View Full Version : So let me get this straight
Marchesk
01-26-2016, 10:17 PM
Wilt, Bran, Baylor and West are career losers because they made it to the finals more than their peers?
plowking
01-26-2016, 10:19 PM
No. Only idiots on here think so.
24-Inch_Chrome
01-26-2016, 10:20 PM
Speaking about Bron, only reason why he should be considered a loser is 2011. That was pathetic, he deserves full blame for costing his team a title.
Making the finals and losing shouldn't be an automatic black mark though, context is everything.
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:22 PM
put robertson in there. And if you really understand ball, You would realize that these losers play more or less the same way. Players whod rather hog the ball than play off the ball for statpadding purposes.
Collie
01-26-2016, 10:26 PM
Dunno about Elgin, but from all accounts I've read, West was an unselfish star who genuinely made his teammates better AND played bigger when it counted. He just had the bad luck of facing the Celtics in their prime (though he should have won twice against the Knicks).
raprap
01-26-2016, 10:27 PM
put robertson in there. And if you really understand ball, You would realize that these losers play more or less the same way. Players whod rather hog the ball than play off the ball for statpadding purposes.
I like how you act you know basketball. You're like a retarded family member that likes to talk in family gatherings and we all act we care about your opinion but really we don't because we know you can't comprehend simple things. :oldlol:
inb4 2/6
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:29 PM
I like how you act you know basketball. You're like a retarded family member that likes to talk in family gatherings and we all act we care about your opinion but really we don't because we know you can't comprehend simple things. :oldlol:
inb4 2/6
You wouldnt be a 2/6 stan if you understand ball my friend:lol
SouBeachTalents
01-26-2016, 10:32 PM
You wouldnt be a 2/6 stan if you understand ball my friend:lol
2/6 > Knicks last 40 seasons
raprap
01-26-2016, 10:32 PM
You wouldnt be a 2/6 stan if you understand ball my friend:lol
You're so predictable. Thanks for proving my point, bro. Hurr durr :lol
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:34 PM
You're so predictable. Thanks for proving my point, bro. Hurr durr :lol
:sleeping 2/6
24-Inch_Chrome
01-26-2016, 10:36 PM
http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/im_retarded_quantum_leap.gif
**** off, shit-poster.
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:37 PM
**** off, shit-poster.
:sleeping 2/6
TheMarkMadsen
01-26-2016, 10:42 PM
So let me get this straight, Wilt made more finals than Russell?
yeah, no :oldlol: :oldlol:
24-Inch_Chrome
01-26-2016, 10:44 PM
http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/im_retarded_quantum_leap.gif
:confusedshrug:
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:46 PM
:confusedshrug:
westbrook stan calling me retarded:lol
24-Inch_Chrome
01-26-2016, 10:47 PM
westbrook stan calling me retarded:lol
:kobe:
Pull your head out of your ass.
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:47 PM
:kobe:
Pull your head out of your ass.
2/6:sleeping
24-Inch_Chrome
01-26-2016, 10:48 PM
http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/im_retarded_quantum_leap.gif
I'm not a Westbrook stan. :confusedshrug:
Teams > players.
SyRyanYang
01-26-2016, 10:50 PM
Getting to the finals = having a good enough team to compete
losing time and again = choker, loser
so yes
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:51 PM
I'm not a Westbrook stan. :confusedshrug:
Teams > players.
Why dont you admit it brah? They play the same way as 2/6. In other words, stat nerd.
24-Inch_Chrome
01-26-2016, 10:53 PM
Why dont you admit it brah? They play the same way as 2/6. In other words, stat nerd.
Because it's not true?
I'm a Raptors fan. I have no idea what you're talking about..
ISHGoat
01-26-2016, 10:57 PM
Why dont you admit it brah? They play the same way as 2/6. In other words, stat nerd.
You and your kind are retards.
knicksman
01-26-2016, 10:59 PM
You and your kind are retards.
2/6 stan :yaohappy:
MJistheGOAT
01-26-2016, 11:03 PM
Depends.
If you win all the matchups you were favoured and lose the ones you weren
tmacattack33
01-26-2016, 11:09 PM
If this is even a question for you, you have let these insidehoops losers/trolls brain wash you.
stalkerforlife
01-26-2016, 11:14 PM
ANY top 15 great could make it to the finals every single year in the current east.
ANY.
It is NOT a big achievement.
MJistheGOAT
01-26-2016, 11:26 PM
ANY top 15 great could make it to the finals every single year in the current east.
ANY.
It is NOT a big achievement.
That
AnaheimLakers24
01-26-2016, 11:27 PM
Bran stan (aka worthless foreign pieces of shut who fu.ck kids) logic - losing =/= loser
G0ATbe
01-26-2016, 11:28 PM
Wilt, Bran, Baylor and West are career losers because they made it to the finals more than their peers?
They're losers because they'll most likely lose on the biggest stage. It's not rocket science gramps.:kobe:
1.5*/6
2/6
1/9
Losers, period.
plowking
01-26-2016, 11:34 PM
Getting to the finals = having a good enough team to compete
losing time and again = choker, loser
so yes
Use backwards induction on that you dumb f*ck and realize how much of a dumb f*ck you are after you do it.
By that measure, if you make the first round, you have a good enough team to compete. Losing time and time again in any round is therefore choking and losing.
Go play in traffic numb nuts.
tpols
01-26-2016, 11:44 PM
ANY top 25 great could make it to the finals every single year in the current east.
ANY.
It is NOT a big achievement.
agreed.
stalkerforlife
01-26-2016, 11:46 PM
agreed.
True.
kennethgriffin
01-26-2016, 11:46 PM
Wilt, Bran, Baylor and West are career losers because they made it to the finals more than their peers?
you're only a loser if you have a chance to win and you dont
nobody had a chance vs the 6-7 HOF celtics
bran had a legit shot in 2011, 2014 and 2015
all he had to do was play up to his potential and they win
and don't give me totals in 2015.. 27% is utter shit
SouBeachTalents
01-26-2016, 11:52 PM
you're only a loser if you have a chance to win and you dont
nobody had a chance vs the 6-7 HOF celtics
bran had a legit shot in 2011, 2014 and 2015
all he had to do was play up to his potential and they win
and don't give me totals in 2015.. 27% is utter shit
No he did not. His team was severely over matched both series. Kobe losing in '04 is worse than those two considering his team was the heavy favorite and he had the worst series of his career. Ditto 2011 for LeBron
Best to have many appearances AND many wins it is.
tpols
01-26-2016, 11:59 PM
Best to have many appearances AND many wins it is.
:oldlol:
MJistheGOAT
01-27-2016, 12:18 AM
Let
SouBeachTalents
01-27-2016, 12:29 AM
[QUOTE=MJistheGOAT]Let
LAZERUSS
01-27-2016, 12:33 AM
Dunno about Elgin, but from all accounts I've read, West was an unselfish star who genuinely made his teammates better AND played bigger when it counted. He just had the bad luck of facing the Celtics in their prime (though he should have won twice against the Knicks).
Not sure about '70. The Knicks went 60-22, while the Lakers went 46-36 (Wilt missed 70 games, and miraculously came back...albeit, at nowhere near 100%.)
Granted, an injured West just puked all over the floor in that game seven.
And he was basically a shell in the '73 Finals, as well.
LAZERUSS
01-27-2016, 12:35 AM
Add Wilt 1969 & Dirk 2007
Russell won a ring that year playing considerably worse in that Finals. And Wilt badly outplayed him in game seven.
SouBeachTalents
01-27-2016, 12:39 AM
Russell won a ring that year playing considerably worse in that Finals. And Wilt badly outplayed him in game seven.
Russell basically played on par with his regular season production
RS: 10/19/5 on 43%
F: 9/21/5 on 40%
Wilt did not
RS: 21/21/5 on 58%
F: 12/25/3 on 50%
LAZERUSS
01-27-2016, 12:47 AM
Russell basically played on par with his regular season production
RS: 10/19/5 on 43%
F: 9/21/5 on 40%
Wilt did not
RS: 21/21/5 on 58%
F: 12/25/3 on 50%
So outplaying your counterpart by a lessor margin means he was the reason his team lost. Outplaying is outplaying.
And I'll post their game seven totals...
Russell, in 48 minutes... 6 points, on 2-7 from the field, with 21 rebounds.
Wilt, in 43 minutes... 18 points, on 7-8 from the field, with 27 boards.
BTW, remove their FG/FGAs from that game seven, and Russell's teammates outshot Wilt's by a .477 to .360 margin...in a two point loss.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.