View Full Version : Paul Pierce scores 46 points in a half
JohnnySic
01-06-2016, 03:32 PM
Dug up an oldie but goodie that many dont know about:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSLHigfTOm0
Includes rare footage of Joe Johnson in his brief Celtics stint. :eek:
FreezingTsmoove
01-06-2016, 03:34 PM
The tens of thousands of daily ISH fans will not be happy when opening up this thread
I would edit the title
you lil bitch ass
JohnnySic
01-06-2016, 03:36 PM
Whoops; fixed.
FreezingTsmoove
01-06-2016, 03:39 PM
Whoops; fixed.
People are going to think PP just scored 46 last night
Proctor
01-06-2016, 03:41 PM
Great post :applause:
feyki
01-06-2016, 03:42 PM
Pierce had 46 points with around %70 TS against Ivy's Phila in elimination game . That was fantastic.
remember this game
only scored 2 points in the first half or something
MP.Trey
01-06-2016, 03:45 PM
People are going to think PP just scored 46 last night
:oldlol: I think people are more in touch with reality than that.
Pushxx
01-06-2016, 04:11 PM
Pierce was a warrior, but Pitino and Wallace ruined that entire era of basketball for me.
It hurt so much. Dark ****ing years...
JohnnySic
01-06-2016, 04:22 PM
Pierce was a warrior, but Pitino and Wallace ruined that entire era of basketball for me.
It hurt so much. Dark ****ing years...
They made a LOT of mistakes. They lucked out when PP slipped to them in the draft.
LoneyROY7
01-06-2016, 05:02 PM
Prime Paulie was an absolute monster.
JEFFERSON MONEY
01-06-2016, 05:12 PM
'Toine
JimmyMcAdocious
01-06-2016, 05:34 PM
We have active posters on here who weren't even alive then.
Always wondered what Pierce's career would look like without the late Big 3 surge. Over/Under Vince Carter's?
Fire Colangelo
01-06-2016, 08:22 PM
We have active posters on here who weren't even alive then.
Always wondered what Pierce's career would look like without the late Big 3 surge. Over/Under Vince Carter's?
Not too much different imo, he was 2nd tier star before the ring and a 2nd tier star after. I would put him over Carter regardless of his ring.
dhsilv
01-06-2016, 08:36 PM
Not too much different imo, he was 2nd tier star before the ring and a 2nd tier star after. I would put him over Carter regardless of his ring.
Man I still don't understand how Carter wasn't able to be better. Sure he was never going to be a great defender, but he should have been so much more offensively.
inclinerator
01-06-2016, 08:50 PM
that's impressive i can only think of jimmy butler, kobe that has scored over 40 in a half since 2000
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.