UK2K
06-10-2016, 01:59 PM
Of course, no sooner was this video posted (with mounds of evidence that they did), Vox (the same site where an editor called for inciting riots at Trump rallies and was punished with a week long paid vacation: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/09/vox-editor-who-advocated-for-inciting-riots-at-trump-rallies-got-one-week-paid-vacation/) came out with an article defending her. Shocking.
But here is the video anyway, and you'd be hard pressed to try and argue that Google (whose employees voted overwhelmingly for Clinton) was not trying to protect their choice for president.
All this is notable considering just a few days ago, Julian Assange came out with information stating that Google does, in fact, try to help Clinton as much as possible.
https://youtu.be/PFxFRqNmXKg
In the video, narrator Matt Lieberman explains how the popular search engine seems to hide search results of articles that bring up negative perceptions of Hillary Clinton when typing “Hillary Clinton cri” into the search bar, like the possibility of criminal charges in relation to her use of a private email server to conduct official government business. However, the three top search results that Google suggests when typing “Hillary Clinton cri” are “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” “Hillary Clinton crisis,” and “Hillary Clinton crime bill 1994,” in that order.
When SourceFed tried inputting “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” Google’s top suggested search result for “Hillary Clinton cri,” into Google Trends, the actual search results for that term were so low they didn’t even register as a trending topic. But the search results for “Hillary Clinton crimes” were much higher. To compare, SourceFed typed “Hillary Clinton cri” into the Bing and Yahoo! search engine, and the top suggested results for each search engine were “Hillary Clinton crimes” and “Hillary Clinton criminal charges,” respectively.
Thinking this may be a fluke, SourceFed tried the search term “Hillary Clinton ind” instead, to see what Google suggested. Google suggests “Hillary Clinton indiana,” “Hillary Clinton india,” and “Hillary Clinton independent voters” as the top three search results. But when comparing search results for “Hillary Clinton india” and “Hillary Clinton indictment” on Google Trends, Google users were found to have searched for “Hillary Clinton indictment” eight times more often than “Hillary Clinton india.” To add to the confusion, both the Bing and Yahoo! search engines’ top suggested results for “Hillary Clinton ind” are “Hillary Clinton indictment.”
Although this isn’t a smoking gun that proves the search engine is collaborating with the Clinton campaign, SourceFed learned that the top suggested search result for “Bernie Sanders soc” is “Bernie Sanders socialist” on all three search engines. If Google is intentionally hiding negative articles about Clinton for its users, it isn’t doing the same for the Vermont senator. Similarly, “Donald Trump rac” comes up with racist on all three engines as well.
Didn't we just have a thread the other day comparing Democrats to the Nazis in terms of using celebrities and media as propaganda tools? Here we are again.
But here is the video anyway, and you'd be hard pressed to try and argue that Google (whose employees voted overwhelmingly for Clinton) was not trying to protect their choice for president.
All this is notable considering just a few days ago, Julian Assange came out with information stating that Google does, in fact, try to help Clinton as much as possible.
https://youtu.be/PFxFRqNmXKg
In the video, narrator Matt Lieberman explains how the popular search engine seems to hide search results of articles that bring up negative perceptions of Hillary Clinton when typing “Hillary Clinton cri” into the search bar, like the possibility of criminal charges in relation to her use of a private email server to conduct official government business. However, the three top search results that Google suggests when typing “Hillary Clinton cri” are “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” “Hillary Clinton crisis,” and “Hillary Clinton crime bill 1994,” in that order.
When SourceFed tried inputting “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” Google’s top suggested search result for “Hillary Clinton cri,” into Google Trends, the actual search results for that term were so low they didn’t even register as a trending topic. But the search results for “Hillary Clinton crimes” were much higher. To compare, SourceFed typed “Hillary Clinton cri” into the Bing and Yahoo! search engine, and the top suggested results for each search engine were “Hillary Clinton crimes” and “Hillary Clinton criminal charges,” respectively.
Thinking this may be a fluke, SourceFed tried the search term “Hillary Clinton ind” instead, to see what Google suggested. Google suggests “Hillary Clinton indiana,” “Hillary Clinton india,” and “Hillary Clinton independent voters” as the top three search results. But when comparing search results for “Hillary Clinton india” and “Hillary Clinton indictment” on Google Trends, Google users were found to have searched for “Hillary Clinton indictment” eight times more often than “Hillary Clinton india.” To add to the confusion, both the Bing and Yahoo! search engines’ top suggested results for “Hillary Clinton ind” are “Hillary Clinton indictment.”
Although this isn’t a smoking gun that proves the search engine is collaborating with the Clinton campaign, SourceFed learned that the top suggested search result for “Bernie Sanders soc” is “Bernie Sanders socialist” on all three search engines. If Google is intentionally hiding negative articles about Clinton for its users, it isn’t doing the same for the Vermont senator. Similarly, “Donald Trump rac” comes up with racist on all three engines as well.
Didn't we just have a thread the other day comparing Democrats to the Nazis in terms of using celebrities and media as propaganda tools? Here we are again.