Did you know: The Democratic party put American citizens in concentration camps.

[Nick Young]

Did you know that the Democratic party, under the executive leadership of FDR, is responsible for interning tens of thousands of American citizens in concentration camps, simply due to their ancestry?


It was only 75 years ago that the Democrats rounded up all Americans of Japanese descent from their homes and forced them to live in concentration camps in the California desert for years.

https://www.loc.gov/exhibits/treasures/images/at0072.3s.jpg

The Democrats even forced these interned Americans WHO COMMITTED NO CRIME to work in sweat shops in order to enable the American war effort against Japan-the nation that these interned American's ancestors came from.
http://www.nps.gov/museum/exhibits/manz/exb/Camp/work/WRANoC886_Manzanar_Free_Press_staff.jpg

http://270c81.medialib.glogster.com/media/41/41644c8072df325bbbc4a2e355ea4db448af021d3aa529f19b d410c2d31ffda4/mansanar-1-jpg.jpg

http://www.owensvalleyhistory.com/manzanar1/000832_t.jpg

https://www.awesomestories.com/images/user/5341569aa2.gif

This is what Democratic party leadership looks like.

Know what you're voting for.

[Nick Young]

#Neverforget

[Nick Young]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/24/FarewelltoManzanarCover.jpg
Check out this book if you want to learn more about the disgusting concentration camps created by FDR and the Democrats.

We must never repeat this mistake again.

[NumberSix]

The democrat party's strategy has always been to instigate sectarianism (for lack of a better word). It's never about ideas, but identity. They don't target positions. They target identities. They never strategize "how can we get votes from issue A or issue B voters". It's always "how do we get votes from identity group A or identity group B".

You just saw this with Hillary the way she and her surrogates kept trying to shamelessly imply that Bernie is a sexist or that he only just recently started pretending to care about black people to get votes. This is standard democrat politics. Bernie is trying to have a battle over actual issues but Hillary just wants to battle over who can better consolidate blacks or Hispanics or whatever.

You can see very easily when they talk about the republican primary polls, they discuss who does better with conservative, very conservative, moderate, libertarian, etc... You don't see any of that in the democrat primaries. All they discuss is white, black, Hispanic, young women, older women, etc... There's no discussion of liberal, very liberal, moderate, etc...

Their entire political strategy is to instigate division between identity groups and if need be create or inflame new tensions where there aren't any.

[nathanjizzle]

sick

[Riks]

Did you know that current Republicans are more similar to Democrats from that era than current Democrats?

[Nick Young]

The democrat party's strategy has always been to instigate sectarianism (for lack of a better word). It's never about ideas, but identity. They don't target positions. They target identities. They never strategize "how can we get votes from issue A or issue B voters". It's always "how do we get votes from identity group A or identity group B".

You just saw this with Hillary the way she and her surrogates kept trying to shamelessly imply that Bernie is a sexist or that he only just recently started pretending to care about black people to get votes. This is standard democrat politics. Bernie is trying to have a battle over actual issues but Hillary just wants to battle over who can better consolidate blacks or Hispanics or whatever.

You can see very easily when they talk about the republican primary polls, they discuss who does better with conservative, very conservative, moderate, libertarian, etc... You don't see any of that in the democrat primaries. All they discuss is white, black, Hispanic, young women, older women, etc... There's no discussion of liberal, very liberal, moderate, etc...

Their entire political strategy is to instigate division between identity groups and if need be create or inflame new tensions where there aren't any.
They still remain true to their KKK roots. The Dems are absolutely obsessed with labeling and sorting people in to piles based on their race and religion. When someone doesn't fit in to the pile sorting and goes against the narrative of how Dems think that person should behave and act, the Dems meltdown. They aren't capable of handling a world that isn't based on absolutes and identity politics.

[Nick Young]

Did you know that current Republicans are more similar to Democrats from that era than current Democrats?
So FDR was actually a Republican?:confusedshrug:

Please explain in your own words when this great switching of ideologies occurred, I wish to learn :cheers:

[Riks]

So FDR was actually a Republican?:confusedshrug:

Please explain in your own words when this great switching of ideologies occurred, I wish to learn :cheers:
The switch was gradual. Lincoln was also Republican, yet you see more Republicans these days that wish for the old times than you see Democrats.

[NumberSix]

The switch was gradual. Lincoln was also Republican, yet you see more Republicans these days that wish for the old times than you see Democrats.
There was no "switch". The democrats have just been very successful scam artists.

Republicans believe that the law should be truly color blind while they democrats believe in strategically not enforcing the law if they can position themselves as the saviour of some identity group.

For example, the republicans believe immigration laws should equally apply to everybody. The democrats want immigration laws to equally apply to everybody EXCEPT Hispanics. If you're Hispanic, the piece of shit democrats will whisper in your ear "the republicans don't REALLY believe in equally applying the law. They just hate Hispanics. You should never vote for them. You should only vote for us."

They intentionally instigate division.

[Nick Young]

The switch was gradual. Lincoln was also Republican, yet you see more Republicans these days that wish for the old times than you see Democrats.



Wow, that's cool to know. Did you know that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and the Civil Rights activists of the 1950s were Republicans?

This is the same party that attempted to stand up against FDR and his unconstitutional internment of American citizens of Japanese descent in concentration camp sweat shops.


When did the switch happen exactly? :confusedshrug:

[Riks]

Wow, that's cool to know. Did you know that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and the Civil Rights activists of the 1950s were Republicans?

This is the same party that attempted to stand up against FDR and his unconstitutional internment of American citizens of Japanese descent in concentration camp sweat shops.


When did the switch happen exactly? :confusedshrug:
Apparently you don't understand the concept of gradual since you are still asking when "exactly" and pointing out stuff from the 50s. :facepalm

[ShackEelOKneel]

Did you know the OP likes spreading old propaganda like it is relevant to today's political parties?

[NumberSix]

Apparently you don't understand the concept of gradual since you are still asking when "exactly" and pointing out stuff from the 50s. :facepalm
The democrat strategy has always been to divide people and politicize identity. The way they do it has just become more sophisticated than their old "der, non whites and non Protestants are bad" approach.

If the democrat party moved to Israel, they'd employ the exact same strategy. Their entire strategy would be telling all the non Jews "hey, the other party hates you. They only like Jews. You can't trust them. You should never vote for them. You should only vote for us".

If the democrat party moved to Syria, their strategy would be to tell all the Shia, Christians and Kurds "the other party hates you. They only like Sunni Arabs. You should never vote for them."

If the democrat party moved to Northern Ireland, their entire strategy would be telling Catholics "the other party hates you. They only represent Protestants. You can't trust them. You should only vote for us."


It's the lowest of the low in politics. It's disgusting and it's what they've always done. And you better believe if some day the demographics shift, they'll adjust and use the same strategy. If for some reason there was mass immigration from eastern Europe because the EU went to hell or something and the US population shifted to be more right wing white Christian... You better believe the democrat party will adjust to the new demographics and start pandering, instigating and dividing accordingly.

[Dresta]

Did you know the OP likes spreading old propaganda like it is relevant to today's political parties?
Well, it is considering many American liberals view themselves as inheritors to FDR, at the same time as calling Trump a fascist and racist. Not only that, but they are using the guilt by association tactics to brand him as a racist. Can't do that and not expect history to bite you in the ass (or maybe you can, considering how little history most people know). Because Mussolini and the Italian fascists were huuuge fans of FDR an his New Deals, so much so that when they realised their glowing admiration was being used against him in America, his press office put out the following statement:

"It is not to be emphasized that Roosevelt

[Dresta]

The democrat strategy has always been to divide people and politicize identity. The way they do it has just become more sophisticated than their old "der, non whites and non Protestants are bad" approach.

If the democrat party moved to Israel, they'd employ the exact same strategy. Their entire strategy would be telling all the non Jews "hey, the other party hates you. They only like Jews. You can't trust them. You should never vote for them. You should only vote for us".

If the democrat party moved to Syria, their strategy would be to tell all the Shia, Christians and Kurds "the other party hates you. They only like Sunni Arabs. You should never vote for them."

If the democrat party moved to Northern Ireland, their entire strategy would be telling Catholics "the other party hates you. They only represent Protestants. You can't trust them. You should only vote for us."


It's the lowest of the low in politics. It's disgusting and it's what they've always done. And you better believe if some day the demographics shift, they'll adjust and use the same strategy. If for some reason there was mass immigration from eastern Europe because the EU went to hell or something and the US population shifted to be more right wing white Christian... You better believe the democrat party will adjust to the new demographics and start pandering, instigating and dividing accordingly.You forget that the Republican Party was initially formed largely through an alliance between sectionalist anti-southerners and Know-Nothingism (anti-Catholic nativists).

Both parties have been guilty of this tbh; it's more a result of excessive democratization and the political pandering it engenders than anything else.

[NumberSix]

You forget that the Republican Party was initially formed largely through an alliance between sectionalist anti-southerners and Know-Nothingism (anti-Catholic nativists).

Both parties have been guilty of this tbh; it's more a result of excessive democratization and the political pandering it engenders than anything else.
I'm not claiming that the Republican Party is innocent. They did the southern strategy and the McCain South Carolina attack was absolutely sickening. I'm just outlining what the democrat party's strategy has been and still is.

[Nick Young]

Yes, I'm not saying that the Repubs are some kind of innocent saintly party.

I do not support the GOP either.

I'm just saiyan that the Dems created the KKK and fought against the Union during the civil war, and also that Democratic party champion FDR interned tens of thousands of American citizens in concentration camp sweat shops.

#FACTS

[Blue&Orange]

Did you know that Americans exterminated the indigenous people of North America?

Did you know that Americans dropped a Nuclear bomb on helpless civilians?

Sampling of Deaths >From US Military Interventions & Propping Up Corrupt
Dictators (using the most conservative estimates)
Nicaragua
30,000 dead
Brazil
100,000 dead
Korea
4 million dead
Guatemala
200,000 dead
Honduras
20,000 dead
El Salvador
63,000 dead
Argentina
40,000 dead
Bolivia
10,000 dead
Uruguay
10,000 dead
Ecuador
10,000 dead
Peru
10,000 dead
Iraq
1.3 million dead
Iran
30,000 dead
Sudan
8-10,000 dead
Colombia
50,000 dead
Panama
5,000 dead
Japan
140,000 dead
Afghanistan
10,000 dead
Somalia
5000 dead
Philippines
150,000 dead
Haiti
100,000 dead
Dominican Republic
10,000 dead
Libya
500 dead
Macedonia
1000 dead
South Africa
10,000 dead
Pakistan
10,000 dead
Palestine
40,000 dead
Indonesia
1 million dead
East Timor
1/3-1/2 of total population
Greece
10,000 dead
Laos
600,000 dead
Cambodia
1 million dead
Angola
300,000 dead
Grenada
500 dead
Congo
2 million dead
Egypt
10,000 dead
Vietnam
1.5 million dead
Chile
50,000 dead


Did you know? Ha the past, the marvelous past!

Are you really gonna vote on a American?

[Nick Young]

Good point bro.

The Democrats are also responsible for developing and then dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. Holy shit, Dems absolutely hate the Japanese.

[Dresta]

Before the Bush's the Democrats were traditionally the war-making party as well.

WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam.

Thanks Democrats, eternal sponsors of the welfare/warfare state! Remember, conservatives might defend the military state now that it exists, but don't forget who built it ("progressives").

[Nick Young]

The brand of progressivism that the modern American Democratic party pushes is the exact same brand that lead to the Great Terror and the beheading of Georges Danton.

Liberal progressives are obsessed with purging each other out of existence. That is what every single liberal and progressive system of government in history has eventually devolved in to.

[longtime lurker]

The democrat strategy has always been to divide people and politicize identity. The way they do it has just become more sophisticated than their old "der, non whites and non Protestants are bad" approach.

If the democrat party moved to Israel, they'd employ the exact same strategy. Their entire strategy would be telling all the non Jews "hey, the other party hates you. They only like Jews. You can't trust them. You should never vote for them. You should only vote for us".

If the democrat party moved to Syria, their strategy would be to tell all the Shia, Christians and Kurds "the other party hates you. They only like Sunni Arabs. You should never vote for them."

If the democrat party moved to Northern Ireland, their entire strategy would be telling Catholics "the other party hates you. They only represent Protestants. You can't trust them. You should only vote for us."


It's the lowest of the low in politics. It's disgusting and it's what they've always done. And you better believe if some day the demographics shift, they'll adjust and use the same strategy. If for some reason there was mass immigration from eastern Europe because the EU went to hell or something and the US population shifted to be more right wing white Christian... You better believe the democrat party will adjust to the new demographics and start pandering, instigating and dividing accordingly.

This is proof that the reich wing is live in their own reality and are completely delusional. Holy projection Batman. I guess this is what happens when a complete and utter buffoon hijacks your party. I for one will happily piss on the grave of the Republican party as we know it.

[Dresta]

This is proof that the reich wing is live in their own reality and are completely delusional. Holy projection Batman. I guess this is what happens when a complete and utter buffoon hijacks your party. I for one will happily piss on the grave of the Republican party as we know it.
Why are you such an unrepentant bigot?

It's astounding that someone can think himself so forward-looking and unprejudiced while being so incredibly narrow-minded.

[Nick Young]

Why are you such an unrepentant bigot?

It's astounding that someone can think himself so forward-looking and unprejudiced while being so incredibly narrow-minded.
cosign

[Nick Young]

Democrats of ISH-Do you think that FDR was a great president? :confusedshrug:

[Nick Young]

Manzanar was a tragedy in American history, and one political party in particular is responsible for that tragedy....


Never forget.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3017/2651376815_feb75c34bd.jpg

[Facepalm]

http://album.dcoweb.org/shook/ShookArch.jpg

[Nick Young]

http://album.dcoweb.org/shook/ShookArch.jpg
Manzanar was no laughing matter, you race bigot.:facepalm

[COnDEMnED]

I did know this. I listen to Howard Stern almost daily. One of his reoccurring guests is George Takei, who most would know as Sulu from the original Star Trek. A few times he's gotten into it how he and his family were actually held in concentration camps as a child and how he thought his father didn't fight hard enough to protect them, and how hard it was to also be a gay, in a concentration camp, to a father who was a decorated Japanese war veteran.

The guys had a hard life but he's incredibly inspirational with all the things he's overcome to be a huge success in America. He's a good guy, does a lot of charity work.

[DonDadda59]

http://album.dcoweb.org/shook/ShookArch.jpg

So appropriate. On so many levels.

A 15 year old girl with terminal cancer made a bucket list that went viral. (http://www.parenting.com/blogs/children-and-technology-blog/jeana-lee-tahnk/15-year-old-terminal-cancer-creates-bucket-list-g) She wanted to use up every last drop of life, live it to the absolute fullest with the little time she had.

Mr. Young on the other hand is using his brief time remaining here on pure f*ckery. Melting down and bumping embarrassing threads. I gave him the chance to be great, to become a legend... And this is what his dare to be great moment produced.

Hell of a life...:ohwell:

[Nick Young]

This is the biggest travesty in American history. Americans imprisoned in concentration camps without trial by their own government.


Only a party like the Democrats would allow something like this to happen.

Remember that next time you think about voting bros.

Be informed.

Be safe.

[Jasper]

fast forward 65 years OP , you'll find that the Bush administration blew the countries money and most retirees retirement.
How many house were foreclosed , people lost jobs , people on the street...
:confusedshrug:
I for one lost 80k during the Bush administration..

Oil - huh

[Nick Young]

fast forward 65 years OP , you'll find that the Bush administration blew the countries money and most retirees retirement.
How many house were foreclosed , people lost jobs , people on the street...
:confusedshrug:
I for one lost 80k during the Bush administration..

Oil - huh
Illegal concentration camps are worse than taxing your money breh.

Once again a selfish self interested lefty accide:facepalm ntally shows his true colors

[TheMan]

Nov 8 can't get here fast enough so we can be rid of this OP hack

[9erempiree]

Nov 8 can't get here fast enough so we can be rid of this OP hack

I respect the OP and he is a man of integrity.

Win or lose he will be here.

A lot of people never show their faces again when the person or team they root for loses.

I expect the OP to be here just as I will be here if Trump loses.

[Nick Young]

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-jovF2BCVKwk/VLS0kPng25I/AAAAAAAABg4/mUiI5y5oAvU/s1600/The-Truth-is-Out-There.png

[jstern]

They were Japanese internment camps.

And it looks like something that Trump would definitely support for anyone we were at war with. (I'm actually a fan of Trump because of the comedic value.) And if he came out for such a thing, it sounds like something that the majority of modern day Republicans would back him on.

So what does that tell you about political parties and whether their values change over the years.

Are current KKK members pro Hilary or Bernie Sanders, even though they started out as Democrats? Or are they more likely to be Republicans.

What about KKK members back in the day?

[senelcoolidge]

Not sure if posted already..but Hilllary's America is coming out. Should be an interesting movie to watch.

https://youtu.be/r7e6gLht6OQ

[Awesomedoers]

Democrats in the 40s and democrats today are very different. Profiling and particular race or religion and blaming them for crime or terror has become very popular among republicans like trump and Cruz. While op is right comparing democrats today and back then is showing a lack of historical knowledge.

[Nick Young]

Stop attempting to minimize FDR's crime. They were concentration camps for Japanese Americans. Japanese Americans were taken from their homes and forced in to concentration camps in the scorching hot California desert. They had poor air conditioning and were forced to do menial labor in order to support the war effort against the nation of their ancestors.

It completely violated the spirit and rule of the US constitution.

Stop trying to revise history. Call the concentration camps what they were.



And it looks like something that Trump would definitely support for anyone we were at war with. (I'm actually a fan of Trump because of the comedic value.) And if he came out for such a thing, it sounds like something that the majority of modern day Republicans would back him on.



Do you have any evidence to support this egregious claim other than speculation based on conjecture?

Facts?
Sources?
Evidence?
Logic?
Real life?

Anything?:confusedshrug:

[UK2K]

They were Japanese internment camps.

And it looks like something that Trump would definitely support for anyone we were at war with. (I'm actually a fan of Trump because of the comedic value.) And if he came out for such a thing, it sounds like something that the majority of modern day Republicans would back him on.

So what does that tell you about political parties and whether their values change over the years.

Are current KKK members pro Hilary or Bernie Sanders, even though they started out as Democrats? Or are they more likely to be Republicans.

What about KKK members back in the day?

And Independents, and 1/3 of Democrats.


While 71 percent of Republican voters supported the ban, 34 percent of likely Democratic voters and 49 percent of independents also did, according to the new poll by Morning Consult.


You are standing out there alone, and all of us can only gaze upon your moral fortitude. :bowdown:

You're so cool and hip and trendy and down for your fellow mankind.

[Nick Young]

Are current KKK members pro Hilary or Bernie Sanders, even though they started out as Democrats?
What about KKK members back in the day?

Yes.

The Grand Dragon of the KKK is publicly supporting Hillary's campaign. (http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president)


Hillary has called KKK leader Robert Byrd her "friend" and "mentor" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iUlFfcY2_4)

The actual video of Hillary's eulogy to Byrd has been removed from youtube and I am finding trouble finding it. The channel from the previous link I used has been deleted completely. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iUlFfcY2_4)

EDIT: here is her eulogy to the KKK leader she considers to be her mentor.
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryweuBVJMEA)

KKK members back in the day were Democrats. The organization was founded by the Democratic Party. They actively fought against the Civil rights movement. The Civil rights movement was in the 1950s-1960s. It was not "100 years ago":hammerhead:

http://madworldnews.com/wp-content/uploads/gal-robert-byrd05-jpg-620x500.jpg
http://2ps46p2qeea548gs4x33cbdz.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/jpeg-640x349.jpg



Modern "identity politics" are nothing but good old fashioned Democratic pro-racial segregation theory. The Democrats are absolutely obsessed with dividing people in to groups and putting them in to boxes based on their ethnic origin. Democrats are actively rallying against Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s dream of a color blind society. Black Lives Matter, a modern movement backed and supported by the Democrats is a racist organization dedicated to racial segregation.


Just look at what's in front of you.


Can anyone provide a link of Donald Trump referring to a KKK leader as a friend and mentor?


The Democratic party has consistently been the party that is pro-racial segregation from the very beginning.


I will leave you with the words of Democratic party hero Lyndon B. Johnson:

"These Negroes, they're getting pretty uppity these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference... I'll have them ******s voting Democratic for the next two hundred years".

[Nick Young]

Never forget
http://all-that-is-interesting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/manzanar-relocation-center-mess-hall.jpg
https://videos.files.wordpress.com/WMMlXu5s/manzanarneveragain-h-264-512_scruberthumbnail_1.jpg
http://www.ncrr-la.org/home/photo2actualhistoricphotog.jpg
http://encyclopedia.densho.org/front/media/cache/31/58/3158e4a93730f797b47335babf4ade36.jpg
https://36.media.tumblr.com/9abe14ba2c971cee45fc285033e46c2f/tumblr_nypq0xFtNR1rqzxz5o1_1280.jpg
Never again