Did you know: Native American Indians came from Asia and Europe!

[Im Still Ballin]

Nice!

[Im Still Ballin]

http://images.slideplayer.com/24/7338418/slides/slide_3.jpg

Fascinating!

[TheMan]

Did you know that DNA science has proven that all humans today descend from a woman who lived in East Africa about a quater of a million years ago???

Fascinating

[Im Still Ballin]

http://www.windows2universe.org/earth/polar/images/lc_inuit_sm.jpg

Inuits have strong mongoloid features

[gigantes]

Did you know: Native American Indians came from Asia and Europe!
where's the map for the out-of-europe theory?

[Im Still Ballin]

where's the map for the out-of-europe theory?
WOW slow down there chief

I'm not saying anything about where it all began

Simply that which is in the title

[DonDadda59]

Did you know that DNA science has proven that all humans today are descend from a woman who lived in East Africa about a quater of a million years ago???

Fascinating

The real life Eve. Further proof that the creator of the Universe is Black.

https://media.giphy.com/media/t3klesb74JUTm/giphy.gif

Praise him! :bowdown:

[Im Still Ballin]

“I’m still processing that Native Americans are one-third European,” says geneticist Connie Mulligan of the University of Florida in Gainesville. “It’s jaw-dropping.” At the very least, says geneticist Dennis O’Rourke of the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, “this is going to stimulate a lot of discussion.”

Researchers have been trying to parse the origins of the first Americans for decades. Most agree that people moved across Beringia, via a vast ice age land bridge (see map p. 410), and began spreading through the Americas, reaching Chile by 14,500 years ago. But the origins of the source populations are not clear, and some archaeologists have even suggested that ancient Europeans crossing the Atlantic were part of the mix (Science, 16 March 2012, p. 1289). Others have contended that early skeletons found in the Americas, such as the 9000-year-old Kennewick Man, show some European features (Science, 10 April 1998, p. 190). In his talk, Willerslev argued that the ancient genome “can actually explain a lot of these inconsistencies,” by offering glimpses of prehistoric populations before more recent migrations and other demographic events blurred the picture.

The genome comes from the right upper arm bone of a boy aged about 4 years, who lived by Siberia’s Belaya River. Those who buried him adorned his grave with flint tools, pendants, a bead necklace, and a sprinkling of ochre. {snip}

Willerslev reported that the team was able to sequence the boy’s genome, and also to radiocarbon date the bone. The team then used a variety of statistical methods to compare the genome with that of living populations. They found that a portion of the boy’s genome is shared only by today’s Native Americans and no other groups, showing a close relationship. Yet the child’s Y chromosome belongs to a genetic group called Y haplogroup R, and its mitochondrial DNA to a haplogroup U. Today, those haplogroups are found almost exclusively in people living in Europe and regions of Asia west of the Altai Mountains, which are near the borders of Russia, China, and Mongolia.

One expected relationship was missing from the picture: The boy’s genome showed no connection to modern East Asians. DNA studies of living people strongly suggest that East Asians—perhaps Siberians, Chinese, or Japanese—make up the major part of Native American ancestors. So how could the boy be related to living Native Americans, but not to East Asians? “This was kind of puzzling at first,” Willerslev told the meeting. But there seemed little doubt that the finding was correct, he said, because nearly all Native Americans from North and South America were equally related to the Mal’ta child, indicating that he represented very deep Native American roots.

The team proposes a relatively simple scenario: Before 24,000 years ago, the ancestors of Native Americans and the ancestors of today’s East Asians split into distinct groups. The Mal’ta child represents a population of Native American ancestors who moved into Siberia, probably from Europe or west Asia. Then, sometime after the Mal’ta boy died, this population mixed with East Asians. The new, admixed population eventually made its way to the Americas. Exactly when and where the admixture happened is not clear, Willerslev said. But the deep roots in Europe or west Asia could help explain features of some Paleoamerican skeletons and of Native American DNA today. “The west Eurasian [genetic] signatures that we very often find in today’s Native Americans don’t all come from postcolonial admixture,” Willerslev said in his talk. “Some of them are ancient.”

The talk sparked lively exchange, and not everyone was ready to buy the team’s scenario, at least until they can read the full paper, which is in press at Nature. {snip}

The new findings are consistent with a report published in Genetics last year (and almost entirely ignored at the time) that used modern DNA to conclude that Native Americans have significant—and ancient—ties to Europeans. {snip}

Fascinating! Interesting to note the European connection... Caucasoid is probably a better word because most of central Asia comprised of them, until Genghis and Ming went genocide lad time

[gigantes]

WOW slow down there chief

I'm not saying anything about where it all began

Simply that which is in the title
uh... that's what i thought i was responding to...? :confusedshrug: