Players who remained great AFTER their athleticism diminished

[Tarik One]

So many players were great during their physical primes and to a degree, so overly dependent on their athleticism. Inevitably, most of them declined fast and very few were able to refine their games or were fundamentally sound to begin with.

Two off the top:

Jordan

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar

[GIF REACTION]

Malone

Although it seemed like Malone didn't slow down until his mid 30's

He was still moving fast on the break in the 2000's

A true testament to his tireless work ethic, dedication and steroid cycles

God bless

[Uncle Drew]

Duncan used to be quite athletic.

[DMAVS41]

Duncan and Dirk definitely...

[WayOfWade]

I would say Dwyane Wade, but while he's playing fine he hasn't found much success. As for who the best are after their athletic primes, I'd say Jordan (won an MVP at 35), Malone (I think he won MVP at 33 or 34), Duncan and Dirk are still balling before our very eyes in spite of both being 37+ years old. Kobe Bryant WAS aging gracefully, whether or not his play would've diminished with or without his injuries is up for debate (I think he'd be playing fine were it not for his injuries). Magic Johnson put up 15/6/7 at age 37 :confusedshrug:

[GIF REACTION]

It's harder for players today to stay at that level

PED rules were extremely lax back then and the league requires more athleticism than ever to play

[pauk]

Reggie.

[ClipperRevival]

How about a guy who was never athletic to begin with and was still great in Nash? The guy had no business excelling at the NBA level given his height and lack of athleticism. But the guy just beat you with pure skill. He had no business breaking down defenders time and time again. Amazing ability to read the defense and use the right counter moves to get the job done. The hesitations and change of pace/speed were amazing.

[plowking]

Wade, Duncan, Andre Miller, Parish, Hill, ... can't think of more.

[plowking]

How about a guy who was never athletic to begin with and was still great in Nash? The guy had no business excelling at the NBA level given his height and lack of athleticism. But the guy just beat you with pure skill. He had no business breaking down defenders time and time again. Amazing ability to read the defense and use the right counter moves to get the job done. The hesitations and change of pace/speed were amazing.

Nash was quick and agile as fark. Dude is an athlete by every metric. Just didn't jump high.

[ArbitraryWater]

How about a guy who was never athletic to begin with and was still great in Nash? The guy had no business excelling at the NBA level given his height and lack of athleticism. But the guy just beat you with pure skill. He had no business breaking down defenders time and time again. Amazing ability to read the defense and use the right counter moves to get the job done. The hesitations and change of pace/speed were amazing.

what if I tell you....




































he was gifted with amazing touch and ability to read defenses, and someone with just an athletic body but no basketball tools didn't have any business to dominate the NBA

https://i.gyazo.com/50256389fb9b814700976a3aebd3592d.png

[Draz]

Ray Allen maybe?

[GIF REACTION]

What if I told you that Nash was lightning quick?

Jesus christ

[ClipperRevival]

Nash had light feet, which is always good but 99% of guys with his height and his level of athleticism would've failed at the NBA level because the skills, anticipation, vision and savvy needed to succeed at this level had to be off the charts, which Nash had.

Even a guy like CP3 was infinitely more athletic and explosive over Nash.

[ClipperRevival]

what if I tell you....




































he was gifted with amazing touch and ability to read defenses, and someone with just an athletic body but no basketball tools didn't have any business to dominate the NBA

https://i.gyazo.com/50256389fb9b814700976a3aebd3592d.png

Westbrook is a very talented and skilled player. He just doesn't play the right way at times. There are plenty of athletic guys who don't excel at this level because they lack skills. Westbrook ain't one of them. Let's not confuse ball hogging and average IQ with no basketball tools.

[GIF REACTION]

Just because he can't jump out of the gym does not mean he's not a good athlete

Good skills and shit alone doesn't get you 2 MVPs

He was a solid athlete

[ClipperRevival]

Just because he can't jump out of the gym does not mean he's not a good athlete

Good skills and shit alone doesn't get you 2 MVPs

He was a solid athlete

Sure, he was a solid athlete but in terms of NBA level athleticism for a PG, he was clearly below average.

[ArbitraryWater]

Westbrook is a very talented and skilled player. He just doesn't play the right way at times. There are plenty of athletic guys who don't excel at this level because they lack skills. Westbrook ain't one of them. Let's not confuse ball hogging and average IQ with no basketball tools.

I didnt mean to reference Westbrook at all, just the facial expression..

people give too much credit to guys who "oh were so poorly physically, overcame so many odds!" like they weren't specially gifted in other, more finer departments...

[GIF REACTION]

And yet the average PG moves with cement feet compared to Nash

Athleticism is defined by many attributes

Nash's speed allowed him to continue to flourish well into his 30's

[ClipperRevival]

And yet the average PG moves with cement feet compared to Nash

Athleticism is defined by many attributes

Nash's speed allowed him to continue to flourish well into his 30's

Nash wasn't fast, nor was he explosive. He just had very light feet along with GOAT level skills. But as an NBA PG, his athleticism was clearly below average. It's a credit to him and his skills. His natural raw talents were nothing special. He beat you with skills.

[SHAQisGOAT]

One of the best examples is Dennis Johnson... Dude had some pretty different "stages" as a player while remaining very good.

He went from being a very athletic and explosive SG in his first years, to a great all-around combo-guard in his prime, to a steadier/calmer, more cerebral PG in his later years... Always maintaining some of his most known traits, like being a great defensive player, great without the ball, good post-game, poke-away technique, so on...

You watch him in his younger days, dude's a great athlete, very quick, rocket-launcher legs, blocking people at the rim, going for dunks, taking players with his first step... Then with the Celtics, he was considerably heavier, stronger but slower, couldn't jump nearly as high, wasn't dunking... But he redefined his game, showing great IQ, very good passing skills, improved jumper, pacing himself at the PG role, still remaining a great defender due to fundamentals, footwork, hand quickness, strength and still nice overall athleticism.


Dude like Larry Bird was never a great athlete to brgin with but if you watch him in his younger days you'll realize he was a pretty nice athlete while making more use of it... In his last days, man could barely move out there and was still putting up 20/10/7/1/1 on .547 TS%.

[Bosnian Sajo]

How hasn't Kobe been mentioned? His injury plagued seasons really did him in, but he was good af even when he lost his athleticism at like 33.

[JT123]

How hasn't Kobe been mentioned? His injury plagued seasons really did him in, but he was good af even when he lost his athleticism at like 33.
:rolleyes:

[Gus Hemmingway]

How hasn't Kobe been mentioned? His injury plagued seasons really did him in, but he was good af even when he lost his athleticism at like 33.
:rolleyes: :facepalm

[Chokefree]

:rolleyes: :facepalm
wow, your new alt Jt123?

[Real Men Wear Green]

So many players were great during their physical primes and to a degree, so overly dependent on their athleticism. Inevitably, most of them declined fast and very few were able to refine their games or were fundamentally sound to begin with.

Two off the top:

Jordan

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
The whole of his Bull career he was one of the most athletic wings. He did have an excellent skill set but I don't think we ever saw him dominate the league without being stronger and faster than anyone that tried to cover him. I don't think we saw him trying to take on guys that could out-quick him consistently until he was in Washington and that's a big reason why he didn't dominate then. The game he developed coming up was one that took advantage of his abilities, not one that was going to continue to work no matter how his explosion declined.

[Gus Hemmingway]

wow, your new alt Jt123?
Posts: 8

class dismissed :lol

[Tarik One]

The whole of his Bull career he was one of the most athletic wings. He did have an excellent skill set but I don't think we ever saw him dominate the league without being stronger and faster than anyone that tried to cover him. I don't think we saw him trying to take on guys that could out-quick him consistently until he was in Washington and that's a big reason why he didn't dominate then. The game he developed coming up was one that took advantage of his abilities, not one that was going to continue to work no matter how his explosion declined.
This actually occurred after his 1st comeback in 95. He clearly wasn't explosive as he was in 1993. Summer of 95 he perfected his mid-range game.

[Real Men Wear Green]

This actually occurred after his 1st comeback in 95. He clearly wasn't explosive as he was in 1993. Summer of 95 he perfected his mid-range game.
His first comeback he was still an elite athlete though. It wasn't until he joined the Wizards that we saw him without a high level of athleticism.

[Alan Ogg]

Kareem

[JT123]

Posts: 8

class dismissed :lol
:roll: Pretty sure he's 20four, just based on how obsessed he's been with following me around.

[GIF REACTION]

Nash wasn't fast, nor was he explosive. He just had very light feet along with GOAT level skills. But as an NBA PG, his athleticism was clearly below average. It's a credit to him and his skills. His natural raw talents were nothing special. He beat you with skills.
"Light feet" is quickness you ****ing moron

That is athleticism

If it weren't, every PG would be moving like Nash... But they don't

Stop being racist

[TripleA]

"Light feet" is quickness you ****ing moron

That is athleticism

If it weren't, every PG would be moving like Nash... But they don't

Stop being racist

Steve Nash was extremely quick.
He lacked in flashier parts of Athleticism like vert and top end speed.

[Bay Area Baller]

2 more Rip Hamilton's work for the Pistons extended well beyond his athleticism . He was so savy for a Sg he would run the off the ball routes and use other players to lose his defender. One way or another he would create separation and had a great shooting stroke. Its no wonder the bulls picked him up and he contributed there too.


Also surprised no one mentions Kidd and his ability to be floor general into his 40s. Added a 3pt shot half way through his career also. He found ways to reinvent his game and apply proper team flow with the ball.

[ProfessorMurder]

Mutombo.

[GIF REACTION]

Steve Nash was extremely quick.
He lacked in flashier parts of Athleticism like vert and top end speed.
Exactly

People acting like he was some average white dude

6-3 and lightning quick

How the hell else what he able to shoot such high percentages at the rim? He picked his spots, sure... But if it were that easy everyone would be doing it

[GIF REACTION]

He's like Tony Parker

You think "unathletic" Parker just magically led the league in points in the paint?

Or maybe... Just maybe quickness is athleticism?

[FKAri]

He's like Tony Parker

You think "unathletic" Parker just magically led the league in points in the paint?

Or maybe... Just maybe quickness is athleticism?

If prime Parker is unathletic then John Wall is unathletic.

[HenryGarfunkle]

Westbrook is a very talented and skilled player. He just doesn't play the right way at times. There are plenty of athletic guys who don't excel at this level because they lack skills. Westbrook ain't one of them. Let's not confuse ball hogging and average IQ with no basketball tools.
wasn't always the case though, and we still see his natural flaws when he airballs layups and such.

he was downright awful skill-wise in his early years in high school. his work ethic is why he has skills, he's probably worked harder than anyone ever for the bball skills he has today

[LAZERUSS]

I wouldn't call him great, but Elgin Baylor was still an elite scorer for a few years after blowing out his knee.

[TheImmortal]

Kobe was the first player that came to mind.. dude was killing it just 2 seasons ago before the achilles gave up on him.

Current Kobe is essentially disabled tbqh.. It's a miracle he's even playing really.

[JohnFreeman]

Pierce still gets buckets

[Wally450]

Considering Pierce was never looked at as super athletic, he has that slow man's game that he worked to perfection. I'll say him. Not 'great' as the title mentions, but still good.

[ClipperRevival]

"Light feet" is quickness you ****ing moron

That is athleticism

If it weren't, every PG would be moving like Nash... But they don't

Stop being racist

Nash had light feet and some quickness but he wasn't explosive nor did he have speed. You mentioned "speed". Pick up a basketball dumbass. Lol.

[GIF REACTION]

Nash had light feet and some quickness but he wasn't explosive nor did he have speed. You mentioned "speed". Pick up a basketball dumbass. Lol.

What is Speed?

Sports Definition: Speed is the ability to move quickly across the ground or move limbs rapidly to grab or throw.

Speed is not just how fast someone can run (or cycle, swim etc.), but is dependent on their acceleration (how quickly they can accelerate from a stationary position), maximal speed of movement, and also speed maintenance (minimizing deceleration). Movement speed requires good strength and power, but also too much body weight and air resistance can act to slow the person down. In addition to a high proportion of fast twitch muscle fibers, it is vital to have efficient mechanics of movement to optimize the muscle power for the most economical movement technique.

No

You need to educate yourself. Nash was a lightning quick guard. Stop thinking so one dimensional about athleticism... It's obvious you've never been a high level athlete before. You just see jumping and go... "WOW!"

Stick to riding Jordan's jock

[ClipperRevival]

No

You need to educate yourself. Nash was a lightning quick guard. Stop thinking so one dimensional about athleticism... It's obvious you've never been a high level athlete before. You just see jumping and go... "WOW!"

Stick to riding Jordan's jock

Lol. Why do you need to search the definition of "speed"? Like i said buddy, pick up a basketball.

[GIF REACTION]

:facepalm

Doesn't even try to respond to anything I've written

Stick to the 3ball threads

All you're good for on this forum

[ClipperRevival]

:facepalm

Doesn't even try to respond to anything I've written

Stick to the 3ball threads

All you're good for on this forum

Real recognize real. Game recognize game. There is no point in stooping down to your elementary education level and argue over common sense stuff.

[GIF REACTION]

What are you even ****ing talking about? You don't have a good answer for anything in this thread... You're not real

Just ****ing stupid

[ClipperRevival]

What are you even ****ing talking about? You don't have a good answer for anything in this thread... You're not real

Just ****ing stupid

I'm not the one who needed to look up the definition of "speed". Nor did i say Nash was "lightning quick." Like i said. Go outside, pick up a basketball and play the game. You will start learning stuff the more you play. Peace!

[GIF REACTION]

I told you what speed was

You questioned me on it

Jesus christ

Stop posting

I'll chuck this here for everybody else, but I'm sure you'll disregard it anyways because you're "REAL"

[QUOTE]Is Steve Nash the Best Athlete in the NBA?
Athleticism is often defined very narrowly. In the context of basketball, athleticism is usually understood to refer primarily to explosiveness laterally (quickness) and vertically (jumping ability); in football, athleticism usually is defined by one's performance in the 40 yard dash and in the bench press. However, this kind of thinking leads to a lot of stereotyping and superficial analysis, usually along racial lines--i.e., Larry Bird being praised for his cerebral skills while Michael Jordan is commended for his athletic ability. The reality is that Bird was a phenomenal athlete, possessing superb hand-eye coordination, quickness for a step (a concept that will be explained below) and better jumping ability than most people seem to think; compare his blocked shot totals to those of legendary leaper Dominique Wilkins (Bird has the edge, with 755 blocks in 897 games compared to Wilkins' 642 blocks in 1074 games)--and while Bird did not have the broad jumping ability of a Julius Erving, he was more than capable of playing above the rim to get rebounds and even throw down some dunks (albeit ones that fans would term "generic"), particularly early in his career.

Last week, while covering Phoenix' 121-117 win over Indiana, I discussed the subject of how to best define athletic ability in a basketball context with Phoenix Coach Mike D'Antoni, former player/current broadcaster Dan Majerle, Suns President of Basketball Operations/General Manager Steve Kerr and Steve Nash (Indiana Coach Jim O'Brien's thoughts about this can be found by clicking on the above link). Here are those interviews, interwoven with some additional thoughts and observations of my own:

Friedman: "Sometimes people talk about the difference between athletic ability and skills but when they talk about athletic ability they pretty much confine that to running fast and jumping high and then they make a distinction between that and the ability to pass or shoot. What is your take on that? Do you define shooting ability and passing ability as just

[GIF REACTION]

Next I spoke with Majerle.

Friedman: "A lot of times people make a distinction between 'athletic ability' and 'skills' but I think that they make a mistake by defining 'athletic ability' too narrowly: they usually just mean running fast or jumping high. As a former player and as someone who gets to see Steve Nash play on a regular basis, what do you think of those distinctions? I think that Steve Nash is an excellent athlete even though he is not a high jumper or a fast runner."

Dan Majerle: "You’re crazy if you don’t think that Steve Nash is a heck of an athlete. I always think of athletes as guys who not only can jump and run and do those things but also guys who can play a bunch of different sports, guys who can play baseball, who can play golf, who can play football, who can play soccer like Steve does. If you are good at all of those types of different things then I think that you are a good athlete and Steve is one of those guys; whatever sport he tries, he’s good at it. He may not be the strongest or the fastest or jump the highest, but you put him in any competitive situation or any kind of other sport and he will more than hold his own. He’s just got such great body control and his central core, his strength and those kinds of things are amazing."

Strength is not the first thing one thinks of with Nash, primarily because bigger guards like Chauncey Billups or Deron Williams can use their size to back him down--but Nash is wiry strong and this strength reveals itself in subtle ways. A good illustration of this is a play that took place with a little less than three minutes remaining in the third quarter of Wednesday's Phoenix-Utah game. Nash dribbled down court at full speed and Matt Harpring picked him up at the top of the key. Without breaking stride, Nash drove hard to the left, got all the way to the rim, stopped, jumped off of his right foot while fading backwards, and then made a short bank shot over Harpring's outstretched arms. There are several important things to understand about why this was such an athletic move: (1) Harpring is 6-7, while Nash is 6-3; (2) Nash is right handed and most right handed players are more adept at jumping off of their left leg; (3) Nash stopped and jumped so quickly--and with just the right amount of fade--that Harpring could not recover. If Nash had dunked over Harpring, then the play would be shown five times and everyone would talk about how athletic Nash is--but what Nash did is an extremely difficult athletic play and he does those kinds of things on a regular basis; that is why he can shoot such a high percentage despite playing in a league in which so many players are allegedly more "athletic" than he is. If you don't think that this move took athletic ability, then the next time you are on a basketball court, try it yourself--it's not nearly as easy to do as it may sound or look. Back to the interview:

Friedman: "Would you agree that a lot of people define athletic ability too narrowly, only using a couple of the most obvious traits, like running and jumping?"

Majerle: "Yeah, definitely; if you look at a guy and call him an athlete just because he runs fast and jumps high--I don’t believe that at all. I think that is very, very narrow; he may not be able to throw a football or do anything like that, so just being able to run and jump does not make him an athlete."

Friedman: "Would you say that being able to shoot really well is an athletic ability or a skill set or some combination of the two?"

Majerle: "I think that it’s both. You have to be an athlete but it also takes a lot of practice. I think that anybody can become a good shooter. I really do--with practice and good fundamentals, anybody can become a good shooter."

Friedman: "But that raises an obvious question, because there are some guys who have been in the NBA for years and they are still poor shooters. Why do you think that is the case? Not to single out anyone in particular but we can all think of certain guys who are not good free throw shooters. Do you think that is because they haven’t worked on it?"

Majerle: "No, I think they work on it but they just don’t get it sometimes; it doesn’t click for certain guys for whatever reason. Guys like Shaq, maybe his hands are too big or whatever, for some reason it just doesn’t click for him. He makes up for it in other ways; obviously, he’s a great player and he can score, he just can’t shoot the ball real well."

Friedman: "Then you have a guy like Dr. J, whose hands are as big as anybody’s and he shot almost 80% from the free throw line."

Majerle: "Yeah, or you have a guy like Yao Ming (a 7-5 center who shoots better than .800 from the free throw line). Like I said, sometimes guys get it and sometimes they don’t."

..

[GIF REACTION]

Steve Kerr won five championships in a 15 year NBA career and he holds the all-time record for career regular season three point field goal percentage (.454). Now his job is to try to evaluate talent and put together the right mix of players to help the Suns win the franchise's first NBA title:

Friedman: "A lot of times when people talk about athletic ability they limit it to two very specific things: being able to jump really high and being able to run really fast. I think that leads to the misconception that someone like Steve Nash or, previously, Larry Bird, is not that athletic. As a former player and someone who is now in management, how do you look at this question of defining what constitutes athletic ability?"

Steve Kerr: "Being a slow white guy who couldn’t jump, I prefer to look at other attributes that constitute athleticism (Kerr chuckles before turning serious). I think that when you look at Nash in particular, balance is such a huge part of his game. Hand-eye coordination and balance may be things that the average person does not associate with athleticism but you can see that there are guys who can really run and jump who can’t make a shot from three feet away; are they more athletic than a guy who is slower and can’t jump but can make shots and do all kinds of things on the floor with his vision and his balance? I don’t know. It’s a word that is open for interpretation, I think."

Friedman: "Would you agree that it is probably too narrowly defined?"

Kerr: "Yeah."

Friedman: "It is defined by very obvious, dramatic things that anybody can see—'Oh, that’s athletic'—but to actually be functional as an athlete and to be able to perform as an athlete you have to have these other skill sets that are harder to measure or harder to appreciate."

Kerr: "I would agree with that. Having played in the league for 15 years, I came across an awful lot of guys who could jump out of the gym or run like the wind and yet they didn’t make the team because it didn’t translate. The so-called athleticism has to translate into whatever sport the player is playing. It translates through other mediums, like we talked about, through balance and through knowledge and through an understanding of how to play. People can be athletic without being good basketball players."

Friedman: "But can you be a good basketball player without being a good athlete? That’s almost the core of the question that I am asking, because I don’t buy the idea that Nash is not a good athlete."

Kerr: "No, if you’re in the NBA, you’re a good athlete. Everybody in the NBA is a great athlete."

Friedman: "Even the supposedly non-athletic guys."

Kerr: "Yeah. Trust me, I was always known as one of the least athletic players in the NBA."

Friedman: "Which I’ve always felt is a bit of a misnomer--and not just with you, but in general. There is a range of athletic abilities represented in the NBA but everybody who is there is a good athlete."

Kerr: "Yeah and there are different forms of it. Hand-eye coordination is a huge part of it."

Friedman: "I want to ask you about a specific aspect of that, which is the word in general: 'hands.' People will say that 'player x'—for instance, Tim Duncan—has 'great hands.' Then there are other players, I won’t mention any names, who have 'bad hands.' I asked Coach D’Antoni about that. I’ll ask you the same thing that I asked him: have you ever seen anyone, either as a player or a talent evaluator, who did not have good hands and then at some point in the future he developed good hands?"

Kerr: "No. I think that it’s a lot like jumping."

Friedman: "It’s an athletic ability."

Kerr: "Yeah. If a guy can’t jump now then he probably won’t be able to jump later--unless he gets those platform shoes they advertise in the basketball magazines."

Friedman (laughing): "I’m not sure those work, either."

Kerr (laughing): "I’m not either. The one thing that guys can improve is shooting--with enough repetition. Terry Porter became a great three point shooter by the end of his career. Magic Johnson became a solid three point shooter."

Friedman: "But even with that, wouldn’t you say that to become a truly great shooter a person must have some kind of athletic ability to be able to practice and develop that trait? I don’t think that you can just take anybody and make them a great shooter. You are talking about someone who is a great athlete and then he is practicing but he has a base of athletic ability to work with."

Kerr: "I guess I’m saying that some people are capable of getting better but they are already pretty good to start with. I think that Shaq can shoot 1000 free throws a day and I just don’t think that it is wired in his body to athletically put the ball through the hoop from range. It is the hardest part of the game for him."

Friedman: "It is so perplexing to see that he can’t do that one thing as well as almost anyone who played high school basketball and can make 70 percent of his free throws."

Kerr: "It was the same thing with Wilt."

Friedman: "Right. It’s not just Shaq."

Kerr: "Tim Duncan has a hard time with it."

Friedman: "Duncan is almost more mystifying because he has good hands and he can make that bank shot. With him, you really think that it’s--I mean, I don’t know."

Kerr: "Mental."

Friedman: "Strange."

Kerr: "I don’t know. A friend of mine has what he calls the 'ball and stick' theory. He says that if you want to figure out if a guy is a good athlete, give him a ball and a stick--which to me is just another name for hand-eye coordination. If you put a golf club in his hands, can he hit the ball around decently? If you give him a baseball bat, can he go to the batting cage and hit the ball consistently? There are some people who can run and jump but 'ball and stick'—they are not great."

Friedman: "By that theory, just to kind of put a bow on everything, Nash is a very good athlete. Coach D’Antoni talked about that Nash can play just about any sport."

Kerr: "Any sport. He’d probably be a scratch golfer. He could probably bowl 300. He just sees it and he does it."

Friedman: "From that standpoint, even though it might surprise the average fan, he might be one of the better athletes in the league--on the 'ball and stick' theory."

Kerr: "If you go by 'ball and stick' theory, he might be the best athlete in the league. Those are generally the guys who can shoot and dribble and pass with either hand. He’s definitely in the upper echelon of the 'ball and stick' theory guys."....

[GIF REACTION]

Naturally, I sought out Nash's take on all of this:

Friedman: "A lot of times when people talk about athletic ability they seem to pretty much limit that to jumping and running. I think that there is a lot more to athletic ability than just those two things and I am interested in your perspective on that."

Nash: "Yeah, I mean in this league I am not going to win many races or jumping contests or weightlifting contests but I’m sure my athleticism is expressed in different ways."

Friedman: "Talking to Steve Kerr and Coach D’Antoni, they mentioned things like your balance, your vision, your hands--that those things are really athletic skills and athletic abilities as well."

Nash: "Court vision, rhythm, balance, timing, agility, creativity I think are all parts of athleticism, not just explosiveness."

Friedman: "Steve Kerr mentioned something to me that he called the 'ball and stick' test for athletic ability: if you give someone a ball and a stick--a baseball bat or a golf club--what can he do with it? He said that from that standpoint you might be the best athlete in the league or at least one of the better athletes. What do you think of that?"

Nash: "I think that you have to incorporate everything. You can’t just say that athleticism is explosiveness. It’s explosiveness, it’s coordination, it’s balance, it’s all of those things--like I said, even timing and creativity. Obviously, I think that there is a lot more to it...but it doesn’t really matter."

He smiled as he uttered the last sentence, almost like he did not want to say too much. I have always thought that it is advantageous for Nash that he does not "look" like a great athlete; that leads to people underestimating what he is capable of doing (and possibly heightens the credit that he receives for his accomplishments because people are wrongly surprised). Nash seems to combine a certain self-deprecation with a quiet confidence; while he readily acknowledges his relative lack of speed or jumping ability he also plainly realizes that his other athletic gifts--such as hand-eye coordination, balance, court vision--more than compensate for his shortcomings.

It would make much more sense for writers, broadcasters and analysts to define exactly what they mean when they use the term "athletic." Instead of saying that someone is "athletic," be specific: say that he jumps high or runs fast or has good hands. Otherwise, the word "athletic" too often is just a meaningless cliche or a codeword with a racial undertone; after all, how many white players are called "athletic" and how many black players are called "cerebral"? Steve Nash is certainly a cerebral player but he is also athletic and that should be brought to the forefront more often; sadly, that requires a level of depth in analysis that does not fit in with 30 second highlight clips, game stories filed under deadline or the way that the print and broadcast media in general are structured--but that does not mean that we should just completely give up trying to understand basketball in that manner.....

[feyki]

Dişide Drogba ..


Nash and Kareem come to my mind at first look . Karl hadn't lost his athleticism at his after 32-33 . Jordan was healthy at his 34 . Players usually stay healthy at their around between 32-34 ages . After 34 , Nash and Kareem were great .