If Curry leads GSW

[Mr Feeny]

To the title to repeat, while putting up his ridiculous numbers, and beats S.A. and Cleveland comfortably, where would you rank him on the all time list?

I'm not talking projection. I'm saying at the end of this season.

[stalkerforlife]

Ahead of Bran.

[hold this L]

To the title to repeat, while putting up his ridiculous numbers, and beats S.A. and Cleveland comfortably, where would you rank him on the all time list?

I'm not talking projection. I'm saying at the end of this season.
16-25 probably. If his career ended right after of course. His career needs some longevity and also more titles to really cement his legacy.

I think you would need a full summer once the rush is gone to make a proper decision.

[kuniva_dAMiGhTy]

I'd rank him in the ~15 range legacy wise, although his peak play would be up there with anybodies. At least offensively.

[I know you are]

Ahead of Bran.
This. Which would also put him ahead of Kobe.

[stalkerforlife]

This. Which would also put him ahead of Kobe.

How?

Kobe's easily better than Bran all time.

[Bandito]

Ahead of Bran.
He's already ahead of Bran. You mean ahead of Kobe ;)

[stalkerforlife]

He's already ahead of Bran. You mean ahead of Kobe ;)

Not yet.

Maybe one day, though.

[Nilocon165]

Not yet.

Maybe one day, though.
Can't wait

[Lebronxrings]

not that much higher tbh. His team without him managed to beat a playoff team!

[AirBonner]

Right behind Dray, Iggy, and Klay

[lilteapot]

How?

Kobe's easily better than Bran all time.
lol at this piece of floridian white trash. worthless honky

[I know you are]

How?

Kobe's easily better than Bran all time.
If it is so easy and not even close, how did ESPN justify #3 and #12?

[AirBonner]

If it is so easy and not even close, how did ESPN justify #3 and #12?
crater face is smarter than them obviously :lol

[riseagainst]

he's already the greatest ever. Another ring this year and he cements that.

[PP34Deuce]

Def HOF first ballot right now. With a top 5 all time peak ever in the history of the game.

I believe Steph at this point is in the 25-30 range. He may have a legendary peak but I can't put him over Dirk, Wade, etc when he's only been amazing for 2 years as opposed to 5-7 from others.

[Mr Feeny]

Def HOF first ballot right now. With a top 5 all time peak ever in the history of the game.

I believe Steph at this point is in the 25-30 range. He may have a legendary peak but I can't put him over Dirk, Wade, etc when he's only been amazing for 2 years as opposed to 5-7 from others.

Yeah he doesn't have the longevity that the others do. If he does manage to do it though, his peak is higher than ten aforementioned. With 2nd consecutive mvp and a second title (with room to add a LOT in the future), I think he's moving up close to 11-15.

[SwayDizzle]

Feenz, why r u posting all normal now?

[Mr Feeny]

Feenz, why r u posting all normal now?

Like I'm not a normal poster :facepalm :coleman:

[stalkerforlife]

If it is so easy and not even close, how did ESPN justify #3 and #12?

Why in the hell would a legitimate basketball aficionado care about what ESPN says?

Grow up, dude.

[Pinkhearts]

Once Curry 3-peats I'll have him as GOAT.

[LAZERUSS]

Why in the hell would a legitimate basketball aficionado care about what ESPN says?

Grow up, dude.

And just for the record...

http://krod.com/espn-commits-costly-turnover-on-top-100-all-time-nbarank/


The self proclaimed ESPN expert panel consisted mostly of online editors and a few writers


In other words...a panel of opinionated fools.

BTW, I do like this comment from that writer...


As expected, Michael Jordan topped the list, followed by Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. Then, things started to get strange. LeBron James has somehow leapfrogged Magic Johnson, Wilt Chamberlain, Larry Bird, and Kobe Bryant as the third greatest player in the history of professional basketball. If you conducted this poll in 10 years when LeBron was wrapping up his Hall of Fame career, you could make an argument that The King should be ranked in the top three or maybe even number one. However, there is no way that James should be given such status after 13 seasons in the NBA.


Incidently, how about ESPN's "panel of experts" in 1999, with their "Sports Century" segment?

https://espn.go.com/sportscentury/athletes.html

MJ, Wilt, Magic, Russell, and then Kareem.

Evidently KAJ came back in the last 17 years and added to that resume.

[BlazerRed]

Ahead of Bran.
Yep. 2/2 + no collusion > 2/7

[TemporaMutantur]

not that much higher tbh. His team without him managed to beat a playoff team!

Eh, the Rockets barely count. They don't even like each other. Apathy ball.

[stalkerforlife]

And just for the record...

http://krod.com/espn-commits-costly-turnover-on-top-100-all-time-nbarank/



In other words...a panel of opinionated fools.

BTW, I do like this comment from that writer...



Incidently, how about ESPN's "panel of experts" in 1999, with their "Sports Century" segment?

https://espn.go.com/sportscentury/athletes.html

MJ, Wilt, Magic, Russell, and then Kareem.

Evidently KAJ came back in the last 17 years and added to that resume.

:applause:

Deserves it's own thread, bro.

[Mr Feeny]

And just for the record...

http://krod.com/espn-commits-costly-turnover-on-top-100-all-time-nbarank/



In other words...a panel of opinionated fools.

BTW, I do like this comment from that writer...



Incidently, how about ESPN's "panel of experts" in 1999, with their "Sports Century" segment?

https://espn.go.com/sportscentury/athletes.html

MJ, Wilt, Magic, Russell, and then Kareem.

Evidently KAJ came back in the last 17 years and added to that resume.

I agree that Kobe is not top 10 :lebronamazed:
Funnily enough so do most people :applause: :applause: :lol

[Mr Feeny]

Why in the hell would a legitimate basketball aficionado care about what ESPN says?

Grow up, dude.

You definitely care :lebronamazed: