Log in

View Full Version : George Lucas behind VFX wage cartel - article for next 48hrs



kNIOKAS
01-05-2016, 07:12 PM
Well this might not be news to you, but it is to me.


The "white-slaver" awakens: It's not Disney to whom George Lucas should be apologizing
George Lucas ended his 2015 in controversy, describing Disney—owners of the Star Wars franchise—as “white slavers.” He quickly apologized. To Disney.

As readers of our series of articles on the Silicon Valley wage-theft cartel will recall, it was George Lucas himself who first initiated the illegal conspiracy to suppress tech workers’ wages by secretly coordinating recruitment and salaries with competing VFX film companies. Lucas later justified his actions by claiming that had he not secretly suppressed employees’ wages, the small movie studios would’ve gone bankrupt and everyone would’ve suffered. Stealing workers’ wages and their opportunities to protect Lucasfilm’s bottom line may have been an act of selfless benevolence, but it also turned Lucas into a multibillionaire when he sold out to Disney in 2012 and pocketed over four billion dollars for himself.

That crowd doesn’t appreciate Lucas’ reckless (and hypocritical) anti-corporate blather like calling Disney “white-slavers.” They’re all about networks, and Hell, so is Lucas. For example, after reneging on his initial pledge to give away his wealth, Lucas wound up plowing millions of his dollars into Starbucks—where his wife Mellody is a board director, a job she got through her lifelong friendship with Bill Bradley, a fellow Starbucks board director. Mellody’s connections to Rahm—Lucas’ wife was donating tens of thousands to his mayoral candidacy even as her firm was upping its management of city funds—helped grease the controversial ten dollar lakefront property, and the new law rushed through by Illinois’ zillionaire Republican governor providing special legal protections for Lucas so that he could rush his museum deal through, a bill that piggybacked on the planned new Obama Library...
Full article unlocked for less than 48 hours now:
https://pando.com/2016/01/05/white-slaver-awakens-how-george-lucas-suppressed-employees-wages-while-becoming-multibillionaire/c6c32ce0bbbcf8647775581f9c95370c7424da13/

kNIOKAS
01-06-2016, 07:01 AM
So you people Star Wars fans, huh

GIF REACTION
01-06-2016, 07:05 AM
All I know is Disney cared more about social agendas than the actual characters and plot in The Force Awakens

kNIOKAS
01-06-2016, 08:05 AM
All I know is Disney cared more about social agendas than the actual characters and plot in The Force Awakens
Like keeping the Empire rich and the Republic opressed? (I don't know which is which in Star Wars tbh)

GIF REACTION
01-06-2016, 10:34 AM
Like keeping the Empire rich and the Republic opressed? (I don't know which is which in Star Wars tbh)
I'm not sure about that

But they focused on trying not to offend anyone, casting a Mary Sue type Woman lead and a black dude sidekick in the name of feminine power and racial diversity. I'm fine with that, but the Mary Sue type chick was extremely over the top, she was literally perfect and had no flaws in the movie... Beat lifelong trained warriors easily, could fix advanced technology/engineering that Han Solo couldn't even... It was so forced and will send the wrong message which women of this day and age get far too often. You can do anything, achieve anything, without putting in the effort for the grind. For example. in the original trilogy, Luke went through a training phase ala Rocky of sorts... Symbolizing the process to mastery...... Women these days get told they are worth a lot and don't need to put the effort it.

Despite all this, it wouldn't have been a major issue, if they actually made original characters and plot. They pretty much jacked the story and characters from A New Hope and little bits of the others... So all in all, we essentially got a modernized, racially diversified and feminist A New Hope.

Pretty lame. All throughout the movie I felt as though I had seen this shit before, and it was all just one big social agenda. So forced. I actually prefer the prequels. Atleast there was originality, politics and depth to the action.

kNIOKAS
01-06-2016, 01:49 PM
I'm not sure about that

But they focused on trying not to offend anyone, casting a Mary Sue type Woman lead and a black dude sidekick in the name of feminine power and racial diversity. I'm fine with that, but the Mary Sue type chick was extremely over the top, she was literally perfect and had no flaws in the movie... Beat lifelong trained warriors easily, could fix advanced technology/engineering that Han Solo couldn't even... It was so forced and will send the wrong message which women of this day and age get far too often. You can do anything, achieve anything, without putting in the effort for the grind. For example. in the original trilogy, Luke went through a training phase ala Rocky of sorts... Symbolizing the process to mastery...... Women these days get told they are worth a lot and don't need to put the effort it.

Despite all this, it wouldn't have been a major issue, if they actually made original characters and plot. They pretty much jacked the story and characters from A New Hope and little bits of the others... So all in all, we essentially got a modernized, racially diversified and feminist A New Hope.

Pretty lame. All throughout the movie I felt as though I had seen this shit before, and it was all just one big social agenda. So forced. I actually prefer the prequels. Atleast there was originality, politics and depth to the action.
So nothing controversial about Lucas calling somebody else "a white slave trader" I take.