PDA

View Full Version : We can prove that Jordan's team would destroy Lebron's with a weaker supporting cast



3ball
08-07-2016, 03:01 PM
.
The 1989 Bulls would destroy the 2009 Cavs since the Bulls took the champion Bad Boys to 6 games, while the Cavs lost to Dwight Howard's lowly Magic.

And the Bulls would destroy the Cavs despite having a weaker supporting cast.. Lebron won 19 more games in 2009 than Jordan won in 1989 (66 to 47), even though their individual stats were equal.. The only way Lebron's equal production can yield 19 more wins is due to a better supporting cast, and probably inferior competition as well.

Since Jordan's 1989 Bulls would beat the 2009 Cavs with a weaker supporting cast, that means Jordan won with superior brand of basketball, which is how the Spurs beat Lebron.
.

Dray n Klay
08-07-2016, 03:05 PM
Those same Bulls team won 55 games without Jordan




Otoh the Cavs team you are referring to only won 19 games without LeBron






Therefore we can conclude MJ's team was FAR superior, and LeBron was able to get more out of his teammates through optimal production.




55 wins vs 19 wins





Jordan's team was 3 times better than LeBrons team

TheWinningFam
08-07-2016, 03:10 PM
Lebron had the better supporting cast? yet he scored 20 more points than his second option that series, Remember, a team can never win by scoring tless, so think about it, lebron lost in 6 averaging 39/8/8 20 points more than his second option while jordan averaged 30/4/3 and only 10 more than his second option, It's harder to score more if your supporting cast is stronger since the objective is to score, therefore lebron is the better player since jordan couldn't score more with a lesser supporting cast which would have opened up for him to score more.

3ball
08-07-2016, 03:25 PM
The 1989 Bulls would destroy the 2009 Cavs since the Bulls took the champion Bad Boys to 6 games, while the Cavs lost to Dwight Howard's lowly Magic.

And the Bulls would destroy the Cavs despite having a weaker supporting cast.. Lebron won 19 more games in 2009 than Jordan won in 1989 (66 to 47), even though their individual stats were equal.. The only way Lebron's equal production can yield 19 more wins is due to a better supporting cast, and probably inferior competition as well.


Since Jordan's 1989 Bulls would beat the 2009 Cavs with a weaker supporting cast, that means Jordan won with superior brand of basketball, which is how the Spurs beat Lebron.