View Full Version : Years Kobe, LeBron, Duncan were the Best Players in the Finals
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:00 PM
LeBron 4 times: (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015)
Duncan 2 times: (1999, 2003)
Kobe 1 time: (2009)
LeBron >>> Duncan >>> Kobe as player of the generation
Sounds about right
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:05 PM
LeBron 4 times: (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015)
Duncan 2 times: (1999, 2003)
Kobe 1 time: (2009)
LeBron >>> Duncan >>> Kobe as player of the generation
Sounds about right
I would give Kobe 2010, as well.
Duncan? As horrific as he was on offense in '05, he was still a dominant rebounder and defender. (As a side-note...Shaq was a MUCH greater offensive force against that SAME Piston team the year before.)
And Lebron was probably the best player in the '14 Finals, but who cared? He had zero impact in that Finals.
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:07 PM
I would give Kobe 2010, as well.
Duncan? As horrific as he was on offense in '05, he was still a dominant rebounder and defender. (As a side-note...Shaq was a MUCH greater offensive force against that SAME Piston team the year before.)
And Lebron was probably the best player in the '14 Finals, but who cared? He had zero impact in that Finals.
Manu was better than Duncan in the Finals, Duncan almost cost his team the series with his Game 4 and Game 5 performances :facepalm
SouBeachTalents
04-30-2016, 12:13 PM
Manu was better than Duncan in the Finals, Duncan almost cost his team the series with his Game 4 and Game 5 performances :facepalm
Duncan was better than Manu in both those games
Mr. Jabbar
04-30-2016, 12:16 PM
during the kobe/shaq era the real finals were WCF. also:2010
know your sport
STATUTORY
04-30-2016, 12:16 PM
why choose the finals? it's just one series of many necessary to win the championship and not necessarily the toughest one. so arbitrary
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:18 PM
why choose the finals? it's just one series of many necessary to win the championship and not necessarily the toughest one. so arbitrary
I don't always agree with you...but THIS.
:applause:
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:18 PM
why choose the finals? it's just one series of many necessary to win the championship and not necessarily the toughest one. so arbitrary
You could say that about any round, but if you're going to only pick one, might as well be the Finals :confusedshrug:
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:19 PM
LOL Wilt/Kobe fan trying to dismiss Finals performances, why am I not surprised :oldlol:
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:20 PM
You could say that about any round, but if you're going to only pick one, might as well be the Finals :confusedshrug:
Shaq's Lakers had their easiest series in the Finals from '00 thru '02. Cakewalks actually. They went 12-3 in those three series, and were an OT game away from two consecutive sweeps.
tpols
04-30-2016, 12:20 PM
You could say that about any round, but if you're going to only pick one, might as well be the Finals :confusedshrug:
or... you can apply year to year context ?
We can educate you Simon, but you have to listen first.
Jameerthefear
04-30-2016, 12:22 PM
LOL Wilt/Kobe fan trying to dismiss Finals performances, why am I not surprised :oldlol:
:roll: this.
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:23 PM
Shaq's Lakers had their easiest series in the Finals from '00 thru '02. Cakewalks actually. They went 12-3 in those three series, and were an OT game away from two consecutive sweeps.
If they were so easy, why did Kobe shit the bed in 2 of those? :confusedshrug:
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:24 PM
or... you can apply year to year context ?
We can educate you Simon, but you have to listen first.
Context? Here's only so many excuses you can make for Kobe being the best finals performer once out of 7 tries :oldlol:
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:26 PM
LOL Wilt/Kobe fan trying to dismiss Finals performances, why am I not surprised :oldlol:
Chamberlain was easily the best player in the Finals in '64, '67, 70, and '72.
As for Lebron...he was AWFUL in a sweeping loss in '07, was AWFUL in a humiliating Finals in '11, and had ZERO impact in '14. Furthermore, he and Glass Ankle Curry will forever be linked to the trivia question...what two MVPs played against each other in the same Finals and lost out in the FMVP to a bench-warmer?
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:28 PM
Chamberlain was easily the best player in the Finals in '64, '67, 70, and '72.
As for Lebron...he was AWFUL in a sweeping loss in '07, was AWFUL in a humiliating Finals in '11, and had ZERO impact in '14. Furthermore, he and Glass Ankle Curry will forever be linked to the trivia question...what two MVPs played against each other in the Finals and lost out in the FMVP to a bench-warmer.
So LeBron had 0 impact with 28/8/4 on 68% TS, but Wilt was the best player averaging 12ppg????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
LeBrons worst Finals performances are better than Wilts best, and that has you so mad right now
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:28 PM
If they were so easy, why did Kobe shit the bed in 2 of those? :confusedshrug:
Same reason that Lebron puked all over the floor in the '07 and '11 Finals.
tpols
04-30-2016, 12:28 PM
If they were so easy, why did Kobe shit the bed in 2 of those? :confusedshrug:
He was tired from carrying the load in the real Finals ..
Let the big fella beat up on todd mccalough and jason collins, to give him a little shine.
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:31 PM
So LeBron had 0 impact with 28/8/4 on 68% TS, but Wilt was the best player averaging 12ppg????
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
LeBrons worst Finals performances are better than Wilts best, and that has you so mad right now
ZERO IMPACT buddy. The average margin in the '14 Finals was...
14.5 ppg...and NBA record.
As for Wilt, I would take his '64, '67, and '70 Finals over ANY of Lebron's. Not even close in fact.
NOR does that include the REAL NBA Finals in the decade of the 60's...Wilt vs Boston...in which Chamberlain completely trashed Russell and the Celtics in '60, '62, '64, '65, '66, '67, and '68 (and outplayed Russell in '69.)
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:34 PM
ZERO IMPACT buddy. The average margin in the '14 Finals was...
14.5 ppg...and NBA record.
As for Wilt, I would take his '64, '67, and '70 Finals over ANY of Lebron's. Not even close in fact.
You realize Wilts Finals stats pace adjusted is 12 points and 15 rebounds? :biggums:
You would take a Deandre Jordan (12 points 15 rebounds) over LeBrons performances??? :roll: :roll: :roll:
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:35 PM
You realize Wilts Finals stats pace adjusted is 12 points and 15 rebounds? :biggums:
You would take a Deandre Jordan (12 points 15 rebounds) over LeBrons performances??? :roll: :roll: :roll:
You realize you are full of shit, right?
As an example...how about the '64 Finals? The two teams averaged a combined 103 ppg.
Next...
Bankaii
04-30-2016, 12:38 PM
Of course Kobetards want to change it to a different round.
The Finals are Kobe's worst enemy:roll:
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 12:43 PM
Of course Kobetards want to change it to a different round.
The Finals are Kobe's worst enemy:roll:
They downplay the regular season and MVPs because "Kobe saved it for the playoffs" but now they also want to downplay the Finals :roll: :roll:
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:44 PM
Of course Kobetards want to change it to a different round.
The Finals are Kobe's worst enemy:roll:
Just like the Lebron fans ignore the 5 > 2, right?
The fact was, Kobe earned at least four of his five rings, and if you include playing brilliantly in an OT win without Shaq, all five.
But the bottom line...Shaq would have two less rings in his career without Kobe carrying LA into the Finals in '01 and '02. And only a fool would argue that Kobe was not the best player in '09 and '10 Finals.
ballinhun8
04-30-2016, 12:45 PM
Add 05 to Duncan
Add 10 to Kobe
Take away 14 for LeBron and possibly 15.
Dumb ass Brontards always trying to add and subtract to make prop their idol. Finals are Lebron's worst opponent :roll:
SouBeachTalents
04-30-2016, 12:46 PM
Just like the Lebron fans ignore the 5 > 2, right?
The fact was, Kobe earned at least four of his five rings, and if you include playing brilliantly in an OT win without Shaq, all five.
But the bottom line...Shaq would have two less rings in his career without Kobe carrying LA into the Finals in '01 and '02. And only a fool would argue that Kobe was not the best player in '09 and '10 Finals.
So then we're definitely not ignoring 11-2 in the Russell/Wilt argument
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:47 PM
Add 05 to Duncan
Add 10 to Kobe
Take away 14 for LeBron and possibly 15.
Dumb ass Brontards always trying to add and subtract to make prop their idol. Finals are Lebron's worst opponent :roll:
Pretty much my sentiments, as well. I would give Lebron '15 simply because he won two games by himself, was an OT game away from another, and kept his team in the clinching loss until the very end. Furthermore, swap Lebron with Curry in that series, and GAC would still be ringless.
Jameerthefear
04-30-2016, 12:48 PM
Add 05 to Duncan
Add 10 to Kobe
Take away 14 for LeBron and possibly 15.
Dumb ass Brontards always trying to add and subtract to make prop their idol. Finals are Lebron's worst opponent :roll:
In what universe was Lebron not the best player in 2014? :oldlol:
Go back to your MJ videos buddy, you clearly know **** all about basketball.
Jameerthefear
04-30-2016, 12:49 PM
According to Laz:
11 > 2
So, Russel >>> Wilt
This is according to Laz. I didn't say anything.
sportjames23
04-30-2016, 12:52 PM
In what universe was Lebron not the best player in 2014? :oldlol:
Go back to your MJ videos buddy, you clearly know **** all about basketball.
LOL at this future pedophile. Don't you have some anime to fap to?
tpols
04-30-2016, 12:52 PM
just re -read OP and saw bron 2014, almost spit my drink out.
damn.
lebron might be more responsible for Kawhi's development than spurs system
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:53 PM
So then we're definitely not ignoring 11-2 in the Russell/Wilt argument
Not at all, but the Lebron fans never use context.
Chamberlain was the better player than Russell in EVERY one of their EIGHT playoff series H2H's...and in most, by huge margins.
Kobe carried the Lakers into the Finals in '01, '02, '04, and '08, and was the best player in the Finals in '09 and '10. Without Kobe in '01 and '02, Shaq has two rings (and one of those as Robin, himself.)
On the flip side...no one should blame Lebron for losing in '07, and '15. I don't blame him for '14, but the reality was, he had zero impact in that Finals. He was great in '12 and '13. And was a huge part of their loss in '11.
THAT is CONTEXT.
feyki
04-30-2016, 12:54 PM
Duncan - 99,02,03,05,07
5 Times
Kobe - 08,09,10
3 Times
Lebron - 09,12,13,14
4 Times
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:55 PM
In what universe was Lebron not the best player in 2014? :oldlol:
Go back to your MJ videos buddy, you clearly know **** all about basketball.
The Heat could have replaced Lebron with Stevie Wonder in '14, and the results would have been the same. The reality was...Lebron had zero impact in a record-setting defeat.
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 12:56 PM
Duncan - 99,02,03,05,07
5 Times
Kobe - 08,09,10
3 Times
Lebron - 09,12,13,14
4 Times
You must be including playoffs.
SouBeachTalents
04-30-2016, 12:56 PM
Not at all, but the Lebron fans never use context.
Chamberlain was the better player than Russell in EVERY one of their EIGHT playoff series H2H's...and in most, by huge margins.
Kobe carried the Lakers into the Finals in '01, '02, '04, and '08, and was the best player in the Finals in '09 and '10. Without Kobe in '01 and '02, Shaq has two rings (and one of those as Robin, himself.)
On the flip side...no one should blame Lebron for losing in '07, and '15. I don't blame him for '14, but the reality was, he had zero impact in that Finals. He was great in '12 and '13. And was a huge part of their loss in '11.
THAT is CONTEXT.
You give Shaq to little credit for the Lakers runs to the Finals. Both he and Kobe were phenomenal in '01, imo they were basic equals. In '02 Kobe was better against the Spurs, but I'd still give the nod to Shaq
Jameerthefear
04-30-2016, 12:58 PM
LOL at this future pedophile. Don't you have some anime to fap to?
Had to log onto your other account little boy? You're a mess.
feyki
04-30-2016, 01:01 PM
You must be including playoffs.
Yes , i did read different the title .
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 01:03 PM
You give Shaq to little credit for the Lakers runs to the Finals. Both he and Kobe were phenomenal in '01, imo they were basic equals. In '02 Kobe was better against the Spurs, but I'd still give the nod to Shaq
This is interesting...
Why? Because this is what a prime Wilt faced in EIGHT of his ten seasons.
Shaq's numbers declined across the board against the Robinson-led Spurs (when the Admiral was basically a starter in those H2H's) from '99 thru '02. Same with MJ against the Bad Boys from '88 thru '90 (I won't include the shell of a team that the '91 Pistons were.) And same with a peak Kareem, whose numbers fell off the cliff against Wilt and Thurmond in the '71, '72, and '73 post-seasons.
CONTEXT.
In any case, without Kobe's brilliant play in the '01 and '02 playoffs, Shaq would not have come close to a ring in those two years. And he had a cakewalk in the Finals going up against a 35 year old Mutombo, whom he was allowed to bloody; a washed up Smits; and a complete clod in MacCulloch.
ballinhun8
04-30-2016, 01:06 PM
In what universe was Lebron not the best player in 2014? :oldlol:
Go back to your MJ videos buddy, you clearly know **** all about basketball.
In what universe do empty stats, getting humiliated in 5 games, and the player guarding you equal to best player in the series?
Empty stats bro. This isn't 2k. Lebron didn't unlock an achievement for losing....
SouBeachTalents
04-30-2016, 01:06 PM
This is interesting...
Why? Because this is what a prime Wilt faced in EIGHT of his ten seasons.
Shaq's numbers declined across the board against the Robinson-led Spurs (when the Admiral was basically a starter in those H2H's) from '99 thru '02. Same with MJ against the Bad Boys from '88 thru '90 (I won't include the shell of a team that the '91 Pistons were.) And same with a peak Kareem, whose numbers fell off the cliff against Wilt and Thurmond in the '71, '72, and '73 post-seasons.
CONTEXT.
In any case, without Kobe's brilliant play in the '01 and '02 playoffs, Shaq would not have come close to a ring in those two years. And he had a cakewalk in the Finals going up against a 35 year old Mutombo, whom he was allowed to bloody; a washed up Smits; and a complete clod in MacCulloch.
Lol, that's kind of an obvious argument to make, I don't think anybody would dispute that if you remove a top 5 player in the league from a team they would still win the title
Manu was better than Duncan in the Finals, Duncan almost cost his team the series with his Game 4 and Game 5 performances :facepalm
2005 Finals
Game 1
Duncan 24 pts 17 rebs 2 asst 2 blks
Manu 26 pts 9 rebs 2 asst 1 stl
Game 2
Duncan 18 pts 11 rebs 1 asst 4 blks
Manu 27 pts 3 rebs 7 asst 3 stl
Game 3
Duncan 14 pts 10 rebs 4 asst 3 stl 1 blk
Manu 7 pts 4 rebs
Game 4
Duncan 16 pts 16 rebs 2 asst 3 blk
Manu 12 pts 4 rebs 3 asst 1 stl 1 blk
Game 5
Duncan 26 pts 19 rebs 2 asst 2 blks
Manu 15 pts 6 rebs 9 asst 1 stl
Game 6
Duncan 21 pts 15 rebs 1 asst 1 blk
Manu 21 pts 10 rebs 3 asst 2 stl
Game 7
Duncan 25 pts 11 rebs 3 asst 2 blk
Manu 23 pts 5 rebs 4 asst 1 stl
Funny how you call out Duncan's game 5: 26 pts 19 rebs 2 asst 2 blks but fail to mention Manu's game 2: 7 pts 4 rebs.
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 01:07 PM
Lol, that's kind of an obvious argument to make, I don't think anybody would dispute that if you remove a top 5 player in the league from a team they would still win the title
We may find out this post-season. And we nearly saw it in '94.
Bankaii
04-30-2016, 02:32 PM
Just like the Lebron fans ignore the 5 > 2, right?
The fact was, Kobe earned at least four of his five rings, and if you include playing brilliantly in an OT win without Shaq, all five.
But the bottom line...Shaq would have two less rings in his career without Kobe carrying LA into the Finals in '01 and '02. And only a fool would argue that Kobe was not the best player in '09 and '10 Finals.
So Russell>Wilt right?
11>2. This is exactly what you just said just different players.
KiiiiNG
04-30-2016, 02:45 PM
:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:
Great thread idea bro!
Putting the myths to bed. 4 time MVP and 4 time Finals best player. Top 3 resume easily.
KiiiiNG
04-30-2016, 02:47 PM
In what universe do empty stats, getting humiliated in 5 games, and the player guarding you equal to best player in the series?
Empty stats bro. This isn't 2k. Lebron didn't unlock an achievement for losing....
Go back to school. Nobody understands your autistic approach to writing.
It's amazing you even have a GED. :oldlol: :facepalm
Dray n Klay
04-30-2016, 02:52 PM
Go back to school. Nobody understands your autistic approach to writing.
It's amazing you even have a GED. :oldlol: :facepalm
:roll: :roll:
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 02:59 PM
Go back to school. Nobody understands your autistic approach to writing.
It's amazing you even have a GED. :oldlol: :facepalm
:lol :lol
Chokefree
04-30-2016, 03:01 PM
:roll: :roll:
its sad when a retired player is living rent free in your head 24/7
Instead of enjoying the playoffs you decide to think about kobe.....
something wrong with you :biggums:
T_L_P
04-30-2016, 03:04 PM
This is interesting...
Why? Because this is what a prime Wilt faced in EIGHT of his ten seasons.
Shaq's numbers declined across the board against the Robinson-led Spurs (when the Admiral was basically a starter in those H2H's) from '99 thru '02. Same with MJ against the Bad Boys from '88 thru '90 (I won't include the shell of a team that the '91 Pistons were.) And same with a peak Kareem, whose numbers fell off the cliff against Wilt and Thurmond in the '71, '72, and '73 post-seasons.
CONTEXT.
In any case, without Kobe's brilliant play in the '01 and '02 playoffs, Shaq would not have come close to a ring in those two years. And he had a cakewalk in the Finals going up against a 35 year old Mutombo, whom he was allowed to bloody; a washed up Smits; and a complete clod in MacCulloch.
Duncan in 99 WCSF vs Shaq's Lakers: 29/11/3/2, 51% shooting
Robinson: 13/7/1/1, 43% sooting
Duncan in 02: 29/17/5/3, 43% shooting
Robinson (sitting 2 games): 6/7/1, 45% shooting
'Robinson-led Spurs'. :oldlol:
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 03:07 PM
Duncan in 99 WCSF vs Shaq's Lakers: 29/11/3/2, 51% shooting
Robinson: 13/7/1/1, 43% sooting
Duncan in 02: 29/17/5/3, 43% shooting
Robinson (sitting 2 games): 6/7/1, 45% shooting
'Robinson-led Spurs'. :oldlol:
I won't bother looking it up now, but I'm sure you also know it...
PJ didn't have Shaq defend Duncan until the 4th quarters...and the reality was, Duncan couldn't shoot to save his life against Shaq in those 4th quarters. I believe his 4th quarter FG% against Shaq was around 40%, with series well below.
Lebronxrings
04-30-2016, 03:08 PM
why choose the finals? it's just one series of many necessary to win the championship and not necessarily the toughest one. so arbitrary
so why do you hate on lebron losing in the finals despite getting there multiple times? That double standard. :oldlol:
T_L_P
04-30-2016, 03:42 PM
I won't bother looking it up now, but I'm sure you also know it...
PJ didn't have Shaq defend Duncan until the 4th quarters...and the reality was, Duncan couldn't shoot to save his life against Shaq in those 4th quarters. I believe his 4th quarter FG% against Shaq was around 40%, with series well below.
And that means the Spurs were 'Robinson-led teams' how exactly?
Duncan's production in one of those series was better than David's in both combined.
Were the Spurs lead more by Elliott from 99-02 than Duncan also? How about Avery Johnson?
Jameerthefear
04-30-2016, 03:44 PM
Go back to school. Nobody understands your autistic approach to writing.
It's amazing you even have a GED. :oldlol: :facepalm
:roll: :roll:
LAZERUSS
04-30-2016, 03:45 PM
And that means the Spurs were 'Robinson-led teams' how exactly?
Duncan's production in one of those series was better than David's in both combined.
Were the Spurs lead more by Elliott from 99-02 than Duncan also? How about Avery Johnson?
My point was that when it was Robinson in the middle, defending Shaq...Shaq's numbers declined considerably. Granted, D-Rob generally had a lot of help (and with pop using some 20+ fouls at the center position.)
ballinhun8
04-30-2016, 05:40 PM
Go back to school. Nobody understands your autistic approach to writing.
It's amazing you even have a GED. :oldlol: :facepalm
Cringe. Do they even have a school system in Oklahoma simon?
No need for the alts to come in and agree with you on this question btw.
Uncle Drew
04-30-2016, 05:42 PM
:roll: :roll:
Why are you laughing about a going back to school joke? You couldn't even spell retarded correctly.
knicksman
04-30-2016, 06:00 PM
5/6>5/7>Nevermind. That shit doesnt belong in there:lol
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 06:07 PM
Cringe. Do they even have a school system in Oklahoma simon?
No need for the alts to come in and agree with you on this question btw.
^^^ Look at how many times this kid cries about alts
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ballinhun8+alts+insidehoops+site:www.insidehoo ps.com
"alts alts alts" :cry: :cry:
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Pa
The
Tic
InsanityKills
04-30-2016, 06:50 PM
^^^ Look at how many times this kid cries about alts
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ballinhun8+alts+insidehoops+site:www.insidehoo ps.com
"alts alts alts" :cry:
:roll: :roll:
Pa
The
Tic
:roll: :roll: :roll:
His whole vocabulary consists of "Simon" and "Alts".
KiiiiNG
04-30-2016, 08:46 PM
^^^ Look at how many times this kid cries about alts
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ballinhun8+alts+insidehoops+site:www.insidehoo ps.com
"alts alts alts"
:roll:
Pa
The
Tic
:roll: :roll:
And usually nobody ever pays any attention to poor dude. He's like the creepy older guy who shows up to the park by himself... just a complete and utter outcast. :lol
He's another lonely disabled reject on SSI, who couldn't type a meaningful post if his life depended on it. He's so out of touch, he thinks talking about alts is actually clever/hard-hitting material that people will laugh at. Instead he gets the ole *sigh and ignore* treatment from everyone. :oldlol:
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 08:55 PM
:roll: :roll:
And usually nobody ever pays any attention to poor dude. He's like the creepy older guy who shows up to the park by himself... just a complete and utter outcast. :lol
He's another lonely disabled reject on SSI, who couldn't type a meaningful post if his life depended on it. He's so out of touch, he thinks talking about alts is actually clever/hard-hitting material that people will laugh at. Instead he gets the ole *sigh and ignore* treatment from everyone. :oldlol:
:roll: :roll:
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 09:02 PM
*brace for the hard hitting*
"QUIT LAUGHING AT YOUR OWN POSTS" :cry: :cry: :cry: - ballin8w1gger
:lol :lol
Lebron23
04-30-2016, 09:07 PM
Ballinhun8 with another L.
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 09:14 PM
And you know he's reading all this to, so red in the face, fuming, trying his hardest to clever up with a post without whining about "alts" BUT... HE.... CANT.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
InsanityKills
04-30-2016, 09:16 PM
And you know he's reading all this to, so red in the face, fuming, trying his hardest to clever up with a post without whining about "alts" BUT... HE.... CANT.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
:roll: :roll: :roll:
knicksman
04-30-2016, 09:22 PM
And you know he's reading all this to, so red in the face, fuming, trying his hardest to clever up with a post without whining about "alts" BUT... HE.... CANT.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
At least hes not a pusy. :confusedshrug: Alts are for pusies. You know you cant beat us one on one coz you lack wit and iq.
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 09:27 PM
At least hes not a pusy. :confusedshrug: Alts are for pusies. You know you cant beat us one on one coz you lack wit and iq.
^^^ This kid is a perfect example of another unoriginal poster
Take a look at how many times he recycles his "IQ" joke
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=knicksman+IQ+insidehoops+site:www.insidehoops. com
:roll: :roll: :roll:
InsanityKills
04-30-2016, 09:31 PM
^^^ This kid is a perfect example of another unoriginal poster
Take a look at how many times he recycles his "IQ" joke
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=knicksman+IQ+insidehoops+site:www.insidehoops. com
:roll: :roll: :roll:
:roll: :roll: :roll:
knicksman
04-30-2016, 09:33 PM
^^^ This kid is a perfect example of another unoriginal poster
Take a look at how many times he recycles his "IQ" joke
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=knicksman+IQ+insidehoops+site:www.insidehoops. com
:roll: :roll: :roll:
:sleeping pusy
InsanityKills
04-30-2016, 09:35 PM
:sleeping pusy
Baby boy couldn't come up with something original.:lol :lol
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 09:36 PM
Baby boy couldn't come up with something original.:lol :lol
brace yourself for an incoming "2/6" DUD from Dicksfan
:roll: :roll: :roll:
knicksman
04-30-2016, 09:39 PM
Baby boy couldn't come up with something original.:lol :lol
Alt to the rescue. Weak. :sleeping
SamuraiSWISH
04-30-2016, 09:40 PM
For their teams?
Duncan: 2003, 2005, 2007, 2013
Kobe: 2008, 2009, 2010
LeBron: 2007, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
Iguodala: 2015
knicksman
04-30-2016, 09:42 PM
brace yourself for an incoming "2/6" DUD from Dicksfan
:roll: :roll: :roll:
But you know it still hurts bro. Or you wouldnt change username and fuming right now:lol
scuzzy
04-30-2016, 09:44 PM
ALTS ALTS ALTS :cry:
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol :lol
Lebron23
04-30-2016, 09:45 PM
For their teams?
Duncan: 2003, 2005, 2007, 2013
Kobe: 2008, 2009, 2010
LeBron: 2007, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
Iguodala: 2015
Are you watching the game right now? Spurs are dismantling the 2 men show OKC Thunder.
InsanityKills
04-30-2016, 09:47 PM
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol :lol
:roll:
KiiiiNG
04-30-2016, 09:48 PM
Are you watching the game right now? Spurs are dismantling the 2 men show OKC Thunder.
1 man show*
#TradeWestbrook for complementary pieces. OKC LACKS CHEMISTY/SHOOTING THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF TODAYS GAME
Lebron23
04-30-2016, 09:50 PM
1 man show*
#TradeWestbrook for complementary pieces. OKC LACKS CHEMISTY/SHOOTING THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT ASPECTS OF TODAYS GAME
true
Trade Westbrook for a bunch of complimentary pieces. But I think he sign with the Wizards.
Chokefree
05-01-2016, 12:11 AM
:roll: :roll:
Why you laughing?
http://s32.postimg.org/40puz9nf9/Draynklayinsidehoops2.png
You need to go back to school
knicksman
05-01-2016, 12:29 AM
:lol
:lol
:lol
:lol :lol
im ish whipping boy coz of 2/6:cry:
SouBeachTalents
05-01-2016, 01:50 AM
For their teams?
Duncan: 2003, 2005, 2007, 2013
Kobe: 2008, 2009, 2010
LeBron: 2007, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
Iguodala: 2015
How does Duncan get '07 but not '99?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.