3ball
12-28-2015, 09:08 PM
.
Here's the percentile rank that 1.00 PPP yields in each category (the higher the rank, the less efficient the play - so if 1.00 PPP translates to the 90th percentile on post-ups and 80th percentile on spot-ups, then spot-ups are more efficient):
1) Cut (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/cut/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 18.8 percentile
2) Roll man on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/roll-man/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 49.3 percentile
3) Off-screen (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/off-screen/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 60.4 percentile
4) Spot-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/spot-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 65.3 percentile
5) Hand-offs (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/hand-off/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 72.4 percentile
6) Isolations (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/isolation/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 77.3 percentile
7) Post-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/post-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive): 81.7 percentile
8) Ballhandler on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 91.7 percentile
HERE'S HOW THIS RELATES TO CURRY'S EFFICIENCY
The least efficient play shown above (ballhandler on screen rolls) constitutes the largest proportion of offense for all point guards (40% to 60% of their offense).
The exception is Steph Curry.. He's the ballhandler on screen-rolls for only 24.2% of his offense.. He simply employs the higher efficiency options more often than his peers.
Specifically, he uses off-screen, spot-up, hand-off and cut plays more than his peers - basically off-ball plays, just like the goat of goats, Michael Jordan.
Curry has Jordan-type smarts because he's smart enough to get his offense off-ball, which in addition to being more efficient, also gives teammates more opportunity/time with the ball to be comfortable and play their game.. Teammates aren't starved of the ball and don't have to subjugate their game to the whim of the #1 option.
.
Here's the percentile rank that 1.00 PPP yields in each category (the higher the rank, the less efficient the play - so if 1.00 PPP translates to the 90th percentile on post-ups and 80th percentile on spot-ups, then spot-ups are more efficient):
1) Cut (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/cut/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 18.8 percentile
2) Roll man on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/roll-man/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 49.3 percentile
3) Off-screen (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/off-screen/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 60.4 percentile
4) Spot-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/spot-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 65.3 percentile
5) Hand-offs (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/hand-off/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 72.4 percentile
6) Isolations (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/isolation/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 77.3 percentile
7) Post-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/post-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive): 81.7 percentile
8) Ballhandler on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 91.7 percentile
HERE'S HOW THIS RELATES TO CURRY'S EFFICIENCY
The least efficient play shown above (ballhandler on screen rolls) constitutes the largest proportion of offense for all point guards (40% to 60% of their offense).
The exception is Steph Curry.. He's the ballhandler on screen-rolls for only 24.2% of his offense.. He simply employs the higher efficiency options more often than his peers.
Specifically, he uses off-screen, spot-up, hand-off and cut plays more than his peers - basically off-ball plays, just like the goat of goats, Michael Jordan.
Curry has Jordan-type smarts because he's smart enough to get his offense off-ball, which in addition to being more efficient, also gives teammates more opportunity/time with the ball to be comfortable and play their game.. Teammates aren't starved of the ball and don't have to subjugate their game to the whim of the #1 option.
.