View Full Version : Does it suck to know there are only two teams that can win the finals?
stalkerforlife
04-07-2016, 07:05 PM
The Warriors because they did it the right way and preserved the integrity of competition.
And the Cavs because they colluded like cowards and have by far the biggest payroll in the league?
Like really...there is absolutely ZERO competition in the east because of Bran's cowardly colluding.
At least the west has the Spurs...but they stand almost a ZERO chance against the Warriors.
Lebronxrings
04-07-2016, 07:06 PM
no. But it sucks that only one player is living rent free in you.
Smoke117
04-07-2016, 07:08 PM
meltdown
Lebron23
04-07-2016, 07:25 PM
LeBron > Kobe
Nilocon165
04-07-2016, 07:27 PM
Who cares
AirBonner
04-07-2016, 08:28 PM
This thread guarantees warriors miss the finals and that op is a ***.
Mike smith
04-07-2016, 08:30 PM
The Warriors because they did it the right way and preserved the integrity of competition.
And the Cavs because they colluded like cowards and have by far the biggest payroll in the league?
Like really...there is absolutely ZERO competition in the east because of Bran's cowardly colluding.
At least the west has the Spurs...but they stand almost a ZERO chance against the Warriors.
Injuries can change that
Old Man River
04-07-2016, 08:42 PM
My Spurs have better chance than Cleveland.
stalkerforlife
04-07-2016, 10:05 PM
Injuries can change that
Very true.
HylianNightmare
04-07-2016, 10:15 PM
Usually there's only 2-3 serious contenders anyway
IllegalD
04-07-2016, 10:18 PM
LeBron > Kobe
Puertoricans >>>>>> Pinoys
Bankaii
04-07-2016, 10:56 PM
Iggy wasn't drafted by the Warriors.
He was the FMVP and most impactful player in the Finals.
You point is invalid.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.