The GOAT standard for a playoff run

[3ball]

.
Jordan's 1991:


32.0 PER

127 ORtg

0.333 WS/48


These are the best stats ever achieved by a #1 option while winning a championship.

Curry won't match Jordan's 1991 postseason, considering he fell short of Jordan's 1991 REGULAR season (lower PER, win shares, offensive win shares, PPG - you name it)

[Quickening]

Ok Ill name it... EFG%, ts%... team ppg :lol :roll:

[stalkerforlife]

https://media.giphy.com/media/nYHRWagU8EDtu/giphy.gif

[3ball]

https://media.giphy.com/media/nYHRWagU8EDtu/giphy.gif


:bowdown:

Curry will never do anything as alpha as that

not only is he not alpha enough, but he'll never have the requisite accolades!!... :rockon:

[aj1987]

Played in a garbage ass era. Dude would be a glorified Lance today.


Curry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ordan.

[ShawkFactory]

Curry got this dude like the wicked witch right now :lol

[Spurs m8]

Played in a garbage ass era. Dude would be a glorified Lance today.


Curry >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ordan.


Pull that d*ck out of your brain, son

[Spurs m8]

Curry got this dude like the wicked witch right now :lol

Jordans got ya mums vag on his lips

[stalkerforlife]

:bowdown:

Curry will never do anything as alpha as that

not only is he not alpha enough, but he'll never have the requisite accolades!!... :rockon:

You should give Curry his respect.

He's surpassed Bran.

Making fun of Bran is the key.

[3ball]

Played in a garbage ass era.


Today's era is the BEGINNER VERSION of the game:


wide open spacing, hands-off perimeter defense, no paint-camping, no flagrant fouls or physicality


Previous eras were the ADVANCED VERSION of the game:


no spacing, hand-checking, paint-camping, flagrant fouls and physicality






Curry >>> Ordan.



Jordan was a better shooter than Curry inside 20 feet:



.....................MJ 1997 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/893/stats/shooting/?Season=1996-97&SeasonType=Regular%20Season)...................Cur ry 2015 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201939/stats/shooting/?Season=2014-15&SeasonType=Regular%20Season)............ Curry 2016 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201939/stats/shooting/)

5-9 ft.......... 49.2%, 126 fga........... 40.3%, 72 fga.......... 47.9%, 71 fga <--- link to nba.com data

10-14 ft....... 51.5%, 466 fga........... 52.9%, 85 fga.......... 50.9%, 57 fga

15-19 ft....... 49.5%, 594 fga........... 43.9%, 132 fga........ 37.3%, 102 fga



Overall midrange % (all shots inside the 3-point line but outside the paint)

JORDAN 1997: 49.3%, 1202 fga

CURRY.. 2015: 41.1%, 285 fga
CURRY.. 2016: 42.5%, 200 fga

[Nilocon165]

You should give Curry his respect.

He's surpassed Bran.

Making fun of Bran is the key.
Compare your life to Lebrons and then think about how utterly retarded this statement is

[stalkerforlife]

Compare your life to Lebrons and then think about how utterly retarted this statement is

:biggums:

And I am much more alpha than Bran.

[SexSymbol]

Today's era is the BEGINNER VERSION of the game:


wide open spacing, hands-off perimeter defense, no paint-camping, no flagrant fouls or physicality


Previous eras were the ADVANCED VERSION of the game:


no spacing, hand-checking, paint-camping, flagrant fouls and physicality



Jordan was a better shooter than Curry inside 20 feet:



.....................MJ 1997 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/893/stats/shooting/?Season=1996-97&SeasonType=Regular%20Season)...................Cur ry 2015 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201939/stats/shooting/?Season=2014-15&SeasonType=Regular%20Season)............ Curry 2016 (http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201939/stats/shooting/)

5-9 ft.......... 49.2%, 126 fga........... 40.3%, 72 fga.......... 47.9%, 71 fga <--- link to nba.com data

10-14 ft....... 51.5%, 466 fga........... 52.9%, 85 fga.......... 50.9%, 57 fga

15-19 ft....... 49.5%, 594 fga........... 43.9%, 132 fga........ 37.3%, 102 fga



Overall midrange % (all shots inside the 3-point line but outside the paint)

JORDAN 1997: 49.3%, 1202 fga

CURRY.. 2015: 41.1%, 285 fga
CURRY.. 2016: 42.5%, 200 fga

it's the other way around.
The defensive and offensive tactics are twice as complicated was it was 15 years ago, let alone 20.
None of the teams pre 00 would survive against current warriors or spurs in a 7 game series. That's just the cold harsh truth.
They were great for their time, sure, so celebrate them on a scale that they were actually on.

[Nilocon165]

:biggums:

And I am much more alpha than Bran.
You're just trolling at this point.

[Cocaine80s]

:biggums:

And I am much more alpha than Bran.
Bullied by black kids and dropped out of high school

Currently unemployed while living off welfare checks

Attempted a gofundme page to pay for groceries

Yea, so much more alpha :roll: :roll: :roll:

[IllegalD]

Bullied by black kids and dropped out of high school

Currently unemployed while living off welfare checks

Attempted a gofundme page to pay for groceries

Yea, so much more alpha :roll: :roll: :roll:


Are you talking about Simon? :lol

[Spurs m8]

:biggums:

And I am much more alpha than Bran.

You're a p*ssy

[Derka]

This is a higher level than mere rent-free. At this point, its rent-free while watching his wife and daughter get humped in his bed on a nightly basis.

Step away from the keyboard, sir.

[3ball]

it's the other way around.
The defensive and offensive tactics are twice as complicated was it was 15 years ago, let alone 20.


The objective of today's X's and O's are to get 3-pointers, and over 2/3 of them are catch-and-shoot - today's players are better at ball-domination and catch-and-shoot, but worse at literally everything else..

Far less players, and a DIMINISHING number of players at the SG thru Center positions are capable of carrying an offense by creating their own shot over and over - they require a screen or a screen/roll-pop situation..

You might say less individual moves results in more teamwork, but it doesn't - it results in less individually-unique plays and passing.. Instead, passes and plays are robotic-looking where players aren't individually unique - the pursuit of catch-and-shoot makes players like monolithic checkers pieces on a board, where the most strategic movement of them on the court wins, NOT the most skilled creativity.






None of the teams pre 00 would survive against current warriors or spurs in a 7 game series. That's just the cold harsh truth.


The Bulls have the best #1 and #2 options, and match the winning championship experience of both the Spurs and Warriors combined.

So keep dreaming.. Even if you think today's X's and O's are superior, the Bulls have the superior #1 and #2 options, so their superior talent coupled with today's X's and O's would DESTROY the weaker #1 and #2 options of the Spurs/Warriors.

Btw, the triangle didn't allow ball-domination (extended live dribbling), which explains why today's players are incapable of running it effectively - they simply don't know how to score without pounding the rock at least 3 times first.. Again, players are better at ball-domination and catch-and-shoot jumpers, but they're worse at everything else, particularly individually-unique play creation.
.