PDA

View Full Version : Who ends up higher all-time: Andrew Wiggins or Kobe Bryant?



dubeta
02-07-2016, 05:26 PM
Wiggins has already put up better stats in his rookie and sophomore seasons, than Kobe did in his, proving superior so far.




Furthermore, its likely that over his career Wiggins will end up with more than 1 MVP, while Kobe could only capture one.





I think the only thing left for Wiggins, is to go on a collusion spree to capture the championships, like Kobe did in '96 (Jerry West, Shaq), '03 (Malone, Payton), and '12 ( Dwight Howard, Steve Nash). Once Wiggins masters this art, he'll have a good chance of surpassing Kobe all-time

lilandywiggins
02-07-2016, 05:31 PM
Wiggins sadly doesn't have Shaq or the Lakers franchise to gift him championships, so people will say Kobe.

BigTicket
02-07-2016, 05:33 PM
Weak attempt at a troll post.

Wiggins isn't even the most promising player on his own team, since Towns has already surpassed him.

dubeta
02-07-2016, 05:33 PM
Weak attempt at a troll post.

Wiggins isn't even the most promising player on his own team, since Towns has already surpassed him.

Kobe wasn't either...



fail

JohnMax
02-07-2016, 05:36 PM
Wiggins first step is not as quick as Kobe so he has to maximize his size and explosiveness advantage.

JebronLames
02-07-2016, 05:42 PM
Wiggins. He'll probably end up 11th all time. Just worried he wont get the front lines and ref help that kobe did.

Lebronxrings
02-07-2016, 05:51 PM
Kobe wasn't either...



fail
dam.

:roll:

NBAplayoffs2001
02-07-2016, 05:55 PM
Not full red OP? Don't worry, threads like this will get you there :cheers:

G-Funk
02-07-2016, 05:58 PM
I doubt Wiggins will be top 5 All-time but who knows bro

dubeta
02-07-2016, 06:00 PM
I doubt Wiggins will be top 5 All-time but who knows bro

What does that have to do with anything??

G-Funk
02-07-2016, 06:03 PM
What does that have to do with anything??
Well u asked who ends up higher all-time and I answered, I doubt Wiggings ends up top 5 all-time. Are you ok?

smoovegittar
02-07-2016, 06:04 PM
Wiggins? Who's that?

Cocaine80s
02-07-2016, 06:19 PM
I doubt Wiggins will be top 11 All-time but who knows bro
fixed that for you

greatest-ever
02-07-2016, 06:56 PM
Lol he has potential but his ceiling is nowhere near top 15 all time. Maybe Scottie Pippen level if he's lucky.

SexSymbol
02-07-2016, 07:29 PM
Another weak troll attempt.
Dubeta's on suicide watch, man's just been off his already weak game for weeks now.

Showtime2001
02-07-2016, 08:08 PM
Furthermore, its likely that over his career Wiggins will end up with more than 1 MVP, while Kobe could only capture one.

http://s7.postimg.org/4phldipy3/12659703_10207621564471438_836756826_n_jpg_oh_6c.j pg

Fire Colangelo
02-07-2016, 08:58 PM
do you guys even know how hard it is to get to top 12 all time?

show some respect guys

dubeta
02-07-2016, 11:04 PM
do you guys even know how hard it is to get to top 12 all time?

show some respect guys

?


Around 2 players every decade get into the top 12


Tell me two players in Wiggins generation better than him

Towns and?

Mr. Jabbar
02-07-2016, 11:06 PM
Kobe and curry are better than lebron, leespn is as reliable as lebron in the clutch

JtotheIzzo
02-08-2016, 07:13 AM
Kobe wasn't either...



fail

Solid ether, but Wiggins will rate better than KAT, KAT is great, but bigging him up v Wiggins is a fav of the haters. He hasn't made the Wolves better year on year and Wiggins is the closer.

Kobe will be higher all time v Wiggins however, 5 chips is too great a mountain to climb.

raprap
02-08-2016, 07:18 AM
Wiggins doesn't have top 12 all time talent. It's safe to say he doesn't reach Kobe. Curry on the otherhand would easily kick kobe out of the top 12. Kobe/Curry fam on suicide watch :violin:

Magic 32
02-08-2016, 07:20 AM
http://www.totalprosports.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Charles-Barkley-sleep.gif

I don't see the point in trolling if you can't be funny about it.

This is just posting for posting sake.

sportjames23
02-08-2016, 08:24 AM
Wiggins. He'll probably end up 11th all time. Just worried he wont get the front lines and ref help that kobe did.

I saw what you did there.

Legends66NBA7
02-08-2016, 09:19 AM
Solid ether, but Wiggins will rate better than KAT, KAT is great, but bigging him up v Wiggins is a fav of the haters. He hasn't made the Wolves better year on year and Wiggins is the closer.

Towns rookie year is better than any Wiggins rookie and sophomore year.

RRR3
02-08-2016, 11:40 AM
Solid ether, but Wiggins will rate better than KAT, KAT is great, but bigging him up v Wiggins is a fav of the haters. He hasn't made the Wolves better year on year and Wiggins is the closer.

Kobe will be higher all time v Wiggins however, 5 chips is too great a mountain to climb.
Towns is quite clearly on a different level than Wiggins, stop being blind to reality. Wiggins is nothing special, Towns is the future.

julizaver
02-08-2016, 11:42 AM
Wiggins has already put up better stats in his rookie and sophomore seasons, than Kobe did in his, proving superior so far.


Bryant. Kobe looked more talanted at that age and I doubt Wiggins possesed the drive and work ethic of Bryant.

Anyway I wish Wiggins become an all-time great for the good of the league.

tmacattack33
02-08-2016, 12:44 PM
It might be close.

To get up to top 15 or so doesn't just require talent and great ability...you also need to stay healthy and be producing at a star level for a good 10 years.

riseagainst
02-08-2016, 01:16 PM
http://s7.postimg.org/4phldipy3/12659703_10207621564471438_836756826_n_jpg_oh_6c.j pg


spot on.

Haters will find anything to hate on a person, no matter how hypocritical; it's so scarily obsessive.

lilandywiggins
02-08-2016, 01:22 PM
Kobe wasn't either...



fail
:lol

Showtime2001
02-08-2016, 01:29 PM
spot on.

Haters will find anything to hate on a person, no matter how hypocritical; it's so scarily obsessive.
ISH logic "One MVP = not top 10"

Shaq not top 10 confirmed going by ISH logic.

DonDraper
02-08-2016, 01:52 PM
ISH logic "One MVP = not top 10"

Shaq not top 10 confirmed going by ISH logic.


Try MVPs + FMVPs combined

lilandywiggins
02-08-2016, 01:57 PM
Try MVPs + FMVPs combined
This. Not a bad way of figuring out top 10 as far as over simplified methods go.

Showtime2001
02-08-2016, 02:02 PM
Try MVPs + FMVPs combined
Can you not read?

"One MVP = Not top 10"

Shaq 1 MVP = Not top 10.

DonDraper
02-08-2016, 02:05 PM
Can you not read?

"One MVP = Not top 10"

Shaq 1 MVP = Not top 10.


Shaq = 3 FMVPs


Try again, Johnny

Showtime2001
02-08-2016, 02:06 PM
Shaq = 3 FMVPs


Try again, Johnny
And regular season MVPs?

1

Not top 10.

DonDraper
02-08-2016, 02:07 PM
And regular season MVPs?

1

Not top 10.


No


The rule is atleast 4 combined FMVPs and MVPs


Try again



This time without the meltdown

Showtime2001
02-08-2016, 02:08 PM
No


The rule is atleast 4 combined FMVPs and MVPs


Try again



This time without the meltdown
There is no rule its called double standard / hypocrite.

By all means continue melting down

:yaohappy:

DonDraper
02-08-2016, 02:13 PM
There is no rule its called double standard / hypocrite.

By all means continue melting down

:yaohappy:


Why would I be melting down? :oldlol:


It's not like my favourite player isn't top 10 or something

Showtime2001
02-08-2016, 02:15 PM
Why would I be melting down? :oldlol:


It's not like my favourite player isn't top 10 or something
Thanks for contributing nothing.

Shaq is not 10 top all time.


:applause:

riseagainst
02-08-2016, 02:46 PM
No


The rule is atleast 4 combined FMVPs and MVPs


Try again



This time without the meltdown


why 4? Seems agenda driven.

Showtime2001
02-08-2016, 03:13 PM
why 4? Seems agenda driven.
Because it is.

Lebronxrings
02-08-2016, 06:35 PM
why 4? Seems agenda driven.
because thats the minimal acceptance which all great players have in common. Its a much better indicator than ring count which means nothing.

Showtime2001
02-08-2016, 07:01 PM
because thats the minimal acceptance which all great players have in common. Its a much better indicator than ring count which means nothing.
There is no minimal acceptance its all agenda driven garbage that means nothing.

TheBigVeto
02-08-2016, 10:33 PM
Wiggins is already better than any version of Kobe.

ballinhun8
02-08-2016, 10:37 PM
because thats the minimal acceptance which all great players have in common. Its a much better indicator than ring count which means nothing.




:facepalm :facepalm :facepalm


Could you get any more stupid?