PDA

View Full Version : It's time for some common sense truck control



MJ23forever
07-15-2016, 09:59 AM
Sure the founders believed we have a right to travel, but they imagined horse and carriages, not modern assault vehicles of war. If only we had stricter truck regulations, we wouldn't have tragedies like in Nice. Nobody needs a fully automatic truck with 6 wheels. #TruckControlNow #EndTruckViolence

Jasi
07-15-2016, 10:01 AM
Trucks are for moving people and goods.
What are assault weapons for, other than killing many people at once, again?

NumberSix
07-15-2016, 10:20 AM
Trucks are for moving people and goods.
What are assault weapons for, other than killing many people at once, again?
Defending people and goods.

Jasi
07-15-2016, 10:24 AM
Defending people and goods.

as a byproduct of killing

NumberSix
07-15-2016, 10:26 AM
as a byproduct of killing
Most defensive gun uses don't involve a single bullet being fired. People have a right to defend themselves from evil scumbags.

Jasi
07-15-2016, 10:29 AM
Most defensive gun uses don't involve a single bullet being fired. People have a right to defend themselves from evil scumbags.

Sure, but they are effective because of the threat coming from their ability to kill.

NumberSix
07-15-2016, 10:30 AM
Sure, but they are effective because of the threat coming from their ability to kill.
Yes, that's correct.

Facepalm
07-15-2016, 10:44 AM
Sure the founders believed we have a right to travel, but they imagined horse and carriages, not modern assault vehicles of war. If only we had stricter truck regulations, we wouldn't have tragedies like in Nice. Nobody needs a fully automatic truck with 6 wheels. #TruckControlNow #EndTruckViolence
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2296746757/n37nkkimyns6wr51ud16_400x400.jpeg

Akrazotile
07-15-2016, 10:51 AM
Sure, but they are effective because of the threat coming from their ability to kill.


What would be a good way of stopping someone driving thru a crowd with a huge truck?

Not a knife, certainly.

~primetime~
07-15-2016, 10:54 AM
Comparing automobiles to military rifles is not something anyone would take seriously.:facepalm

We use cars and trucks every day.

Military rifles are only used by mass killers, there are virtually no examples of civilians using them to defend.

Long Duck Dong
07-15-2016, 11:00 AM
If semi-auto rifles weren't good for defense, then why does law enforcement use them?

~primetime~
07-15-2016, 11:04 AM
If semi-auto rifles weren't good for defense, then why does law enforcement use them?
You mean SWAT?

Find me just ONE example of a civilian killing a "bad guy" with a military rifle.

Long Duck Dong
07-15-2016, 11:12 AM
You mean SWAT?



Almost every cop I know has an AR-15 in his patrol vehicle.


Find me just ONE example of a civilian killing a "bad guy" with a military rifle.

That was too easy

http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/148344-story

Click the video link.

Want another example? :oldlol:

Akrazotile
07-15-2016, 11:13 AM
You mean SWAT?

Find me just ONE example of a civilian killing a "bad guy" with a military rifle.


Im sure its happened during some home invasions. I do agree with you it's obviously a completely separate issue from cars and trucks being used as weapons. Still, it's funny how a lot of liberals think guns are the reason people die, and not the malicious intent of other people.

DeuceWallaces
07-15-2016, 12:25 PM
Almost every cop I know has an AR-15 in his patrol vehicle.



That was too easy

http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/148344-story

Click the video link.

Want another example? :oldlol:

That was a security guard at a tax preparation business.

It's probably happened before, but your dumbass didn't bother to even read what you linked.

TommyGriffin
07-15-2016, 12:30 PM
If there were no trucks...all those people would still be alive. Trucks are the problem here, not the radical islamic terrorists. If we ban all trucks our problems will be solved.

Nanners
07-15-2016, 12:35 PM
I know this thread was supposed to be a joke but killing 77 people with a truck is pretty inconceivable. Thats more people than any mass shooting as far as I can remember.

Facepalm
07-15-2016, 12:38 PM
If there were no trucks...all those people would still be alive. Trucks are the problem here, not the radical islamic terrorists. If we ban all trucks our problems will be solved.
We need to build a wall and ban all trucks until we can figure out WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON!

Facepalm
07-15-2016, 12:39 PM
I know this thread was supposed to be a joke but killing 77 people with a truck is pretty inconceivable. Thats more people than any mass shooting as far as I can remember.
84

DonDadda59
07-15-2016, 12:39 PM
The Only thing that can stop a bad guy with a truck is a good guy with a truck.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/4132556/truck-crash-lucky-driver-o.gif

DeuceWallaces
07-15-2016, 12:39 PM
Can you rent a car if you're on the no-fly list?

TommyGriffin
07-15-2016, 12:41 PM
I know this thread was supposed to be a joke but killing 77 people with a truck is pretty inconceivable. Thats more people than any mass shooting as far as I can remember.
Trucks are now statistically proven to be more dangerous than assault rifles.

http://i65.tinypic.com/359xv07.jpg

Something needs to be done.

NumberSix
07-15-2016, 12:45 PM
Nobody needs a truck that big with that much horsepower.

~primetime~
07-15-2016, 12:45 PM
The Only thing that can stop a bad guy with a truck is a good guy with a truck.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view7/4132556/truck-crash-lucky-driver-o.gif
is that real? :wtf:

can't stop watching this...

Sarcastic
07-15-2016, 12:50 PM
There is truck control. It's harder to get a truck license than it is to get a gun in most states.

Long Duck Dong
07-15-2016, 01:01 PM
That was a security guard at a tax preparation business.

It's probably happened before, but your dumbass didn't bother to even read what you linked.

Are you really this stupid? It was a security guard at home run business. A security guard is a civilian. But hey there are dozens, maybe hundreds of example easily found with people defending themselves with assault weapons.

Here ya go.

15 year old boy shoots intruders with AR-15

http://www.inquisitr.com/477139/gun-control-15-year-old-defends-sister-from-burglars-with-ar-15-rifle/

If you insist the assailant DIE by the AR-15

http://www.montgomerynews.com/articles/2013/04/28/glenside_news_globe_times_chronicle/news/doc517549f7bcb60865299808.txt

DeuceWallaces
07-15-2016, 01:14 PM
is that real? :wtf:

can't stop watching this...

Yeah. It's a pretty "famous" gif of a Russian accident. Specifically the driver who slides out the front like a boss.

~primetime~
07-16-2016, 08:51 PM
Are you really this stupid? It was a security guard at home run business. A security guard is a civilian. But hey there are dozens, maybe hundreds of example easily found with people defending themselves with assault weapons.

Here ya go.

15 year old boy shoots intruders with AR-15

http://www.inquisitr.com/477139/gun-control-15-year-old-defends-sister-from-burglars-with-ar-15-rifle/

If you insist the assailant DIE by the AR-15

http://www.montgomerynews.com/articles/2013/04/28/glenside_news_globe_times_chronicle/news/doc517549f7bcb60865299808.txt
No, there are not. There are only a tiny handful of people killed every year total from assault rifles, like 30ish a year...and most of them are murders. This year the I bet over 50% of the total will be the fcking Pulse club.

It's one of the main arguments that gun fanatics use to declare we don't need to make them illegal, that barely anyone ever dies from them.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/6e/38/51/6e385143fa2937148fe6e5d7688d1018.jpg

You saying there are 'hundreds' of examples EASILY found is something you just made up.

~primetime~
07-16-2016, 08:53 PM
this:

http://lunchbreath.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Weapons_600.jpg

Real Men Wear Green
07-16-2016, 09:27 PM
Actually you have to have a license and insurance to drive a truck. Neither is required to own a gun.

FKAri
07-17-2016, 03:52 AM
Most defensive gun uses don't involve a single bullet being fired. People have a right to defend themselves from evil scumbags.
Why we can't we just have nukes? Nuclear armament and mutual assured destruction has proved to be the best deterrent. WW2 might have gone on longer and WW3 might have taken place if not for that.

warriorfan
07-17-2016, 05:04 AM
Why we can't we just have nukes? Nuclear armament and mutual assured destruction has proved to be the best deterrent. WW2 might have gone on longer and WW3 might have taken place if not for that.

u just went full retard