PDA

View Full Version : Warriors are 35-2 now, half way there to beat 72-10, will they get it?



ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 01:16 PM
Their schedule i believe is getting more difficult
Cavs spurs and thunder are coming

HylianNightmare
01-10-2016, 02:46 PM
Yeah. Unless they start resting people

Spurs5Rings2014
01-10-2016, 02:48 PM
They'll get the record, we'll get the title.

:pimp:

Harison
01-10-2016, 02:52 PM
Depends on health.

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 02:54 PM
They'll get the record, we'll get the title.

:pimp:
I dont know bruh
Although im a spurs fans, the cavs are looking really good right now

Dr Hawk
01-10-2016, 02:55 PM
I dont know bruh
Although im a spurs fans, the cavs are looking really good right now

No way the Cavs win the title

dhsilv
01-10-2016, 02:55 PM
Their schedule i believe is getting more difficult
Cavs spurs and thunder are coming

Assuming normal stats and all, they're going to play 10 games against those 3 teams. Even if they go 500 and that's 9 losses (2 currently, 2 more based on prior data, and 5 from those teams).

The argument a team has had a weak schedule is pretty silly given that context.

juju151111
01-10-2016, 02:56 PM
No way the Cavs win the title
Umm why not?The Cavs wasn't healthy at the start. Since Shump and Irving been back they are way better.

nba_55
01-10-2016, 02:57 PM
Bulls didn't have to face teams as good as Spurs, Cavs and even OKC. So no, they won't beat the record.

Dr Hawk
01-10-2016, 02:58 PM
Umm why not?The Cavs wasn't healthy at the start. Since Shump and Irving been back they are way better.
Nah. Warriors and Spurs are that much betterz

nba_55
01-10-2016, 02:58 PM
No way the Cavs win the title

They have a good chance against Warriors. It would be much harder against Spurs.

juju151111
01-10-2016, 03:01 PM
Nah. Warriors and Spurs are that much betterz
I don't see much your talking about.

Dr Hawk
01-10-2016, 03:04 PM
I don't see much your talking about.

The Warriors are a happy and talented team. With happy I mean that every player is happy and comfortable with the role they have. Doesn't happen the same in the Cavs with Love. He is not comfortable and he is playing under his ability.


Also, the Warriors are a better offensive and defensive team, and they are deeper as well.

I don't see Cavs beating them

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:08 PM
Assuming normal stats and all, they're going to play 10 games against those 3 teams. Even if they go 500 and that's 9 losses (2 currently, 2 more based on prior data, and 5 from those teams).

The argument a team has had a weak schedule is pretty silly given that context.

8 games to be exact
4 against sas
3 against okc
And 1 against cav

Boogey
01-10-2016, 03:08 PM
Cavs don't want to see Leonard

Mr. Jabbar
01-10-2016, 03:11 PM
Yes. So many wins ahead of us, including the championship :rockon:

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:12 PM
Yes. So many wins ahead of us, including the championship :rockon:
Random

dunksby
01-10-2016, 03:13 PM
They gotta go 38-7 right? Really difficult to tell as the fatigue factor comes into play, I'd love to see them make history.

juju151111
01-10-2016, 03:13 PM
The Warriors are a happy and talented team. With happy I mean that every player is happy and comfortable with the role they have. Doesn't happen the same in the Cavs with Love. He is not comfortable and he is playing under his ability.


Also, the Warriors are a better offensive and defensive team, and they are deeper as well.

I don't see Cavs beating them
After the trades last year the Cavs were toos in offensive and defensive stats. They took the Warriors to 6 with Love and Kyrie injured. Im not saying the Warriors will lose, but it will be close like 7 games diwn to the wire. Love is fine woth his role.

juju151111
01-10-2016, 03:14 PM
They gotta go 38-7 right? Really difficult to tell as the fatigue factor comes into play, I'd love to see them make history.
They rest alot of 4th Q

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:16 PM
After the trades last year the Cavs were toos in offensive and defensive stats. They took the Warriors to 6 with Love and Kyrie injured. Im not saying the Warriors will lose, but it will be close like 7 games diwn to the wire. Love is fine woth his role.
Yeah cavs will have a chance if they play the warriors
However if they play the spurs then theyre done

nba_55
01-10-2016, 03:18 PM
Yeah cavs will have a chance if they play the warriors
However if they play the spurs then theyre done
Why? They beat them in San Antonio last season.

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:19 PM
Why? They beat them in San Antonio last season.
U mean during a regular season which Pop does not give a xxxx for?

nba_55
01-10-2016, 03:21 PM
U mean during a regular season which Pop does not give a xxxx for?

Why do they keep winning games if they don't give a **** about regular season? And what do you have to support your claim of ''they are done if they meet the Spurs''?

1987_Lakers
01-10-2016, 03:21 PM
If I'm a Spurs' fan I would be concerned about beating OKC to be honest.

In 2012, the Spurs got backdoor swept by OKC.

In 2014, the Spurs won the series in 6, but in two of those games Ibaka was out, when Ibaka came back in game 3 OKC pretty much owned the Spurs.

nba_55
01-10-2016, 03:23 PM
If I'm a Spurs' fan I would be concerned about beating OKC to be honest.

In 2012, the Spurs got backdoor swept by OKC.

In 2014, the Spurs won the series in 6, but in two of those games Ibaka was out, when Ibaka came back in game 3 OKC pretty much owned the Spurs.

Then in game 6, Spurs beat them by like 25 points with Ibaka playing.

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:24 PM
Why do they keep winning games if they don't give a **** about regular season? And what do you have to support your claim of ''they are done if they meet the Spurs''?
Cause theyre just that good as a basketball team
They dont be like "oh, two of our starters are out, thats why we lost"

dhsilv
01-10-2016, 03:25 PM
If I'm a Spurs' fan I would be concerned about beating OKC to be honest.

In 2012, the Spurs got backdoor swept by OKC.

In 2014, the Spurs won the series in 6, but in two of those games Ibaka was out, when Ibaka came back in game 3 OKC pretty much owned the Spurs.

This spurs team is night and day different from 2012 and okc is rather different as well. As for 2014, again the addition of aldridge is just a dramatic difference.

1987_Lakers
01-10-2016, 03:26 PM
Then in game 6, Spurs beat them by like 25 points with Ibaka playing.

No, it was a 5 point game that went to OT.

OKC went 2-2 against the Spurs when Ibaka played, and Ibaka wasn't close to 100%.

nba_55
01-10-2016, 03:26 PM
Cause theyre just that good as a basketball team
They dont be like "oh, two of our starters are out, thats why we lost"

I really didn't get the bolded part. And they are just that good of a basketball team is your reason? And Warriors are not? Why did you claim that Cavs could beat the Warriors, but would have no chance against Spurs?

1987_Lakers
01-10-2016, 03:27 PM
This spurs team is night and day different from 2012 and okc is rather different as well. As for 2014, again the addition of aldridge is just a dramatic difference.

I agree, but keep in mind Duncan & Parker have regressed as players since then, and Danny Green looks very bad this year.

nba_55
01-10-2016, 03:29 PM
No, it was a 5 point game that went to OT.

OKC went 2-2 against the Spurs when Ibaka played, and Ibaka wasn't close to 100%.

It was game 5 that they won by like 25 points with Ibaka playing, my bad. The only reason why they went 2-2 with Ibaka was because they played 3 home games and 1 away. The only away game they played, they lost by like 25 points.

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:29 PM
I really didn't get the bolded part. And they are just that good of a basketball team is your reason? And Warriors are not? Why did you claim that Cavs could beat the Warriors, but would have no chance against Spurs?

Spurs matched up better against the cavs than the warriors
The spurs are beating the cavs in 2014 finals by 15-20 every game

inclinerator
01-10-2016, 03:29 PM
nope

nba_55
01-10-2016, 03:30 PM
Spurs matched up better against the cavs than the warriors
The spurs are beating the cavs in 2014 finals by 15-20 every game

Explain why they match up better.

Kvnzhangyay
01-10-2016, 03:39 PM
Explain why they match up better.

Prob because of Aldridge/Duncan vs Thompson/Love matchup

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:40 PM
Prob because of Aldridge/Duncan vs Thompson/Love matchup
And kawhi vs lebron

dhsilv
01-10-2016, 03:42 PM
I agree, but keep in mind Duncan & Parker have regressed as players since then, and Danny Green looks very bad this year.

The point was more related to their style has changed. The rock paper siccors aspect of the nba is still around, but I'm not sure they're still paper at this point if you will.

SugarHill
01-10-2016, 03:44 PM
And kawhi vs lebron
:biggums:

ortonsaw
01-10-2016, 03:45 PM
:biggums: :biggums:

bdreason
01-10-2016, 04:29 PM
This next stretch of 10 games will tell the story. Our guys are noticeably slowing down a bit, especially on defense, and we have a string of very tough road and home games coming up.

vs Heat
@ Nuggets
@ Pistons
vs Lakers
@ Cavs
@ Bulls
vs Pacers
vs Spurs
vs Mavs


Only one 'gimme' game on that list. Every other game is very lose-able.

sundizz
01-10-2016, 04:34 PM
This next stretch of 10 games will tell the story. Our guys are noticeably slowing down a bit, especially on defense, and we have a string of very tough road and home games coming up.

vs Heat
@ Nuggets
@ Pistons
vs Lakers
@ Cavs
@ Bulls
vs Pacers
vs Spurs
vs Mavs


Only one 'gimme' game on that list. Every other game is very lose-able.

Whatchutalking about. The only tough games should be the Cavs and Spurs. Of course it is the NBA and any team can win on a given night but nobody else on that list has the 48 minute ability to stay with this team.

coin24
01-10-2016, 06:12 PM
Funny if they beat the record then lost to the Spurs in the playoffs:lol

At least the Spurs will push brans shit in again