PDA

View Full Version : Switch Kobe and Duncan on their current teams



sportjames23
01-18-2016, 02:43 AM
Are the Spurs still dominant with Kobe? Do the Lakers still suck with Duncan?

SpaceJam
01-18-2016, 02:44 AM
Spurs less dominant

Lakers less trash

Jameerthefear
01-18-2016, 02:49 AM
kobe straight up wouldn't play. he'd just ruin what they have in san antonio.
duncan would probably be the best player on the lakers impact-wise, but that team isn't winning many more games.

TheMarkMadsen
01-18-2016, 02:53 AM
Spurs less dominant

Lakers less trash


yeah Duncan's 8 points per game and 26 minutes per game is really going to make a difference on a lottery team :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

current SA starting shooting guard = 7/4/2 on 36% while taking 7 FGA per game..

Give Kobe two all stars, an amazing bench and a GOAT coach and he would be a great addition to the Spurs. He currently has no problem deferring the young guys when they get hot, he would be fine with taking a backseat to two all stars this year..

Mr. Jabbar
01-18-2016, 02:53 AM
to think kobe would be playing with the best cast he ever had :lol

SaltyMeatballs
01-18-2016, 02:54 AM
Spurs would suck more

Kobe would ruin the flow by his shot jacking. If he just plays defense, takes smart shots, and passes to the right man the Spurs would still suck a little more. They'd miss Duncan's post defense and rebounding.

Lakers would be a little better

This isn't the same Duncan from the early 2000's. No no no NO! If that were the case, the Lakers would be one of the best teams. The Lakers play better this season without Kobe and that's a fact. Add Duncan to that team and they get some veteren leadership, defense and rebounding.

Jameerthefear
01-18-2016, 03:01 AM
Spurs would suck more

Kobe would ruin the flow by his shot jacking. If he just plays defense, takes smart shots, and passes to the right man the Spurs would still suck a little more. They'd miss Duncan's post defense and rebounding.

Lakers would be a little better

This isn't the same Duncan from the early 2000's. No no no NO! If that were the case, the Lakers would be one of the best teams. The Lakers play better this season without Kobe and that's a fact. Add Duncan to that team and they get some veteren leadership, defense and rebounding.
yep. kobe fans are just going to come here and rage but we all know the truth. kobe is straight up a net negative by pretty much every metric. the spurs wouldn't touch someone like him with a 10 foot pole

AnaheimLakers24
01-18-2016, 03:13 AM
yep. kobe fans are just going to come here and rage but we all know the truth. kobe is straight up a net negative by pretty much every metric. the spurs wouldn't touch someone like him with a 10 foot pole
Your little dick will never feel a ******, loser :roll:

Quickening
01-18-2016, 03:16 AM
Your little dick will never feel a ******, loser :roll:
Kobe fans cannot handle the truth :lol

34-24 Footwork
01-18-2016, 03:27 AM
Jason Terry and Lebron James switch teams in the 2011 finals...

which team wins?

34-24 Footwork
01-18-2016, 03:30 AM
yep. kobe fans are just going to come here and rage but we all know the truth. kobe is straight up a net negative by pretty much every metric. the spurs wouldn't touch someone like him with a 10 foot pole

Your avatar either has a caricature of an underage asian girl....or an ACTUAL underage asian girl :lol :lol

If it's grass on the field, play ball, eh?

IMObjective
01-18-2016, 03:45 AM
Spurs would suck more

Kobe would ruin the flow by his shot jacking. If he just plays defense, takes smart shots, and passes to the right man the Spurs would still suck a little more. They'd miss Duncan's post defense and rebounding.

Lakers would be a little better

This isn't the same Duncan from the early 2000's. No no no NO! If that were the case, the Lakers would be one of the best teams. The Lakers play better this season without Kobe and that's a fact. Add Duncan to that team and they get some veteren leadership, defense and rebounding.
Prime Duncan led an all NBA all-star cast to third place against teams with mostly non-NBA players and much inferior talent, to the embarrassment of Americans everywhere. I don't hate Duncan, but just sayin. :D

kennethgriffin
01-18-2016, 06:40 AM
the spurs dont even need duncan


hes averaging like 2 points

Hittin_Shots
01-18-2016, 07:13 AM
the spurs dont even need duncan


hes averaging like 2 points

The Lakers don't even need Kobe,


He's averaging terrible basketball.

Also that guy that said Kobe would defer to all stars and take the back seat, Kobe on a team he thinks is in the running doesn't take the back seat he tries to take the limelight and would ruin it at this point in his career.

BuffaloBill
01-18-2016, 07:23 AM
Spurs wouldn't be able to pay for all those good players that make the team so stacked

Put Duncan on the lakers, Pau and Nash would still be there, Odom wouldn't be a drug addict. Phil wouldn't have quit on the lakers. Shaq and Duncan would have dominated the league from 1999-2007

BuffaloBill
01-18-2016, 07:24 AM
the spurs dont even need duncan


hes averaging like 2 points


And leading the league in defensive real plus minus.

Quickening
01-18-2016, 07:26 AM
And leading the league in defensive real plus minus.

I wonder if having the GOAT coach and DPOY helps with that :lol but yes he is obviously better than Kobe at this point

BuffaloBill
01-18-2016, 07:37 AM
I wonder if having the GOAT coach and DPOY helps with that :lol but yes he is obviously better than Kobe at this point


Technically Duncan has a higher defensive impact than Kawhi, they're both top 10. But yeah good defenders make teammates become better defenders.

But even without Kahwi, Duncan is top 5 all time in blocks, and holds the record for all defensive team selections. He'd still be an elite defender with or without Kawhi.

kennethgriffin
01-18-2016, 08:09 AM
if kobe was on the spurs. his +/- would be allot better too


duncan is a role player