It's time. It's time for America to elect DONALD J TRUMP for President

[Akrazotile]

Let's Make America Great Again, yall :applause:

[dude77]

:applause: :applause: just a matter of time now

[TheMan]

:oldlol:

****ing cornballs :lol

[Akrazotile]

:oldlol:

****ing cornballs :lol



http://s32.postimg.org/s12p8v3yd/MAGAhat.jpg


Ya mad?


:djparty

[Real Men Wear Green]

http://s32.postimg.org/s12p8v3yd/MAGAhat.jpg


Ya mad?


:djpartyYes. You spent all the money you made from that website on a single hat and it wasn't even made in America.

[NumberSix]

Yes. You spent all the money you made from that website on a single hat and it wasn't even made in America.
They actually ARE made in America.

[Real Men Wear Green]

They actually ARE made in America.those are $25. The site hasn't made that much money yet.

[gigantes]

yeah, what the USA needs is for a remorseless conman (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/nyregion/donald-trump-atlantic-city.html?smid=tw-share) to become president.

let's see if this time he can put millions out of work instead of just thousands, like before. :rockon:

[nathanjizzle]

http://s32.postimg.org/s12p8v3yd/MAGAhat.jpg


Ya mad?


:djparty

pleb

[branslowski]

Vote for a guy who's mocked a disabled person, disrespects woman's choice, is a racist and a failed reality T.V character? Yawl need Jesus.

[Akrazotile]

Yes. You spent all the money you made from that website on a single hat and it wasn't even made in America.


BUT I AM, and this is ONLY THE BEGINNING, BABY!!!

[9erempiree]

Vote for a guy who's mocked a disabled person, disrespects woman's choice, is a racist and a failed reality T.V character? Yawl need Jesus.

I've seen you say worst.

[nathanjizzle]

Vote for a guy who's mocked a disabled person, disrespects woman's choice, is a racist and a failed reality T.V character? Yawl need Jesus.

hes also scammed americans in a pyramid scheme. thats the most telling about his character.

[NumberSix]

Vote for a guy who's mocked a disabled person, disrespects woman's choice, is a racist and a failed reality T.V character? Yawl need Jesus.
Vote for someone who pretends terrorism isn't a thing?

[branslowski]

I've seen you say worst.

I wouldn't make a good president either.:confusedshrug: Also not racist.

[Terahite]

Trump is going to win in a landslide. Book it.

:party: :hammertime: :party: :hammertime: :party:

http://www.bdcwire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/donald-trump-ice-bucket-gif.gif

[imdaman99]

It's time for you to logout. You're having meltdowns on every single forum on ISH. One simply cannot get away from your shenanigans.

[poido123]

It. Is. Time.




Let's shake the world up a bit and stop this leftist nonsense

[G-train]

Vote for a guy who's mocked a disabled person, disrespects woman's choice, is a racist and a failed reality T.V character? Yawl need Jesus.

Hillary ain't no angel.

[BoutPractice]

Disregarding beliefs and plans for a minute...

Aren't any of you just a tiny bit worried that, if you look at his track record in business, the man you're pledging alliegance has the textbook personality type of those self-indulgent kings you hear about in the history books?

- A narcissist who makes everything about him
- Obsessed with self-promotion, needs to put his name on everything
- Always needs glamour and excitement, dislikes the boring day-to-day work needed to make an organization function
- Surrounds himself with sycophants, and ruthlessly punishes everyone who criticises him regardless of whether they are right
- Known for many whims and eccentricities his subordinates have to cater to
- Makes fantastical plans that can't possibly materialize
- Engages in grandiose building projects (the tallest skyscraper, the biggest casino, the largest wall) with someone else's money
- Abruptly reneges on his promises
- Piles on absurd amount of debt he then refuses to pay
- Can easily be provoked into a fight

In politics, this translates to Henry VIII, Louis XIV, Yeonsangun... typically these monarchs are very popular at first, but by the time they leave office the state coffers are empty. They remain famous in history books for their force of personality, and yes, their "greatness", but this greatness is achieved at the expense of everyone else.

Also and more generally, it's rare for "big men" to become this big without crashing in the end. It's almost like a law of physics... hubris breeds nemesis, what goes up must come down, etc. A President Trump would simply be too big for America... and contrary to the expression, too big must fail.

[poido123]

yeah, what the USA needs is for a remorseless conman (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/12/nyregion/donald-trump-atlantic-city.html?smid=tw-share) to become president.

let's see if this time he can put millions out of work instead of just thousands, like before. :rockon:



:hammerhead:


What about Hillary? You are guaranteed a fck up.


Hillary has a track record of wars, corruption and lies. At least with Donald you have a chance to see an improvement on these things.

[poido123]

Disregarding beliefs and plans for a minute...

Aren't any of you just a tiny bit worried that, if you look at his track record in business, the man you're pledging alliegance has the textbook personality type of those self-indulgent kings you hear about in the history books?

- A narcissist who makes everything about him
- Obsessed with self-promotion, needs to put his name on everything
- Always needs glamour and excitement, dislikes the boring day-to-day work needed to make an organization function
- Surrounds himself with sycophants, and ruthlessly punishes everyone who criticises him regardless of whether they are right
- Known for many whims and eccentricities his subordinates have to cater to
- Makes fantastical plans that can't possibly materialize
- Engages in grandiose building projects (the tallest skyscraper, the biggest casino, the largest wall) with someone else's money
- Abruptly reneges on his promises
- Piles on absurd amount of debt he then refuses to pay
- Can easily be provoked into a fight

In politics, this translates to Henry VIII, Louis XIV... typically these monarchs are very popular at first, but by the time they leave office the state coffers are empty. They remain famous in history books for their force of personality, and yes, their "greatness", but this greatness is achieved at the expense of everyone else.



You can honestly sit in your bubble and declare that Hillary is better?


Get help my son

[Akrazotile]

Disregarding beliefs and plans for a minute...

Aren't any of you just a tiny bit worried that, if you look at his track record in business, the man you're pledging alliegance has the textbook personality type of those self-indulgent kings you hear about in the history books?

- A narcissist who makes everything about him
- Obsessed with self-promotion, needs to put his name on everything
- Always needs glamour and excitement, dislikes the boring day-to-day work needed to make an organization function
- Surrounds himself with sycophants, and ruthlessly punishes everyone who criticises him regardless of whether they are right
- Known for many whims and eccentricities his subordinates have to cater to
- Makes fantastical plans that can't possibly materialize
- Engages in grandiose building projects (the tallest skyscraper, the biggest casino, the largest wall) with someone else's money
- Abruptly reneges on his promises
- Piles on absurd amount of debt he then refuses to pay
- Can easily be provoked into a fight

In politics, this translates to Henry VIII, Louis XIV, Yeonsangun... typically these monarchs are very popular at first, but by the time they leave office the state coffers are empty. They remain famous in history books for their force of personality, and yes, their "greatness", but this greatness is achieved at the expense of everyone else.

Also and more generally, it's rare for "big men" to become this big without crashing in the end. It's almost like a law of physics... hubris breeds nemesis, what goes up must come down, etc. A President Trump would simply be too big for America... and contrary to the expression, too big must fail.


First of all, this idea that Trump will suddenly crown himself emporer, as though Congress either doesn't exist or will just simply roll over and let him, is a completely irrational talking point simply used as an attempt to undermine him.

Second of all, Plato himself posited that a bad autocrat is actually better than a bad democracy. Because the autocrat, though selfish and self-indulgent, at least has the concern in mind of preserving the state he rules. Whereas an idiocracy-democracy will soon crumble due to the people's equal selfishness, but inability to maintain a collective discipline that will preserve the stability of the state.

Of course, I would prefer to keep our democracy/republic and simply strive to have a better informed, more rational citizenry, but the point is that regardless the idea that he will bring America to ruin is a scare tactic and strawman. The funny thing is... I've yet to be presented with an argument for how exactly Trump's most controversial ideas - building a wall and banning muslim immigrants - would actually do America any harm whatsoever. Like... what are the down sides to these things? They hurt feelings?

That's it?

People need to get over their feelings. Too many citizens let feelings get in the way of intelligent policy analysis. People goin around weeping for everything. Weep for this, weep for that. Cry about the world, the world is so unfair to the muslims, :cry: :cry: :cry: Let's open our borders, let's disarm ourselves, let's give everything away for free... These are people who are projecting their own insecurities about their position in an ordered, merit-centric world out in the political sphere. They can't compete so they want everything to be turned into some idealogical fantasy, which in practice turns things into shit. But they don't care. Because their goal is not to move up... but to move everyone else down to where they are. And I don't mean financially, necessarily - but psychologically.