PDA

View Full Version : Curry's team vs MJ's team



tmacattack33
01-05-2016, 09:08 PM
Pippen > Thompson
Rodman = Draymond Green
Kukoc > Igoudala
Kerr = Barbosa
Ron Harper > Livingston
Longley = Speights
John Salley = Rush

3-0 for MJ's team, with 3 ties

diamenz
01-05-2016, 09:19 PM
that's a pretty comprehensive study you put together there man.

sd3035
01-05-2016, 09:22 PM
Ordan would be about 22-12 with this Current GS team

JohnFreeman
01-05-2016, 09:22 PM
Bulls sweep and Jordan fvcks Currys girl

juju151111
01-05-2016, 10:21 PM
Ordan would be about 22-12 with this Current GS team
Really dumb

juju151111
01-05-2016, 10:33 PM
Ordan would be about 22-12 with this Current GS team
Bro Mj was 26-12 without Pippen and Rodman severally regressing in 98. Mj had a wrist injury at the start of the season too and was 35 years old. No way Curry goes 26-12 with no Draymond green and Thompson regressing missing half the season. Especially not at 35 years old dumb****

Smoke117
01-05-2016, 10:37 PM
Bro Mj was 26-12 without Pippen and Rodman severally regressing in 98. Mj had a wrist injury at the start of the season too and was 35 years old. No way Curry goes 26-12 with no Draymond green and Thompson regressing missing half the season. Especially not at 35 years old dumb****

To be fair to Curry...the league was much weaker in general in 98 than it is now.

juju151111
01-05-2016, 10:39 PM
To be fair to Curry...the league was much weaker in general in 98 than it is now.
Here a another retard.

plowking
01-05-2016, 10:47 PM
Here a another retard.

This is too funny given you're calling out another poster for being a retard. :oldlol:

juju151111
01-05-2016, 10:51 PM
This is too funny given you're calling out another poster for being a retard. :oldlol:
You the leader of these dumbass. I speak only facts.

plowking
01-05-2016, 10:54 PM
You the leader of these dumbass. I speak only facts.

Another statement poorly written that doesn't help your case. :oldlol:

I didn't even say anything bad to you, you just automatically lashed out to protect your boy Jordan. :oldlol:

And no, you don't speak fact. The league is more than likely better now than back then. These Spurs, Cavs and GSW's are better than the Jazz, and all of them would more than likely take down the Bulls who were coming to their end.

Smoke117
01-05-2016, 11:00 PM
Another statement poorly written that doesn't help your case. :oldlol:

I didn't even say anything bad to you, you just automatically lashed out to protect your boy Jordan. :oldlol:

And no, you don't speak fact. The league is more than likely better now than back then. These Spurs, Cavs and GSW's are better than the Jazz, and all of them would more than likely take down the Bulls who were coming to their end.

The late 90s were weak due to the expansion teams and the fact that pretty much all the stars of the late 80s and throughout the 90s were on their way out. The league as whole was weak in 98...that's just a simple fact.

juju151111
01-05-2016, 11:16 PM
Another statement poorly written that doesn't help your case. :oldlol:

I didn't even say anything bad to you, you just automatically lashed out to protect your boy Jordan. :oldlol:

And no, you don't speak fact. The league is more than likely better now than back then. These Spurs, Cavs and GSW's are better than the Jazz, and all of them would more than likely take down the Bulls who were coming to their end.
None of them taking down the Bulls. Cavs never even won a chip. You always have an agenda. You don't have to say it.

I always speak facts. Bulls 26-12 without his 2nd best player. Fact

juju151111
01-05-2016, 11:17 PM
The late 90s were weak due to the expansion teams and the fact that pretty much all the stars of the late 80s and throughout the 90s were on their way out. The league as whole was weak in 98...that's just a simple fact.
No it wasn't. Lol

Straight_Ballin
01-05-2016, 11:23 PM
I didn't watch the league back then but today's league is better.

Keep living in that dream world of yours! :oldlol:

plowking
01-05-2016, 11:30 PM
:cry: :cry: :cry:


WTF.

3ball
01-06-2016, 12:58 AM
Pippen > Thompson
Rodman = Draymond Green
Kukoc > Igoudala
Kerr = Barbosa
Ron Harper > Livingston
Longley = Speights
John Salley = Rush


DRAYM GREEN 2015 PO (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/g/greendr01.html): 13.7 ppg.. 10.1 rpg.. 5.2 apg.. 1.8 spg.. 1.2 bpg.. 1st team all Def
RODMAN 1996-1998 PO (http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/r/rodmade01.html#1996-1998-sum:playoffs_per_game):.. 5.4 ppg.. 11.3 rpg.. 1.8 apg.. 0.4 spg.. 0.7 bpg.. NO all def in 97 or 98


So Draymond is way better than Rodman.

And Iggy > Kukoc

Who gives a shit about the rest... Except you omitted Harrison Barnes and Bogut - each would both be the 4th best players on the Bulls.





3-0 for MJ's team, with 3 ties


The Warriors were more stacked by a mile, which is why Curry won the championship last year despite scoring a FAR LOWER proportion of his team's points than Jordan while he was on the floor:


.................Percentage of points scored while on the floor


........................RS.....RS 4th.... PO....PO 4th....Finals.. Finals 4th


JORDAN 1997.... 36.0..... 40.1..... 37.7..... 46.3 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/893/stats/usage/?Season=1996-97&SeasonType=Playoffs&Period=4)...... 40.9...... 50.4 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/893/stats/usage/?Season=1996-97&SeasonType=Playoffs&Period=4&PORound=4)
JORDAN 1998.... 36.3..... 42.1..... 39.7..... 48.8 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/893/stats/usage/?Season=1997-98&SeasonType=Playoffs&Period=4)...... 43.6...... 49.1 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/893/stats/usage/?Season=1997-98&SeasonType=Playoffs&Period=4&PORound=4)


CURRY 2015..... 29.9..... 36.2...... 33.4..... 36.6...... 29.3...... 40.6
CURRY 2016..... 34.8 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201939/stats/usage/)..... 41.7 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201939/stats/usage/?Season=2015-16&SeasonType=Regular%20Season&Period=4)