UK2K
08-02-2016, 03:17 PM
There go three more. I'd bet anything and everything they won't be the last three either.
If you read this board, you'd think these emails were no big deal. Maybe the posters here aren't on par with the rest of their party...
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/02/ap-sources-ceo-at-democratic-national-committee-resigns.html
The Chief Executive of the Democratic National Committee Amy Dacey has resigned in the wake of an email hack that embarrassed the party on the eve of its convention.
A pair of top staffers also followed Dacey out the door: spokesperson Luis Miranda, and CFO Brad Marshall. The moves were announced in a press release from the DNC on Tuesday.
"Thanks in part to the hard work of Amy, Luis, and Brad, the Democratic Party has adopted the most progressive platform in history, has put itself in financial position to win in November, and has begun the important work of investing in state party partnerships," new DNC Chair Donna Brazile said in the release. "I'm so grateful for their commitment to this cause, and I wish them continued success in the next chapter of their career."
Brazile also announced in the release that Tom McMahon, a former DNC executive director, will lead the transition team at the party committee.
The content of the hacked emails exposed an apparent lack of neutrality in the primary race between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, with party officials disparaging Sanders.
Keep deflecting away... the media has already received their talking points. Ironically, several of these outlets were specifically named as colluding with the DNC to help Clinton gain an edge:
The DNC replaced Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the eve of the party’s convention in Philadelphia – she immediately got a post with the Clinton campaign – and fired back with accusations that Russia was behind the hack and the leaks, accusing Moscow of backing Republican nominee Donald Trump.
US media picked up the accusations, reporting them under headlines such as “Russian Intelligence Hacked DNC Emails” (NBC), “Suspected Russian hack of DNC widens” (Yahoo News), “All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind the DNC Hack,” (Motherboard), “Evidence mounts linking DNC email hacker to Russia” (The Hill) and “What we know about Russia’s role in the DNC hack” (Politifact).
Actual evidence, however, was nowhere to be found. Instead, reporters relied on insinuations such as, “there seems to be widespread agreement among cybersecurity experts and professionals” (Politifact) that Russia was somehow responsible.
If you read this board, you'd think these emails were no big deal. Maybe the posters here aren't on par with the rest of their party...
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/02/ap-sources-ceo-at-democratic-national-committee-resigns.html
The Chief Executive of the Democratic National Committee Amy Dacey has resigned in the wake of an email hack that embarrassed the party on the eve of its convention.
A pair of top staffers also followed Dacey out the door: spokesperson Luis Miranda, and CFO Brad Marshall. The moves were announced in a press release from the DNC on Tuesday.
"Thanks in part to the hard work of Amy, Luis, and Brad, the Democratic Party has adopted the most progressive platform in history, has put itself in financial position to win in November, and has begun the important work of investing in state party partnerships," new DNC Chair Donna Brazile said in the release. "I'm so grateful for their commitment to this cause, and I wish them continued success in the next chapter of their career."
Brazile also announced in the release that Tom McMahon, a former DNC executive director, will lead the transition team at the party committee.
The content of the hacked emails exposed an apparent lack of neutrality in the primary race between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, with party officials disparaging Sanders.
Keep deflecting away... the media has already received their talking points. Ironically, several of these outlets were specifically named as colluding with the DNC to help Clinton gain an edge:
The DNC replaced Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz on the eve of the party’s convention in Philadelphia – she immediately got a post with the Clinton campaign – and fired back with accusations that Russia was behind the hack and the leaks, accusing Moscow of backing Republican nominee Donald Trump.
US media picked up the accusations, reporting them under headlines such as “Russian Intelligence Hacked DNC Emails” (NBC), “Suspected Russian hack of DNC widens” (Yahoo News), “All Signs Point to Russia Being Behind the DNC Hack,” (Motherboard), “Evidence mounts linking DNC email hacker to Russia” (The Hill) and “What we know about Russia’s role in the DNC hack” (Politifact).
Actual evidence, however, was nowhere to be found. Instead, reporters relied on insinuations such as, “there seems to be widespread agreement among cybersecurity experts and professionals” (Politifact) that Russia was somehow responsible.