Hillary calls black kids "super predators", suggests we must "bring them to heel"

[Nick Young]

Thanks Massa Hillary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALXulk0T8cg


Is anyone still going to vote for this anti-black racist?:confusedshrug: :confusedshrug: :confusedshrug:

[9erempiree]

"bring them to heel" is an old racist term.

[~primetime~]

this is the 3rd thread on this today...

we really need a mod in here

[Nick Young]

this is the 3rd thread on this today...

we really need a mod in here
Because it is a big ****ing deal when a presidential candidate says and believes this kind of racist shit.

[nathanjizzle]

why are you guys so scared of the truth? shes referring to black thugs that should be persecuted.

[Nick Young]

this is what a racist politician looks like.

[tmacattack33]

The fuq?? U serious?

She's clearly talking about gang members or whatever.


Also, damn...that was Hilary in 1996? She a milf.

[FillJackson]

this is the 3rd thread on this today...

we really need a mod in hereIt's Nick Young meltdown day.

[Nick Young]

It's Nick Young meltdown day.
This thread was posted on the 25th bro:cheers:

[Patrick Chewing]

Also, damn...that was Hilary in 1996? She a milf.


Ugh! At no point in time in her life has that woman been attractive.


She has an ugly soul.

[Riks]

It's Nick Young meltdown day.
He clearly meant "week."

[NumberSix]

Real talk. Has ANYONE in the media asked her to "disavow" these comments?

[Nick Young]

Real talk. Has ANYONE in the media asked her to "disavow" these comments?
It is being swept under the rug by the mainstream media. The fix is on. Imagine if a video of Bernie or Trump saying this had come out :lol

[macmac]

As a humanitarian fully of empathy, she obviously said "bring them to heal". You misogynists are twisting that poor woman's words

[outbreak]

As a humanitarian fully of empathy, she obviously said "bring them to heal". You misogynists are twisting that poor woman's words
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heel,_Netherlands

she is perplexed because what she really meant was take them on a first class holiday to Heel in the Netherlands.

[Dresta]

Let's not forget that Bill "the first black President" Clinton was a member of an all-white country club:

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/21/us/the-1992-campaign-democrats-clinton-says-golfing-at-all-white-club-was-mistake.html

:roll:

[NumberSix]

Let's not forget that Bill "the first black President" Clinton was a member of an all-white country club:

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/21/us/the-1992-campaign-democrats-clinton-says-golfing-at-all-white-club-was-mistake.html

:roll:
Let's not forget that Bill associates with people that throw private island pedo parties.

[~primetime~]

I don't even care what Bill does in his spare time...he was a great pres, all that matters

[Dresta]

I don't even care what Bill does in his spare time...he was a great pres, all that matters
Tell that to all the Sudanese children he killed to distract from the Lewinsky scandal.

[~primetime~]

Tell that to all the Sudanese children he killed to distract from the Lewinsky scandal.
Okay sure...I'll also tell it to the families of 9-11 victims...cause everyone knows Bill orchestrated Sept 11, they should at least know that the economy was great under him, and no wars.

[lakers_forever]

Hillary Clinton in Black History

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uWu0nSsg7w

[Heilige]

Tell that to all the Sudanese children he killed to distract from the Lewinsky scandal.


Who do you think were great U.S. Presidents?

[Dresta]

Okay sure...I'll also tell it to the families of 9-11 victims...cause everyone knows Bill orchestrated Sept 11, they should at least know that the economy was great under him, and no wars.
Why are you comparing a baseless conspiracy to a verifiable fact, and a logical deduction from that fact, as if they were the same thing?


The Observer noted that "[T]he loss of this factory is a tragedy for the rural communities who need these medicines" quoting Tom Carnaffin, technical manager with "intimate knowledge" of the destroyed plant.[13] A month later, Guardian correspondent Patrick Wintour elaborated that the plant "provided 50 percent of Sudan’s medicines, and its destruction has left the country with no supplies of chloroquine, the standard treatment for malaria". He continued that, despite this, the British government (who publicly backed the attack) refused requests "to resupply chloroquine in emergency relief until such time as the Sudanese can rebuild their pharmaceutical production".[14] The factory was a principal source of Sudan's anti-malaria and veterinary drugs according to the CBW Conventions Bulletin.[15]

Germany's ambassador to Sudan from 1996 to 2000, Werner Daum, wrote an article in 2001 in which he called "several tens of thousands of deaths" of Sudanese civilians caused by a medicine shortage a "reasonable guess".[16]


I have a very clear memory of the destruction of the Al-Shifa chemical plant in Khartoum on August 20 1998, and of the false claim made by the Administration that it had sought out and destroyed a nerve gas facility that was linked to Osama bin Laden’s shady business empire. I wrote a series of columns in The Nation, dated October 5, October 19 and November 16, 1998.The first one of these was recirculated on the web by Salon magazine. I then wrote an expanded essay for the January 1999 issue of Vanity Fair. And the chapter in my book No One Left To Lie To, titled “Clinton’s War Crimes,” is a summary and digest of all the above. I quoted Tom Carnaffin, the British engineer who had helped construct the plant. I quoted the German ambassador, Werner Daum, who had recently toured it. I interviewed one of the world’s leading authorities on inorganic chemistry, Professor R.J.P. Williams. I interviewed Milton Bearden, a retired CIA station chief. My conclusions, which were stated earlier and at greater length than by any of the journalists cited by Chomsky, were that the factory was a medical and pharmaceutical facility, unrelated in any way to the holdings of bin Laden, and that this could and should have been known in advance. In any case, I argued, the United States had no right to hit Sudanese territory without at least first requesting an inspection of the plant. In short, as I put it, several times and in several different ways, “only one person was killed in the rocketing of Sudan. But many more have died, and will die, because an impoverished country has lost its chief source of medicines and pesticides.” As I also phrased it, the President had “acted with caprice and brutality and with a complete disregard for international law, and perhaps counted on the indifference of the press and public to a negligible society like that of Sudan.”

http://www.thenation.com/article/rejoinder-noam-chomsky/

Whatta man :applause:

[Blue&Orange]

Why are you comparing a baseless conspiracy to a verifiable fact, and a logical deduction from that fact, as if they were the same thing?


Whatta man :applause:
Oh so Clinton killing thousands of Sudanese children to distract people from Lewinsky case is a verifiable act? :roll: :lol :roll:

What a delusional brainwashed dumb idiot.

[Dresta]

Oh so Clinton killing thousands of Sudanese children to distract people from Lewinsky case is a verifiable act? :roll: :lol :roll:

What a delusional brainwashed dumb idiot.
No, that he directly caused the deaths of many Sudanese children by bombing the major supplier of pharmaceuticals in a poor African country is the verifiable "fact" you stupid and illiterate c*nt.

The logical deduction would be seeing that the timing of the bombing coincided with the peak of the Lewinsky scandal, and the fact Clinton took a unilateral decision without consulting the Joint Chiefs, on what was very flimsy intelligence.

But honestly, i'm the one being completely irrational here, in actually expecting you to be capable of reading. You've long-proven you can't do that.

[Blue&Orange]

No, that he directly caused the deaths of many Sudanese children by bombing the major supplier of pharmaceuticals in a poor African country is the verifiable "fact" you stupid and illiterate c*nt.

The logical deduction would be seeing that the timing of the bombing coincided with the peak of the Lewinsky scandal, and the fact Clinton took a unilateral decision without consulting the Joint Chiefs, on what was very flimsy intelligence.

But honestly, i'm the one being completely irrational here, in actually expecting you to be capable of reading. You've long-proven you can't do that.
haha you are sooooooooooo DUMB!

I can read, i read "a reasonable GUESS", you are the one that can't read, can't think, can't do nothing with your brain, some German fellow makes a guess and you call it a verifiable fact.

hahhahahahahahahahaha

You are a ****ing chimp. Don't you get tired of being owned, i mean it's like more a dozen interactions where you get exposed to the low IQ brainwashed redneck ignorant diot that you are.

Please i will be waiting for verifiable proof of why Clinton did it, and the number of death's he caused.

oh and...


In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

Praise be to God and prayers and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and his followers and companions.

I, Usama Bin Muhammad ‘Awadh Bin ‘Abud Bin Laden, have signed below. In regard to the money that is in Sudan, it is about $29 million dollars.
I hope, for my brothers, sisters, and maternal aunts, to obey my will and to spend all the money that I have left in Sudan on Jihad, for the sake of Allah

Bin Laden Testament... had nothing going on in Sudan. :rolleyes:

oh and


In 2004, nonetheless, Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen testified to the 9/11 Commission by characterizing Al Shifa as a "WMD-related facility", which played a "chemical weapons role" such as to pose a risk that it, with the help of the alleged Iraqi chemical weapons program connections, might help Al Qaeda get chemical weapons technology.

No backpedaling here, unlike Bush pals on Iraq War.

oh and tbe Factory opened in July 1997, logical deduction is that it was opened to distract from the Lewinsky scandal. lol


Enough?

Whats' dumber? saying,

Tell that to all the Sudanese children he killed to distract from the Lewinsky scandal.

or call it verified fact?

[Blue&Orange]

Leo Casey disputed the 50% figure supplied by the Sudanese government, which "has every reason to inflate these numbers", and criticized the assumption that any deaths had to result from even a 50% loss, as Al-Shifa "was only one of six pharmaceutical factories in [Sudan's] capital city of Khartoum" and Sudan could have imported any replacement medicines it needed with the "greatly increased revenues from oil fields in the southern part of the country"


Former Secretary of Defense Cohen defended, in his testimony to the 9/11 Commission in 2004, along with other cited Clinton security cabinet members in their separate 9/11 Commission testimony, the decision to destroy Al-Shifa: "At the time, the intelligence community at the highest level repeatedly assured us that "it never gets better than this" in terms of confidence in an intelligence conclusion regarding a hard target. There was a good reason for this confidence, including multiple, reinforcing elements of information ranging from links that the organization that built the facility had both with Bin Laden and with the leadership of the Iraqi chemical weapons program; extraordinary security when the facility was constructed; physical evidence from the site; and other information from HUMINT and technical sources. Given what we knew regarding terrorists’ interest in acquiring and using chemical weapons against Americans, and given the intelligence assessment provided us regarding the al-Shifa facility, I continue to believe that destroying it was the right decision."[28]

The only verifiable fact here is how i destroyed your arrogant redneck dumb ass again. Sleep tight.

[Dresta]

Holy shit, you can't be serious? You're actually quoting Clinton's flunkies thinking it proves or means something--what do you expect, for them to admit to their war crimes? There's a ton of evidence to support what i am saying, and the denials of the people complicit in Clinton's crimes (and who have a clear stake in covering them up), is the only "evidence" you have. The German ambassador has an "agenda" to lie does he? Not to mention that Clinton has a history of using the military to bomb people to distract from his own transgressions: his bombing of Iraq, for example, just happened to coincide with his impeachment hearing--another coincidence I suppose? :lol

What you're doing is like my quoting Dick Cheney saying there were wmds in Iraq and saying I "pwned" or "destroyed" you by quoting Dick Cheney (i.e. f*cking idiotic).

You're incredible, really: you're always laughing at the stupidity of Republicans, when at least they've come to recognise they've been lied to--you, on the other hand, keep pathetically shilling for the Clintons, and defending Bill's blatant war crimes. It's really quite sad. What's that effect when really stupid people can't recognise how stupid they are? That's you in a nutshell.

edit:

I already quoted this, and you ignored it:


And the chapter in my book No One Left To Lie To, titled “Clinton’s War Crimes,” is a summary and digest of all the above. I quoted Tom Carnaffin, the British engineer who had helped construct the plant. I quoted the German ambassador, Werner Daum, who had recently toured it. I interviewed one of the world’s leading authorities on inorganic chemistry, Professor R.J.P. Williams. I interviewed Milton Bearden, a retired CIA station chief. My conclusions, which were stated earlier and at greater length than by any of the journalists cited by Chomsky, were that the factory was a medical and pharmaceutical facility, unrelated in any way to the holdings of bin Laden, and that this could and should have been known in advance. In any case, I argued, the United States had no right to hit Sudanese territory without at least first requesting an inspection of the plant. In short, as I put it, several times and in several different ways, “only one person was killed in the rocketing of Sudan. But many more have died, and will die, because an impoverished country has lost its chief source of medicines and pesticides.” As I also phrased it, the President had “acted with caprice and brutality and with a complete disregard for international law, and perhaps counted on the indifference of the press and public to a negligible society like that of Sudan.”

Yeah, but i'm sure Clinton's Secretary of Defense is a reliable source on Clinton, ya know, like Rumsfeld was a reliable source on Iraq :roll:.

What a joke you are.

[masonanddixon]

I may have to vote Hillary now!

[Blue&Orange]

What a joke you are.
Yo dumb redneck brainwash chimp, show us the verifiable facts that Clinton killed thousands of children to distract people from Monica.

Can you verify that the factory was not one of six pharmaceutical factories in capital city of Khartoum?

Can you verify that the factory was not opened in July and it was attacked in august? Or can we just lower our IQ to your levels and say that the logic deduction is that it opened in July to distract people from Monica?

Can you verify that Bin Laden has not 10 times more ties to Sudan than to Iraq?

Can you verify that the attack was not backed by the UK?


lol This chimp is quoting "Clinton’s War Crimes" book and calling me out for Bias. How dumb can this idiot be.


Milton Bearden,

Wikipedia "He played a role in funding and training the mujahedeen to fight occupying Soviet forces."
IT's a "reasonable guess" that thousands of children and women were killed because of the training of this terrorists ups freedom fighters by Milton Bearden?


In August 1999, he argued that the threat posed by Osama bin Laden had been blown out of proportion. He called for the U.S. to renounce "any plans for a unilateral military action against Osama bin Laden
haha dude was on point!!

Tom Carnaffin


"Carnaffin subsequently worked as technical manager for the Baaboud family, which owned the factory"

Article he wrote,

It is said that the principal objective in a war against Iraq is to destroy the weapons of mass destruction of a nation who has aggressively occupied other nations and territories. But Wait! What about Israel? They have weapons of mass destruction and have occupied Palestinian territory for decades, definitely more than 12 years, without incurring sanctions: Non compliance with UN resolutions: Constant further advancement into Palestinian lands: Persistent aggression towards its neighbours, and still no sign of the 140,000 troops going to sort that out.
hahaha no Bias.


The destruction of Dresta continues.


What's dumber?
Saying Clinton killed thousands of children to distract you from Monica, saying it a verifiable fact, calling it a logical deduction, or keep defending that inane comment beyond all reason.


Brainwashed dumb redneck, i'm surprised you didn't sneak Obama in somehow, first time you don't bring obama while discussing something completely unrelated. i guess calling you out on it worked. haha

[Im Still Ballin]

Hilarious watching Blue&Orange trying to keep up with Dresta

Like a student and master

[nathanjizzle]

Hilarious watching Blue&Orange trying to keep up with Dresta

Like a student and master

what? a master doesnt have a student, a master has a disciple. a teacher has a student. this is an example of why you are not qualified to be my friend.

[Im Still Ballin]

what? a master doesnt have a student, a master has a disciple. a teacher has a student. this is an example of why you are not qualified to be my friend.
But that was when we were friends.

[Im Still Ballin]

what? a master doesnt have a student, a master has a disciple. a teacher has a student. this is an example of why you are not qualified to be my friend.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1-9-xkpgPk

Replace kids with friends.

But that was when we were friends.

[Brunch@Five]

No, that he directly caused the deaths of many Sudanese children by bombing the major supplier of pharmaceuticals in a poor African country is the verifiable "fact" you stupid and illiterate c*nt.

how is it "direct causation" when the presumed ("guessed") deaths of children are clearly not even collateral damage but an effect of multiple causes such as general poverty, poor infrastructure, non-existent medical system, lack of foreign humanitarian aid? Children didn't die from the bombing itself; they didn't die from pollution following the bombing of a chemical/pharmaceutical plant. That I would accept as "direct cause".

What exactly about this is "direct causation"?

[Lebron23]

I just read that this was a 20 years old quote.