Cuckanada

[fiddy]

Canada allows female mounted police to wear hijab

The iconic uniform is updated "to better reflect the diversity" in Canada and boost recruitment of Muslim women.


"The commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police recently approved this addition to the uniform," Scott Bardsley, a spokesman for Ralph Goodale, the public safety minister, told the AFP news agency.

"This is intended to better reflect the diversity in our communities and encourage more Muslim women to consider the Royal Canadian Mounted Police as a career option."

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/08/canada-female-mounted-police-wear-hijab-160824141522168.html

:roll: :roll:

[warriorfan]

Canada has tons of square white guys aka the leaders in getting cucked

[nathanjizzle]

because anyone wearing a hijab is a terrorist.

[Bourne]

I'm Canadian and have no problem with this. If they want to adorn symbols of subjugation that is their prerogative.

[Bourne]

because anyone wearing a hijab is a terrorist.

I think this has more to do with opposing the spread of Islam's bad ideas, not banning them as a defense against terrorism.

[D-Wade316]

Where does OP live again? That's right. Some shithole in eastern europe.

[fiddy]

Where does OP live again? That's right. Some shithole in eastern europe.
...which does not allow women to be oppressed to dress in burqas

http://btvnovinite.bg/article/bulgaria/politika/zabranata-za-burki-mina-na-parvo-chetene-v-parlamenta.html

[BoutPractice]

Why do you assume a hijab is necessarily a symbol of subjugation ? (keeping in mind that universality is a key matter in countries where there is rule of law)

I know a woman who converted to Islam - her husband was culturally Muslim but not very religious. He didn't try to convert her, she converted on her own and decided to wear the veil against his wishes. She didn't feel subjugated, she felt empowered by this decision.

In fact, many radical converts in the West are young women who decide to wear ostentatiously religious clothing to annoy their parents (very much like deciding to go punk, or emo).

Does that mean that it's always a fully reasoned choice? No. But the same applies to men. Men are just as susceptible to peer pressure as women (humans in general make very little use of their capacity for free will)... for instance, it's not uncommon for Muslim men to be indifferent to the whole hijab issue (or other religious customs)... until another Muslim who isn't indifferent starts questioning their manhood. We shouldn't have double standards on how we define the threshold of choice for men and women.

But one thing is certain: the assumption that there's always a big bad male (usually a husband, father, or brother) forcing women to make choices is demeaning to men and women alike.

[fiddy]

Why do you assume a hijab is necessarily a symbol of subjugation ?
Because it is. :confusedshrug:

[nathanjizzle]

people are stupid. this is the exact reason why im not a social person and look down on people.

[fiddy]

people are stupid. this is the exact reason why im not a social person and look down on people.

http://67.media.tumblr.com/d93ac3913176a5463758f40eb72e2c5c/tumblr_o3ku50v0vF1umnj3go1_1280.jpg

[highwhey]

http://67.media.tumblr.com/d93ac3913176a5463758f40eb72e2c5c/tumblr_o3ku50v0vF1umnj3go1_1280.jpg
ayyy lmao

savage nikkas

[poido123]

...which does not allow women to be oppressed to dress in burqas

http://btvnovinite.bg/article/bulgaria/politika/zabranata-za-burki-mina-na-parvo-chetene-v-parlamenta.html



Alpha AF nation :applause:

[poido123]

Why do you assume a hijab is necessarily a symbol of subjugation ? (keeping in mind that universality is a key matter in countries where there is rule of law)

I know a woman who converted to Islam - her husband was culturally Muslim but not very religious. He didn't try to convert her, she converted on her own and decided to wear the veil against his wishes. She didn't feel subjugated, she felt empowered by this decision.

In fact, many radical converts in the West are young women who decide to wear ostentatiously religious clothing to annoy their parents (very much like deciding to go punk, or emo).

Does that mean that it's always a fully reasoned choice? No. But the same applies to men. Men are just as susceptible to peer pressure as women (humans in general make very little use of their capacity for free will)... for instance, it's not uncommon for Muslim men to be indifferent to the whole hijab issue (or other religious customs)... until another Muslim who isn't indifferent starts questioning their manhood. We shouldn't have double standards on how we define the threshold of choice for men and women.

But one thing is certain: the assumption that there's always a big bad male (usually a husband, father, or brother) forcing women to make choices is demeaning to men and women alike.



Pointing to one or two instances against the norm is not proving a point.


There are women all over the middle East burning the burqa as a sign of that subjagation.


Men in these regions do use it as a sign of control. It's definately cultural and widely accepted in their religion to suppress their women.

[JtotheIzzo]

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/08/canada-female-mounted-police-wear-hijab-160824141522168.html

:roll: :roll:


LOL, there are people coming to Canada in droves from your part of the world, trying to get out of that shithole and make a better life for themselves.

Has your sister been sold into prostitution yet or did your Mom get her a job at the tourist bar she works at wanking off British tourists?

[tomtucker]

never help naggers and muslims, when they multiply like the rodents they are, they will not only make fun of you, like the asian here.......they will fukking kill you

[tomtucker]

LOL, there are people coming to Canada in droves from your part of the world, trying to get out of that shithole and make a better life for themselves.

Has your sister been sold into prostitution yet or did your Mom get her a job at the tourist bar she works at wanking off British tourists?

biggest idiots are the ones who let them in

[Patrick Chewing]

because anyone wearing a hijab is a terrorist.


It's a primitive look. No woman deserves to be covered up like that.


Sheets and curtains are for homes, not for attire.

[JtotheIzzo]

biggest idiots are the ones who let them in

had to, we don't all have the luxury of bordering at 3rd world country, someone needs to drive cab and work fast food

[fiddy]

LOL, there are people coming to Canada in droves from your part of the world, trying to get out of that shithole and make a better life for themselves.

Has your sister been sold into prostitution yet or did your Mom get her a job at the tourist bar she works at wanking off British tourists?
This cuck mad AF

[Nick Young]

had to, we don't all have the luxury of bordering at 3rd world country, someone needs to drive cab and work fast food
the soft bigotry of low expectations.

[Long Duck Dong]

When a nation tries to hard to assimilate to it's immigrants rather than expect it's immigrants to assimilate within the nation, it is doomed.

Long Duck Don 2016

[JtotheIzzo]

the soft bigotry of low expectations.

direct shot at the poster in question would be the proper analysis.

[JtotheIzzo]

This cuck mad AF

you see a statement of fact as anger?

[fiddy]

you see a statement of fact as anger?
Look up the definition of a fact. The only fact here is that you're a cuck.

[JtotheIzzo]

Look up the definition of a fact. The only fact here is that you're a cuck.


looks like you mad AF now, riding the hate will only get you so far, get out of your shithole, escape while you can, soon your types will close the door over here, move before its not too late.

exiting the madness will leave you not so mad, not mad like you are right now anyways.

[fiddy]

looks like you mad AF now, riding the hate will only get you so far, get out of your shithole, escape while you can, soon your types will close the door over here, move before its not too late.

exiting the madness will leave you not so mad, not mad like you are right now anyways.
Care to explain why am i mad exactly?

[Lebowsky]

Because it is. :confusedshrug:
I don't see anything wrong with wearing a hijab. If were were talking about a niqab I could see a reason for controversy, but what's so wrong with a woman covering her hair?
Edit : didn't mean to quote fiddy's post. ****ing iphone...

[fiddy]

I don't see anything wrong with wearing a hijab. If were were talking about a niqab I could see a reason for controversy, but what's so wrong with a woman covering her hair?
Edit : didn't mean to quote fiddy's post. ****ing iphone...
Wearing a hijab by itself is not a big deal, however, a country amending one of its uniforms to appeal to a certain religious group is against the values of a sectarian/civilized society.

[UK2K]

So it's totally cool if a cop approaches your car with a Halloween mask on then.

Awesome.

[PistonsFan#21]

So it's totally cool if a cop approaches your car with a Halloween mask on then.

Awesome.

does the hijab cover the face? because if not i dont understand the analogy with a halloween mask.

[UK2K]

does the hijab cover the face? because if not i dont understand the analogy with a halloween mask.

My Halloween mask won't cover my face...

Throw on a pair of sunglasses, and you are pretty ****ing hard to identify, aren't you?

[DingDengDong]

Why is this funny to the OP? It shouldn't be a problem for the police to let somebody whose culture pretty much requires it wear it on the job. It isn't like the police are forced to wear it.

[DingDengDong]

So it's totally cool if a cop approaches your car with a Halloween mask on then.

Awesome.
My god, your stupidity astounds me if you think they are at all similar.

[UK2K]

Why is this funny to the OP? It shouldn't be a problem for the police to let somebody whose culture pretty much requires it wear it on the job. It isn't like the police are forced to wear it.

Because there's a regulated uniform for a reason...

If you can't abide by the uniform, don't apply. What is difficult about that? What if she wants to work construction? Be a pilot? She gonna be a welder with a hijab on too?

You start making exceptions for people, and then everyone wants an exception.

[UK2K]

My god, your stupidity astounds me if you think they are at all similar.

I don't give a ****... I really don't.

If you don't understand why it's an issue, I can't help you.

[DingDengDong]

I don't give a ****... I really don't.

If you don't understand why it's an issue, I can't help you.
Nice meltdown. :lol

[Nash]

Where does OP live again? That's right. Some shithole in eastern europe.
Eastern Europeans are the worst. They talk about Europe and try to claim it as if they are part of what made Western Europe so great.

[fiddy]

Eastern Europeans are the worst. They talk about Europe and try to claim it as if they are part of what made Western Europe so great.
Balkans=GOAT easily. Perfect balance of white genes and heart. Stay salty.

[FKAri]

Canada is probably the most successful template for multiculturalism.


It's a primitive look. No woman deserves to be covered up like that.


Sheets and curtains are for homes, not for attire.
Your thinking is primitive. If she is choosing to dress like that, then its not an issue. As for the full face cover thing, its only an issue for the same reason a balaclava is an issue.


Balkans=GOAT easily. Perfect balance of white genes and heart. Stay salty.
What a completely non-primitive, and forward thinking thing to say.

[JEFFERSON MONEY]

https://reporting4work.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/covered-women.png

[StephHamann]

Eastern Europeans are the worst. They talk about Europe and try to claim it as if they are part of what made Western Europe so great.

I mean, it's not their fault that France was perfectly fine with supporting the Ottomans who were enslaving the Balkans for hundreds of years, while Poland-Lithuania (100% slavic) and the Holy Roman Empire (partial slavic) were defending Europe.

[Nick Young]

Slavs and Hungars (are they slavs?) and Poles (who are slavs) protected Europe from Ottomans.

King Francis and the POS traitor French were supporting the pro-slavery Turks this is true.


Thank you based Balkanites and Eastern Euros.


Eastern Europe is on the way up and Western Europe is getting ****ed. The tides of power are turning.

[warriorfan]

Cuckservative meltdown :roll:

[Dresta]

Eastern Europeans are the worst. They talk about Europe and try to claim it as if they are part of what made Western Europe so great.
Congrats on proving what an ignorant turd you are. The distinction between "Eastern Europe" and "Western Europe" did not even emerge until the desolation of WW2 and the Communist regression that set those countries back several generations. The Czech Republic and Poland and Hungary were Central, not Eastern European States: that whole dichotomy is a construction of the iron curtain, and you show how shallow your historical knowledge is by accepting it at face value.

If there was an East/West European split, then it was the Catholic/Orthodox divide. The Greco-Roman infused Christian heritage of Europe was by no means limited to France, England, Spain and Sweden, dumbass. Bohemia, Prussia, Poland, Hungary (and more)--these were key players and important contributors to European history and culture. Go learn some history.

[andgar923]

Wearing a hijab by itself is not a big deal, however, a country amending one of its uniforms to appeal to a certain religious group is against the values of a sectarian/civilized society.
It's actually the opposite.

[red1]

Canada is probably the most successful template for multiculturalism.


Your thinking is primitive. If she is choosing to dress like that, then its not an issue. As for the full face cover thing, its only an issue for the same reason a balaclava is an issue.


What a completely non-primitive, and forward thinking thing to say.
Thank you for being a voice of reason in an intellectually bankrupt thread.

Fiddy, give me ONE reason why she shouldn't be allowed to wear a hijab. Just one. All I ask.

[red1]

So it's totally cool if a cop approaches your car with a Halloween mask on then.

Awesome.
http://izquotes.com/quotes-pictures/quote-wise-men-speak-because-they-have-something-to-say-fools-because-they-have-to-say-something-plato-146515.jpg

[pauk]

Slavs and Hungars (are they slavs?) and Poles (who are slavs) protected Europe from Ottomans.

King Francis and the POS traitor French were supporting the pro-slavery Turks this is true.


Thank you based Balkanites and Eastern Euros.


Eastern Europe is on the way up and Western Europe is getting ****ed. The tides of power are turning.

Haha... Ottomans could of made entire Balkans extinct if they wanted to... they held South/East Europe in fetal position for as long as they wanted...

Ottomans this Ottomans that booohoo, reality is the conquests at that primitive time was completely normal all around the world.... Ottomans just so happened to be one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful, no need to hate.... did not have anything to do with ***ing religion, more to do with nations/ethnicities (or groups/clans/tribes/races/whatever).

Balkans for example had always internal problems (with their slavic & other neighbours) since eternity way before/longer & after Ottomans.... ask Fiddy about his Bulgaria during that time, for example during the Ottoman time Bulgaria under Tsar Ivan Aleksandur was in decline, to consolidate his authority over as much territory as possible he divided the state into three appanages held by his sons and they beat the crap out of eachother for power... In addition to internal problems, Bulgaria was further crippled by Hungarian attacks before & after (No, they were not muslims)... yet somebody like Fiddy has nothing bad to say about Hungarians... funny... "kill me/take over my country ONLY if you have my religion! all cool!"

You almost make it seem like its all cool when christians in Europe made some conquests, perfectly normal... not muslims, oh mi oh my.... and that was only once some time like 700 years ago... Slovenians, Croats, Serbs, Bosnians, Montenegrins, Macedonians, Albanians, Bulgarians, Hungarians, Romanians ALL went to war against eachother.... long before any muslim set foot there, for much longer, even today/recently.... just look at today, just some 20-30 years ago... did those evil muslims/ottomans have anything to do with those conquest attempts in fr. Yugoslavia? Serbs/Croats murdering Croats/Serbs? Had something to do with religion huh? Did muslims genocide Bosnians?

[StephHamann]

once again showing your stupidity in meltdown form

:lol

[Dresta]

Haha... Ottomans could of made entire Balkans extinct if they wanted to... they held South/East Europe in fetal position for as long as they wanted...

Ottomans this Ottomans that booohoo, reality is the conquests at that primitive time was completely normal all around the world.... Ottomans just so happened to be one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful, no need to hate.... did not have anything to do with ***ing religion, more to do with nations/ethnicities (or groups/clans/tribes/races/whatever).

Balkans for example had always internal problems (with their slavic & other neighbours) since eternity way before/longer & after Ottomans.... ask Fiddy about his Bulgaria during that time, for example during the Ottoman time Bulgaria under Tsar Ivan Aleksandur was in decline, to consolidate his authority over as much territory as possible he divided the state into three appanages held by his sons and they beat the crap out of eachother for power... In addition to internal problems, Bulgaria was further crippled by Hungarian attacks before & after (No, they were not muslims)... yet somebody like Fiddy has nothing bad to say about Hungarians... funny... "kill me/take over my country ONLY if you have my religion! all cool!"

You almost make it seem like its all cool when christians in Europe made some conquests, perfectly normal... not muslims, oh mi oh my.... and that was only once some time like 700 years ago... Slovenians, Croats, Serbs, Bosnians, Montenegrins, Macedonians, Albanians, Bulgarians, Hungarians, Romanians ALL went to war against eachother.... long before any muslim set foot there, for much longer, even today/recently.... just look at today, just some 20-30 years ago... did those evil muslims/ottomans have anything to do with those conquest attempts in fr. Yugoslavia? Serbs/Croats murdering Croats/Serbs? Had something to do with religion huh? Did muslims genocide Bosnians?lol, the Ottomans would've been crushed if the British and French didn't have an active interest in using them to limit Russian power.

"the most powerful.."

:hammerhead:

[StephHamann]

lol, the Ottomans would've been crushed if the British and French didn't have an active interest in using them to limit Russian power.

"the most powerful.."

:hammerhead:

to limit Habsburgian power, Russia was a non relevant eastern european power prior to 1700.

In fact the french shamelesly occupied big barts of the Holy Roman Empire while the majority of the german armies were busy fighting against the Ottomans in Vienna 1681.

[JtotheIzzo]

Congrats on proving what an ignorant turd you are. The distinction between "Eastern Europe" and "Western Europe" did not even emerge until the desolation of WW2 and the Communist regression that set those countries back several generations. The Czech Republic and Poland and Hungary were Central, not Eastern European States: that whole dichotomy is a construction of the iron curtain, and you show how shallow your historical knowledge is by accepting it at face value.

If there was an East/West European split, then it was the Catholic/Orthodox divide. The Greco-Roman infused Christian heritage of Europe was by no means limited to France, England, Spain and Sweden, dumbass. Bohemia, Prussia, Poland, Hungary (and more)--these were key players and important contributors to European history and culture. Go learn some history.

so your line >>> his line.

at least you had the balls to slam him in the beginning of your post for doing the exact thing you did in your second paragraph.

Eastern European nations are weak, and if Russia cuts off their resources, totally f*cked.

Bordering on prosperous nations yet unable to get their shit together, even after inclusion to the EU.

Don't you right wing blowhards frown on countries and people who cannot pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite all the opportunities.

And the f*ckin Balkans??? LOL, bunch of savages (in the bad way) weren't they just committing genocide 20 years ago? Pathetic.

[Dresta]

so your line >>> his line.

at least you had the balls to slam him in the beginning of your post for doing the exact thing you did in your second paragraph.

Eastern European nations are weak, and if Russia cuts off their resources, totally f*cked.

Bordering on prosperous nations yet unable to get their shit together, even after inclusion to the EU.

Don't you right wing blowhards frown on countries and people who cannot pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite all the opportunities.

And the f*ckin Balkans??? LOL, bunch of savages (in the bad way) weren't they just committing genocide 20 years ago? Pathetic.
Seriously, what the f*ck are you blabbering on about here? This post is entirely incoherent and doesn't address anything I said in my own (I did not even mention the Balkans, knowing little about them).

Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, etc are not "weak" and they are a part of Central Europe, and played a large role in a shared and common European history. They only started being called "Eastern Europe" as distinguishing from more advanced "Western Europe" after they were abandoned to Stalin. So f*ck you with your "all the opportunities" bullshit: these are some of the most oppressed people in the world in recent history (far, far more oppressed than American blacks in the 20th century btw).

Is Milan Kundera a "right wing blowhard" too? Read this and learn something you narrow-minded imbecile:

http://www.bisla.sk/english/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Kundera_tragedy_of_Central_Europe.pdf


In November 1956, the director of the Hungarian News Agency, shortly before his office was flattened by artillery fire, sent a telex to the entire world with a desperate message announcing that the Russian attack against Budapest had begun. The dispatch ended with these words: "We are going to die for Hungary and for Europe."

What did this sentence mean? It certainly meant that the Russian tanks were endangering Hungary and with it Europe itself. But in what sense was Europe in danger? Were the Russian tanks about to push past the Hungarian borders and into the West? No. The director of the Hungarian News Agency meant that the Russians, in attacking Hungary, were attacking Europe itself. He was ready to die so that Hungary might remain Hungary and European.

In fact, what does Europe mean to a Hungarian, a Czech, a Pole? For a thousand years their nations have belonged to the part of Europe rooted in Roman Christianity. They have participated in every period of its history. For them, the word "Europe" does not represent a phenomenon of geography but a spiritual notion synonymous with the word "West." The moment Hungary is no longer European—that is, no longer Western—it is driven from its own destiny, beyond its own history: it loses the essence of its identity.

"Geographic Europe" (extending from the Atlantic to the Ural Mountains) was always divided into two halves which evolved separately: one tied to ancient Rome and the Catholic Church, the other anchored in Byzantium and the Orthodox Church. After 1945, the border between the two Europes shifted several hundred kilometers to the west, and several nations that had always considered themselves to be Western woke up to discover that they were now in the East.[1] As a result, three fundamental situations developed in Europe after the war: that of Western Europe, that of Eastern Europe, and, most complicated, that of the part of Europe situated geographically in the center—culturally in the West and politically in the East.

Why do you speak on topics you evidently know nothing about? Why do you incessantly pathologise opinions you are too ignorant or stupid to understand?

[Nick Young]

:roll:

Seems like the Cucknadians are done being cucks

[QUOTE][URL="http://angusreid.org/political-correctness/"]Majority of Canadians say political correctness has

[Nick Young]

so your line >>> his line.

at least you had the balls to slam him in the beginning of your post for doing the exact thing you did in your second paragraph.

Eastern European nations are weak, and if Russia cuts off their resources, totally f*cked.

Bordering on prosperous nations yet unable to get their shit together, even after inclusion to the EU.

Don't you right wing blowhards frown on countries and people who cannot pull themselves up by the bootstraps despite all the opportunities.

And the f*ckin Balkans??? LOL, bunch of savages (in the bad way) weren't they just committing genocide 20 years ago? Pathetic.
Your come back tour has been an abject failure so far, gramps.

Every time you write a new ignorant post like this, it makes you look worse.


For your own sake-stop.