View Full Version : Belichick/Brady or Popovich/Duncan
Tarik One
10-30-2015, 10:06 AM
http://nflhumor.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/nfl_u_bradybelichick01_576.jpg
http://s3.amazonaws.com/media.wbur.org/wordpress/10/files/2014/05/0531_oag_duncovich-624x404.jpg
Different sports, similar pedigrees
Which pair are you more impressed with?
Wally450
10-30-2015, 10:14 AM
Brady Belichick.
Brady's top guys have come and gone while Duncan still has Parker and Manu. (Even though they're on the decline)
You can't be wrong with either one though.
Derka
10-30-2015, 10:16 AM
Can't go wrong with either one, honestly.
Brady/Belichick
Even when the Pats were complete ass on paper, they were still competitive.
When have the Spurs ever been ass on paper? Not in the last two decades or so.
Legends66NBA7
10-30-2015, 10:25 AM
Duncan/Popovich. They had consistent dominance through 3 decades.
Takes nothing away from Brady/Belichick, though, who have been great for a long time as well.
T_L_P
10-30-2015, 10:28 AM
Brady Belichick.
Brady's top guys have come and gone while Duncan still has Parker and Manu. (Even though they're on the decline)
You can't be wrong with either one though.
Not that I disagree with your pick, but listing Parker as a reason why it's not Pop/Duncan is a little odd. He's been a net negative for the past year so it's actually a testament to Duncan/Pop that they can still win games with him playing.
Bill would have traded or benched his ass a long time ago because he simply has bigger balls than Pop.
highwhey
10-30-2015, 11:37 AM
Duncan is 21...Brady is 12...coincidence?
highwhey
10-30-2015, 11:42 AM
Brady/Belichick
Even when the Pats were complete ass on paper, they were still competitive.
When have the Spurs ever been ass on paper? Not in the last two decades or so.
Are you an idiot? Yes is the correct answer.
Spurs have remained competitive every single year even when Manu and Parker have declined substantially. Their record is a testament to Popavichs coaching and ability to pick the right talent. Name a year when they weren't competitive? I know this because they pummeled my Suns in their prime Nash-era.
Fcking redneck. :facepalm
highwhey
10-30-2015, 11:44 AM
Tim and Tom
coincidence as well?
:oldlol:
Tim is ghey tho.
highwhey
10-30-2015, 11:50 AM
Not from what I've seen:
https://usatftw.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/screen-shot-2014-05-20-at-8-01-20-am.jpg
:applause:
That'shis? Damn, he a champ on and off the court :pimp:
Are you an idiot? Yes is the correct answer.
Spurs have remained competitive every single year even when Manu and Parker have declined substantially. Their record is a testament to Popavichs coaching and ability to pick the right talent. Name a year when they weren't competitive? I know this because they pummeled my Suns in their prime Nash-era.
Fcking redneck. :facepalm
My point was the Spurs have always had a solid roster. The patriots have not.
Even when they were 'down' they still had all stars everywhere.
Last season Brady was throwing TD passes to guys nobody has ever even heard of. Matthew Mulligan? Amendola? Dobson?
While I give Pops a lot of credit, the roster for SA has never been 'bad'.
dazzer87
10-30-2015, 12:24 PM
Brady Belichick. You know how hard it is to keep winning in the NFL year in and year out. Most great teams has a windows of 3-4 years at max of being really good. Also, with free agency most great players dont stay with the same team for a long period of time. Look at all the great assistants coaches NE has lost in the last 16 years.
When its all said and done, this will be the greatest run in sport history....
Brady Belichick. You know how hard it is to keep winning in the NFL year in and year out. Most great teams has a windows of 3-4 years at max of being really good. Also, with free agency most great players dont stay with the same team for a long period of time. Look at all the great assistants coaches NE has lost in the last 16 years.
When its all said and done, this will be the greatest run in sport history....
Saw Brady is now 36-4 vs divisional opponents.
That's domination. Not 'a solid few years', that is complete domination.
With another Superbowl, Brady will go down as the best QB of all time. Even now, he has an argument.
NumberSix
10-30-2015, 01:16 PM
The ones that don't constantly cheat.
Derka
10-30-2015, 01:29 PM
The ones that don't constantly cheat.
So no professional sports team ever. Got it.
imdaman99
10-30-2015, 01:37 PM
5-1 > 4-2
NumberSix
10-30-2015, 01:40 PM
So no professional sports team ever. Got it.
I'm not aware of any Spurs cheating scandals.
Derka
10-30-2015, 01:42 PM
I'm not aware of any Spurs cheating scandals.
Well that sounds like a personal problem.
chips93
10-30-2015, 01:42 PM
My point was the Spurs have always had a solid roster. The patriots have not.
Even when they were 'down' they still had all stars everywhere.
Last season Brady was throwing TD passes to guys nobody has ever even heard of. Matthew Mulligan? Amendola? Dobson?
While I give Pops a lot of credit, the roster for SA has never been 'bad'.
Diaw was cut by the worst team in nba history before becoming one of the best bench players in the league. Patty mills was on his way out of the league. Same for danny green.
its a testament to pop's coaching, and duncan's leadership that they can turn castoffs into championship level role players.
bdreason
10-30-2015, 04:00 PM
I'll take the duo that didn't cheat to win their titles.
falc39
10-30-2015, 04:23 PM
So no professional sports team ever. Got it.
That's a big assumption to make.
Wally450
10-31-2015, 03:59 AM
That's a big assumption to make.
The only thing that the Patriots have actually been caught of doing is taping the other sidelines, which Bill didn't know about; and he know about more rules than most NFL officials.
The Deflating balls thing is really just an act hoping to get the Pats punished. There's no real evidence that they ever cheated.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.