View Full Version : if kobes 93rd-163rd.. where do these guys rank
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 03:01 AM
Damien Lillard = 21ppg/6apg on 43%
Dermar Derozan = 20ppg/3apg on 41%
Victor Oladipo = 18ppg/4apg on 43%
kyle Lowry = 18ppg/6apg on 41%
Brandon Knight = 17ppg/5apg on 42%
Isaiah Thomas = 16ppg/4apg on 42%
kevin love = 16ppg/2apg on 43%
mike conley = 16ppg/5apg on 44%
kobe bryant = 20-23ppg/5-6apg on 41-42% (Projected*)
i mean.. seriously.. kobe isnt all that bad.
http://theshoegame.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/kobe-bryant-best-sneaker-moments-happy-36th-birthday.jpg
Fallen Angel
10-10-2015, 03:05 AM
https://i.gyazo.com/6c18437f25496ed7640fddcc64223f52.png
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 03:06 AM
The Lakers are 14 points per 100 possessions better with Kobe off the court this season than they are with Kobe on the court. Among all players with at least 1,000 minutes this season, only Kobe's teammate Jordan Hill has had a more negative effect on his team's production than Bryant himself.
Kobe ranks among the worst players in the league this season in a number of categories:
• 124th in field goal percentage (third-worst among qualified players)
• 103rd in 3-point percentage (fifth-worst)
• 74th in player efficiency rating
• 361st in win shares
Kobe's 0.1 win shares are the fewest of the 73 players to play at least 1,200 minutes this season[
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 03:13 AM
https://i.gyazo.com/6c18437f25496ed7640fddcc64223f52.png
the low fg% is what separated kobe last year
if he just rises it up to 41-42% hes basically damien lillard.. a top 15 player in the league
f*cking hilarious
:lol
i love analytics
:rolleyes:
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 03:14 AM
The Lakers are 14 points per 100 possessions better with Kobe off the court this season than they are with Kobe on the court. Among all players with at least 1,000 minutes this season, only Kobe's teammate Jordan Hill has had a more negative effect on his team's production than Bryant himself.
Kobe ranks among the worst players in the league this season in a number of categories:
• 124th in field goal percentage (third-worst among qualified players)
• 103rd in 3-point percentage (fifth-worst)
• 74th in player efficiency rating
• 361st in win shares
Kobe's 0.1 win shares are the fewest of the 73 players to play at least 1,200 minutes this season[
kobe sucked last year
he played most of it rehabbing his leg and playing with a torn shoulder. and still hadnt fully overcome the achilles
we'l see if he sucks again. but i doubt it
its real easy to kick a guy when hes down
Fallen Angel
10-10-2015, 03:15 AM
https://i.gyazo.com/0aabd914c01462a7369061e5369c15ce.png
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 03:16 AM
https://i.gyazo.com/0aabd914c01462a7369061e5369c15ce.png
i also expect kobe to be much better than last year
:confusedshrug:
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 03:18 AM
if kobe shoots over 41% with around 20ppg and 4-5apg
hes doing a great job. period
otherwise all those other guys suck donkey d*ck
buddha
10-10-2015, 03:20 AM
https://i.gyazo.com/6c18437f25496ed7640fddcc64223f52.png
lol @ espn projections all they do is subtract two points for older players and add two points for younger players. true story.
catch24
10-10-2015, 03:20 AM
Most of those guys bring a lot more to the table than JUST scoring.
Kobe will be better than projected, but your reasoning is irrational...
Mr. Jabbar
10-10-2015, 03:21 AM
We're giving ESPN too much credit here. This ranking, like everything they've done, holds zero credibility.
Fallen Angel
10-10-2015, 03:25 AM
Pretty hard to find a comparable player to Kobe.
He's inefficient.
He's a negative defender.
He's turnover prone.
He can easily turn into a black hole on offense.
Kobe Bryant could be comparable to Derrick Rose. Congratulations.
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 03:31 AM
Pretty hard to find a comparable player to Kobe.
He's inefficient.
He's a negative defender.
He's turnover prone.
He can easily turn into a black hole on offense.
Kobe Bryant could be comparable to Derrick Rose. Congratulations.
a) kobe can and will be just as efficient as any of those other guys mentioned
b) kobes defense isnt elite anymore. but its not like anyones dropping more than 8-10 ppg on him nightly
c) kobe averaged 3 turnovers for his 6apg last year .. big deal
d) kobe only hogs when he has sh*t teammates. i feel this year will be a different story
outbreak
10-10-2015, 03:37 AM
Damien Lillard = 21ppg/6apg on 43%
Dermar Derozan = 20ppg/3apg on 41%
Victor Oladipo = 18ppg/4apg on 43%
kyle Lowry = 18ppg/6apg on 41%
Brandon Knight = 17ppg/5apg on 42%
Isaiah Thomas = 16ppg/4apg on 42%
kevin love = 16ppg/2apg on 43%
mike conley = 16ppg/5apg on 44%
kobe bryant = 20-23ppg/5-6apg on 41-42% (Projected*)
i mean.. seriously.. kobe isnt all that bad.
http://theshoegame.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/kobe-bryant-best-sneaker-moments-happy-36th-birthday.jpg
https://38.media.tumblr.com/507be937bd33343f39b0f40ecb24e11d/tumblr_nvwi1rK9bR1s02vreo1_250.gif
Oladipo is predicted to score 38ppg 16apg on 68% espn are crazy for not having him number one
Tking714
10-10-2015, 04:10 AM
Marcus smart was ranked 85th? Tyreke Evans 87th?
Someone needs to convince me that these two players are better than ANY version of Kobe we're gonna see.
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 04:20 AM
Marcus smart was ranked 85th? Tyreke Evans 87th?
Someone needs to convince me that these two players are better than ANY version of Kobe we're gonna see.
marcus smart 2014-15 = 7.8ppg, 3.3rpg, 3.1apg, 36.7fg%
ESPN says this is better than kobe bryant?
:lol
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 04:48 AM
Marcus smart was ranked 85th? Tyreke Evans 87th?
Someone needs to convince me that these two players are better than ANY version of Kobe we're gonna see.
They don't hurt their team when they are on the court. Not to mention that it's a projection. Smart will only get better, since he's a 21 y/o sophomore, while Kobe is old as dirt and will only decline worse.
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 04:51 AM
marcus smart 2014-15 = 7.8ppg, 3.3rpg, 3.1apg, 36.7fg%
ESPN says this is better than kobe bryant?
:lol
Kobe:
OffRtg: 100.4
DefRtg: 112.6
NetRtg: -12.2
Smart:
OffRtg: 103.7
DefRtg: 101.3
NetRtg: 2.5
Yep, that is definitely better than Kobe Bryant.
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 04:53 AM
Marcus Smart > Kobe Bryant
IT's official
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 05:00 AM
The Lakers are better when Kobe doesn't play. What happens if he actually doesn't play you're asking? They blow out the future champs: http://espn.go.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400578718
What happens if he does play? They lose by 21, with Kobe taking more than 33% of the teams shots, missing more than half of them, being a -33 in his time on the court. http://www.basketball-reference.com/boxscores/201411160LAL.html
:applause:
Tking714
10-10-2015, 05:11 AM
They don't hurt their team when they are on the court. Not to mention that it's a projection. Smart will only get better, since he's a 21 y/o sophomore, while Kobe is old as dirt and will only decline worse.
Are u seriously justifying 7ppg by saying he doesn't "hurt" his team?
He doesn't help either. U throw Kobe on the celtics and they score 15- 20 more ppg easy.
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 05:13 AM
Are u seriously justifying 7ppg by saying he doesn't "hurt" his team?
He doesn't help either. U throw Kobe on the celtics and they score 15- 20 more ppg easy.
And they allow more than 30 too. Job well done. In DRPM, Kobe is ranked 451st, out of 474.
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:16 AM
Kobe:
OffRtg: 100.4
DefRtg: 112.6
NetRtg: -12.2
Smart:
OffRtg: 103.7
DefRtg: 101.3
NetRtg: 2.5
Yep, that is definitely better than Kobe Bryant.
this is why analytics are going nowhere fast
:roll:
Tking714
10-10-2015, 05:18 AM
And they allow more than 30 too. Job well done. In DRPM, Kobe is ranked 451st, out of 474.
DRPM depends on the lineup that's out on the floor with that player as well. kobe was out there with boozer and sacre when he played. Nearly useless stat/heavily flawed stat.
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:19 AM
based on analytics ... the water/towel boy is a better baskeball player than lebron james during nights he doesnt shoot well
because 0/0/0 on 0fgas is less of a negative impact
:oldlol:
i'm officially a better finals player than lebron in 2015
he shot 37%
i didnt take a shot... i deserve fmvp votes damnit
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 05:22 AM
based on analytics ... the water/towel boy is a better baskeball player than lebron james during nights he doesnt shoot well
because 0/0/0 on 0fgas is less of a negative impact
:oldlol:
i'm officially a better finals player than lebron in 2015
he shot 37%
i didnt take a shot... i deserve fmvp votes damnit
Meltdown
Tking714
10-10-2015, 05:23 AM
based on analytics ... the water/towel boy is a better baskeball player than lebron james during nights he doesnt shoot well
because 0/0/0 on 0fgas is less of a negative impact
:oldlol:
i'm officially a better finals player than lebron in 2015
he shot 37%
i didnt take a shot... i deserve fmvp votes damnit
Prime Fisher >> Prime kobe because he didn't mess up the flow of the game
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:23 AM
Meltdown
technically by ESPN ranking standards
i deserve a higher finals ranking than lebron james
i hurt the cavs less than lebron did
:lol
i am currently a better player.
ANALYTICS
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 05:24 AM
DRPM depends on the lineup that's out on the floor with that player as well. kobe was out there with boozer and sacre when he played. Nearly useless stat/heavily flawed stat.
Sacre actually was a positive when on the court, whereas Kobe was a 3.06 negative. Sacre also had a DefRtg of 102.2.
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 05:24 AM
technically by ESPN ranking standards
i deserve a higher finals ranking than lebron james
i hurt the cavs less than lebron did
:lol
Cavs won 2 thanks to Lebron.
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:25 AM
Prime Fisher >> Prime kobe because he didn't mess up the flow of the game
damn i never thought of it this way
adam morrison might have been the lakers real finals mvp in 2010
he didnt miss a single shot
ANALYTICS!
:applause:
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:27 AM
Cavs won 2 thanks to Lebron.
more like .... thanks to me
if it wasnt for me not missing a single shot.. who knows where lebrons sh*t percentages would have taken that team
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 05:29 AM
Meltdown. :roll:
Tking714
10-10-2015, 05:29 AM
Sacre actually was a positive when on the court, whereas Kobe was a 3.06 negative. Sacre also had a DefRtg of 102.2.
no he wasn't. going by your analytics argument Sacre had an rpm of -1.02
are you cherrypicking your analytics? :no:
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 05:29 AM
no he wasn't. going by your analytics argument Sacre had an rpm of -1.47
are you cherrypicking your analytics? :no:
RPM =/= DRPM
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:30 AM
espn.com
where a player with 0.1ppg on 100% shooting for the season is better than 23/5/6 on 39% because of net negative impact formula
mike penburthy = GOAT?
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:33 AM
RPM =/= DRPM
RPM =/3 over DPER USAGE win share advanced 2 for 6 +/- RAW is WAR net negative ( T to the power of 5 ) means... sasha vujacic is the greatest center of all time
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:37 AM
http://blogwillhunting.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/gwh_mirror.jpg
yes..... ok ..... mhmmm
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fM0L9abY3bo/SKnNMZlNoWI/AAAAAAAAAEA/wpQcNY6zDAU/s320/nochalk.jpg
almost got it.... just a few more calculations
http://www.papodecinema.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/20140718-genio-indomavel-papo-de-cinema-06.jpg
i just proved marcus smart is better than kobe bryant
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 05:37 AM
Kobe's already a huge, inmense black hole on defense + inefficient scorer (even more) + ball stopper + attempts ridiculously bad shots.
BTW, a player with 10ppg on .40 FG% can help a team a LOT more than Kobe is right now thanks to defense and intangibles. Would anyone take Kobe over Draymond Green?
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 05:41 AM
Kobe's already a huge, inmense black hole on defense + inefficient scorer (even more) + ball stopper + attempts ridiculously bad shots.
BTW, a player with 10ppg on .40 FG% can help a team a LOT more than Kobe is right now thanks to defense and intangibles. Would anyone take Kobe over Draymond Green?
I would definitely take Kobe over Draymond Green. Who wouldn't want 19ppg on 35% shooting while being a complete no show on the defensive end.
How great is our God?
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:42 AM
Kobe's already a huge, inmense black hole on defense + inefficient scorer (even more) + ball stopper + attempts ridiculously bad shots.
BTW, a player with 10ppg on .40 FG% can help a team a LOT more than Kobe is right now thanks to defense and intangibles. Would anyone take Kobe over Draymond Green?
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/60/e9/af/60e9af91c0d87207e58bb3bb5fac6b51.jpg
bunch of f*cking matt damons in here
writing out math equations to cope with their rough childhood
https://1john417.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/robin-williams.jpg
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dfXpRn8uFL8/hqdefault.jpg
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 05:44 AM
I would definitely take Kobe over Draymond Green. Who wouldn't want 19ppg on 35% shooting while being a complete no show on the defensive end.
How great is our God?
:bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:
Every time our gawd makes a basket:
https://media.giphy.com/media/mA10sco0hGFaM/giphy.gif
Amazonas keeps shrinking for a reason
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:45 AM
I would definitely take Kobe over Draymond Green. Who wouldn't want 19ppg on 35% shooting while being a complete no show on the defensive end.
How great is our God?
https://coubsecure-a.akamaihd.net/get/bucket:32.11/p/coub/simple/cw_timeline_pic/c1ec46b8b9d/43d216b1a3b8b731c598d/big_1407945022_image.jpg
poor little equation kids
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 05:45 AM
The meltdown is real :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
KENNETH, KOBE OR DRAYMOND GREEN, WHO DO OYU TAKE?
Uncle Drew
10-10-2015, 05:46 AM
:roll:
Poor, poor Kenneth.
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:47 AM
:bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:
Every time our gawd makes a basket:
https://media.giphy.com/media/mA10sco0hGFaM/giphy.gif
Amazonas keeps shrinking for a reason
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/t7ahvOQJqCU/maxresdefault.jpg
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:49 AM
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/01/31/article-1352263-0CFB6C8A000005DC-740_468x603.jpg
anythings possible
if goodPER hunting can shake kobes hand. so can even the harshest stat geek
Tking714
10-10-2015, 05:50 AM
Dude. Kenneth. We were doing Ok with our argument until you freaked out :lol
outbreak
10-10-2015, 05:52 AM
Bargnani contributes more wins than kobe
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:54 AM
http://www.okmoviequotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Good-Will-Hunting-quotes-5.gif
http://www.twelvebytwelve.net/gwh-images/gwh-01651-detail.jpg
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:55 AM
Bargnani contributes more wins than kobe
less is more
= analytics
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 05:59 AM
http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/usa/images-2/matt-damon-good-will-hunting.jpg
mhmm.. yup almost got it
now... just calculating per...
1. Michael Jordan* 28.60
2. George Mikan* 28.51
3. LeBron James 27.43
4. Shaquille O'Neal 26.13
5. Hakeem Olajuwon* 25.69
6. Chris Paul 25.16
7. Tim Duncan 24.58
8. Kevin Durant 24.35
9. Charles Barkley* 24.18
10. Dirk Nowitzki 23.98
11. Tracy McGrady 23.40
12. Dolph Schayes* 23.29
13. Dwight Howard 23.13
14. Jerry West* 23.06
15. David Robinson* 23.02
16. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar* 23.01
17. Magic Johnson* 22.95
18. Russell Westbrook 22.75
19. Wilt Chamberlain* 22.75
20. Dwyane Wade 22.70
21. Bob Pettit* 22.59
22. Kobe Bryant 22.40
23. Stephen Curry 22.24
24. Amar'e Stoudemire 22.08
25. Julius Erving* 22.05
26. Blake Griffin 22.01
27. Elgin Baylor* 21.83
28. Rick Barry* 21.81
29. Moses Malone* 21.57
30. Larry Bird* 21.41
31. Baron Davis 21.36
32. Allen Iverson 21.24
33. George Gervin* 21.16
34. Karl Malone* 21.12
35. Kevin Garnett 21.12
36. Oscar Robertson* 20.99
37. James Harden 20.98
38. Bob Lanier* 20.81
39. Pau Gasol 20.73
40. George Yardley* 20.72
41. Cliff Hagan* 20.62
42. Shawn Kemp 20.55
43. Gus Williams 20.37
44. Artis Gilmore* 20.36
45. Paul Arizin* 20.33
46. Dan Issel* 20.07
47. Carmelo Anthony 19.94
48. Alex English* 19.92
49. Walter Davis 19.91
50. John Stockton* 19.84
51. Walt Frazier* 19.84
52. Steve Nash 19.84
53. Isiah Thomas* 19.80
54. Manu Ginobili 19.79
55. Anfernee Hardaway 19.76
56. George McGinnis 19.73
57. Clyde Lovellette* 19.72
58. Clyde Drexler* 19.71
59. Patrick Ewing* 19.63
60. Reggie Miller* 19.55
61. Bill Russell* 19.40
http://ounodesign.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Damoncu-500x279.png
dear god... i just proved bill russell isn't a top 50 player all time
outbreak
10-10-2015, 06:25 AM
How do you measure russells per when blocks steals and offensive rebounds weren't counted in his era?
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 07:05 AM
kenneth http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/degrassi/images/a/a0/Calm_down.gif
We love you. You need tro lower that blood pressure. Shhhh, calm down, everything is fine now.
lil jahlil
10-10-2015, 07:08 AM
In short: Above Kobe.
Dr Hawk
10-10-2015, 08:05 AM
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/01/31/article-1352263-0CFB6C8A000005DC-740_468x603.jpg
anythings possible
if goodPER hunting can shake kobes hand. so can even the harshest stat geek
The basketball looks huge on Kobe's little hands.
ISHGoat
10-10-2015, 09:12 AM
lmao kenneth melting down
Marcus Smart this season > Kobe this season
dubeta
10-10-2015, 09:40 AM
Honestly, if anyone of us somehow made the league, we'd have a higher PER/Winshares than Kobe
KG215
10-10-2015, 12:01 PM
this is why analytics are going nowhere fast
:roll:
Because they don't fit your biased agenda?
Makes sense.
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 12:24 PM
Because they don't fit your biased agenda?
Makes sense.
you act like analytics aren't biased towards guys who are invisible... just as long as they don't "get in the way"
and averaging 1/1/1/1/1 on 44% is better than averaging 20/0/0/0/0 on 42%
yup... dj mbenga is really a top 10 player all time
catch24
10-10-2015, 12:38 PM
you act like analytics aren't biased towards guys who are invisible... just as long as they don't "get in the way"
and averaging 1/1/1/1/1 on 44% is better than averaging 20/0/0/0/0 on 42%
yup... dj mbenga is really a top 10 player all time
Could you give a hypothetical that isn't over-saturated with agenda?
Also, when did raw individual numbers become analytics?
kennethgriffin
10-10-2015, 12:41 PM
Based on analytics... lebron played excellent in the 2011 nba finals
Hate to break it to people... but stats lie
People who protect their efficiency sometimes hurt their teams more than they help
catch24
10-10-2015, 12:46 PM
Based on analytics... lebron played excellent in the 2011 nba finals
Hate to break it to people... but stats lie
People who protect their efficiency sometimes hurt their teams more than they help
Which analytics suggest he played well?
:biggums:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.