Huffington Post removes article about Hillary's health and fires journalist

[Duderonomy]

The Huffington Post has sensationally censored an article pertaining to questions about Hillary Clinton’s health and banned the journalist who wrote it from posting on their website altogether.

David Seaman penned a commentary piece discussing questions surrounding Hillary’s health problems on Sunday. The story included a link to my viral video about the subject, which now has over 3.5 million views.

However, within hours the post was deleted and Seaman’s posting rights were completely revoked.

The link now just contains an editor’s note stating, “This post is no longer available on the Huffington Post.”

The Huff Post deleted the article despite the fact that pieces questioning John McCain’s health were heavily featured on the website in 2008.

Other leftist news outlets, most recently the Guardian, have also featured my video without the article immediately being deleted.

It appears as though the main reason for the article being deleted was the fact that Seaman didn’t automatically dismiss the entire issue as a “conspiracy theory” in line with the rest of the pro-Hillary media.

In a YouTube video posted in response to the deletion of the article, Seaman described the censorship as “chilling” and “Orwellian”.

“Both of my articles have been pulled without notice of any kind, just completely deleted from the Internet, and both of those articles mentioned Hillary’s health,” states Seaman.

“That video that Paul Watson put up has been viewed more than 3.5 million times, so it was a very newsworthy thing for me to link out to,” noted Seaman, adding that he should have been able to link to it without having his account revoked.

“I’ve filed hundreds of stories over the years as a journalist and I’ve never had anything like this happen….I’ve never experienced this,” remarked Seaman, adding that he was now seeking legal counsel.

“This is spooky, to me this is extremely spooky – I don’t like it,” he added, pointing to how the media has dispensed with any notion of balance to jump on Trump while giving Hillary a free pass.

“They’re deleting and censoring commentary on her health – why is that?” asked Seaman. “Do they not want more people to watch that video on YouTube, is that what’s going on here?”

In a related development, Donald Trump officially challenged Hillary Clinton to release her full medical records, but the Clinton campaign almost immediately refused to do so.

The video that Seaman linked to in his now deleted article is embedded below.



http://www.infowars.com/huffington-post-bans-journalist-for-writing-about-hillarys-health-deletes-article/

[NumberSix]

Even Fox News has partisan Democrats. Left wing media though doesn't tolerate any voice of opposition.

[Long Duck Dong]

Like CNN, people have stopped taking the Huff Post seriously for quite a while now.

In da tank....

[Nanners]

same thing happened to dr drew when he brought up hillarys health

[Nick Young]

Libcucks are taking Ls left and right. When is the last time the libtards have had a genuinely solid W? :confusedshrug:

[DeuceWallaces]

Maybe their editorial board didn't want their website to peddle in propaganda and conspiracy. I guess they prefer facts, sources, and corroborated evidence.

Crazy.

[UK2K]

Libcucks are taking Ls left and right. When is the last time the libtards have had a genuinely solid W? :confusedshrug:

Doesn't matter... they own the propaganda that is the MSM... and their followers are too stupid to bother to look elsewhere.

That's why the ACA passed; because Americans are too ****ing stupid. (Not my words... Democrats' words).

[DonDadda59]

Maybe their editorial board didn't want their website to peddle in propaganda and conspiracy. I guess they prefer facts, sources, and corroborated evidence.

Crazy.

http://whistleblower-newswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/image0062.jpg

Many people are saying Hillary has Aphasia. Therefore it's true and should be put into print without any due diligence. :no:

[Nick Young]

Doesn't matter... they own the propaganda that is the MSM... and their followers are too stupid to bother to look elsewhere.

That's why the ACA passed; because Americans are too ****ing stupid. (Not my words... Democrats' words).
The media shilling has stopped working. CNN continues to hemorrhage viewers. Last I checked they were below 700k in primetime :lol

Trump leads the national polls.


Hillary played the race card and it had no effect on the numbers.

Barring assassination of Trump, she has nothing left.

She is also working to duck the debates.

[FillJackson]

Huffington Post removes article about Hillary's health and fires journalist
I don't know if you know the Huffinton Post's model, but most of their contributors are not journalists.

This guy's profile doesn't mention journalism.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/david-seaman. I would be very curious to see what this guy was paid.

I guess it depends on how broadly you want to define journalism.

[Akrazotile]

Maybe their editorial board didn't want their website to peddle in propaganda and conspiracy. I guess they prefer facts, sources, and corroborated evidence.

Crazy.



Uhh..



The Huff Post deleted the article despite the fact that pieces questioning John McCain’s health were heavily featured on the website in 2008.


No, it appears they don't.


They prefer Democrats not be questioned. That is their preference.

[Akrazotile]

I don't know if you know the Huffinton Post's model, but most of their contributors are not journalists.

This guy's profile doesn't mention journalism.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/david-seaman


I don't know if you know how definitions work, but this is the definition of journalist:


[quote]jour

[Nick Young]

I don't know if you know the Huffinton Post's model, but most of their contributors are not journalists.

This guy's profile doesn't mention journalism.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/author/david-seaman
The paid CTR shills all across the internet are turning on Huffpo now. Filijackson is no different :lol

[Dresta]

Maybe their editorial board didn't want their website to peddle in propaganda and conspiracy. I guess they prefer facts, sources, and corroborated evidence.

Crazy.
If you seriously think that is the reason then you are completely deluded. Regardless, any candidate over 65 should be releasing their medical records, because honestly, people of that age without any health problems are very rare, and it is probably not a good thing to have a person who has time consuming medical problems as President. The same could be said about Reagan, who I don't think was all there in his second term. Both candidates are elderly and should both reveal their medical records--there is nothing "conspiracyish" about this.

You should stop pretending to be an objective facts man btw, because this post right here is one of the most absurdly partisan on this site. Your political opinions are informed by emotion and tribalism, not fact, impossible as this may be for you to ever accept (which means your opinions will never change substantially).

[Nick Young]

If you seriously think that is the reason then you are completely deluded. Regardless, any candidate over 65 should be releasing their medical records, because honestly, people of that age without any health problems are very rare, and it is probably not a good thing to have a person who has time consuming medical problems as President. The same could be said about Reagan, who I don't think was all there in his second term. Both candidates are elderly and should both reveal their medical records--there is nothing "conspiracyish" about this.

This is a fantastic idea and based only in common sense.

[DeuceWallaces]

If you seriously think that is the reason then you are completely deluded. Regardless, any candidate over 65 should be releasing their medical records, because honestly, people of that age without any health problems are very rare, and it is probably not a good thing to have a person who has time consuming medical problems as President. The same could be said about Reagan, who I don't think was all there in his second term. Both candidates are elderly and should both reveal their medical records--there is nothing "conspiracyish" about this.

You should stop pretending to be an objective facts man btw, because this post right here is one of the most absurdly partisan on this site. Your political opinions are informed by emotion and tribalism, not fact, impossible as this may be for you to ever accept (which means your opinions will never change substantially).

So you obviously have evidence of her health problems. I'm sure everyone would like to see it.

I wouldn't want any reputable source posting articles claiming Trump is a pill popping speed addict.

[NumberSix]

So you obviously have evidence of her health problems. I'm sure everyone would like to see it.

I wouldn't want any reputable source posting articles claiming Trump is a pill popping speed addict.
She had blood clots in her brain. You don't think it's reasonable to inquire about her health?

[FillJackson]

Uhh..





No, it appears they don't.


They prefer Democrats not be questioned. That is their preference.
Dude you're quoting infowars.
You want to believe infowars you go ahead.

[FillJackson]

She had blood clots in her brain. You don't think it's reasonable to inquire about her health?
She did not have a clot in her brain.

She had a clot in her head but not her brain, still risky, but less so than a brain clot.

Also clots are fairly well treated these days.

[Akrazotile]

She did not have a clot in her brain.

She had a clot in her head but not her brain, still risky, but less so than a brain clot.

Also clots are fairly well treated these days.


Tell that to Chris Bosh

[Nick Young]

She did not have a clot in her brain.

She had a clot in her head but not her brain, still risky, but less so than a brain clot.

Also clots are fairly well treated these days.
That Correct the Record ninja-edit

[Dresta]

So you obviously have evidence of her health problems. I'm sure everyone would like to see it.

I wouldn't want any reputable source posting articles claiming Trump is a pill popping speed addict.
Try reading my post again: maybe you'll get it next time.

Somehow it's a "conspiracy" to think an old age pensioner might have medical issues and not be fit for an incredibly stressful job. :rolleyes: