Women in their 20s earn more than men of same age, study finds

[Nick Young]

77 cents for every dollar a man earns doe, amirite?:confusedshrug:

http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/aug/29/women-in-20s-earn-more-men-same-age-study-finds


The funniest thing is, the article still finds a way to spin things that women are still oppressed in the work force, and in fact need even higher salaries than what they currently have.

[Patrick Chewing]

Goddamnit, OP. You chauvinist pig. Women should be making double!

[niko]

So they earn more early on for like a year or two and then for the remainder of their lives earn less. In England. OMG. You've totally disproven that men and women earn differently. :bowdown:

I wish i was a woman because that 2 years they get more totally outweighs the next 38 years of the career.

There's a discrepency. I don't think it's fair to look at it because the fact of the matter is there are more men in bigger positions (so they earn more) and women leave to have kids so any gap hurts earning, etc. But what you did, the "i found something that supports my opinion if you only read the first 2 sentences" is pretty lame.

[Hit_Em]

Yet they want jameer to pay on dates smh

[Nick Young]

So they earn more early on for like a year or two and then for the remainder of their lives earn less. In England. OMG. You've totally disproven that men and women earn differently. :bowdown:


No. I didn't disprove that. Feminist writer Christina Hoff Summers did.
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html) The wage gap has proven to be a myth for a long time, by several different studies. Even Time Magazine wrote an article about it. (http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/)

Just because Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama talk about the wage gap myth and incorrectly cite statistics to get votes, it doesn't make it true.



I wish i was a woman because that 2 years they get more totally outweighs the next 38 years of the career.

There's a discrepency. I don't think it's fair to look at it because the fact of the matter is there are more men in bigger positions (so they earn more) and women leave to have kids so any gap hurts earning, etc. But what you did, the "i found something that supports my opinion if you only read the first 2 sentences" is pretty lame.

Women choose to have children and stay at home. No one is forcing them to do this. Nothing is stopping women from reaching the highest positions. Your argument is once again based entirely on emotion and logical fallacies, and ignores logic and statistics.

Basically, you are making excuses for women earning more than men, and then demanding that women earn even more than they already do. Why? Because of the genitals they were born with?

[ThePhantomCreep]

Yet they want jameer to pay on dates smh

What they really want is for jameer to stop spraying their dorm rooms with pig's blood.

[NumberSix]

There's also a pay gap between part time workers and full time workers. Clearly, there is some sort of anti-part-time-worker bias going on here.

[NumberSix]

Women choose to have children and stay at home. No one is forcing them to do this. Nothing is stopping women from reaching the highest positions. Your argument is once again based entirely on emotion and logical fallacies, and ignores logic and statistics.

Basically, you are making excuses for women earning more than men, and then demanding that women earn even more than they already do. Why? Because of the genitals they were born with?
Don't you understand? The only way to be fair is to pay women the same money for doing less work.

[Goro]

:applause:

[sd3035]

Women's success is largely based on their looks, after the 20s end, their looks decline faster than Wilt in the Finals

[Nick Young]

Women's success is largely based on their looks, after the 20s end, their looks decline faster than Wilt in the Finals
Also, many voluntarily choose to get married before 30, and then quit their job to stay at home.

[knickballer]

Wage gap is a myth at this point. Yes, Men earn more than women on the dollar but what that's not taking in consideration is that men usually pursue more challenging and difficult careers. That's why most of the Math, Science, Engineering, Accounting, etc, majors are predominately male and these fields are higher paying. I think 77% of Liberal Arts degrees are pursued by women and those degrees aren't going to be as lucrative as the engineering one...

Do people really think a company will pay a female less for the same position and credentials as their male counterpart? You know there's laws in place to prevent that...

[Akrazotile]

So they earn more early on for like a year or two and then for the remainder of their lives earn less. In England. OMG. You've totally disproven that men and women earn differently. :bowdown:

I wish i was a woman because that 2 years they get more totally outweighs the next 38 years of the career.

There's a discrepency. I don't think it's fair to look at it because the fact of the matter is there are more men in bigger positions (so they earn more) and women leave to have kids so any gap hurts earning, etc. But what you did, the "i found something that supports my opinion if you only read the first 2 sentences" is pretty lame.


We've been aware for some time now.

[Euroleague]

Of course chicks earn more in their 20s..........it's called prostitution.

WTF kind of idiots had to do a study to figure that out?

https://media3.giphy.com/media/Hhm8HArpOEPvO/200.gif

[TonyMontana]

Yep. but we wont hear this.

The only reason for the statistics of "men making more" is because of older guys 50+, and MAYBe 40s. These guys are bigshots who skew the stats. The majority of modern men have little hope of reaching the same salary as their father. These guys lived and grew up in a time where man was able to take care of a family on his own.

The point is, life is easier for a woman. ESPECIALLY if your young, and not fat. Looking good alone opens so many doors as a woman. Personality, skills? If you look good the unfortunate truth is people will hire you for that alone, which is sad.

If your a guy, you have to bank more on connections, or having money. Men are seen as expendable by society, and noone enjoys being around random men. Not women, or other men. Both sexes seem to prefer the company of women.

[bigkingsfan]

Waitresses and strippers put them over.

[niko]

I didn't say the wage gap was real. I said it's sad you googled for 2 minutes and posted a study that doesn't even prove what you said and you didn't even read. I stand by that.

[sundizz]

It is true though. But at the same it is like affirmative action. Women need this sort of help to convince them they are capable of this sort of lifestyle. Changing an embedded belief in hard. Even now, most women I've met (21-34 year olds) don't have that self belief of high level success. They still are not leaders etc. It has been changing a lot and will continue to change. However, MOST women still look to a man to lead. Whether that is pure biology, or whether it is a learned way of life, that is a different debate.

My only problem is that some women (like my sister) have that attitude/belief of success like a man, but they deal with the stress like a women (attack others/insecure etc).

From my experience in the workforce men understand that is a marathon and handle their emotions in a much calmer and easier to work with manner. Women, still are always trying to sprint and get on co-workers a lot about trivial non-important things. They nag lol. It is why I'm glad my field (finance) still is mostly men. Unless it is a field like education, it is super hard to deal with women in the workplace as managers, supervisors etc.

I say this too because it becomes so apparent how their confidence works when you see them in a non work setting. When we (as an office) go out to a group dinner etc the women become meek and etc. It always ends up being guys that do the ordering, figuring out how we are going to get there, etc. And if a women wants to do something we all just have to agree. No one feels comfortable arguing with her like they would another guy (because of the women's perceived weakness).

[NumberSix]

It is true though. But at the same it is like affirmative action. Women need this sort of help to convince them they are capable of this sort of lifestyle. Changing an embedded belief in hard. Even now, most women I've met (21-34 year olds) don't have that self belief of high level success. They still are not leaders etc. It has been changing a lot and will continue to change. However, MOST women still look to a man to lead. Whether that is pure biology, or whether it is a learned way of life, that is a different debate.
That's not just women, that's people in general. The vast majority of humans are just not leaders. It's most apparent when you tell people who bitch about workers not making as much as business owners that nothing is stopping them from starting their own business, they act like you just said something utterly ridiculous. They find the idea of themselves starting a business to be preposterous. It's like they couldn't possibly imagine themselves being successful.

[Pushxx]

Men are ****ed in this generation as a whole. Thankfully the best and smartest men will always shine.

The topic of gender in society is so toxic things are going deeper into the shitter, especially once the overly politically-correct "safe-spaces" atmosphere of universities culminates in tangible results in our society. It's not even about improving men as a whole. It's the entire country that suffers, and it distracts the country from addressing the major economic and political problems that hurts our country.

[Cactus-Sack]

Women who have never been married or had children actually continue to earn more into their mid thirties.

Expect this income gap to continue to widen. Women account for about two thirds of college graduates these days.

Of course men will never fall too far behind, because even the most brain dead doofus can earn 60k/year working on oil rigs, logging, fishing boats etc. As long as he has a GED and a good work ethic. What career options does a similarly qualified women have? Walmart? Waitressing? Welfare queening? The only good paying jobs for uneducated women require real hustle (prostitution) or good looks (stripping, hig class prostitution)

Funny how strong independent womyn constantly decry their lack of representation in STEM fields or comfy boardrooms, but are fine with the fact that 99% of fisherman/loggers/rig pigs are men...

[Cactus-Sack]

As they should since more women are in college more than men.

Though they still lack in the Finance and Technology department, which are probably the two biggest money-earning fields out there.
Because they suck at these things.


Side note: Any of y'all been on a plane with a female pilot? The second "*krrrr* This is your captain speaking" came over the speakers in a woman's voice you could feel everyone on the plane tense up. You could cut the anxiety with a knife.

[Nick Young]

I didn't say the wage gap was real. I said it's sad you googled for 2 minutes and posted a study that doesn't even prove what you said and you didn't even read. I stand by that.
LOL the study proves exactly what I said. The wage gap is a lie. Stop pretending like it's real breh.

[Nick Young]

It is true though. But at the same it is like affirmative action. Women need this sort of help to convince them they are capable of this sort of lifestyle. Changing an embedded belief in hard. Even now, most women I've met (21-34 year olds) don't have that self belief of high level success. They still are not leaders etc. It has been changing a lot and will continue to change. However, MOST women still look to a man to lead. Whether that is pure biology, or whether it is a learned way of life, that is a different debate.
It is how humans evolved to be, going back to cavemen times. People forget that evolution takes longer than 30 years to erase instincts that have taken tens of thousands of years to develop. There is a cognitive dissonance in that humanity hasn't evolved to live the way that modern feminist society wants us all to live. It is idiotic to ignore biology and evolution, when we believe in it for every other species on the planet.

[Nick Young]

Men are ****ed in this generation as a whole. Thankfully the best and smartest men will always shine.

The topic of gender in society is so toxic things are going deeper into the shitter, especially once the overly politically-correct "safe-spaces" atmosphere of universities culminates in tangible results in our society. It's not even about improving men as a whole. It's the entire country that suffers, and it distracts the country from addressing the major economic and political problems that hurts our country.
It won't. Don't worry. We still live in a dog eat dog world and it's survival of the fittest. These squishy stuffed animal marshmallow people will not survive and flourish once they get out of university. I have seen many of these types fail spectacularly with my own eyes. And every time I do, I smile on the inside and the outside.

[Heavincent]

That's not just women, that's people in general. The vast majority of humans are just not leaders. It's most apparent when you tell people who bitch about workers not making as much as business owners that nothing is stopping them from starting their own business, they act like you just said something utterly ridiculous. They find the idea of themselves starting a business to be preposterous. It's like they couldn't possibly imagine themselves being successful.

Entitlement. I remember a dude on here implying that he's just as important as the business owner. "I contributed, so it's my business too!" :oldlol:

[fiddy]

british study :coleman:

[LikeMike]

This will end when they have children in their 30s.

[Euroleague]

That's not just women, that's people in general. The vast majority of humans are just not leaders. It's most apparent when you tell people who bitch about workers not making as much as business owners that nothing is stopping them from starting their own business, they act like you just said something utterly ridiculous. They find the idea of themselves starting a business to be preposterous. It's like they couldn't possibly imagine themselves being successful.

Or maybe they find people comparing the top 1% to "anyone starting their own business", to be the absolute dumb ****s that they are.

You are right that anyone can start their own business. If you think anyone can be a member of the top 1% (which is what most business owners are - even small business owners are almost always in the top 1%), then you are a god damn retard.

That kind of reasoning is absurd. It's like people that think going to a an Ivy league school, or having a PHD is based on your grades, and your IQ level. Or that how much money you make is based on "how hard you work".

It's the same kind of incredibly epic dumb shit "logic".

[Euroleague]

Entitlement. I remember a dude on here implying that he's just as important as the business owner. "I contributed, so it's my business too!" :oldlol:

Only people with IQs below 70 (that would be you) believe in Ayn Rand bullshit. Since they are so stupid, they freely announce it to others and brag about it.

[sportsfan76]

There's also a pay gap between part time workers and full time workers. Clearly, there is some sort of anti-part-time-worker bias going on here.


Why apply for a part-time job if you don't have a full-time already?

[sportsfan76]

It is true though. But at the same it is like affirmative action. Women need this sort of help to convince them they are capable of this sort of lifestyle. Changing an embedded belief in hard. Even now, most women I've met (21-34 year olds) don't have that self belief of high level success. They still are not leaders etc. It has been changing a lot and will continue to change. However, MOST women still look to a man to lead. Whether that is pure biology, or whether it is a learned way of life, that is a different debate.

My only problem is that some women (like my sister) have that attitude/belief of success like a man, but they deal with the stress like a women (attack others/insecure etc).

From my experience in the workforce men understand that is a marathon and handle their emotions in a much calmer and easier to work with manner. Women, still are always trying to sprint and get on co-workers a lot about trivial non-important things. They nag lol. It is why I'm glad my field (finance) still is mostly men. Unless it is a field like education, it is super hard to deal with women in the workplace as managers, supervisors etc.

I say this too because it becomes so apparent how their confidence works when you see them in a non work setting. When we (as an office) go out to a group dinner etc the women become meek and etc. It always ends up being guys that do the ordering, figuring out how we are going to get there, etc. And if a women wants to do something we all just have to agree. No one feels comfortable arguing with her like they would another guy (because of the women's perceived weakness).


Is it because they are MOODY???

[NumberSix]

Or maybe they find people comparing the top 1% to "anyone starting their own business", to be the absolute dumb ****s that they are.

You are right that anyone can start their own business. If you think anyone can be a member of the top 1% (which is what most business owners are - even small business owners are almost always in the top 1%), then you are a god damn retard.

That kind of reasoning is absurd. It's like people that think going to a an Ivy league school, or having a PHD is based on your grades, and your IQ level. Or that how much money you make is based on "how hard you work".

It's the same kind of incredibly epic dumb shit "logic".
I don't think just anyone can't start a business and become part of the top 1%. We don't all have an equal amount of intelligence or talent. We don't all have equally good ideas.

Everybody has the same opportunity to become an NBA player. Whether you're rich, poor, black, white, whatever. I'm sure a woman could even make the NBA if she was good enough. You can try. If you're good enough, you'll make it. If you're just not good enough, no amount of trying will do it. The same goes for business. Bad products and bad ideas just aren't gonna make money.

[!@#$%Vectors!@#]

Of course chicks earn more in their 20s..........it's called prostitution.

WTF kind of idiots had to do a study to figure that out?

https://media3.giphy.com/media/Hhm8HArpOEPvO/200.gif


:lol :lol :bowdown: :bowdown: EuroGOd

SHould build a statue for you. This isn't Yugopotamia you euro dirtbag

http://nick.mtvnimages.com/nick/promos-thumbs/games/fop/yugopotamia-mania/yugopotamia-mania-promo-4x3.jpg?quality=0.51&maxdimension=600

[Pushxx]

It won't. Don't worry. We still live in a dog eat dog world and it's survival of the fittest. These squishy stuffed animal marshmallow people will not survive and flourish once they get out of university. I have seen many of these types fail spectacularly with my own eyes. And every time I do, I smile on the inside and the outside.

You're right to a degree: people won't fundamentally change internally.

Unfortunately that doesn't mean society won't change, especially when the federal government has been ****ing up so badly over the last 65 years.

For all intents and purposes, that liberal bullshit does impact us, and it will get worse before it gets better. Let's hope we don't have to bottom out first.

[Nick Young]

You're right to a degree: people won't fundamentally change internally.

Unfortunately that doesn't mean society won't change, especially when the federal government has been ****ing up so badly over the last 65 years.

For all intents and purposes, that liberal bullshit does impact us, and it will get worse before it gets better. Let's hope we don't have to bottom out first.
It is already on the getting better phase. The public, celebrities and even liberal media like Time are pushing back and speaking out and writing articles against hugbox pro-censorship anti-freedom of speech culture.

These patsies are not going to be influencing any legislature. They are a vocal minority of tumblrinas that thinks they have more power than they do.

The real world has no time for these scrubs.

[niko]

LOL the study proves exactly what I said. The wage gap is a lie. Stop pretending like it's real breh.
No, it says there's no gap in the first few years only and then there's a gap. Learn to ****ing read. There's probably 100 actual real studies that could prove your point but you picked the first one and didn't even read it.

You picked a study that shows a gap as your proof theirs no gap.

[Nick Young]

No, it says there's no gap in the first few years only and then there's a gap. Learn to ****ing read. There's probably 100 actual real studies that could prove your point but you picked the first one and didn't even read it.

You picked a study that shows a gap as your proof theirs no gap.

The ‘Wage Gap’ Myth That Won’t Die
You have to ignore many variables to think women are paid less than men. California is happy to try.

When it comes to economically foolish laws, California is second to none. A good example is the California Fair Pay Act, which Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to sign in coming days.

This bill, which the California senate unanimously passed in August, is a state version of the Paycheck Fairness Act that the U.S. Congress rejected in 2014. Like its national counterpart, it is an aggressive attempt to eradicate a wage gap between men and women that is allegedly due to discrimination in the workplace. But this wage gap is illusory, and the legislation will have unintended consequences, including for women.

The Fair Pay Act will prohibit employers from paying men and women different wages for “substantially similar work.” At first glance, this prohibition might appear reasonable: Government data for 2014 show that women in California earn, on average, 84 cents for every dollar earned by men. (Nationally, women earn about 79 cents for every dollar earned by men.)

But a closer look reveals a different picture. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) notes that its analysis of wages by gender does “not control for many factors that can be significant in explaining earnings differences.”

What factors? Start with hours worked. Full-time employment is technically defined as more than 35 hours. This raises an obvious problem: A simple side-by-side comparison of all men and all women includes people who work 35 hours a week, and others who work 45. Men are significantly more likely than women to work longer hours, according to the BLS. And if we compare only people who work 40 hours a week, BLS data show that women then earn on average 90 cents for every dollar earned by men.

Career choice is another factor. Research in 2013 by Anthony Carnevale, a Georgetown University economist, shows that women flock to college majors that lead to lower-paying careers. Of the 10 lowest-paying majors—such as “drama and theater arts” and “counseling psychology”—only one, “theology and religious vocations,” is majority male.

Conversely, of the 10 highest-paying majors—including “mathematics and computer science” and “petroleum engineering”—only one, “pharmacy sciences and administration,” is majority female. Eight of the remaining nine are more than 70% male.

Other factors that account for earnings differences include marriage and children, both of which cause many women to leave the workforce for years. June O’Neill, former director of the Congressional Budget Office, concluded in a 2005 study that “there is no gender gap in wages among men and women with similar family roles.” Time magazine reported in 2010 that in 98% of America’s largest 150 cities, including my hometown of Los Angeles, single women under 30 actually earned, on average, 8% more than their male counterparts.

Ms. O’Neill and her husband concluded in their 2012 book, “The Declining Importance of Race and Gender in the Labor Market,” that once all these factors are taken into account, very little of the pay differential between men and women is due to actual discrimination, which is “unlikely to account for a differential of more than 5 percent but may not be present at all.”

What California’s Fair Pay Act will do, however, is make the state, already notorious for regulation and red tape, a more difficult place to do business. Companies must now ensure that every penny of wage differential between the men and women they employ is attributable to bona-fide differences in education, training, experience, quantity or quality of work, and so on. Referring to the countless factors at play, Harvard economist Claudia Goldin has said “it’s not checkable.” Yet even attempting to do so will only add to companies’ already substantial regulatory-compliance budgets.

Some of these factors—quality of work, for instance—are inevitably subjective, yet trial lawyers will swoop in to turn every conceivable pay difference into a lawsuit. Employers who cannot “prove” objectively that one employee’s work was better than another’s may face costly penalties. Many will surely pay to settle these lawsuits instead of taking them to court.

All of this money would be better spent by businesses to hire more workers or raise wages, including for countless women. Ms. Goldin has even suggested that women’s employment could decline.

Such are the unintended consequences that may accompany this feel-good but ultimately foolish law. As Gov. Brown prepares to sign the California Fair Pay Act, he should ask himself a simple question: Does he really want to put women at an actual disadvantage while attempting to eliminate an imagined one?


http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-wage-gap-myth-that-wont-die-1443654408

:confusedshrug:



The Biggest Myth About the Gender Wage Gap

The real gap isn't between men and women doing the same job. It's between the different jobs that men and women take.

It might be the most famous statistic about female workers in the United States: Women earn "only 72 percent as much as their male counterparts."

It's also famously false.

A new survey from PayScale this morning finds that the wage gap nearly evaporates when you control for occupation and experience among the most common jobs, especially among less experienced workers. It is only as careers advance, they found, that men outpaced female earnings as they made their way toward the executive suite.

So, women aren't starting off behind their male counterparts, so much as they're choosing different jobs and losing ground later in their careers.

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/business/Screen%20Shot%202013-05-29%20at%203.32.18%20PM.png

The irony is that as women advance in their own careers, they might be more likely to fall behind, but they are also more likely to negotiate. That popular refrain that women don't know how to ask for a raise? That's bunk, too, the researchers concluded. Nearly a third of women -- and 29 percent of men -- have asked for raises, and even more female executives have done the same. In female-dominated sectors like health care and education more, half of women have negotiated for salary, benefits, or a promotion .

Still, inequalities persist. Comparing men and women job-by-job conceals the fact that men still dominate many of the highest-paying jobs. PayScale studied more than 120 occupation categories, from "machinist" to "dietician." Nine of the ten lowest-paying jobs (e.g.: child-care worker, library assistant) were disproportionately female. Nine of the ten highest-paying jobs (e.g.: software architect, psychiatrist) were majority male. Nurse anesthetist was the best-paid position held mostly by women; but an estimated 69 percent of better-paid anesthesiologists were male.

The highest-paid job in PayScale's controlled set is anesthesiologists, who are 69 percent male and 31 percent female -- creating a 38 percent percentage-point "jobs gap." Here is the jobs gap for the ten highest-paid positions.

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/business/Screen%20Shot%202013-05-29%20at%204.41.59%20PM.png

PayScale's study is a necessary chaser to BLS and Census data, because the government "compares all weekly earnings, even though women and men do different things," said PayScale chief economist Katie Bardaro. "We're trying to compare men and women with the same education, same management responsibilities, similar employers, in companies with a similar number of employees." After controlling for these factors, "the gender wage gap disappears for most positions," she said.

In one job, they had enough data to show a statistically significant wage advantage for female workers. That is "dental hygienist."

But even if the gender gap disappears after controlling for experience and job selection, it's hard to imagine that men thoroughly dominating the highest-paying positions is a good outcome. For example, the expectation that women more than men bear the responsibility to raise children gently nudges thousands of highly educated women out of full-time work.

There is a wage difference. But it might not be the wage difference that you thought. The real gap isn't between men and women doing the same job. The real gap is between men and women doing different jobs and following different careers.

That gap should continue to tighten. Women have earned the majority of bachelor's degrees for the last few years. They're well-positioned to benefit from a growing professional service economy, and working moms are already the primary breadwinners in 40 percent of households with kids, an all-time high. But if women are more likely to go into health care than manufacturing, more likely to work in human resources than software, and more likely to leave their careers early to start a family, the gaps will persist.

Ideally, some day soon, it won't take a statistical "control" to show that men and women are fundamental equal partners -- and equal competitors -- in the work force. It will just be the obvious truth.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/05/the-biggest-myth-about-the-gender-wage-gap/276367/

Are you saying that women shouldn't be allowed the right to choose their own degrees in university, choose their own career path, or choose when they want to leave their job to have a baby and take care of it? That sounds pretty patriarchal of you, bro.

[Duderonomy]

So they earn more early on for like a year or two and then for the remainder of their lives earn less. In England. OMG. You've totally disproven that men and women earn differently. :bowdown:

I wish i was a woman because that 2 years they get more totally outweighs the next 38 years of the career.

There's a discrepency. I don't think it's fair to look at it because the fact of the matter is there are more men in bigger positions (so they earn more) and women leave to have kids so any gap hurts earning, etc. But what you did, the "i found something that supports my opinion if you only read the first 2 sentences" is pretty lame.
Go back to your parent's apartment :coleman:

[Nick Young]

I wish i was a woman

:confusedshrug:

[Adelina]

The average full-time salary for 16- to 17-year-old females fell from £9,750 in 2006 to just £7,176 in 2013. Over the same period, 16- to 17-year-old males saw their income dip marginally from £8,639 to £8,561. It means young women’s salaries fell by more than a quarter (26.4%) over an eight-year period, compared with a drop of only 1% for young men. To take surveys to make money (https://surveys.gobranded.com/paid-surveys/) it is possible to carry out a search for web-sites that have data entry posts. In this case, you can get paid in accordance towards the entries typed in.

[Long Duck Dong]

Stupid bots :lol

[FultzNationRISE]

niko was always one of the cringiest posters here.

[Jasper]

Goddamnit, OP. You chauvinist pig. Women should be making double!

your right they are smarter than you , but men are strong !!!!!!!!
soo..
I watched Jeopardy today , and the guy who is the champ is a grad from college.. Matt won by a land slide - 44k and bet on final
jeopardy 30k and walked away with 75k for a day ... some people are unconsciously smart !!!!!!
Right after the show the local news was talking about the decline in trade jobs , and people are not filling those positions , even
though college requirements are not needed...
So the bottom line is what jobs are people actually filling ???
(our country is really screwed up , not working , and if working expecting a CEO job or nothing else)

[Jasper]

The average full-time salary for 16- to 17-year-old females fell from £9,750 in 2006 to just £7,176 in 2013. Over the same period, 16- to 17-year-old males saw their income dip marginally from £8,639 to £8,561. It means young women’s salaries fell by more than a quarter (26.4%) over an eight-year period, compared with a drop of only 1% for young men. To take surveys to make money (https://surveys.gobranded.com/paid-surveys/) it is possible to carry out a search for web-sites that have data entry posts. In this case, you can get paid in accordance towards the entries typed in.

do you not have the same issues as other countries - jobs not being filled ??

[Axe]

Stupid bots :lol
They are spamming with impunity these days. Just like the others when they create new dups here. :ohwell:

[72-10]

This reminds me of those Datelines they show with bitches who go to college with 10 mil in their pocket.:roll:

[StickyWice]

Bartenders and strippers

Stickyickyicky