90sgoat
11-02-2015, 08:23 AM
I've noticed that setting a screen in these last seasons have come to mean something very different than in the past. Most screens are basically illegal screens.
In addition to not being allowed to breathe on the James Hardens and Steph Currys of the league, now defenders frequently have to fight over 2 or 3 screens set by the same player in rapid succession. I don't see how this can't be anything else than illegal screening?
What usually happens is the screener runs up to the perimeter, then sets a semi-screen and when the defender sees it, the penetrating guard switches direction and the screener rotates and sets a new screen in the opposite direction, except the screener neever really sets a screen but is basically moving the entire time.
Tell me you have seen this too? These moving screens set in succession, which are impossible to get around.
A screen is set once, you can't just keep setting screens by moving around, then it's an illegal screen.
Just another rule perverted by the current NBA.
In addition to not being allowed to breathe on the James Hardens and Steph Currys of the league, now defenders frequently have to fight over 2 or 3 screens set by the same player in rapid succession. I don't see how this can't be anything else than illegal screening?
What usually happens is the screener runs up to the perimeter, then sets a semi-screen and when the defender sees it, the penetrating guard switches direction and the screener rotates and sets a new screen in the opposite direction, except the screener neever really sets a screen but is basically moving the entire time.
Tell me you have seen this too? These moving screens set in succession, which are impossible to get around.
A screen is set once, you can't just keep setting screens by moving around, then it's an illegal screen.
Just another rule perverted by the current NBA.