If all Democrats were forced to live together, same for Republicans. Would it work?

[Back In Shape]

And how do you think things would play out in the 2 respective societies?

I'm talking all demographics(race,education,income level) all living side by side, with the only common criteria being party affiliation.

I don't want to know which one you think is better, rather what each society would look and function like.

[Terahite]

http://i.imgur.com/9PO5CfZ.gif

Us independents don't really think about this shit. We'd rather see the divisive party system abolished. Trump will get it done.

Trump the Great Unifier.

[Overdrive]

Of course it would work, but they look for difference in between them and on one side there'd be Republicans and Dempublicans and on the other Democrats Repocrats.

Mankind loves to devide.

[JohnnySic]

Democrats can take the northeast and west coast and republicans can have the flyover states.

Something like this:

http://i.imgur.com/I3LJV.png

[DCL]

they would find new things to argue with each other.

[Nick Young]

The Dems would begin purging each other and never stop finding more enemies in the party they need to publicly shame and kick out, and more things to get needlessly upset about.


I don't know how Repub culture would function.

[DukeDelonte13]

New York and California

versus

Mississippi and Alabama?


:confusedshrug:

[Akrazotile]

New York and California

versus

Mississippi and Alabama?


:confusedshrug:

New York and California would completely collapse without its conservative-minded business owners and workforce. They are basically the poles that hold up the tent for all the immigrants and hippies.

A state filled with Republicans would be divided socially among evangelicals and libertarians, but economically it would be strong af.

An entirely Democrat state would have lots of kumbaya and no social judgement - by white people anyway, blacks would likely continue as the most homophobic demographic - but economically it would be a shit show.

Republicans build strong, safe communities. Democrats emphasize sensitivity, tolerance, individuals getting whatever they want. Basically Republicans make kids eat their vegetables even if they dont want to - Democrats let their kids have candy for dinner and pat themselves on the back for being "the cool parent."


This question isnt even a contest. Republicans would run shit, Democrats would descend into poverty and slavery basically, with poor blacks enslaving pu$$y white cuckolds, except with little economic function in place to even make it prosperous.

[Edgar Friendly]

New York and California

versus

Mississippi and Alabama?


:confusedshrug:

CA and NY literally are the TOP 2 most segregated areas in the USA. Mississippi and Alabama are in the 2 of the 3 LEAST segregated states in the USA. So uhhmmm no. :rolleyes:

If Democrats and Republicans had to actually be literal neighbors. No walls, no separate school districts, no gated communities.

Republicans

http://fscomps.fotosearch.com/compc/CSK/CSK007/pr80123.jpg

http://www.scenichudson.org/sites/default/files/images/handshake-northwind-solar_580.jpg

Democrats

http://media.trb.com/media/photo/2009-04/46610480.jpg

http://www.barenakedislam.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/maxresdefault-e13753855622951.jpg

[UK2K]

Everyone knows, deep down inside, that if you split the country into two with one party on each side, it'd only be a matter of time before the Democrat side starts hopping the fence to the Republican side.

It's being disingenuous to suggest anything otherwise.

[BoutPractice]

If the United States were an apartment building, and you put all the Democrats in one shared apartment and all the Republicans in another, they'd still all have the same landlord.

[Im Still Ballin]

New York and California would completely collapse without its conservative-minded business owners and workforce. They are basically the poles that hold up the tent for all the immigrants and hippies.

A state filled with Republicans would be divided socially among evangelicals and libertarians, but economically it would be strong af.

An entirely Democrat state would have lots of kumbaya and no social judgement - by white people anyway, blacks would likely continue as the most homophobic demographic - but economically it would be a shit show.

Republicans build strong, safe communities. Democrats emphasize sensitivity, tolerance, individuals getting whatever they want. Basically Republicans make kids eat their vegetables even if they dont want to - Democrats let their kids have candy for dinner and pat themselves on the back for being "the cool parent."


This question isnt even a contest. Republicans would run shit, Democrats would descend into poverty and slavery basically, with poor blacks enslaving pu$$y white cuckolds, except with little economic function in place to even make it prosperous.
CJ Samuels with the DAGGER.

[nathanjizzle]

the republican side would not have internet or computers. they would be driving fuel burning trucks into the year 2200. they would still allow blacks to eat at restaurants as long as the blacks feel out of place and uncomfortable about it.

[poido123]

the republican side would not have internet or computers. they would be driving fuel burning trucks into the year 2200. they would still allow blacks to eat at restaurants as long as the blacks feel out of place and uncomfortable about it.



http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/3100000/lemons-are-cool-lemons-3195163-160-120.jpg

[NumberSix]

the republican side would not have internet or computers. they would be driving fuel burning trucks into the year 2200. they would still allow blacks to eat at restaurants as long as the blacks feel out of place and uncomfortable about it.
Did computers and Internet come out of capitalist or socialist countries? Hmmm.

You notice Apple, Microsoft and IBM came out of America. Not Sweden or the USSR.

Dem supporters are too dumb to recognize how dumb they are. Lefties confirming the Dunning-Kruger effect on a daily basis.

[TheMan]

Lol @ the idiots entertaining such a stupid premise :oldlol:

And of course the cuckservatives are the only ones so insecure that they need to go into great detail how such "societies" would pan out in their favor :lol

[NumberSix]

Lol @ the idiots entertaining such a stupid premise :oldlol:

And of course the cuckservatives are the only ones so insecure that they need to go into great detail how such "societies" would pan out in their favor :lol
Lol. Are you people ever going to attempt to learn what this word means? You keep making your self look stupid.

Hint... It's not a word that people on the left call people on the right. It's a word that people on the right call other people on the right who aren't "conservative" enough.

Long story short. A "cuckservative" is a weak, open boarders republican.

[nathanjizzle]

Did computers and Internet come out of capitalist or socialist countries? Hmmm.

You notice Apple, Microsoft and IBM came out of America. Not Sweden or the USSR.

Dem supporters are too dumb to recognize how dumb they are. Lefties confirming the Dunning-Kruger effect on a daily basis.

wow you are just stupid. bill gates is a liberal. al gore who help passed laws to expand the internet in its infant stages is a liberal. the overwhelming majority of tech companies in computer sciences are liberal companies. Way to be out of touch with society. as if old conservatives in the last 40 years were fostering the growth of computers and the internet and not young libs.

[Nick Young]

Lol @ the idiots entertaining such a stupid premise :oldlol:

And of course the cuckservatives are the only ones so insecure that they need to go into great detail how such "societies" would pan out in their favor :lol
Is Thomas Moore a cuckservative?

Is Jonathan Swift a cuckservative?

Is Plato a cuckservative?

[NumberSix]

wow you are just stupid. bill gates is a liberal. al gore who help passed laws to expand the internet in its infant stages is a liberal. the overwhelming majority of tech companies in computer sciences are liberal companies. Way to be out of touch with society. as if old conservatives in the last 40 years were fostering the growth of computers and the internet and not young libs.
Carly Fiorina?

The point is, if Bill Gates grew up in a leftist country he would have been a farmer or a sales clerk or something.

[UK2K]

Lol @ the idiots entertaining such a stupid premise :oldlol:

And of course the cuckservatives are the only ones so insecure that they need to go into great detail how such "societies" would pan out in their favor :lol
So you disagree with the general sentiment that the Democrat side would be... a mess?

[NumberSix]

So you disagree with the general sentiment that the Democrat side would be... a mess?
The Republican side would be pretty much something like America. The democrat side would be something like Mexico.

[StephHamann]

The Democrats would probably start a war like they always do.

Party of warmongers.

[UK2K]

The Republican side would be pretty much something like America. The democrat side would be something like Mexico.
Oh absolutely.

And of course you'd have the rich white people who will run the Democrat zone, and they'll tell people to be all for the earth while they're living in monstrous houses; they're all for equality as long as they can just brag about it but not have to experience it; and that they're all for socialist pay scales but they aren't giving up their share.

The rest of the zone would be a mix of a war zone and a ghetto.

[TheMan]

The Republican side would be pretty much something like America. The democrat side would be something like Mexico.
You couldn't be any more incorrect if you even wanted to be purposefully :facepalm

Mexico's economic policies have been consistently more rightwing than the US, they follow the Reagan/Thatcher neoliberal economic policies to a tee, that's why you see a small middle class, a large segment is poor and a select few have almost all the wealth of the nation (the US is getting there too BTW, just check how the rich have gotten richer and the US middle class is shrinking).

The US is actually more leftist than Mexico considering their social programs, social security, welfare, safety net programs. :lol The only thing Mexico is more left than the US is their government funded national healthcare program for every citizen (and even non citizens) but most of the industrialized nations in the world already have that.

[NumberSix]

You couldn't be any more incorrect if you even wanted to be purposefully :facepalm

Mexico's economic policies have been consistently more rightwing than the US, they follow the Reagan/Thatcher neoliberal economic policies to a tee, that's why you see a small middle class, a large segment is poor and a select few have almost all the wealth of the nation (the US is getting there too BTW, just check how the rich have gotten richer and the US middle class is shrinking).

The US is actually more leftist than Mexico considering their social programs, social security, welfare, safety net programs. :lol The only thing Mexico is more left than the US is their government funded national healthcare program for every citizen (and even non citizens) but most of the industrialized nations in the world already have that.
Mexico's problem aren't due to right/left. It's more a matter of their culture and lower IQs.

[Nick Young]

You couldn't be any more incorrect if you even wanted to be purposefully :facepalm

Mexico's economic policies have been consistently more rightwing than the US, they follow the Reagan/Thatcher neoliberal economic policies to a tee, that's why you see a small middle class, a large segment is poor and a select few have almost all the wealth of the nation (the US is getting there too BTW, just check how the rich have gotten richer and the US middle class is shrinking).

The US is actually more leftist than Mexico considering their social programs, social security, welfare, safety net programs. :lol The only thing Mexico is more left than the US is their government funded national healthcare program for every citizen (and even non citizens) but most of the industrialized nations in the world already have that.
Did Reagan/Thatcher allow drug lords and gangsters to take control of their respective countries?:confusedshrug:

[9erempiree]

Dems- wouldn't get shit done and it would be a regressive society. Nobody works when they can just share the wealth. There would be no motivation for inventions.

Republicans- probably a GOAT economy. Problem would be libertarians vs. establishments vs. evangelicals.

[longtime lurker]

It's cute that Republicunts think their states wouldn't be the equivalent of third world countries if Democrats and Republicans were forced to live separately. I'm sure you'd see more sterling examples like Louisiana and Kansas:

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html

Plus imagine how much worse things would if these welfare queen red states weren't sucking off the teet of the federal government.

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-most-least-dependent-on-the-federal-government/2700/#red-vs-blue

Republicans continue to live in an alternate reality :hammerhead:

[NumberSix]

Plus imagine how much worse things would if these welfare queen red states weren't sucking off the teet of the federal government.

They'd get their act together. You know why? Because they'd have no choice.

[KyrieTheFuture]

Nobody wants to admit that the two sides can't live without one another

[KyrieTheFuture]

Carly Fiorina?

The point is, if Bill Gates grew up in a leftist country he would have been a farmer or a sales clerk or something.
You mean the woman that almost destroyed HP? Really?

[TheMan]

Mexico's problem aren't due to right/left. It's more a matter of their culture and lower IQs.:biggums:
This nikka has the nerve to shit on Mexico when the US voted for Dumya (twice:lol ) and fourth grade level speaking Donald Trump has the most delegates in the GOP :oldlol:

Bro, you have no leg to stand on critisizing Mexico's IQ when all the world considers the US a country full of dumbasses :yaohappy:

Mexico's problem is corrupt rightwing corporatist economic policies designed to keep most of the wealth at the very top...(the GOP probably get's a hard on by how Mexico have modeled their economy the way they want the US to), all the money at the top, scraps for everyone else.

The US getting there tho :applause:

[NumberSix]

:biggums:
This nikka has the nerve to shit on Mexico when the US voted for Dumya (twice:lol ) and fourth grade level speaking Donald Trump has the most delegates in the GOP :oldlol:

Bro, you have no leg to stand on critisizing Mexico's IQ when all the world considers the US a country full of dumbasses :yaohappy:

Mexico's problem is corrupt rightwing corporatist economic policies designed to keep most of the wealth at the very top...(the GOP probably get's a hard on by how Mexico have modeled their economy the way they want the US to), all the money at the top, scraps for everyone else.

The US getting there tho :applause:
I have no problem with a few people having all the money if it happens naturally. We're not all equal. You should fully expect that smart people will make more money then dumb people. That's perfectly fine. Of course a high IQ inventor is going to make more money than a guy who can barely figure out how to make a sandwich properly.

And I'm sorry to tell you, Mexicans do have a significantly lower average IQ. #factsAreMean.

Mexico is a third world country. They have a much lower standard of living. It's an empirical fact that people living in an area with a lower standard of living have a lower average IQ. I'm sorry if you don't like science.

[TheMan]

I have no problem with a few people having all the money if it happens naturally. We're not all equal. You should fully expect that smart people will make more money then dumb people. That's perfectly fine. Of course a high IQ inventor is going to make more money than a guy who can barely figure out how to make a sandwich properly.

And I'm sorry to tell you, Mexicans do have a significantly lower average IQ. #factsAreMean.

Mexico is a third world country. They have a much lower standard of living. It's an empirical fact that people living in an area with a lower standard of living have a lower average IQ. I'm sorry if you don't like science.
Links?

BTW, scientists have found that traditional IQ tests don't reflect a person's intelligence...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9755929/IQ-tests-do-not-reflect-intelligence.html

And lol at you thinking inventing shit is what makes most of a nation's wealthy...most of it is old money, passed from generation to generation. Bill Gates is an outlier, the Hiltons are the norm. So in your opinion, Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton are geniuses :yaohappy:

[NumberSix]

Links?

BTW, scientists have found that traditional IQ tests don't reflect a person's intelligence...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/9755929/IQ-tests-do-not-reflect-intelligence.html

And lol at you thinking inventing shit is what makes most of a nation's wealthy...most of it is old money, passed from generation to generation. Bill Gates is an outlier, the Hiltons are the norm. So in your opinion, Kim Kardashian and Paris Hilton are geniuses :yaohappy:
Everything you think is wrong.

1. The vast majority of wealthy Americans don't come from wealth.
2. The vast majority of inherited fortunes are lost after 2 generations.
3. IQ testing is extremely reliable. The only people who claim it isn't are SJWs who don't like the results. Congrats on finding an article from 2012 that vaguely suggests IQ testing isn't accurate unless it's a series of IQ tests.
4. Learn what the word "average" means.

[Hawker]

:biggums:
This nikka has the nerve to shit on Mexico when the US voted for Dumya (twice:lol ) and fourth grade level speaking Donald Trump has the most delegates in the GOP :oldlol:

Bro, you have no leg to stand on critisizing Mexico's IQ when all the world considers the US a country full of dumbasses :yaohappy:

Mexico's problem is corrupt rightwing corporatist economic policies designed to keep most of the wealth at the very top...(the GOP probably get's a hard on by how Mexico have modeled their economy the way they want the US to), all the money at the top, scraps for everyone else.

The US getting there tho :applause:

You need to get out more. The average non-american isn't any smarter than the average american. They're not even aware of the many ways they benefit from America.

[Back In Shape]

http://www.ooyuz.com/images/2016/2/30/1459361860237.jpg

It'd make a hell of a reality show.

[greymatter]

Carly Fiorina?

You must have been in a cave or totally oblivious to the fact that she ran HP into the ground. The tech sector decline of most major companies in early 2000s (stock price) was ~33%, Carly managed to destroy HP to the tune of 50+%.

In any case, no one expects movement conservatives (imbeciles who get their news from talking heads at Fox "News") to offer anything insightful or remotely grounded in reality.

[greymatter]

You need to get out more. The average non-american isn't any smarter than the average american. They're not even aware of the many ways they benefit from America.

Yeah, set that bar low. Why not compare Americans to their counterparts in other 1st world countries rather than the other 6.7 billion people in the world?

http://www.businessinsider.com/pisa-rankings-2013-12

Oh yeah, that's right. Conservatives haven't seen a goal post they haven't tried to move.

[Back In Shape]

Carly Fiorina?


Or Meg Whitman

[Hawker]

Yeah, set that bar low. Why not compare Americans to their counterparts in other 1st world countries rather than the other 6.7 billion people in the world?

http://www.businessinsider.com/pisa-rankings-2013-12

Oh yeah, that's right. Conservatives haven't seen a goal post they haven't tried to move.

Really has nothing to do with high scores in math and reading but more to do with policy and why America does what it does. Their simplistic comparisons between countries fall short every time as they don't understand how the US government works nor the culture.