PDA

View Full Version : Is it Sound Logic to Vote for Trump because Hillary is just that bad?



CavsLebronMo
07-14-2016, 10:15 AM
Trump is far from the ideal candidate, and he isn't really a conservative. But the chance that Hillary Clinton could run the country is frightening. She's so robotic in everything she does. She tries to portray republicans as immoral when she is one of the worst people in our political history. She's a liar and is obsessed with power.

Trump choosing his VP is important to me. If it is Gingrich or Christie, I am going to vote for him. Hopefully they can straighten him out a little bit and he will become more presidential.

Duderonomy
07-14-2016, 10:27 AM
More Democratics are boycotting Hilary than are Republicans who wouldn't vote for Trump. Honestly it's scary either of them are this close. I think Trump will do less harm than say Hilary or Cruz. Obama was criminally under qualified to be president in 2008. But your average voter didn't seem to care. When you think about it Trump just needs to act more presidential and appeal to moderates and he will win.

UK2K
07-14-2016, 10:34 AM
Trump is far from the ideal candidate, and he isn't really a conservative. But the chance that Hillary Clinton could run the country is frightening. She's so robotic in everything she does. She tries to portray republicans as immoral when she is one of the worst people in our political history. She's a liar and is obsessed with power.

Trump choosing his VP is important to me. If it is Gingrich or Christie, I am going to vote for him. Hopefully they can straighten him out a little bit and he will become more presidential.

Gingrich is smart, and Christie would mop the floor with any Democrat VP in a debate.

I actually think Gingrich would help to keep Trump in line.

Really, I'd rather vote for one of the independents, but there's no chance either of them can win, so not voting for Trump would be voting for Clinton. It's not even Clinton so much that I don't like, it's the entire elitists group in Washington.

Clinton has lied over and over. Then lied about lying. Then changed her lie to not sound like a lie, which in reality, still was a lie.

Clinton was called, more or less, the dumbest person to ever handle classified information by the director of the FBI, yet Obama says she's the most qualified candidate in history??? Either she's wholy incompetent (as the FBI director said) or she's the most qualified ever (as Obama has said).

A month ago, Bernie said Clinton was not qualified. Now, suddenly she is?

Akrazotile
07-14-2016, 11:03 AM
My hope from this election, however it goes, is that people will be inspired to take back control of everything the people were designed to control when our country was founded.

We have a habit as a population of getting riled up and slinging mud at each other during each election, but when it's over we just accept our politicians doing what they want, how they want. That's not how it's supposed to be. Power is supposed to be in peoples hands but people need to be active and informed to make any use of it. Hopefully the unprecedented unpopularity of this election's candidates will spur us to do something about the gross overreach of power that has been demonstrated by financial elites and their hired bureaucrats.

Patrick Chewing
07-14-2016, 11:11 AM
She is a crook. She is a liar.


She has probably told 15 lies to 15 different people since she woke up this morning.

She's not mentally stable. This is clear as day as she "didn't know" she was sending classified e-mails. How a person in such a high position can be so clueless is beyond me. She probably needs medical assistance on a daily basis and maybe is heavily sedated. Maybe this is the cause of her extreme lying. She doesn't want the public to know she is mentally and physically incapable of making a sandwich, much less running this country.