Why are people complaining about the child rescuing Hero's blurred Trump shirt on CNN

[TommyGriffin]

Let's be fair and maintain our integrity. If he was wearing a Hilary shirt it would of been blurred out also.

[Nick Young]

Let's be fair and maintain our integrity. If he was wearing a Hilary shirt it would of been blurred out also.
Does your CTR shilling know no boundaries?

[TommyGriffin]

Does your CTR shilling know no boundaries?
Are you trying to say that CNN would of not blurred it if he was wearing a Hilary shirt? C'mon man. You are making us all look bad with this conspiracy theory type stuff.

[UK2K]

Let's be fair and maintain our integrity. If he was wearing a Hilary shirt it would of been blurred out also.

No, it wouldn't.

The fact you even suggested it would shows how oblivious you are.

[TommyGriffin]

No, it wouldn't.

The fact you even suggested it would shows how oblivious you are.
So it's a CNN conspiracy? They only blur Trump's? Are you on drugs dude?

[atljonesbro]

So it's a CNN conspiracy? They only blur Trump's? Are you on drugs dude?
I assume you missed the whole DNC email leaks debacle where we found out the DNC is paying CNN for favorable coverage

[Patrick Chewing]

Let's be fair and maintain our integrity. If he was wearing a Hilary shirt it would of been blurred out also.


Riiiiiiiiight.


It's called censorship. It also infringes on his 1st Amendment rights.



And you have to be an idiot not to know that CNN slobbers all over Hillary Clinton.

[UK2K]

So it's a CNN conspiracy? They only blur Trump's? Are you on drugs dude?

It's not a conspiracy... it's out in the open.

If you don't want to see it, I don't really care. Based on the fact you even have to ask the question tells me everything I need to know.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2016/07/24/wikileaks-emails-pro-clinton-cnn-political-commentator-pre-checked-op-ed-with-dnc/?postshare=2121469397273100&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.3ad4f109d0f7

A sharp indictment of the Sanders people shouldn’t have shocked anyone familiar with Cardona, who is a committed Clintonite. CNN.com even dropped some italicized language at the top of the op-ed:

Editor’s Note: Maria Cardona, a political commentator for CNN, is a Hillary Clinton supporter and Democratic Party superdelegate. She is a principal at the Dewey Square Group, which does work for a super PAC supporting Clinton. The opinions expressed in this commentary are hers.

And, perhaps the Democratic National Committee’s. What CNN.com did not include in its disclaimer is that Cardona pre-checked a draft of the op-ed with the DNC. That revelation comes from the mass of emails released by WikiLeaks and indexed here. On the morning of May 18, Cardona sent a draft of the op-ed to the DNC under this subject line: “Subject: URGENT – DRAFT CNN OPED ON NV.” Her request was in the top line: “I want to make sure it is not to heavy handed. Please let me know asap! Thanks!!”

Sure enough, DNC spokesman Luis Miranda replied, ” It’s fine with me, but the Clinton campaign would probably ask you not to place it.” To which Cardona shot back, ” Ok, will check with them.”


You're a lost cause. You think CNN would ask Trump if the language in their article is too heavy handed? No, they wouldn't.

So... you're dumb.

[Nick Young]

I assume you missed the whole DNC email leaks debacle where we found out the DNC is paying CNN for favorable coverage
This dude is an alt. Likely belonging to FiliJackson, ISH's paid Correct the Record Hillary shill. (http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/4/21/1518537/-Clinton-SuperPac-Admits-to-Paying-Internet-Trolls)

[highwhey]

The people claiming they would display hilary's name is hilarious. So yall think advertising is free? :roll:

Let's ignore how campaigns require a billion dollars to make it

[Facepalm]

Riiiiiiiiight.


It's called censorship. It also infringes on his 1st Amendment rights.



And you have to be an idiot not to know that CNN slobbers all over Hillary Clinton.


****ing typical Trumptard that doesn't understand what freedom of speech means

[Facepalm]

No, it wouldn't.

The fact you even suggested it would shows how oblivious you are.

Let's be fair and maintain our integrity. If he was wearing a Hilary shirt it would of been blurred out also.


So 2 billion in free advertising wasn't already enough? :oldlol:

[UK2K]

So 2 billion in free advertising wasn't already enough? :oldlol:

Ironically they did MORE for Trump by not showing the logo...

Now the story is front page news.

When will these people learn? :oldlol: No wonder their network has gone down the shitter for years now.

[senelcoolidge]

Obvious censorship. There was no profanity on the guys shirt. There was no reason to blur it out. First time I've seen them do that when it wasn't profanity or some obscene picture.

[TommyGriffin]

You guys are making all Trump supporters seem like paranoid rednecks. This is not a good look for us. There are no CNN conspiracies. :facepalm

[ILLsmak]

wow.

-Smak

[TheMan]

:lol

Trump supporters are easily triggered.

They blur out anything they deem as free advertising you rubes, if he was wearing a shirt with Nike on it, they blur it out you dumbasses, lol.

Haven't you guys ever seen blurred out shirts? Do you think they had x rated imagery on their shirts...or brand names :facepalm