View Full Version : Kobe's Lakers or LeBron's Cavaliers (More Stacked?)
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 03:50 PM
Who is more stacked?
Love > Pau
Irving > Odom
TT > Ariza
Mozgov > Bynum
JR > Derek Fisher
Cleveland is stacked
Nilocon165
05-08-2016, 03:52 PM
Who is more stacked?
Love > Pau
Irving > Odom
TT > Ariza
Mozgov > Bynum
JR > Derek Fisher
Cleveland is stacked
:facepalm
scuzzy
05-08-2016, 03:55 PM
Mozgov doesn't even play anymore
OP comfirmed box score watcher
Bankaii
05-08-2016, 04:11 PM
Who is more stacked?
Green > Pau > Love
Curry > Irving > Fisher
Odom > Barnes = TT
Bogut > Bynum > Mozgov
Klay > Ariza > JR
Golden State is stacked
FMVP Iggy's Warriors are stacked:eek: :bowdown:
Best players at 4/5 spots.
Showtime2001
05-08-2016, 04:55 PM
Cavs easily.
ArbitraryWater
05-08-2016, 05:02 PM
Who is more stacked?
Love > Pau
Irving > Odom
TT > Ariza
Mozgov > Bynum
JR > Derek Fisher
Cleveland is stacked
whats with these random comparisons, not done by best player or position :wtf:
best player wise:
Bron > Kobe
Gasol > Irving
Odom > Love
Bynum > Thompson
Ariza/Artest > Smith
Who's next? Shumpert and Fisher?
dubnation
05-08-2016, 05:12 PM
Who is more stacked?
Love > Pau
Irving > Odom
TT > Ariza
Mozgov > Bynum
JR > Derek Fisher
Cleveland is stacked
:roll:
:facepalm
Irving would be a TERRIBLE fit next to Kobe, so you could say Odom is better in that situation. On the other hand, TT would benefit a lot from all the Kobe assists :lol
TheImmortal
05-08-2016, 05:30 PM
Cavaliers and it ain't even close.. especially when you factor in just how easily he gets to the Finals.. only having to beat just 1 legit team.
Lebronxrings
05-08-2016, 05:33 PM
:roll:
:facepalm
Irving would be a TERRIBLE fit next to Kobe, so you could say Odom is better in that situation. On the other hand, TT would benefit a lot from all the Kobe assists :lol
dam ether by a real warrior fan
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 06:07 PM
Cavs are undeniably more stacked. They have two guys other than Lebron who are averaging around 20ppg.
Did anybody on the Lakers outscore Kobe for an entire series like Kyrie did Lebron in these playoffs??
dubnation
05-08-2016, 06:09 PM
Cavs are undeniably more stacked. They have two guys other than Lebron who are averaging around 20ppg.
Did anybody on the Lakers outscore Kobe for an entire series like Kyrie did Lebron in these playoffs??
There are 2 sides to the ball. Kyrie and KLove might score 20 ppg, but they are below average defenders and playmakers. Pau and Odom were far more versatile. It's also hard to outscore a guy like Kobe who jacks up 25+ shots per game.
Bankaii
05-08-2016, 06:30 PM
Cavs are undeniably more stacked. They have two guys other than Lebron who are averaging around 20ppg.
Did anybody on the Lakers outscore Kobe for an entire series like Kyrie did Lebron in these playoffs??
Did anyone on the Lakers take nearly as many FGA as Kobe like Kyrie did Lebron last round?
inclinerator
05-08-2016, 06:33 PM
There are 2 sides to the ball. Kyrie and KLove might score 20 ppg, but they are below average defenders and playmakers. Pau and Odom were far more versatile. It's also hard to outscore a guy like Kobe who jacks up 25+ shots per game.
:yaohappy:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 06:44 PM
There are 2 sides to the ball. Kyrie and KLove might score 20 ppg, but they are below average defenders and playmakers. Pau and Odom were far more versatile. It's also hard to outscore a guy like Kobe who jacks up 25+ shots per game.
so pau's soft european azz had defense better than average?
nice revisionist history! u dont know shit about ball, stop posting in this thread! :roll:
oh the horror
05-08-2016, 06:45 PM
I'd argue Pau over Love man. Seriously. Imagine a prime Pau on this Cavs team? Whew.
ArbitraryWater
05-08-2016, 06:47 PM
I'd argue Pau over Love man. Seriously. Imagine a prime Pau on this Cavs team? Whew.
.. ya think?!
Id argue Odom over Love, too. Much more versatile, better defensively, creative, ballhandling.. pretty identical stats, but much better advanced stats.
TrueBlue89
05-08-2016, 06:47 PM
Lakers easily.
oh the horror
05-08-2016, 06:49 PM
.. ya think?!
Id argue Odom over Love, too. Much more versatile, better defensively, creative, ballhandling.. pretty identical stats, but much better advanced stats.
It's funny too because back in his Minnesota days you wouldn't think so. But after the move one has to look at Odom's ability to slide right into a roster and immediately open up options for them in terms of how he can play. Odom can do almost anything you need including guarding wing players of all sizes.
Love on the other hand while talented has looked out of place at times on this roster.
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 06:53 PM
Mozgov doesn't even play anymore
OP comfirmed box score watcher
bynum wouldn't even play most of the time either but it was due to injury...not because his team being so stacked :lol
we already went through this in another thread Mozgov > Bynum
Mozgov
http://s32.postimg.org/xpkvqrxxh/mozgov.png
Bynum
http://s32.postimg.org/4ljc8ommd/bynum.jpg
:rolleyes:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 07:34 PM
bynum wouldn't even play most of the time either but it was due to injury...not because his team being so stacked :lol
we already went through this in another thread Mozgov > Bynum
Mozgov
http://s32.postimg.org/xpkvqrxxh/mozgov.png
Bynum
http://s32.postimg.org/4ljc8ommd/bynum.jpg
:rolleyes:
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/2906986/kg-2000-dunk-contest-reaction-o.gif
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 07:38 PM
Did anyone on the Lakers take nearly as many FGA as Kobe like Kyrie did Lebron last round?
how do you not see how stupid that argument is.
The Lakers didn't have anybody who could routinely get off shots and create for themselves as much a Kobe.
But the Cavs do have a player who can routinely get off shots and create for themselves as much as Lebron (who you would call one of the GOAT scorers)
Having that luxury is another reason why this team is more stacked that the Lakers :hammerhead: :hammerhead:
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 07:42 PM
There are 2 sides to the ball. Kyrie and KLove might score 20 ppg, but they are below average defenders and playmakers. Pau and Odom were far more versatile. It's also hard to outscore a guy like Kobe who jacks up 25+ shots per game.
Pau was average defensively for a big, Odom was extremely inconsistent and was never anything more than an average defender.
And again, the Lakers didn't have anybody who could actually create for themselves to get up shots, other than Kobe.
The Cavs have two guys other than Lebron who can consistently create for themselves, one of which is just as good at creating for himself as Lebron is in 2016.
Having two guys other than yourself who can create looks for themselves > being the only guy who can consistently create for himself.
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 07:42 PM
how is even a question?
Lakers were more stacked by faaaarrrr.
Cavs are 4-13 without Lebron the past 2 years. :facepalm
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 07:42 PM
Pau was average defensively for a big, Odom was extremely inconsistent and was never anything more than an average defender.
And again, the Lakers didn't have anybody who could actually create for themselves to get up shots, other than Kobe.
The Cavs have two guys who can consistently create for themselves, one of which is just as good at creating for himself as Lebron is in 2016.
Having two guys other than yourself who can create looks for themselves > being the only guy who can consistently create for himself.
4-13 without Lebron past 2 years.
raprap
05-08-2016, 07:43 PM
Pau was average defensively for a big, Odom was extremely inconsistent and was never anything more than an average defender.
And again, the Lakers didn't have anybody who could actually create for themselves to get up shots, other than Kobe.
The Cavs have two guys who can consistently create for themselves, one of which is just as good at creating for himself as Lebron is in 2016.
Having two guys other than yourself who can create looks for themselves > being the only guy who can consistently create for himself.
:yaohappy:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 07:47 PM
4-13 without Lebron past 2 years.
jesus, how could a team that talented go 4-13? :wtf:
this shows you the number that lebron-ball does over on a team
complete system and chemistry killer
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 07:51 PM
jesus, how could a team that talented go 4-13? :wtf:
this shows you the number that lebron-ball does over on a team
complete system and chemistry killer
Plot twist: The team wasn't talented.
NEXT
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 07:52 PM
Plot twist: The team wasn't talented.
NEXT
meltdown!!!
:roll: :roll: :roll:
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 07:57 PM
Lebron fans ITT
deflect, deflect, deflect,
:oldlol: :oldlol:
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 07:57 PM
meltdown!!!
:roll: :roll:
It didn't take a lot to get you to meltdown :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 07:58 PM
Lebron fans ITT
deflect, deflect, deflect,
:oldlol: :oldlol:
If they have so many players who can creat for themselves, then why are they 4-13 without Lebron?
NEXT
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:02 PM
If they have so many players who can creat for themselves, then why are they 4-13 without Lebron?
NEXT
what does that W/L record have to do with how many shot creators they have on that team? :oldlol: :oldlol:
That record includes games where half the team was being traded in 2015, includes games where Love missed, includes games where Kyrie missed.
regular season W/L in this context is such a dumb thing to go off of, so no surprise that its your go to argument. Nets swept the HEAT in the regular season a couple years back then got swept in the playoffs.
Guess what buddy? The 2013 Heat were 5-1 without Lebron, guess that means they didn't need him..... right? Since that seems to be your holy grail of arguments. :hammerhead: :hammerhead:
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 08:06 PM
what does that W/L record have to do with how many shot creators they have on that team? :oldlol: :oldlol:
If they have so many shot creators, then they should have dominated even without Lebron.
That clearly wasn't the case as the 4-13 record shows it.
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:06 PM
Now if you'd like to address the fact that the Cavs have two players other than Lebron who are averaging 20ppg, and how they have a player who is just as good at creating his own look as Lebron in 2016 compared to the Lakers who only had one guy who consistently create his own look in Kobe.. that would be nice.
Kobe led those teams in scoring and assist while putting up 30ppg on 56.4% TS with 6 assist per game
Lebron currently is averaging 24ppg on 57.6% TS with 7 assist per game.. and those scoring/efficiency will go down slightly after today game..
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 08:07 PM
Now if you'd like to address the fact that the Cavs have two players other than Lebron who are averaging 20ppg, and how they have a player who is just as good at creating his own look as Lebron in 2016 compared to the Lakers who only had one guy who consistently create his own look in Kobe.. that would be nice.
Kobe led those teams in scoring and assist while putting up 30ppg on 56.4% TS with 6 assist per game
Lebron currently is averaging 24ppg on 57.6% TS with 7 assist per game.. and those scoring/efficiency will go down slightly after today game..
Lebron makes his teammates better.
They haven't even touched the playoffs without Lebron.
And they are 4-13 without Lebron past 2 years.
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:07 PM
If they have so many shot creators, then they should have dominated even without Lebron.
That clearly wasn't the case as the 4-13 record shows it.
the 2013 heat were 5-1 without Lebron, which shows that they were stacked af and didn't need Lebron because of their regular season W/L without him that season
great argument :oldlol: :oldlol:
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:09 PM
Lebron makes his teammates better.
by scoring 6 less points per game than Kobe on the same efficiency while dishing out 1 more assist and turning it over 1 more time per game??
:roll: :roll:
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 08:09 PM
the 2013 heat were 5-1 without Lebron, which shows that they were stacked af and didn't need Lebron because of their regular season W/L without him that season
great argument :oldlol: :oldlol:
small sample
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 08:10 PM
by scoring 6 less points per game than Kobe on the same efficiency while dishing out 1 more assist and turning it over 1 more time per game??
:roll: :roll:
The attention he draws off-ball opens the whole game for his teammates.
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:15 PM
small sample
so then why don't you only use the cavs w/l without Lebron this season, instead of combining it with last seasons record when they were a different team and had different pieces
If you're using their W/L record without Lebron from this year, the same will be... six games.. the same sample size that you are saying it too small to judge from the 2013 HEAT.
So you just ruined your own argument by admitting that 6 game sample size is too small to judge
thanks for walking right into that, TOO EASY
:oldlol: :oldlol:
AirBonner
05-08-2016, 08:22 PM
I say they are pretty equal. Except the lakers didn't have two teams in the playoffs (spurs warriors) that were much better than them.
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 08:30 PM
so then why don't you only use the cavs w/l without Lebron this season, instead of combining it with last seasons record when they were a different team and had different pieces
If you're using their W/L record without Lebron from this year, the same will be... six games.. the same sample size that you are saying it too small to judge from the 2013 HEAT.
So you just ruined your own argument by admitting that 6 game sample size is too small to judge
thanks for walking right into that, TOO EASY
:oldlol: :oldlol:
Because Love and Irving were shot creators also the year before.
Bankaii
05-08-2016, 08:34 PM
how do you not see how stupid that argument is.
The Lakers didn't have anybody who could routinely get off shots and create for themselves as much a Kobe.
But the Cavs do have a player who can routinely get off shots and create for themselves as much as Lebron (who you would call one of the GOAT scorers)
Having that luxury is another reason why this team is more stacked that the Lakers :hammerhead: :hammerhead:
So you're saying Pau and Odom couldn't create shots for themselves?:roll:
ShawkFactory
05-08-2016, 08:38 PM
Love is not a better player than Pau was.
Don't care about anything else here.
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:41 PM
So you're saying Pau and Odom couldn't create shots for themselves?:roll:
can you read??
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:42 PM
Because Love and Irving were shot creators also the year before.
team was different in 2015
6 game sample size in 2016 which you admit was too small
NEXT
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 08:45 PM
team was different in 2015
6 game sample size in 2016 which you admit was too small
NEXT
They still had the shot creators you are talking about.
No excuses of the awful record.
NEXT
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:46 PM
They still had the shot creators you are talking about.
No excuses of the awful record.
NEXT
:facepalm :facepalm
IGOTGAME
05-08-2016, 08:49 PM
I say they are pretty equal. Except the lakers didn't have two teams in the playoffs (spurs warriors) that were much better than them.
The Lakers would beat this Spurs team imo. The Warriors would be tougher but still possible.
livinglegend
05-08-2016, 08:49 PM
:facepalm :facepalm
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Hold this L.
Bankaii
05-08-2016, 08:51 PM
can you read??
"The Lakers didn't have anyone that could create for themselves as much as Kobe"
Based on what exactly, PPG?
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 08:52 PM
lmao livinglegend is in full dubeta meltdown mode right now :roll: :roll:
n iggas cant even talk ball with out melting down
We WIN!
We WIN!
We WIN!
:banana:
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:52 PM
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Hold this L.
the only thing I'm holding is the knowledge of you being a complete moron, who had his own logic thrown back into his face and couldn't come up with any new arguments in return
You yourself said 6 game sample size is too small, so 6 games from that 4-13 record are irrelevant
the rest of those games are from last year, when the team was different and both Kyrie and Love missed time when Lebron was out.
You have nothing new to add, you got owned, accepted it, move on and try to come up with a different reason to explain how this stacked ass cavs team has a terrible supporting cast around Lebron
:lol :lol
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 08:53 PM
"The Lakers didn't have anyone that could create for themselves as much as Kobe"
Based on what exactly, PPG?
go ahead and make the argument that Pau Gasol is as good of a shot creator as Kobe Bryant
:roll: :roll:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 09:04 PM
Love is not a better player than Pau was.
Don't care about anything else here.
:facepalm
Just cause LeBron-Ball turns his teammates into worse players doesn't make those players worse
GASOL AND LOVE BEFORE KOBE AND BEFORE LEBRON
2007 Gasol - Age 26
20/9/3
2014 Love - Age 25
26/12/4
GET THE **** OUT OF HERE
PP34Deuce
05-08-2016, 09:06 PM
Cavs playing great at this time.
Winning is winning.
dubnation
05-08-2016, 09:11 PM
so pau's soft european azz had defense better than average?
nice revisionist history! u dont know shit about ball, stop posting in this thread! :roll:
Well, he actually did. That's not debatable. Pau was at least a solid defender from 2008-2010.
And I mean, that's actually irrelevant, since he's infinitely better than Love on D, and far more versatile on O. So what point are you trying to make?
dubnation
05-08-2016, 09:12 PM
:facepalm
Just cause LeBron-Ball turns his teammates into worse players doesn't make those players worse
GASOL AND LOVE BEFORE KOBE AND BEFORE LEBRON
2007 Gasol - Age 26
20/9/3
2014 Love - Age 25
26/12/4
GET THE **** OUT OF HERE
:lol Take that f*cking avatar off you f*cking punk
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 09:13 PM
Well, he actually did. That's not debatable. Pau was at least a solid defender from 2008-2010.
And I mean, that's actually irrelevant, since he's infinitely better than Love on D, and far more versatile on O. So what point are you trying to make?
I'll take Pau over Love, but saying Pau was far more versatile on offense when Love is a great 3pt shooter (something Pau never did) and is a great passer at the 4 too, is ridiculous.
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 09:14 PM
:lol Take that f*cking avatar off you f*cking punk
**** you you curry stan you are a fake frontrunning bitch
dubnation
05-08-2016, 09:18 PM
**** you you curry stan you are a fake frontrunning bitch
:roll:
everyone here knows you're the biggest Curry stan non-GSW fan out here bro. you're not fooling anyone. How are you gonna say I'm a frontrunner :roll:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 09:21 PM
:roll:
everyone here knows you're the biggest Curry stan non-GSW fan out here bro. you're not fooling anyone. How are you gonna say I'm a frontrunner :roll:
you are a new fan who just started posting when curry started playing well
you are a front-running stan
face it
dubnation
05-08-2016, 09:29 PM
you are a new fan who just started posting when curry started playing well
you are a front-running stan
face it
I post when I have free time and it feels right. It says more about you than it does about me that you keep track of that sh*t. I joined in the beginning of 2014 before GSW was a juggernaut, and I've been a fan for 15+ years.
You have 50,000+ posts across countless alt accounts and you're trying to roast me? :roll:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 09:43 PM
I post when I have free time and it feels right. It says more about you than it does about me that you keep track of that sh*t. I joined in the beginning of 2014 before GSW was a juggernaut, and I've been a fan for 15+ years.
You have 50,000+ posts across countless alt accounts and you're trying to roast me? :roll:
yeah 2014, JUST A COINCIDENCE when the warriors started doing good you came to talk ball...bullshit
50k posts...:wtf: u r melting down bro
dubnation
05-08-2016, 09:52 PM
yeah 2014, JUST A COINCIDENCE when the warriors started doing good you came to talk ball...bullshit
50k posts...:wtf: u r melting down bro
Even if that were true -- meaning I just became a fan in the early 2014 season -- the Dubs were coming off a season where they got eliminated in the 1st round... quite an opportunity to jump on a championship bandwagon... right? Though, since you're actually a Kobe stan I wouldn't expect you to know that anyway.
enjoy the playoffs though, just make sure you log on to the right account for who you're stanning that day :applause:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 09:55 PM
Even if that were true -- meaning I just became a fan in the early 2014 season -- the Dubs were coming off a season where they got eliminated in the 1st round... quite an opportunity to jump on a championship bandwagon... right?
compared to the previous 5+ years...yes, it was an opportunity to jump on the bandwagon
just because they weren't championship bound doesn't mean there wasn't a wagon that u hopped ur ass on, stop trying to blur the lines here we know you are a bandwagoner just admit it
dubnation
05-08-2016, 09:57 PM
compared to the previous 5+ years...yes, it was an opportunity to jump on the bandwagon
just because they weren't championship bound doesn't mean there wasn't a wagon that u hopped ur ass on, stop trying to blur the lines here we know you are a bandwagoner just admit it
deflecting :roll:
I'm done lil' boy. Go watch the WCSF it's a good game
ShawkFactory
05-08-2016, 09:58 PM
:facepalm
Just cause LeBron-Ball turns his teammates into worse players doesn't make those players worse
GASOL AND LOVE BEFORE KOBE AND BEFORE LEBRON
2007 Gasol - Age 26
20/9/3
2014 Love - Age 25
26/12/4
GET THE **** OUT OF HERE
You don't know ball if you think love is better than Pau was. Or at least more useful as a 2nd option.
Pau gives you so many more things. Kobe will be the first to tell you that. He was the most skilled big man in the league.
Better defense, better/smarter passing, just smarter in general. Incredibly efficient. Overall a guy that would be much more beneficial to have on your team than Love...in any scenario.
You can take your extra 6 points from your guy jacking up extra threes on a mediocre team. I'll take the W.
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 09:58 PM
deflecting :roll:
I'm done lil' boy. Go watch the WCSF it's a good game
deflecting by bringing up the fact that when the warriors were playing their best ball in half a decade ur ass shows up and starts talking about it...
:roll:
warriorfan
05-08-2016, 10:00 PM
You don't know ball if you think love is better than Pau was. Or at least more useful as a 2nd option.
Pau gives you so many more things. Kobe will be the first to tell you that. He was the most skilled big man in the league.
Better defense, better/smarter passing, just smarter in general. Incredibly efficient. Overall a guy that would be much more beneficial to have on your team than Love...in any scenario.
You can take your extra 6 points from your guy jacking up threes a game on a mediocre team. I'll take the W.
oh so now pau gasol is the white kevin garnett? :lol
interesting revisionist history going on here :roll: :roll: :roll:
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 10:04 PM
How can you say that Pau was the most skilled big in the league when he was playing in the same league as Dirk, Duncan & KG
:confusedshrug: :confusedshrug:
TheMarkMadsen
05-08-2016, 10:06 PM
How do people not see that having to argue between who was better, Lebron's 3rd option or Kobe's 2nd that you've already lost the argument about which team was more stacked.
dubnation
05-08-2016, 10:09 PM
deflecting by bringing up the fact that when the warriors were playing their best ball in half a decade ur ass shows up and starts talking about it...
:roll:
Yeah, quote me where I was talking about the Warriors in this thread?
...
That's what I thought.
Disaprine
05-08-2016, 11:12 PM
lebron, because he had wade and bosh.
Smoke117
05-09-2016, 05:12 AM
The Lakers obviously.
TommyGriffin
05-09-2016, 10:45 AM
You guys are really underrating our Cavs team this year.
Steven Kerry
05-09-2016, 10:51 AM
Who is more stacked?
Love > Pau
Irving > Odom
TT > Ariza
Mozgov > Bynum
JR > Derek Fisher
Cleveland is stacked
Agenda obvious from first comparison.
Springsteen
05-09-2016, 10:51 AM
**** you you curry stan you are a fake frontrunning bitch
Having a crisis of faith there buddy?
warriorfan
05-09-2016, 10:52 AM
Having a crisis of faith there buddy?
having a rent free meltdown there fakkit? :roll:
Springsteen
05-09-2016, 11:18 AM
having a rent free meltdown there fakkit? :roll:
You could throw another buzzword in there if you want. :D
You sure like batting for the Lakers though, huh...
Makes me wonder who you were rooting for when the Warriors sucked. :kobe:
ImKobe
05-09-2016, 02:59 PM
There are 2 sides to the ball. Kyrie and KLove might score 20 ppg, but they are below average defenders and playmakers. Pau and Odom were far more versatile. It's also hard to outscore a guy like Kobe who jacks up 25+ shots per game.
lol what :biggums:
want to compare them same age?
Kobe 2010 Playoffs
29/6/6 22 FGA 57%TS
Lebron 2016 Playoffs
24/9/7 19 FGA 56%TS
Lebron last year averaged 27 FGA while averaging only 30 ppg on 49%TS
Kobe 2009 averaged 30 ppg on 56%TS while only taking 23 shots a game
who's the bigger chucker?
riseagainst
05-09-2016, 03:00 PM
easily the Cavs
TheImmortal
05-09-2016, 04:33 PM
Mosgov
http://s32.postimg.org/xpkvqrxxh/mozgov.png
Bynum
http://s32.postimg.org/4ljc8ommd/bynum.jpg
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/2906986/kg-2000-dunk-contest-reaction-o.gif
Ether. :applause:
stalkerforlife
05-09-2016, 04:35 PM
lol what :biggums:
want to compare them same age?
Kobe 2010 Playoffs
29/6/6 22 FGA 57%TS
Lebron 2016 Playoffs
24/9/7 19 FGA 56%TS
Lebron last year averaged 27 FGA while averaging only 30 ppg on 49%TS
Kobe 2009 averaged 30 ppg on 56%TS while only taking 23 shots a game
who's the bigger chucker?
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/2906986/kg-2000-dunk-contest-reaction-o.gif
TheMarkMadsen
05-09-2016, 04:38 PM
Bran stans getting owned in this thread lmao
NBASTATMAN
05-09-2016, 06:04 PM
I'd argue Pau over Love man. Seriously. Imagine a prime Pau on this Cavs team? Whew.
Pau is much better than Love even now.. When you consider defense its a no brainer... Love does stretch out the floor more than Pau though but with PAU they would have a shot blocker and that would make them much harder to beat..
Defense is the CAVS problem no offense.. BTW THE LAKERS WERE STACKED but this Cavs team has more talent... But THIS CAVS team is going to have to beat either SPURS OR WARRIORS which are both better teams than even the 2009-2010 CHAMPION LAKERS...:rockon:
RECORD WITHOUT LEBRON 1-4 OR SO
RECORD WITHOUT KOBE AND BYNUM IN 2010 SOMETHING LIKE 6-2 AT ONE POINT OR SO..
PAU PROVED TO BE THE BEST PLAYER IN 2010 PLAYOFFS
KOBE WAS THE BEST IN 2009 PLAYOFFS
Cold soul
05-09-2016, 06:15 PM
Lebron Cavs due to having better depth and better players, but Pau who was amazing #2 option to Kobe the fit was perfect to Kobe game. Gasol gets underrated here he's better than both Love and Kyrie.
TheMarkMadsen
05-09-2016, 06:20 PM
PAU PROVED TO BE THE BEST PLAYER IN 2010 PLAYOFFS
KOBE WAS THE BEST IN 2009 PLAYOFFS
Ok troll.
I guess getting outscored by 10ppg in the playoffs by his teammate, and 14 ppg in certain series, while averaging less assist and steals than that same guy makes him the best player in the player in the playoffs :roll: :roll:
G0ATbe
05-09-2016, 06:22 PM
Kobe never had a stacked team. Even when he had Shaq it was a 2 man wrecking crew, nowhere near stacked from top to bottom like this Cavs team is.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.