View Full Version : Muslim bombings in NY, Muslim stabbing in Minny, Muslim shootings in Philly
9erempiree
09-18-2016, 02:59 PM
I'm not hearing much from the news and this is a legitimate attack/war on America.
Media does not want to report it so I urge everyone to do your research.
It's like nothing happened and we have 3 incidents related to Islamic Attacks.
:facepalm
Back In Shape
09-18-2016, 03:04 PM
The stabbings were by a Muslim asking people if they were Muslim before he stabbed them and ISIS said he was one of their soldiers.
How do you know the bombings were committed by Muslims though?
Bosnian Sajo
09-18-2016, 03:21 PM
"why do you keep following me around, waaa"
:rolleyes:
9erempiree
09-18-2016, 03:24 PM
The stabbings were by a Muslim asking people if they were Muslim before he stabbed them and ISIS said he was one of their soldiers.
How do you know the bombings were committed by Muslims though?
You can easily find that information on social media but the media doesn't want to report it. As someone that has compassion, I turned on my TV and expected coverage of these Islamic attacks and found nothing.
Very strange considering that one of our presidential candidates were warning us about these attacks.
I do like how people are agreeing that Muslims should be banned now. It took a sequence attack to make people realize.:hammerhead:
Smoke117
09-18-2016, 03:25 PM
If only they could knock you off.
9erempiree
09-18-2016, 03:28 PM
If only they could knock you off.
Here comes the apologist.
I just hope the public is more aware of these sequenced attacks and why it is vital to vet illegal immigrants and certain radical ideology.
I will not call it a religion for the fear of offending other religions. This radical ideology should not reach our shores.
warriorfan
09-18-2016, 03:48 PM
Scared ******* like the OP is the reason why the Patriot Act got passed.
Bosnian Sajo
09-18-2016, 03:49 PM
I do like how people are agreeing that Muslims should be banned now. It took a sequence attack to make people realize.:hammerhead:
Banned? :oldlol:
This isn't an internet forum we are talking about, moron.
9erempiree
09-18-2016, 04:00 PM
You guys notice how they don't want to call it terrorism?
Terrorism and Islam is synonymous. When you think Islam you think terrorism and when you think terrorism, you think Islam. This is how the Left thinks. They equate the two as a nice marriage and they are afraid to offend Muslims if they call it terrorism.
Doesn't matter who made the bombs its terrorism.
NumberSix
09-18-2016, 04:06 PM
Scared ******* like the OP is the reason why the Patriot Act got passed.
No need for a patriot act. Just need to end Muslim immigration.
9erempiree
09-18-2016, 04:09 PM
Vetting and banning Muslims from entering the country is a real issue. People thought the proposal was ridiculous but as time passes it is becoming a viable option.
There are countries in the world banning these people and I don't see why a country like America cannot do the same.
NumberSix
09-18-2016, 04:16 PM
Vetting and banning Muslims from entering the country is a real issue. People thought the proposal was ridiculous but as time passes it is becoming a viable option.
There are countries in the world banning these people and I don't see why a country like America cannot do the same.
America has traditionally never had immigration from Islamic countries. Why start now?
Why would there be ANY immigration from 3rd world countries? What's the point?
9erempiree
09-18-2016, 04:17 PM
America has traditionally never had immigration from Islamic countries. Why start now?
Why would there be ANY immigration from 3rd world countries? What's the point?
I think you know the answer to that question.
Bosnian Sajo
09-18-2016, 05:20 PM
We chillin :pimp:
nathanjizzle
09-18-2016, 05:23 PM
I'm not hearing much from the news and this is a legitimate attack/war on America.
Media does not want to report it so I urge everyone to do your research.
It's like nothing happened and we have 3 incidents related to Islamic Attacks.
:facepalm
how many indians did whites kill in the 1600s and 1700s? what was the predominant religion there?
Hawker
09-18-2016, 05:51 PM
how many indians did whites kill in the 1600s and 1700s? what was the predominant religion there?
I don't believe the british were ruling India during the 1600s and 1700s. Maybe the late 1700s if I remember.
how many indians did whites kill in the 1600s and 1700s? what was the predominant religion there?
It's 2016.
9erempiree
09-18-2016, 06:29 PM
how many indians did whites kill in the 1600s and 1700s? what was the predominant religion there?
Bro...you have to come at me better than that.:rolleyes:
dude77
09-18-2016, 07:09 PM
President Trump here we come
HarryBergeron
09-19-2016, 01:45 AM
how many indians did whites kill in the 1600s and 1700s? what was the predominant religion there?
Nice fallacy dummy.
War =/= terrorism
Religious people killing =/= killing in the name of religion
I thought right wingers were supposed to be stupid? Why is it that it's the lefties spouting fallacies and false equivalences? TV lied to me.
It's 2016.
Cool logic right there... its 2016-09-19 08:19... anything before that, its a clean slate... How far back is it acceptable for you to go and what type of kill count do you want? Because as a fr. Yugoslavian who luckily lives to tell the tale about the fr. Croatian, Bosnian & Kosovo genocide (by very Orthodox Christians) and lost an aunt there who was pregnant, im ready to give you some amazing examples in every detail...
Back In Shape
09-19-2016, 02:53 AM
Cool logic right there... its 2016-09-19 08:19... anything before that, its a clean slate...
Better start another clean slate
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/17/us/nj-explosive-trash-can/
HarryBergeron
09-19-2016, 03:31 AM
Better start another clean slate
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/17/us/nj-explosive-trash-can/
:oldlol: @that headline. "Explosive trashcan"
Trashcans are a receptacle of peace.
NumberSix
09-19-2016, 07:00 AM
Cool logic right there... its 2016-09-19 08:19... anything before that, its a clean slate... How far back is it acceptable for you to go and what type of kill count do you want? Because as a fr. Yugoslavian who luckily lives to tell the tale about the fr. Croatian, Bosnian & Kosovo genocide (by very Orthodox Christians) and lost an aunt there who was pregnant, im ready to give you some amazing examples in every detail...
While we're on the subject of physical traits, people with black hair have by far committed the most atrocities in history. So next time somebody tells you how bad the nazis were, you hit em right back with "oh yeah? you think the nazis were bad? What they did is nothing compared to what people with black hair have done all through history".
Cool logic right there... its 2016-09-19 08:19... anything before that, its a clean slate... How far back is it acceptable for you to go and what type of kill count do you want? Because as a fr. Yugoslavian who luckily lives to tell the tale about the fr. Croatian, Bosnian & Kosovo genocide (by very Orthodox Christians) and lost an aunt there who was pregnant, im ready to give you some amazing examples in every detail...
Preferably at least within the last two generations, but if the point is to make it known that everyone has committed atrocities, we can go back we far as it takes to make our point.
Isn't that how it works?
"But in 1306 the Muslim invaders..."
dude77
09-19-2016, 07:38 AM
'ahmad khan' manhattan bombing suspect
http://static.bnonews.com/files/images/9192016ManhattanBombingSuspectAhmadKhanRahamiCredi tNYPD.jpg
Ahmad Khan Rahami, 28, is originally from Afghanistan and is a naturalised American living in New Jersey (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/ahmad-khan-rahami-new-york-bombings-suspect-image-latest-news-updates-bomber-identified-manhattan-a7316266.html)
Investigators believe they may be hunting a terrorist cell located in the United States
dude77
09-19-2016, 07:55 AM
if they have it their way, this will become the norm here in the states .. just another regular bombing, nothing to see
NumberSix
09-19-2016, 08:01 AM
'ahmad khan' manhattan bombing suspect
http://static.bnonews.com/files/images/9192016ManhattanBombingSuspectAhmadKhanRahamiCredi tNYPD.jpg
Ahmad Khan Rahami, 28, is originally from Afghanistan and is a naturalised American living in New Jersey (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/ahmad-khan-rahami-new-york-bombings-suspect-image-latest-news-updates-bomber-identified-manhattan-a7316266.html)
What possible reason is there to have immigration from Afghanistan? What the hell is the benefit?
dude77
09-19-2016, 08:07 AM
What possible reason is there to have immigration from Afghanistan?
none .. I can understand select immigrants that are thoroughly vetted but even then I wouldn't because of the tension between the U.S. and these places .. it's just not a smart thing to do, not for a long time ..
and bill wants to settle what, 10k in detroit ? .. hillary wants a 1 million if she gets in office .. and people call trump crazy .. it's almost like they're trying to induce these incidents to happen for some reason
Muslim killed in Minny was stopped by an off-duty police officer.
Shot and killed him.
How fitting. In Minnesota of all places.
bluechox2
09-19-2016, 02:29 PM
must have been a pussay to just bomb a dumpster...probably shat his pants thinking of the man hunt had he had a real target
trump milking this shitt up good
Nick Young
09-19-2016, 02:54 PM
#Notallbombs
#bombsofpeace
http://s22.postimg.org/oqnjzanlt/hij.jpg
HarryBergeron
09-19-2016, 03:12 PM
^As that's a DM article I assume it's in England. Perhaps they'd be more comfortable if the were allowed to sing "Allah save the Queen?"
9erempiree
09-19-2016, 03:56 PM
How do you know the bombings were committed by Muslims though?
I just kno bro.
Patrick Chewing
09-19-2016, 04:21 PM
#AllTerroristsAreMuslim
Not to be confused with #NotAllMuslimsAreTerrorists
senelcoolidge
09-19-2016, 04:49 PM
The Somali's were brought in by Clinton..or during her tenure as SoT. She wants to bring in more muslims.
TheMan
09-19-2016, 07:24 PM
Some of them black muzzies are fukkable doe
highwhey
09-19-2016, 08:06 PM
https://www.tacomaworld.com/attachments/img_2438-jpg.1175581/
highwhey
09-19-2016, 08:07 PM
https://www.tacomaworld.com/attachments/image-jpg.1171626/
highwhey
09-19-2016, 08:07 PM
https://www.tacomaworld.com/attachments/image-jpg.1172243/
highwhey
09-19-2016, 08:08 PM
https://www.tacomaworld.com/attachments/virb0444-jpg.1172280/
highwhey
09-19-2016, 08:09 PM
https://www.tacomaworld.com/attachments/img_20160915_084245328_hdr-jpg.1173920/
highwhey
09-19-2016, 08:10 PM
https://www.tacomaworld.com/attachments/image-jpg.1174663/
Back In Shape
09-19-2016, 08:30 PM
Some of them black muzzies are fukkable doe
Looks that way but someone already dropped the money shot on them. I can see man seed on their foreheads.
9erempiree
09-19-2016, 08:47 PM
Too frequent.
Patrick Chewing
09-19-2016, 10:23 PM
I can't believe DeBlasio, Cuomo, Clinton, and Obama went in front of a microphone yesterday for hours combined and said this attack was everything but radical Islamic terrorism.
What a pathetic group of people we have leading us.
No wonder Trump is the Republican candidate for President. The people are tired of the cowardice shown on a daily basis by these spineless pieces of shit in office.
**** 'em all.
9erempiree
09-19-2016, 10:26 PM
We just tired of this shit.
highwhey
09-19-2016, 10:28 PM
We just tired of this shit.
We're tired of racism.
BoutPractice
09-20-2016, 06:13 AM
Serious question: since the plan of jihadists is to provoke a Muslim uprising in the West...
And since the people who think Muslims are "the problem" are the most likely to think moderate Muslims could easily be radicalized into terrorism...
Why do those same people advocate for public language and policies that single out Muslims as a group, instead of radical islamists?
Wouldn't it provoke the very uprising / civil war that ISIS and their like want, helping cause dozens of new terrorist attacks in the West? At the very least, wouldn't help it them recruits thousands of new jihadists to make up for the ones we keep destroying in their so-called Caliphate?
Surely, following from your own premises, it would make more practical sense to "build a wall", as it were, between ordinary Islam and radical Islam, thereby preventing the two from merging into a mega-enemy, would it not?
HarryBergeron
09-20-2016, 06:31 AM
Serious question: since the plan of jihadists is to provoke a Muslim uprising in the West... (1)
And since the people who think Muslims are "the problem" are the most likely to think moderate Muslims could easily be radicalized into terrorism... (2)
Why do those same people advocate for public language and policies that single out Muslims as a group, instead of radical islamists? (3)
Wouldn't it provoke the very uprising / civil war that ISIS and their like want, helping cause dozens of new terrorist attacks in the West? At the very least, wouldn't help it them recruits thousands of new jihadists to make up for the ones we keep destroying in their so-called Caliphate? (4)
Surely, following from your own premises, it would make more practical sense to "build a wall", as it were, between ordinary Islam and radical Islam, thereby preventing the two from merging into a mega-enemy, would it not? (5)
This is a ridiculously uniformed post. Kudos man, I don't think I could write 5 paragraphs about something I know nothing of.
1. Who says this is the "jihadists plan" These goat fvckers are a decentralized collection of various groups who kill each other more than westerners and agree on nothing except fvckking children being acceptable.
2. Moderate Islam is a myth. http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/
3. See two. You are being overly generalistic, listen to any trump/cruz etc speech, they never talk about "islam" or "muslims" but rather "radical islamic extremism" etc. You are wrong and should feel bad.
4. ISIS haven't said they want that, and 2% of the population isn't capable of starting a civil war.
5. See two. Moderate Islam does not exist.
kurple
09-20-2016, 06:34 AM
This is a ridiculously uniformed post. Kudos man, I don't think I could write 5 paragraphs about something I know nothing of.
1. Who says this is the "jihadists plan" These goat fvckers are a decentralized collection of various groups who kill each other more than westerners and agree on nothing except fvckking children being acceptable.
2. Moderate Islam is a myth. http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/
3. See two. You are being overly generalistic, listen to any trump/cruz etc speech, they never talk about "islam" or "muslims" but rather "radical islamic extremism" etc. You are wrong and should feel bad.
4. ISIS haven't said they want that, and 2% of the population isn't capable of starting a civil war.
5. See two. Moderate Islam does not exist.
:facepalm :facepalm
9erempiree
09-20-2016, 06:36 AM
Serious question: since the plan of jihadists is to provoke a Muslim uprising in the West...
And since the people who think Muslims are "the problem" are the most likely to think moderate Muslims could easily be radicalized into terrorism...
Why do those same people advocate for public language and policies that single out Muslims as a group, instead of radical islamists?
Wouldn't it provoke the very uprising / civil war that ISIS and their like want, helping cause dozens of new terrorist attacks in the West? At the very least, wouldn't help it them recruits thousands of new jihadists to make up for the ones we keep destroying in their so-called Caliphate?
Surely, following from your own premises, it would make more practical sense to "build a wall", as it were, between ordinary Islam and radical Islam, thereby preventing the two from merging into a mega-enemy, would it not?
:roll:
In theory what you are saying is correct but knowing what we know about Islam and you still want to bring them in?
If a Muslim can fly back and forth to the Middle East and get radicalized then what is stopping a Muslim from coming here and radicalizing hundreds and thousands of them at a time?
Lets not act like the only way for Muslims to be peaceful lies on whether they can come over to the Western world.
How many more attacks till people realize that Islam is dangerous? I asked a friend this and he actually said if 3 more attacks happen before the year ends then he will believe they are dangerous.:facepalm Can't believe he actually gave me a number.
People are seriously in denial.
It's like this....we know Muslims are going to attack America because we won't allow them here....therefore we allow Muslims to be here. That is not good logic. We will not bring people here that want to attack us. At this point there is a big trust issue.
We're tired of racism.
You're one of those people that will go way out of your way to "not be racist", even if it means putting your family at risk.
I saw a guy deliver pizza to the cops working in NY... my first thought was "I wouldn't eat it, it's probably poisoned."
Then I thought... if it was a brown dude offering, I wouldn't eat it. If it was a white dude, I may. Given that you're working a terrorist attack by a Muslim... 99% of the country would likely have the same thoughts. You are the kind of person that would gobble that shit down just to prove you aren't racist. :oldlol:
That's how desperate you are to be PC. It's gotten bad.
NumberSix
09-20-2016, 07:09 AM
Serious question: since the plan of jihadists is to provoke a Muslim uprising in the West...
Stop importing Muslims to the west and we don't need to worry about the rest of your post.
kurple
09-20-2016, 07:19 AM
Stop importing Muslims to the west and we don't need to worry about the rest of your post.
But the west need to handle the consequences of playing world police for 50 years
And it's shocking that you don't know the difference between jihadists and Muslims
HarryBergeron
09-20-2016, 07:46 AM
:facepalm :facepalm
Care to make a refutation Awale?
But the west need to handle the consequences of playing world police for 50 years
And it's shocking that you don't know the difference between jihadists and Muslims
Yes, everything is the wests fault, Muzzies certainly have not been killing each other for praying to their child raping prophet the wrong way for a milennia... As for your second sentence, it's a fallacy.
Low IQ. Sad!
CeltsGarlic
09-20-2016, 08:22 AM
Serious question: since the plan of jihadists is to provoke a Muslim uprising in the West...
And since the people who think Muslims are "the problem" are the most likely to think moderate Muslims could easily be radicalized into terrorism...
Why do those same people advocate for public language and policies that single out Muslims as a group, instead of radical islamists?
Wouldn't it provoke the very uprising / civil war that ISIS and their like want, helping cause dozens of new terrorist attacks in the West? At the very least, wouldn't help it them recruits thousands of new jihadists to make up for the ones we keep destroying in their so-called Caliphate?
Surely, following from your own premises, it would make more practical sense to "build a wall", as it were, between ordinary Islam and radical Islam, thereby preventing the two from merging into a mega-enemy, would it not?
You are thinking that moderate muslims are unlikely to become terrorists, but at the same time already creating an excuse that it is all west fault for being intolerant. :lol
No other group demands so much attention to not go full killing spree.
NumberSix
09-20-2016, 08:27 AM
But the west need to handle the consequences of playing world police for 50 years
It's not our problem. Let the Turks "handle the consequences" for the previous 600 years of Ottoman rule over the Middle East.
Hawker
09-20-2016, 10:34 AM
But the west need to handle the consequences of playing world police for 50 years
And it's shocking that you don't know the difference between jihadists and Muslims
Why should the citizens of today pay for policies that were started 50 years ago? Hell, the citizens of that time weren't even the ones making the decisions. The ones that did make the decision to play world police, politicians, don't face the consequences as they will always be protected.
Nick Young
09-20-2016, 11:09 AM
We're tired of racism.
It is racist of you to imply that followers of islam all share the same race.
Disgusting.
Islam is a religion practiced by all races all over the world.
Check your bigotry privilege, bro.
HarryBergeron
09-20-2016, 02:18 PM
Why should the citizens of today pay for policies that were started 50 years ago? Hell, the citizens of that time weren't even the ones making the decisions. The ones that did make the decision to play world police, politicians, don't face the consequences as they will always be protected.
Original sin.
JEFFERSON MONEY
09-21-2016, 10:09 PM
Care to make a refutation Awale?
Yes, everything is the wests fault, Muzzies certainly have not been killing each other for praying to their child raping prophet the wrong way for a milennia... As for your second sentence, it's a fallacy.
Low IQ. Sad!
:( :( :( :( Golly. I hope we don't pray to the Prophet otherwise we would be committing the absolute worst sin in Islam.
HarryCallahan
09-21-2016, 10:17 PM
That post got you on an FBI watch list.
Nick Young
09-21-2016, 10:21 PM
trumpnation2016
@datrumpnation1
@SabaRMC does a fantastic job in support of Trump's national security policies! Americans of all backgrounds coming together who love USA!
Another Don Lemon with another shooked mental breakdown as Muslim woman supports Trump. Watch his meltdown as she suggests terrorists need to be vetted.
(https://twitter.com/datrumpnation1/status/778446267349250049)
NumberSix
09-21-2016, 11:06 PM
Don Lemon is such a flaming pile of retard.
He plays a clip of Trump saying "I'm not saying Muslims. We need to profile, but I'm not saying to profile Muslims" and Don then say to the Muslim Trump supporter "Trump is saying he wants to profile Muslims".
:hammerhead:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.