PDA

View Full Version : Players who have averaged 40+ for playoffs



Marchesk
11-05-2015, 02:46 PM
Kind of surprising that there are only two considering first round exits, injuries after a couple games and what not. At least according to BR.

Jordan in 86 for 3 games against that great Celtics team.

43.7

And West in 65 for 11 games

40.6

Makes me wonder how many players have averaged 40 or more for a playoff series.

ClipperRevival
11-05-2015, 02:59 PM
Besides his legendary 1986 performance, MJ did it these times as well.

1988 vs Cleveland
45.2 PPG

1989 vs Cleveland
39.8 PPG (I know a tad short but it's so close)

1990 vs Philadelphia
43.0 PPG

1992 vs Miami
45.0 PPG

1993 vs Phoenix
41.0 PPG

ClipperRevival
11-05-2015, 03:03 PM
MJ was without a doubt the most CONSISTENTLY, DOMINANT scorer in NBA history. Wilt peaked higher for a season/game and Kobe for a game but no one did it like MJ on a game by game and season by season basis like MJ.

There's a reason why he owns the highest scoring average in history for both the regular season (30.1) and playoffs (33.4) and is second only to Rick Barry in finals (33.6). And he did it with GOAT efficiency as he is the all time leader in PER for both the regular season and playoffs.

dubeta
11-05-2015, 03:07 PM
MJ was without a doubt the most CONSISTENTLY, DOMINANT scorer in NBA history. Wilt peaked higher for a season/game and Kobe for a game but no one did it like MJ on a game by game and season by season basis like MJ.

There's a reason why he owns the highest scoring average in history for both the regular season (30.1) and playoffs (33.4) and is second only to Rick Barry in finals (33.6). And he did it with GOAT efficiency as he is the all time leader in PER for both the regular season and playoffs.

Pace during scoring seasons? Efficiency? TS%? 3 point game?


There's more to scoring than total volume.


Yea Jordan was a good scorer, but he was flawed in many ways

riseagainst
11-05-2015, 03:08 PM
Pace during scoring seasons? Efficiency? TS%? 3 point game?


There's more to scoring than total volume.


Yea Jordan was a good scorer, but he was flawed in many ways

dis nigguh talking about flaws. Don't even go there.

:lol
:roll:

Marchesk
11-05-2015, 03:09 PM
MJ was without a doubt the most CONSISTENTLY, DOMINANT scorer in NBA history. Wilt peaked higher for a season/game and Kobe for a game also but no one did it like MJ on a game by game and season by season basis like MJ.

Over an entire career, you're right. I might argue that Wilt having different roles after the first half of his career is a reason for that. When Wilt was the primary scorer he was leading the league every year and setting records.

Granted, the 60s had the highest pace of any decade, and Wilt got more FGA as a result. He also was allowed to play more minutes. But he still led the league in scoring every year over guys like West and Baylor.

And there is the playoffs, although again he changed roles. So during his primary scoring years, his playoff averages were around Jordan's. They might have been higher if Boston wasn't always in the way, but that's kind of like complaining about Detroit being in Jordan's way.

Marchesk
11-05-2015, 03:12 PM
Yea Jordan was a good scorer, but he was flawed in many ways

I think the point is that Jordan was the best playoff scorer of all time, including the 60s, on teams that won six titles.

Psileas
11-05-2015, 03:26 PM
Over an entire career, you're right. I might argue that Wilt having different roles after the first half of his career is a reason for that. When Wilt was the primary scorer he was leading the league every year and setting records.

Granted, the 60s had the highest pace of any decade, and Wilt got more FGA as a result. He also was allowed to play more minutes. But he still led the league in scoring every year over guys like West and Baylor.

And there is the playoffs, although again he changed roles. So during his primary scoring years, his playoff averages were around Jordan's. They might have been higher if Boston wasn't always in the way, but that's kind of like complaining about Detroit being in Jordan's way.

AND he was a center. Let's not pretend that centers are equally benefited by high pace with guards and ball handlers in general.

juju151111
11-05-2015, 03:30 PM
Pace during scoring seasons? Efficiency? TS%? 3 point game?


There's more to scoring than total volume.


Yea Jordan was a good scorer, but he was flawed in many ways
Bulls routinely were the slowest pace team.

ArbitraryWater
11-05-2015, 03:33 PM
Pace during scoring seasons? Efficiency? TS%? 3 point game?


There's more to scoring than total volume.


Yea Jordan was a good scorer, but he was flawed in many ways

:roll: :roll: :roll:

ShawkFactory
11-05-2015, 03:37 PM
Pace during scoring seasons? Efficiency? TS%? 3 point game?


There's more to scoring than total volume.


Yea Jordan was a good scorer, but he was flawed in many ways
Care to name those many flaws?

ballinhun8
11-05-2015, 03:42 PM
Care to name those many flaws?


He won too many rings :confusedshrug: :confusedshrug:

Nuff Said
11-05-2015, 04:01 PM
Over an entire career, you're right. I might argue that Wilt having different roles after the first half of his career is a reason for that. When Wilt was the primary scorer he was leading the league every year and setting records.

Granted, the 60s had the highest pace of any decade, and Wilt got more FGA as a result. He also was allowed to play more minutes. But he still led the league in scoring every year over guys like West and Baylor.

And there is the playoffs, although again he changed roles. So during his primary scoring years, his playoff averages were around Jordan's. They might have been higher if Boston wasn't always in the way, but that's kind of like complaining about Detroit being in Jordan's way.
How come Wilt, "the greatest scorer of all time" was not asked to be the team's number one scorer every time? If he was the best, why would someone else take his shots?