09-13-2015, 04:49 PM
Here's KevinNYC's opinion on consent when genders are reversed:

It's not sketchy.

It's not new.

It's a legal principle that has been around for a while. What you are talking about is retracting consent which is a different thing.

But the principle is straightforward. Let's say you pass out at a party. A man came in and undressed you and went down on you. He can't claim it was consensual because "you didn't say no." It was nonconsensual, thus a crime because you were in no condition to give your consent because you weren't conscious. There's absolutely nothing sketchy about this.

It's similar to a claim of self-defense when someone is killed. There's nothing sketchy about defending yourself if your life is in danger, but for individual cases the prosecutor has to decide if that standard has been met. If the prosecutor thinks it was self-defense they won't bring a case, but if the standard hasn't been met they can prosecute for manslaughter and during the trial the jury will decide whether the standard of self-defense has been met.
http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8355083&postcount=140

Jameerthefear
09-13-2015, 04:54 PM
KevinNYC = cuck
Jam = cuck

cuckers
I'm NOT a cuck jayda...

Jameerthefear
09-13-2015, 04:59 PM
I don't speak canadian

KevinNYC
09-13-2015, 08:18 PM
Here's KevinNYC's opinion on consent when genders are reversed:
But the principle is straightforward. Let's say you pass out at a party. A man came in and undressed you and went down on you. He can't claim it was consensual because "you didn't say no." It was nonconsensual, thus a crime because you were in no condition to give your consent because you weren't conscious. There's absolutely nothing sketchy about this.
http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8355083&postcount=140yeah, these two situations are completely similiar.

Scenario I laid out was

1. 'You' are passed out at a party (I was speaking to a man)
2 A man comes in, undesses you and goes down on you. (Note, I didn't say lover or boyfriend just a man.)

So this is a scenario of a man you're not involved with going down on you when you passed out.

The scenario is this news story is

1. A man and a woman in a relationship are shitface drunk. Decide to have drunken, public and consensual* sex.
2. They start having sex.
3. The man passes out
4. Woman continues sex
5. Cops come and arrest her.

Note, that boyfriend does say it was consensual ....I consented to that, I just didn't finish the job as you could say

So this is a scenario man and a woman in a relationship having consensual sex and one of them falls asleep.

These are in no way parallel.

Jameerthefear
09-13-2015, 08:38 PM
yeah, these two situations are completely similiar.

Scenario I laid out was

1. 'You' are passed out at a party (I was speaking to a man)
2 A man comes in, undesses you and goes down on you. (Note, I didn't say lover or boyfriend just a man.)

So this is a scenario of a man you're not involved with going down on you when you passed out.

The scenario is this news story is

1. A man and a woman in a relationship are shitface drunk. Decide to have drunken, public and consensual* sex.
2. They start having sex.
3. The man passes out
4. Woman continues sex
5. Cops come and arrest her.

Note, that boyfriend does say it was consensual ....I consented to that, I just didn't finish the job as you could say

So this is a scenario man and a woman in a relationship having consensual sex and one of them falls asleep.

These are in no way parallel.
Don't try to flip jack shit. Your EXACT WORDS: "It was nonconsensual, thus a crime because you were in no condition to give your consent because you weren't conscious. There's absolutely nothing sketchy about this."