PDA

View Full Version : Rousey can beat a below average man in a fight...



stalkerforlife
11-15-2015, 01:54 AM
Said no below average man ever.

Phucking geeks.

Akrazotile
11-15-2015, 02:10 AM
Remember when people here thought she could whoop 6'0 230 lb men if they "werent seriously trained fighters" :roll:

stalkerforlife
11-15-2015, 02:12 AM
Remember when people here thought she could whoop 6'0 230 lb men if they "werent seriously trained fighters" :roll:

:facepalm

plowking
11-15-2015, 02:13 AM
Remember when people here thought she could whoop 6'0 230 lb men if they "werent seriously trained fighters" :roll:

:oldlol:

Myself and a few other were called idiots for saying that we wouldn't lose to a fight to a 135lbs woman. :oldlol:

Wally450
11-15-2015, 02:13 AM
Plowking would whoop that ass. :applause:

stalkerforlife
11-15-2015, 02:16 AM
I would literally kill any woman alive if I had the desire to. I'm sick of these MMA junkies thinking MMA can overcome biology.

I would throw that bitch off a 100 foot balcony like she was a phucking rag a muffin.

LikeMike
11-15-2015, 02:17 AM
What happened?

GIF REACTION
11-15-2015, 02:20 AM
I would literally kill any woman alive if I had the desire to. I'm sick of these MMA junkies thinking MMA can overcome biology.

I would throw that bitch off a 100 foot balcony like she was a phucking rag a muffin.
With that small wingspan

It will be close.

Megabox!
11-15-2015, 02:21 AM
I legit had an argument with my stupid ass Friends about this a few weeks ago. They said she could take 3 average joes off the street by her self :facepalm. If she can't grapple you, you win

stalkerforlife
11-15-2015, 02:22 AM
With that small wingspan

It will be close.

:biggums:

Akrazotile
11-15-2015, 02:22 AM
With that small wingspan

It will be close.


Plus Rousey has a bigger package.


Ill still take stalker tho.

stalkerforlife
11-15-2015, 02:23 AM
Plus Rousey has a bigger package.


Ill still take stalker tho.

:biggums:

Akrazotile
11-15-2015, 02:24 AM
:biggums:


:oldlol:

Im just playin bro. I know the package size is more or less equal.

JohnFreeman
11-15-2015, 02:25 AM
I would pin her and make her eat my ass

Godzuki
11-15-2015, 02:27 AM
most of u fgts would lose to Homm too. it just proves there are 2 bitches youd all lose to :sleeping

stalkerforlife
11-15-2015, 02:29 AM
I would pin her and make her eat my ass

:roll:

FKAri
11-15-2015, 02:38 AM
:oldlol:

Myself and a few other were called idiots for saying that we wouldn't lose to a fight to a 135lbs woman. :oldlol:

well, I don't wanna burst ur bubble bro...but...

plowking
11-15-2015, 03:24 AM
well, I don't wanna burst ur bubble bro...but...

Ronda just got absolutely destroyed by a 135lbs woman who used her reach.

You think she will beat 6 foot + men who weight 205lbs+ or 225lbs+?

oarabbus
11-15-2015, 05:11 AM
Ronda just got absolutely destroyed by a 135lbs woman who used her reach.

You think she will beat 6 foot + men who weight 205lbs+ or 225lbs+?

Probably not.

But I think Pac could beat most 6' 205/225lb guys, who aren't trained in fighting.

plowking
11-15-2015, 05:14 AM
Probably not.

But I think Pac could beat most 6' 205/225lb guys, who aren't trained in fighting.

I'm fully aware of my capabilities.

Ronda Rousey cannot beat me, or most in shape, 6 foot+ males in the 205lbs+ region. On average, she will lose.

Pac and Mayweather on the other hand, I never claimed to be able to beat, nor do I think I could. These guys probably walk around at 160lbs and hit harder than 99% of the population.

dunksby
11-15-2015, 05:14 AM
Remember when people here thought she could whoop 6'0 230 lb men if they "werent seriously trained fighters" :roll:
Remember when people thought he she could beat a 6'9" 250 lbs super athletic man aka LeBron James?

plowking
11-15-2015, 05:18 AM
Remember when people thought he she could beat a 6'9" 250 lbs super athletic man aka LeBron James?

:oldlol: I remember that.

"She would just judo flip him and armbar him"... :oldlol:

Half the men in the 170lbs division in the UFC would struggle to fight a man the size of Lebron James, let alone Ronda freaking Rousey.

TheImmortal
11-15-2015, 05:20 AM
I'm fully aware of my capabilities.

Ronda Rousey cannot beat me, or most in shape, 6 foot+ males in the 205lbs+ region. On average, she will lose.

Pac and Mayweather on the other hand, I never claimed to be able to beat, nor do I think I could. These guys probably walk around at 160lbs and hit harder than 99% of the population.
Of course she can't beat you... there's a reason why she chickened out against a transexual MMA fighter in Fallon Fox and talked about how he has this distinct advantage with musculature, bone structure and the like.... A ****ing sissy ******* got her shook.. Obvious is obvious. :lol

dunksby
11-15-2015, 05:22 AM
:oldlol: I remember that.

"She would just judo flip him and armbar him"... :oldlol:

Half the men in the 170lbs division in the UFC would struggle to fight a man the size of Lebron James, let alone Ronda freaking Rousey.
Yep. that's exactly what I said, and all them UFC fiends attacked me for not knowing my martial arts :oldlol: I guess that means not basing my knowledge on Kung Fu movies and TV.

NumberSix
11-15-2015, 05:36 AM
You good train a pit bull to fight all you want, but it will never be able to beat a lion. At some point, nature is insurmountable.

oarabbus
11-15-2015, 05:37 AM
I'm fully aware of my capabilities.

Ronda Rousey cannot beat me, or most in shape, 6 foot+ males in the 205lbs+ region. On average, she will lose.

Pac and Mayweather on the other hand, I never claimed to be able to beat, nor do I think I could. These guys probably walk around at 160lbs and hit harder than 99% of the population.

Yeah I agree Rousey loses to an athletic in shape 6' 200+lb guy, at least 70% of the time. Maybe higher.

I just remember seeing people (not necessarily you) saying size = law and that "midget Pacquiao couldn't beat a 6'3" in shape guy"

NumberSix
11-15-2015, 05:45 AM
Yeah I agree Rousey loses to an athletic in shape 6' 200+lb guy, at least 70% of the time. Maybe higher.

I just remember seeing people (not necessarily you) saying size = law and that "midget Pacquiao couldn't beat a 6'3" in shape guy"
Well, Pacquiao legitimately couldn't beat a below average boxer who is like 6'3, 220lbs.

Boxing is a skill sport, but there's a reason it has weight classes. Strength+reach gap has WAY more impact than a skill gap.

oarabbus
11-15-2015, 05:47 AM
Well, Pacquiao legitimately couldn't beat a below average boxer who is like 6'3, 220lbs.

Boxing is a skill sport, but there's a reason it has weight classes. Strength+reach gap has WAY more impact than a skill gap.

I know he couldn't beat a below average PRO 6'3" 220lb boxer...

I'm not sure how he'd fare against a semipro/amateur 6'3" 220lb boxer...

But the example I gave was an athletic 6'3" 200+lb guy who wasn't a boxer. Like a gymbro. I see Pac winning that fight more often than not.

And skill can supersede weight+reach+strength, like when Fedor beat a superheavyweight Hong Man Choi. Choi had 1'2" (!) and 120lbs advantage (!!) on Fedor AND was a trained kickboxer... and lost.

Akrazotile
11-15-2015, 05:48 AM
Yeah I agree Rousey loses to an athletic in shape 6' 200+lb guy, at least 70% of the time. Maybe higher.

I just remember seeing people (not necessarily you) saying size = law and that "midget Pacquiao couldn't beat a 6'3" in shape guy"


I honestly do struggle to see how a 5'5 Pacqiao would beat a guy that's 6'3 220. Pacqaio (to my knowledge) isn't any more trained in take downs and grappling etc than his opponent. And I don't see how he would even be able to reach the guy with punches. A 6' guy, ok, fine. But 6'3 is a ten inch difference. The taller guy could just throw keep throwing haymakers til he connects, he could still stand far enough away not to get countered. I just don't see how Manny gets close to him.

plowking
11-15-2015, 05:53 AM
Well, Pacquiao legitimately couldn't beat a below average boxer who is like 6'3, 220lbs.

Boxing is a skill sport, but there's a reason it has weight classes. Strength+reach gap has WAY more impact than a skill gap.

I actually had the chance to train against some guys here in Australia competing for belts. I had about 50lbs on the guy, and I could not do shit to him in the ring. Not so much in terms of punching power, and him overwhelming me or anything, but I could not cut off the ring, I could not hit him, and I kept eating straight shots the whole time we were in there. I guess it could be different outside the ring where I would be able to hold, and fight dirty, throw him around and use my superior strength. But these boxers are so incredibly elusive, and when they do hit you, you can feel it. This was just a sparring session too.

I'm not entirely sure how a fight with Pacman against a 6'3, 220lbs athletic, non boxer fight would go, but as someone falling in that category, I'm not sure I'd like my chances too much. Inside the ring, no shot. Outside the ring, both guys would have to be careful, but Pac has years of practicing how to throw a great punch. An athletic 6'3 male has great physical traits, but if you can't throw decent punches, you are at a great disadvantage.

plowking
11-15-2015, 05:57 AM
I honestly do struggle to see how a 5'5 Pacqiao would beat a guy that's 6'3 220. Pacqaio (to my knowledge) isn't any more trained in take downs and grappling etc than his opponent. And I don't see how he would even be able to reach the guy with punches. A 6' guy, ok, fine. But 6'3 is a ten inch difference. The taller guy could just throw keep throwing haymakers til he connects, he could still stand far enough away not to get countered. I just don't see how Manny gets close to him.

Not like that at all, and I'm telling you this as someone who has boxed.

Think of it as someone like Chris Paul playing a 6'8 high schooler. You think the 6'8 guy would be able to back him down all game long, but you know Paul is too savvy, understands the leverages associated with basketball, and will still manage to muscle the kid around.

dunksby
11-15-2015, 06:00 AM
I actually had the chance to train against some guys here in Australia competing for belts. I had about 50lbs on the guy, and I could not do shit to him in the ring. Not so much in terms of punching power, and him overwhelming me or anything, but I could not cut off the ring, I could not hit him, and I kept eating straight shots the whole time we were in there. I guess it could be different outside the ring where I would be able to hold, and fight dirty, throw him around and use my superior strength. But these boxers are so incredibly elusive, and when they do hit you, you can feel it. This was just a sparring session too.

I'm not entirely sure how a fight with Pacman against a 6'3, 220lbs athletic, non boxer fight would go, but as someone falling in that category, I'm not sure I'd like my chances too much. Inside the ring, no shot. Outside the ring, both guys would have to be careful, but Pac has years of practicing how to throw a great punch. An athletic 6'3 male has great physical traits, but if you can't throw decent punches, you are at a great disadvantage.
Boxing is an art man, casual fans mostly look at the hands and arms and forget these guys are so quick on their feet. Boxers train as much in throwing and docking as they do on their footwork, boxing is different than MMA and UFC in the sense that brute force on its own doesn't make you great, also the stricter rules obviously.

NumberSix
11-15-2015, 06:04 AM
Not like that at all, and I'm telling you this as someone who has boxed.

Think of it as someone like Chris Paul playing a 6'8 high schooler. You think the 6'8 guy would be able to back him down all game long, but you know Paul is too savvy, understands the leverages associated with basketball, and will still manage to muscle the kid around.
It's like Micael Jordan playing 1 on 1 against Shaq. He's just gonna back him down and dunk it every single time.

Sometimes size and strength is just too much to overcome.

Now if we're talking about high school kids or boxers vs non-boxers, ok.... The guy can't be a complete scrub.

dunksby
11-15-2015, 06:07 AM
It's like Micael Jordan playing 1 on 1 against Shaq. He's just gonna back him down and dunk it every single time.

Sometimes size and strength is just too much to overcome.

Now if we're talking about high school kids or boxers vs non-boxers, ok.... The guy can't be a complete scrub.
You said below average boxer though?

ThePhantomCreep
11-15-2015, 06:29 AM
Manny has a decent shot at outpointing a bad heavyweight.

Keep in mind that Harry Greb (5'8", middleweight) handed future heavyweight champion Gene Tunney his only loss. Skill can overcome size in boxing to a certain extent.

If the fighter is anything above tomato can status, Manny gets crushed.

NumberSix
11-15-2015, 06:47 AM
You said below average boxer though?
Yeah, by professional standards. Not the average standard of your local gym.

dunksby
11-15-2015, 06:50 AM
Yeah, by professional standards. Not the average standard of your local gym.
And who's that in your Shaq vs Jordan analogy?

NumberSix
11-15-2015, 07:20 AM
And who's that in your Shaq vs Jordan analogy?
Obvious, Jordan is more more skilled, smaller guy and Shaq is the lesser skilled, bigger guy.

dunksby
11-15-2015, 07:35 AM
Obvious, Jordan is more more skilled, smaller guy and Shaq is the lesser skilled, bigger guy.
So Shaq is a below average basketball player? Man why you gotta say stupid shit all the time?

plowking
11-15-2015, 07:36 AM
http://i.imgur.com/lTJcxZV.gif

Smoke117
11-15-2015, 07:54 AM
I would literally kill any woman alive if I had the desire to. I'm sick of these MMA junkies thinking MMA can overcome biology.

I would throw that bitch off a 100 foot balcony like she was a phucking rag a muffin.

You sure? You did, afterall, drop out of HS because of acne...:oldlol:

NumberSix
11-15-2015, 08:30 AM
So Shaq is a below average basketball player? Man why you gotta say stupid shit all the time?
Less skilled than Jordan =/= below average player


C'mon now.

dunksby
11-15-2015, 08:32 AM
Less skilled than Jordan =/= below average player


C'mon now.
Your analogy was basically Manny = Jordan vs Shaq = below average boxer.

NumberSix
11-15-2015, 08:35 AM
Your analogy was basically Manny = Jordan vs Shaq = below average boxer.
No it isn't. It's simply size+strength vs skill. You already know that. Stop strawmanning.

Megabox!
11-15-2015, 10:35 AM
http://i.imgur.com/lTJcxZV.gif
:roll: :roll: I'm f*cking done, you guys on ISH kill me :roll:

CelticBaller
11-15-2015, 10:41 AM
And ****** around here was saying lebron can't beat her smh

stalkerforlife
11-15-2015, 11:07 AM
http://i.imgur.com/lTJcxZV.gif

:roll: