PDA

View Full Version : Whats kobe's argument over shaq


TheWinningFam
09-09-2016, 09:37 PM
Discuss if there is any, im just wondering what it is

Shaq dominated in his prime and handidly won the 3 fmvps when they played together. http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/ehh3.png
Kool Boy
09-09-2016, 09:47 PM
Discuss if there is any, im just wondering what it is

Shaq dominated in his prime and handidly won the 3 fmvps when they played together. http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/ehh3.png
Longevity...
JT123
09-09-2016, 10:01 PM
Longevity...
:wtf: I'm a Kobe stan, but this is NOT a good argument.

Kobe was elite from 2000-2013
Shaq was elite from 1992-2006

Seems like the Diesel has the edge here as well. :(
There is literally no argument for having Kobe over Shaq
Kool Boy
09-09-2016, 10:32 PM
:wtf: I'm a Kobe stan, but this is NOT a good argument.

Kobe was elite from 2000-2013
Shaq was elite from 1992-2006

Seems like the Diesel has the edge here as well. :(
There is literally no argument for having Kobe over Shaq
oh crap you're right wtf
AintNoSunshine
09-09-2016, 10:33 PM
He can make occasional fade away 3s? I cant think of anything else.
egokiller
09-09-2016, 11:27 PM
Guys like Kobe wanted to show the world they could win by NOT playing with the most dominant man of all time, Shaq.

Kobe did exactly that, TWICE which is why when guys like KD and Lebron join stacked teams, they look like bitches because Kobe stuck with the same team his entire life and then capped it off with a 60 point last game.
Bankaii
09-10-2016, 12:18 AM
Because Shaq himself said so.
Shaq's word > all objective measures that say Kobe was a sidekick to Shaq half his career.

Logic:applause:
G0ATbe
09-10-2016, 12:23 AM
Kobe moulded Shaq into the player he became. It's no surprise his stats plummeted instantly when he left the lakers. By all means, Shaq was a loser before and after kobe. he also colluded with the 2 greatest sgs of all time and failed to even eclipse kobe in ringcount despite team hopping to contender after contender for a decade. Kobe won multiple championships with Pau Gasoft as his go to guy.

Shaq has no argument over Kobe. And as stated above, Shaq agrees.
Yao Ming's Foot
09-10-2016, 12:35 AM
Shaq's own documented testimony on the subject.
LilEddyCurry
09-10-2016, 01:22 AM
:wtf: I'm a Kobe stan, but this is NOT a good argument.

Kobe was elite from 2000-2013
Shaq was elite from 1992-2006

Seems like the Diesel has the edge here as well. :(
There is literally no argument for having Kobe over Shaq
:eek:
SamuraiSWISH
09-10-2016, 01:30 AM
Kobe won more rings without Shaq, than vice a versa.
AirBonner
09-10-2016, 02:05 AM
3>2 obe doesn't measure up.
SwayDizzle
09-10-2016, 03:37 AM
Kobe moulded Shaq into the player he became. It's no surprise his stats plummeted instantly when he left the lakers. By all means, Shaq was a loser before and after kobe. he also colluded with the 2 greatest sgs of all time and failed to even eclipse kobe in ringcount despite team hopping to contender after contender for a decade. Kobe won multiple championships with Pau Gasoft as his go to guy.

Shaq has no argument over Kobe. And as stated above, Shaq agrees.
Shut this thread down
AirBonner
09-10-2016, 03:47 AM
Kobe moulded Shaq into the player he became. It's no surprise his stats plummeted instantly when he left the lakers. By all means, Shaq was a loser before and after kobe. he also colluded with the 2 greatest sgs of all time and failed to even eclipse kobe in ringcount despite team hopping to contender after contender for a decade. Kobe won multiple championships with Pau Gasoft as his go to guy.

Shaq has no argument over Kobe. And as stated above, Shaq agrees.
Shaq was already a better player than kobe ever was BEFORE he got to LA. :facepalm kobetard's like to make up history.
knicksman
09-10-2016, 04:28 AM
Kobe is the more effective player. Shaq is pretty useless in the clutch thats why he hasnt won jack shit until kobe came around
Mr Feeny
09-10-2016, 04:29 AM
Kobe won more rings without Shaq, than vice a versa.If Pippen had won the 2000 title with the blazers, would that have made him better than Jordan?

If those 6 bulls rings were all won with Jordan as the lead dog, then it doesn't matter if scottie had won an additional one. Jordan would have 6 rings as the man and scottie would have had 1.
aj1987
09-10-2016, 05:20 AM
Kobe moulded Shaq into the player he became. It's no surprise his stats plummeted instantly when he left the lakers.
Shaq averaged 21.5 PPG on 58% in '04 with the Lakers. Averaged 22.9 PPG the very next season on 60% with the Heat. In nearly 3 fewer minutes played.



By all means, Shaq was a loser before and after kobe. he also colluded with the 2 greatest sgs of all time and failed to even eclipse kobe in ringcount despite team hopping to contender after contender for a decade. Kobe won multiple championships with Pau Gasoft as his go to guy.
Shaq won a ring 2 seasons after leaving the Lakers. Dude was way past his prime and Kobe was still in his prime in '09 and '10.

Kobe would be ringless without Shaq/Pau. That's a fact.


Shaq has no argument over Kobe. And as stated above, Shaq agrees.
:roll:
knicksman
09-10-2016, 05:59 AM
Shaq averaged 21.5 PPG on 58% in '04 with the Lakers. Averaged 22.9 PPG the very next season on 60% with the Heat. In nearly 3 fewer minutes played.



Shaq won a ring 2 seasons after leaving the Lakers. Dude was way past his prime and Kobe was still in his prime in '09 and '10.

Kobe would be ringless without Shaq/Pau. That's a fact.


:roll:


Wade>>>pau. And that doesnt even include the refs
aj1987
09-10-2016, 06:10 AM
Wade>>>pau. And that doesnt even include the refs
And Wade's career >>>>>>>>> Kucks franchise.
knicksman
09-10-2016, 06:24 AM
And Wade's career >>>>>>>>> Kucks franchise.



More like. I got owned so bad coz im dumb
aj1987
09-10-2016, 06:37 AM
More like. I got owned so bad coz im dumb
Yes. You did get owned and you're retarded AF.
knicksman
09-10-2016, 06:52 AM
Yes. You did get owned and you're retarded AF.

Whatever troll
aj1987
09-10-2016, 06:56 AM
Whatever troll

https://crayfisher.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/ironymeter2.gif
LongLiveTheKing
09-10-2016, 07:09 AM
Shaq won more rings as a team's best player.
Dragonyeuw
09-10-2016, 05:16 PM
Longevity...

Nope. Shaq was elite from the outset, 1992 up till 2006. That's 14 years. Kobe was elite from 2001-2013, 12 years, injured 2 years after that, and then this final season that.....yeah. Kobe barely played his rookie year, 26mpg his second, didn't become a full time starter until his third, and became a legit star in his 4th. Shaq also played 3 years of college ball, a higher level of play and 'wear and tear', if you want to use that argument, compared to HS ball.