View Full Version : Big O vs. Curry
Doctor K
02-25-2016, 11:59 PM
ok lets end this
Who is the 2nd greatest PG at their very peaks?
feyki
02-26-2016, 08:14 AM
Oscar was better rebounder and playmaker at his peak . But This Year Curry playing insane scoring-shooting performances . I select Curry .
Dr Hawk
02-26-2016, 08:20 AM
At their peaks it is not even close. Curry
Harison
02-26-2016, 08:27 AM
Its not just Big O, Isiah and Stockton also have a word or two to say.
Curry obviously is the best 3PT shooter among PGs of All-time, but game doesnt end there, other greats contributed more to the table and were arguably more impactful.
Marchesk
02-26-2016, 09:05 AM
At their peaks it is not even close. Curry
Thirty point tripple double. An MVP over Russell and Wilt and prime Baylor. But it's not even close, huh?
aj1987
02-26-2016, 09:11 AM
Thirty point tripple double. An MVP over Russell and Wilt and prime Baylor. But it's not even close, huh?
That would translate to something like 18/4/4 today. Not really impressive. Past him prime 34 year old Wade numbers.
LakersForlife
02-26-2016, 09:25 AM
basketball is shit back then
aj1987
02-26-2016, 09:31 AM
basketball is shit back then
Your English is shit now.
LAZERUSS
02-26-2016, 12:39 PM
That would translate to something like 18/4/4 today. Not really impressive. Past him prime 34 year old Wade numbers.
No, it would translate to 40-20-15 numbers in today's era.
livinglegend
02-26-2016, 12:42 PM
Nobody saw big O in his prime.
Useless thread.
ralph_i_el
02-26-2016, 12:46 PM
No, it would translate to 40-20-15 numbers in today's era.
:rolleyes:
crisoner
02-26-2016, 12:48 PM
Nobody saw big O in his prime.
Useless thread.
True
LAZERUSS
02-26-2016, 12:48 PM
:rolleyes:
40-20-15 is no more ridiculous than 18-4-4.
ralph_i_el
02-26-2016, 01:42 PM
40-20-15 is no more ridiculous than 18-4-4.
One of those is absolutely impossible. The other is clearly a possibility.
I don't think it's likely that Oscar would do worse than 20-5-5, but it's still something that actually could happen, unlike 40-20-15
aj1987
02-26-2016, 02:00 PM
No, it would translate to 40-20-15 numbers in today's era.
Definitely, if he was playing against HS kids. :cheers:
senelcoolidge
02-26-2016, 02:04 PM
I think the only advantage for Curry would be shooting it from far...that's about it. Robertson had superior court vision. Was bigger and stronger. Better in the post. Great mid range shooter. Curry might edge him out on FT % by a little probably.
jongib369
02-26-2016, 02:19 PM
18/4/4
What a Joke :lol
You don't think Oscar could get 22.0 attempts?
And you bumped his assists down that much? You do realize it was 1 step=no assist right?
Oscars stats would be more like 27-30PPG, 6-8 Rebounds, 11-12 assists
What he said recently about Steph Curry was ignorant IMO, but while I think he'd have a hell of a time guarding Curry, he'd also abuse Curry himself
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0263/9009/files/ncb_g_robertson_576.jpg?12260384163558041588
http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/game-on/2010/10/22/1ablog-oscarrobertsonx-large.jpg
sd3035
02-26-2016, 02:23 PM
The big O would be a homeless man's Draymond Green without the defense in today's league
A decent backup pg for a lottery team
Sarcastic
02-26-2016, 03:31 PM
Nobody saw big O in his prime.
Useless thread.
So that means it obviously never happened.
riseagainst
02-26-2016, 03:34 PM
taking into account pace and better quality of players of today compared to Big O's era, he'll probably average something like 22-5-5.
T_L_P
02-26-2016, 04:07 PM
No, it would translate to 40-20-15 numbers in today's era.
No, it would translate to 18/4/4 today.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.